Nikon D3100 vs D3200 Comparison
Nikon D3100
Nikon D3200
DSLRDSLRThe Nikon D3200 emerges as the winner with a score of 54/100, while the Nikon D3100 trails behind with a score of 41/100. Both cameras are DSLRs, announced in 2012 and 2010 respectively, and share the same launch price of $699. They also have identical dimensions (124/125 x 96 x 75/77mm) and weight (505g / 1.11lbs).
The Nikon D3200’s higher score represents its superior performance in certain aspects. However, the Nikon D3100 may still have some advantages over the D3200. Careful consideration of each camera’s specifications is crucial when deciding which one best fits your needs.
Ultimately, the choice between the Nikon D3100 and D3200 comes down to personal preference and the specific requirements of the user.
Nikon D3100 vs D3200 Overview and Optics
The Nikon D3200 outperforms the Nikon D3100 in optics, with a score of 63/100 compared to the D3100’s 41/100. Both cameras share some common specifications, such as the CMOS sensor type, APS-C sensor size, Nikon F DX lens mount, and the absence of image stabilization.
The D3200 boasts a higher megapixel count at 24.2, compared to the D3100’s 14.8, resulting in higher image resolution and detail. Additionally, the D3200 has a faster shooting speed of 4 frames per second, making it better suited for capturing fast-paced action. The Expeed 3 processor in the D3200 also contributes to improved image processing and overall performance. Furthermore, the D3200 has a significantly higher DXOMARK score for its sensor (81) compared to the D3100 (67), indicating better image quality and low-light performance.
Although the Nikon D3100 has a lower score in optics, it still offers decent image quality for its price range. With a 14.8 megapixel sensor and Expeed 2 processor, the D3100 can capture good-quality images, though not as detailed or vibrant as the D3200. Its shooting speed of 3 frames per second may not be as fast as the D3200, but it is still capable of capturing some action shots.
Taking these factors into account, the Nikon D3200 is the clear winner in terms of optics, offering higher image quality, better low-light performance, and faster shooting speed. However, the Nikon D3100 remains a viable option for those on a budget or just starting out in photography, providing satisfactory image quality and performance for its price range.
APS-CAPS-C
3:23:2
Nikon D3100 vs D3200 Video Performance
When comparing the Nikon D3100 and the Nikon D3200, it is important to note that the Nikon D3100 does not have video functionality. This means that users looking for a camera with video capabilities should consider the Nikon D3200 instead.
The Nikon D3200 offers a video score of 43 out of 100. Its maximum video resolution is Full HD, with video dimensions of 1920 x 1080. This camera also supports a maximum video frame rate of 30fps. However, it does not have built-in time-lapse functionality.
Considering the video capabilities of the Nikon D3200 and the lack of video functionality in the Nikon D3100, the Nikon D3200 is the better option for users who require video recording features in their camera.
Full HD
Nikon D3100 vs D3200 Features and Benefits
The Nikon D3200 outperforms the Nikon D3100 in features, earning a score of 41/100 compared to the D3100’s 36/100. Despite this difference, both cameras share several specifications, including a 3-inch screen size, absence of a touchscreen, flip screen, GPS, WiFi, and Bluetooth.
The D3200’s superiority lies in its screen resolution, which stands at 921,000 dots, a significant improvement over the D3100’s 230,000 dots. This higher resolution provides the D3200 with a clearer and sharper display, allowing for better image review and menu navigation. Consequently, the D3200 offers a more enjoyable and efficient user experience.
On the other hand, the D3100 does not surpass the D3200 in any specific feature. However, its lower score does not imply that it is a poor choice for a camera. It still boasts a decent set of features that cater to various photography needs. The D3100 remains a reliable option for those who prioritize affordability and do not require advanced display capabilities.
Considering these points, the Nikon D3200 stands out as the better camera in terms of features. Its enhanced screen resolution significantly improves the user experience, making it a more attractive option for photographers. The Nikon D3100, while not as advanced, remains a viable choice for budget-conscious users who can compromise on display quality. Ultimately, the choice between these two cameras depends on individual preferences and requirements.
3"3"
Nikon D3100 vs D3200 Storage and Battery
The Nikon D3100 outperforms the Nikon D3200 in storage and battery, scoring 53/100 compared to the D3200’s 27/100. Both cameras possess a single memory card slot, accepting SD, SDHC, and SDXC cards. Additionally, neither camera has USB charging capabilities.
The D3100’s battery life surpasses the D3200, offering 4,500 shots as opposed to the D3200’s 540 shots. They both use the EN-EL14 battery type. The D3200, however, is compatible with UHS-I memory cards, allowing for faster data transfer rates compared to the D3100.
Despite the D3200’s faster memory card compatibility, the D3100’s significantly superior battery life makes it the better option in terms of storage and battery performance.
Nikon D3100 vs D3200 – Our Verdict
Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Nikon D3100 or the Nikon D3200: