Fujifilm X100T vs Leica M Typ 240 Comparison
Fujifilm X100T
Leica M Typ 240
Price | |||
---|---|---|---|
Brand | Fujifilm | Leica | |
Model | X100T | M Typ 240 | |
Released Refers to the year this camera was officially made available for sale. | 2015 | 2012 | |
Announcement Date Refers to the date the manufacturer publicly announced the upcoming release and general specs of this camera. | October 02, 2015 | September 17, 2012 | |
Camera Type | |||
Camera Size | |||
Camera Weight |
The Leica M Typ 240 wins with a score of 57/100, compared to the Fujifilm X100T‘s 53/100. Both cameras are mirrorless and share similarities in size and weight. The Fujifilm X100T measures 127 x 74 x 52mm and weighs 440g, while the Leica M Typ 240 comes in at 139 x 80 x 42mm and 680g.
The Leica M Typ 240 has a higher score, indicating that it is a better camera overall. However, the Fujifilm X100T has its advantages, such as being lighter and more affordable, with a launch price of $1300 compared to the Leica’s $6950.
Although the Leica M Typ 240 is the winner, both cameras have their merits, and the choice depends on individual preferences and budget.
Fujifilm X100T vs Leica M Typ 240 Overview and Optics
The Leica M Typ 240 comes out ahead in the optics comparison, scoring 62/100, while the Fujifilm X100T scores 54/100. Both cameras share some common specifications, such as having a CMOS sensor, no image stabilization, and similar processors ��� EXR Processor II for the Fujifilm and Maestro for the Leica.
The Leica M Typ 240 outperforms the Fujifilm X100T in a few key areas. Firstly, it has a higher megapixel count of 24, compared to the Fujifilm’s 16. This allows for more detailed and higher-resolution images. Additionally, the Leica M Typ 240 has a full-frame sensor, which is larger than the APS-C sensor of the Fujifilm X100T. A larger sensor typically results in better image quality, especially in low light situations. The Leica M Typ 240 also has a DXOMARK sensor score of 84, while the Fujifilm X100T does not have a DXOMARK score. Lastly, the Leica M Typ 240 has a lens mount, allowing for interchangeable lenses, while the Fujifilm X100T has a fixed lens mount.
On the other hand, the Fujifilm X100T has a faster shooting speed of 6 frames per second, compared to the Leica M Typ 240’s 3 frames per second. This can be advantageous in capturing fast-moving subjects or action shots.
Taking these factors into account, the Leica M Typ 240 offers better image quality and versatility due to its higher megapixel count, larger sensor size, and interchangeable lens system. However, the Fujifilm X100T provides a faster shooting speed, which can be beneficial for some photographers. Ultimately, the choice between these two cameras will depend on the specific needs and preferences of the user.
Optics
|
Fujifilm X100T
|
Leica M Typ 240
|
|
|
|
||
Megapixels The higher the number of megapixels, the more detail the cameras sensor can capture. | 16 MP | 24 MP | |
---|---|---|---|
Image Resolution Image resolution is measured in pixels and megapixels, width by height. The higher the number, the higher its resolution. | 4896 x 3264 px | 5952 x 3976 px | |
Sensor Type The camera sensor captures light and records the image. Sensors vary in physical size, the number of pixels, and quality. | CMOS | CMOS | |
Sensor Size The sensor size contributes to the overall quality as well as the dynamic and tonal range a camera can capture. As a rule of thumb, the more surface there is to read the light, the more information it will capture. | 23.6 x 15.8 mm | 24 x 36 mm | |
Sensor Format Refers to the most commonly used sensor sizes. | |||
Frame Rate The number of sequential frames per second the camera can write to the memory card when shooting in burst or continuous mode. | 6 fps | 3 fps | |
Lens Mount The lens mount will tell you what type of lens range you can fit onto the camera body. Often the same camera company will have different lens ranges for different cameras. | Fixed | Leica M | |
Image Processor The image processor in the camera converts the information collected on the sensor for digital storage on the memory card. | EXR Processor II | Maestro | |
Aspect Ratio The aspect ratio refers to the proportional difference between width and height. The most popular aspect ratios are 3:2 and 4:3. | |||
Minimum ISO (Native) Refers to the lowest native (or 'base') ISO setting. Lower ISO are less sensitive to light but make a cleaner image. | 200 | 200 | |
Maximum ISO (Native) Refers to the highest native (or 'base') ISO setting. Higher ISO is necessary for low-light situations or night photography, but higher ISOs often introduce grain or noise. | 6,400 | 6,400 | |
Minimum ISO (Expanded) Expanded (or extended) ISO is a digitally enhanced feature available on some cameras. It allows you to push beyond the native ISO range if necessary. | 100 | 100 | |
Maximum ISO (Expanded) Expanded (or extended) ISO is a digitally enhanced feature available on some cameras. It allows you to push beyond the native ISO range if necessary. | 51200 | 6400 | |
Minimum Shutter Speed The minimum shutter speed will tell you the longest exposure your camera can take without using an external accessory. | 30 s | 60 s | |
Maximum Shutter Speed The maximum shutter speed tells you the length inside 1 second the camera will capture. These can sometimes be extended with accessories such as extra external batteries. | 1/ 4000 s | 1/ 4000 s | |
Autofocus Points Autofocus points show where the camera is focusing graphically as squares or brackets in Live View or on an electronic viewfinder. These points are also used for light meter readings. | 49 | 0 | |
In-body Stabilization In-body Stabilization means the camera has a certain technology embedded that counteracts camera shake. | |||
Viewfinder Type The viewfinder type is either electronic or optical. Electronic viewfinders will have a small screen in the viewfinder. Optical viewfinders will use prisms and mirrors to look through the lens. | Electronic | Optical (rangefinder) | |
Viewfinder Resolution | 2,360,000 dots | N/A |
Fujifilm X100T vs Leica M Typ 240 Video Performance
The Fujifilm X100T outperforms the Leica M Typ 240 in video capabilities, scoring 70/100 compared to the Leica’s 43/100. Both cameras share some common specifications, such as Full HD maximum video resolution and 1920×1080 maximum video dimensions. However, the Fujifilm X100T offers superior features that contribute to its higher score.
The Fujifilm X100T has an advantage in video frame rate, offering a maximum of 60fps, whereas the Leica M Typ 240 only reaches 30fps. This higher frame rate allows for smoother video playback and more flexibility during post-processing, such as creating slow-motion footage. Additionally, the Fujifilm X100T has built-in time-lapse functionality, which the Leica M Typ 240 lacks. This feature enables users to create unique time-lapse videos without the need for additional equipment or software.
Although the Leica M Typ 240 falls short in comparison to the Fujifilm X100T, it still maintains Full HD video resolution and 1920×1080 video dimensions, providing decent video quality for casual users. However, its lower video score reflects the limitations in frame rate and the absence of built-in time-lapse functionality.
Taking all factors into consideration, the Fujifilm X100T is the superior option for video capabilities, thanks to its higher frame rate and built-in time-lapse feature. While the Leica M Typ 240 still offers acceptable video quality, its limitations make it less versatile and less suitable for those prioritizing video performance.
Video
|
Fujifilm X100T
|
Leica M Typ 240
|
|
|
|
||
Video Indicates if this camera is capable of recording video. | |||
---|---|---|---|
Max Video Resolution The best resolution this camera can capture video in. Modern cameras can capture up to 8K video. | |||
Max Video Dimensions Video resolution measured by the greatest number of pixels possible in each frame, width by height. A higher resolution means more detail or clarity in your video. | 1920 x 1080 px | 1920 x 1080 px | |
Max Video Frame Rate How many frames per second your video will capture. Most cameras have options for multiple frame rates, depending on the resolution you shoot in. For a general video, 24p or 30p is the standard, but more serious filmmakers may need a higher frame rate for creative effect. | 60 p | 30 p | |
Time-Lapse Built In A built in time-lapse mode will allow continuous shooting throughout a prolonged period of time to be compressed into a sped up video. | |||
Video File Format Different cameras can record in various video file formats. The File format you record in can impact how you edit and use the files. | H.264 | Motion JPG, MOV |
Fujifilm X100T vs Leica M Typ 240 Features and Benefits
The Fujifilm X100T outperforms the Leica M Typ 240 in terms of features, scoring 58 out of 100, while the Leica M Typ 240 scores 54. Both cameras share some common specifications. They both have a 3-inch screen size and lack a touchscreen and GPS.
The Fujifilm X100T has several advantages over the Leica M Typ 240. Its screen resolution is significantly higher, with 2,360,000 dots compared to the Leica’s 920,000 dots. This results in a sharper and clearer display for the Fujifilm X100T. Additionally, the X100T has a flip screen, offering more flexibility when composing shots. The presence of Wi-Fi and Bluetooth connectivity in the X100T further enhances its functionality, allowing for easy sharing and remote control of the camera.
The Leica M Typ 240, on the other hand, has limited advantages over the Fujifilm X100T. It does not have a flip screen, Wi-Fi, or Bluetooth connectivity. These missing features make the Leica M Typ 240 less versatile and user-friendly compared to the Fujifilm X100T.
In terms of features, the Fujifilm X100T is the clear winner. Its higher screen resolution, flip screen, and connectivity options provide a better user experience and more flexibility when capturing photos. On the contrary, the Leica M Typ 240 falls short in features, making it less competitive in comparison to the Fujifilm X100T.
Features
|
Fujifilm X100T
|
Leica M Typ 240
|
|
|
|
||
Built-in Flash A built-in flash will often be positioned right above the lens. This will automatically pop up when you activate it. | |||
---|---|---|---|
External Flash External flashes are often connected through a hot shoe at the top of a camera, or a cable at the side of the camera. | |||
GPS GPS features in a camera will include location metadata to each of your photographs. | |||
Weather Sealing Weather sealing capabilities will give you more confidence when shooting in unfavourable conditions. | |||
Screen Type | LCD | TFT LCD | |
Touch Screen Touchscreen allows you to change camera settings and access menus with a swipe of your finger, instead of using buttons. | |||
Screen Size | |||
Screen Resolution Screen dots indicate the resolution of the LCD screen by including each sub pixel. | 2,360,000 dots | 920,000 dots | |
Flip Screen A flip screen (or articulating screen) is a second screen which can flip out from the side or top of the camera. This rotating screen allows you more freedom to take photos at different angles. | |||
Live View Live View feature allows you to see a continuous live video of what is being seen through your lens. | |||
Wi-Fi | |||
Bluetooth Bluetooth capabilities allow you wireless control of your camera with other external devices. | |||
Fujifilm X100T vs Leica M Typ 240 Storage and Battery
The Leica M Typ 240 triumphs over the Fujifilm X100T in the storage and battery category with a score of 27/100, while the Fujifilm X100T scores 21/100. Both cameras share similarities in their storage capabilities, as they both have a single memory card slot and accept SD, SDHC, and SDXC cards. However, the Leica M Typ 240 stands out in battery performance, offering a longer battery life of 500 shots compared to the Fujifilm X100T’s 330 shots, using the BP-SCL2 battery type.
Despite its lower score, the Fujifilm X100T still performs well with its Lithium-Ion NP-95 battery, though it falls short in comparison to the Leica M Typ 240’s endurance. Neither camera offers USB charging capabilities.
Considering these factors, the Leica M Typ 240 proves to be superior in terms of storage and battery life, providing users with a longer-lasting experience. The Fujifilm X100T remains a decent option, but those seeking extended battery life may find the Leica M Typ 240 more suitable.
Storage and Battery
|
Fujifilm X100T
|
Leica M Typ 240
|
|
|
|
||
Memory Card | SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-I compatible) | SD / SDHC / SDXC | |
---|---|---|---|
Dual Memory Card Slots | |||
Battery Type | Lithium-Ion NP-95 | BP-SCL2 | |
Battery Life Approximately how long this cameras battery will last measured by how many photographs you will be able to take. | 330 shots | 500 shots | |
USB Charging |
DXOMARK Scores
Sensor scores tested by DXOMARK |
Fujifilm X100T
|
Leica M Typ 240
|
|
Overall Score DXOMARK overall sensor score. | N/A | ||
---|---|---|---|
Portrait (Color Depth) As described by DXOMARK 'The Portrait score in our camera sensor reviews defines color depth performance and its unit is a number of bits. A color depth of 22 bits is excellent; differences below 1 bit are barely noticeable.' | N/A | 22.7 bits | |
Landscape (Dynamic Range) As described by DXOMARK 'The Landscape score in our camera sensor tests defines the maximum dynamic range of the camera sensor and its unit is an exposure value (EV). A value of 12 EV is excellent with differences below 0.5 EV usually not noticeable.' | N/A | 11.7 EVs | |
Sports (Low-Light ISO) Described by DXOMARK as 'The maximal value of ISO sensitivity needed to reach a given value of Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR). The greater the value, the better' | N/A | 787 |
Scores
|
Fujifilm X100T
|
Leica M Typ 240
|
Fujifilm X100T vs Leica M Typ 240 – Our Verdict
Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Fujifilm X100T or the Leica M Typ 240:
User Scores
|
Fujifilm X100T
|
Leica M Typ 240
|
|
B&H photo video | N/A |
---|