Leica M9 vs Sony a9 II Comparison

The Sony a9 II outperforms the Leica M9 with a notable score difference of 48 points (82/100 vs. 34/100). Both cameras share the common feature of being mirrorless. However, the Sony a9 II surpasses the Leica M9 in various aspects. Launched a decade later, in 2019, it boasts a more affordable price of $4500 compared to the Leica M9’s $5500. Additionally, the Sony a9 II is slightly larger (129 x 96 x 76mm) and heavier (678g) than the Leica M9 (139 x 80 x 37mm, 585g). The Leica M9 does not have any significant advantages over the Sony a9 II. Considering these points, the Sony a9 II emerges as the superior choice between the two cameras.

Leica M9 vs Sony a9 II Overview and Optics

The Sony a9 II outperforms the Leica M9 in optics, scoring 82 out of 100 compared to the Leica M9’s 42-point score. Both cameras share some specifications, such as full-frame sensor size and similar lens mounts (Leica M for the M9 and Sony FE for the a9 II). However, the Sony a9 II surpasses the Leica M9 in several aspects, making it the winner in this comparison.

The Sony a9 II has a higher megapixel count of 24.2, compared to the Leica M9’s 18 megapixels, which means it captures more detailed images. Additionally, the a9 II boasts a rapid shooting speed of 20, while the M9 lags behind at just 2. The a9 II’s CMOS sensor and Bionz X processor contribute to its superior DXOMARK score of 93, as opposed to the M9’s CCD sensor and Maestro II processor, which result in a 69 DXOMARK score. Furthermore, the Sony a9 II has image stabilization, a feature absent in the Leica M9.

On the other hand, the Leica M9 does have some advantages, mainly due to its lens mount. The Leica M mount allows for compatibility with a wide range of high-quality lenses, which can enhance the camera’s performance. However, this advantage does not outweigh the overall superiority of the Sony a9 II’s optics.

Considering the significant difference in scores and the various aspects where the Sony a9 II outshines the Leica M9, it is evident that the a9 II is the better camera in terms of optics. While the Leica M9 does offer compatibility with a range of lenses, it falls short in comparison to the Sony a9 II’s performance and features.

When it comes to video capabilities, the Leica M9 does not offer any video functionality. This is an important factor to consider for those who require video recording as part of their photography needs. On the other hand, the Sony a9 II provides a range of video features that cater to different types of users.

The Sony a9 II has a video score of 70 out of 100. This camera supports 4K video recording with a maximum resolution of 3840 x 2160, ensuring high-quality footage for various purposes. The maximum video frame rate for the Sony a9 II is 30fps, which is suitable for capturing smooth motion in videos. Additionally, the camera includes built-in time-lapse functionality, which enables users to create stunning time-lapse videos with ease.

Taking into account the video capabilities, the Sony a9 II is the clear choice for those who need video recording in their photography pursuits. While the Leica M9 may excel in other aspects, its lack of video functionality makes it less versatile compared to the Sony a9 II. As a result, users should carefully consider their specific needs and preferences when choosing between these two cameras.

The Sony a9 II outperforms the Leica M9 in features with a score of 83/100 compared to the Leica M9’s 17/100. Both cameras share some common specifications, such as screen size and the absence of GPS. However, the Sony a9 II surpasses the Leica M9 in several aspects, making it the superior choice in terms of features.

The Sony a9 II has a larger screen size of 3 inches, while the Leica M9 has a 2.5-inch screen. The screen resolution of the Sony a9 II is significantly higher at 1,440,000 dots compared to the Leica M9’s 230,000 dots. The Sony a9 II also has a touchscreen and a flip screen, features that the Leica M9 lacks. Additionally, the Sony a9 II offers WIFI and Bluetooth connectivity, which the Leica M9 does not have.

In contrast, the Leica M9 does not outperform the Sony a9 II in any of the listed features. The only advantage the Leica M9 has over the Sony a9 II is the brand prestige associated with Leica cameras. However, this does not directly impact the camera’s performance or features.

Considering the significant differences in features, the Sony a9 II is the better choice for photographers seeking advanced technology and convenience. The Leica M9, on the other hand, may appeal to those who value the brand’s history and reputation but are willing to compromise on features.

The Sony a9 II outperforms the Leica M9 in storage and battery, with a score of 79/100 compared to the M9’s 21/100. Both cameras accept SD and SDHC memory cards, but the a9 II surpasses the M9 by having two memory card slots and compatibility with SDXC (UHS-II) cards. The a9 II also boasts a longer battery life, providing 690 shots per charge, while the M9 offers only 350 shots. Additionally, the a9 II uses the NP-FZ100 battery and supports USB charging, while the M9 relies on the BP-SCL1 battery and lacks USB charging capabilities.

The M9 has no significant advantages in storage and battery over the a9 II. In terms of storage and battery life, the Sony a9 II is the clear winner, offering more versatility and convenience for photographers. The Leica M9, although a formidable camera, falls short in this comparison.

Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Leica M9 or the Sony a9 II:

• Nikon Z6 II vs Sony a9 II
• Sony a1 vs a9 II
• Sony a7 IV vs a9 II
• Sony a9 vs a9 II
• Sony a7 III vs a9 II
• Sony a7R V vs a9 II