CameraReviews.com
menu
Hi Camera Lovers 👋 If you buy a camera through our referral links, you support our site at no cost to you 😉 Full info here.

Leica M Typ 240 vs M11 Comparison

Optics
Video
Features
Storage & Battery

Leica M Typ 240

Leica M Typ 240
57%

Leica M11

leica m11
Winner!
74%
Leica M Typ 240
vs
Leica M11
Price
Brand
Leica
Leica
Model
M Typ 240
M11
Released
2012
2022
Announcement Date
September 17, 2012
January 13, 2022
Camera Type
Mirrorless
Mirrorless
Camera Size
Camera Weight

The Leica M11 emerges as the winner with a score of 74 out of 100, outperforming the Leica M Typ 240 by 17 points. Both cameras share the mirrorless camera type and have similar dimensions with the M11 being slightly lighter at 640g compared to the M Typ 240’s 680g.

The M11 holds an advantage with its more recent release in 2022, making it a more modern choice compared to the M Typ 240 from 2012. This results in a higher launch price of $8995 for the M11, while the M Typ 240 launched at $6950.

Despite its lower score, the M Typ 240 may still appeal to some users due to its lower launch price and slightly larger size, which could provide a more comfortable grip for certain individuals.

Taking all factors into consideration, the Leica M11 stands out as a better camera with its higher score, reflecting its more advanced features and lighter weight, making it a worthwhile investment for those seeking a high-quality mirrorless camera.

Leica M Typ 240 vs M11 Overview and Optics

The Leica M11 outperforms the Leica M Typ 240 in optics, scoring 78 out of 100 compared to the Typ 240’s 62. Both cameras share several specifications, including a full-frame CMOS sensor, Leica M lens mount, and lack of image stabilization. However, the M11 has superior features that contribute to its higher score.

The M11’s standout advantage is its 60-megapixel resolution, which is more than double the Typ 240’s 24 megapixels. This significant increase in resolution allows the M11 to capture more detail and produce higher quality images. Additionally, the M11 has a faster shooting speed of 4.5 frames per second compared to the Typ 240’s 3 frames per second, enabling photographers to capture fast-paced action more effectively.

Furthermore, the M11 features an upgraded Maestro III processor, which contributes to its improved performance and image quality. The M11’s sensor has a DXOMARK score of 100, while the Typ 240’s sensor scores 84, highlighting the M11’s superior image quality.

Despite the M11’s advantages, the Typ 240 remains a solid camera option. Its lower resolution may be sufficient for some photographers, and its lower price point could be an attractive factor for those on a budget.

Taking all aspects into consideration, the Leica M11 is the clear winner in terms of optics due to its higher resolution, faster shooting speed, and improved processor. However, the Leica M Typ 240 remains a viable option for those who prioritize cost efficiency and are satisfied with a lower resolution.

Optics
Optics
62%
78%
Megapixels
24 MP
60 MP
Image Resolution
5952 x 3976 px
9528 x 6328 px
Sensor Type
CMOS
CMOS
Sensor Size
24 x 36 mm
24 x 36 mm
Sensor Format
Full Frame
Full Frame
Frame Rate
3 fps
4.5 fps
Lens Mount
Leica M
Leica M
Image Processor
Maestro
Maestro III
Aspect Ratio
3:2
3:2
Minimum ISO (Native)
200
100
Maximum ISO (Native)
6,400
50,000
Minimum ISO (Expanded)
100
64
Maximum ISO (Expanded)
6400
50000
Minimum Shutter Speed
60 s
3600 s
Maximum Shutter Speed
1/ 4000 s
1/ 4000 s
Autofocus Points
0
1
In-body Stabilization
Viewfinder Type
Optical (rangefinder)
Optical (rangefinder)

Leica M Typ 240 vs M11 Video Performance

When it comes to video capabilities, there is a significant difference between the Leica M Typ 240 and the Leica M11. The Leica M11 does not offer any video functionality, making it unsuitable for those looking to capture video content. On the other hand, the Leica M Typ 240 provides some video features, although they may not be as advanced as those found in other cameras on the market.

The Leica M Typ 240 has a video score of 43 out of 100, which is not particularly high but still offers basic video capabilities. The camera supports Full HD video resolution with maximum dimensions of 1920 x 1080 pixels. This allows users to capture decent quality videos, suitable for casual use or sharing on social media platforms. The M Typ 240 also has a maximum video frame rate of 30fps, which is standard for most cameras in this category. However, it does not include built-in time-lapse functionality, which may be a disadvantage for some users.

Given the absence of video functionality in the Leica M11, it is clear that the Leica M Typ 240 is the better choice for individuals who wish to have video capabilities in their camera. The M Typ 240’s video features may not be the most advanced or impressive, but they still offer users the ability to capture video content when needed. This difference in video capabilities should be considered when deciding between these two cameras, as it may be a crucial factor for some users.

Video
Video
43%
Video
Max Video Resolution
Full HD
N/A
Max Video Dimensions
1920 x 1080 px
N/A
Max Video Frame Rate
30 p
N/A
Time-Lapse Built In
Video File Format
Motion JPG, MOV
N/A

Leica M Typ 240 vs M11 Features and Benefits

The Leica M11 outperforms the Leica M Typ 240 with a feature score of 72/100 compared to 54/100. Despite having several similarities, the M11 proves to be a superior camera in terms of features.

Both cameras share a 3-inch screen size and lack a flip screen and Bluetooth connectivity. However, the M11 surpasses the M Typ 240 in screen resolution, offering 2,332,800 dots compared to the latter’s 920,000 dots. This results in a sharper and clearer display, enhancing the user experience.

The M11 also boasts a touchscreen, making it more user-friendly and efficient, while the M Typ 240 lacks this feature. Furthermore, the M11 offers GPS and WiFi capabilities, allowing for seamless geotagging and wireless transfer of photos. These features enhance the M11’s usability and convenience, contributing to its higher score.

On the other hand, the M Typ 240 does not surpass the M11 in any specific feature. Its lower score reflects its dated technology and limited capabilities compared to the more advanced M11.

Given the differences in features, the Leica M11 is the superior camera. Its higher screen resolution, touchscreen, GPS, and WiFi capabilities make it more user-friendly and versatile. While the Leica M Typ 240 is a decent camera, it lacks the advanced features that set the M11 apart. The M11’s higher score reflects its better performance and functionality, making it the clear winner in this comparison.

Features
Features
54%
72%
Built-in Flash
External Flash
GPS
Weather Sealing
Screen Type
TFT LCD
TFT LCD
Touch Screen
Screen Size
3"
3"
Screen Resolution
920,000 dots
2,332,800 dots
Flip Screen
Live View
Wi-Fi
Bluetooth

Leica M Typ 240 vs M11 Storage and Battery

The Leica M11 outperforms the Leica M Typ 240 in storage and battery with a score of 45/100, compared to the Typ 240’s 27/100. Both cameras have one memory card slot and accept SD, SDHC, and SDXC cards. However, the M11 has an advantage with its compatibility with UHS-II cards, enabling faster read and write speeds.

Regarding battery life, the M11 leads with 700 shots per charge, while the Typ 240 offers 500 shots. The M11 utilizes a BC-SCL7 battery type, and the Typ 240 uses a BP-SCL2. A significant advantage of the M11 is its USB charging capability, absent in the Typ 240.

Though the M Typ 240 has no clear advantages in storage and battery, it remains a reliable camera. Nevertheless, the M11’s longer battery life, UHS-II compatibility, and USB charging make it the superior choice in this category.

Storage and Battery
Storage and Battery
27%
45%
Memory Card
SD / SDHC / SDXC
SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-II compatible)
Dual Memory Card Slots
Battery Type
BP-SCL2
BC-SCL7
Battery Life
500 shots
700 shots
USB Charging
DXOMARK Scores
Sensor scores tested by DXOMARK
Overall Score
84%
100%
Portrait (Color Depth)
22.7 bits
26.3 bits
Landscape (Dynamic Range)
11.7 EVs
14.8 EVs
Sports (Low-Light ISO)
787
3376
Scores

Leica M Typ 240 vs M11 – Our Verdict

Leica M Typ 240 vs M11 Comparison image.

Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Leica M Typ 240 or the Leica M11:

User Scores
B&H photo video
Spotted a mistake with these camera specs? Please let us know so we can update it!