Nikon D3100 vs D3500 Comparison

The Nikon D3500 emerges as the winner with a score of 61/100, compared to the Nikon D3100‘s 41/100. Both cameras are DSLRs and share similar dimensions, with the D3500 being slightly heavier at 615g. Released in 2018, the D3500 is newer and more affordable with a launch price of $499.95, while the D3100 was released in 2010 at $699.

The D3500’s higher score reflects its superior performance and features. Its more recent release ensures updated technology, making it a better choice for photographers. However, the D3100 has a lighter weight, which may be an advantage for those who prioritize portability.

Taking these specifications into account, the Nikon D3500 is the better camera due to its improved performance, affordability, and updated technology. The Nikon D3100 may still appeal to those who prefer a lighter camera, but its lower score and older technology make it less competitive.

Nikon D3100 vs D3500 Overview and Optics

The Nikon D3500 outperforms the Nikon D3100 in optics, scoring 65/100 compared to the D3100’s 41/100. Both cameras share common features, such as the CMOS sensor type, APS-C sensor size, Nikon F lens mount, and lack of image stabilization. However, the D3500 has advantages that contribute to its higher score, while the D3100 has a few redeeming qualities.

The D3500 boasts 24 megapixels, a significant increase from the D3100’s 14.8 megapixels. This difference results in sharper, more detailed images. The D3500 also has a faster shooting speed of 5 frames per second, compared to the D3100’s 3 frames per second. This improvement allows for capturing fast-moving subjects more efficiently. The D3500 features an Expeed 4 processor, an upgrade from the D3100’s Expeed 2 processor, which enhances overall performance and image quality. The D3500’s sensor scores an impressive 87 on DXOMARK, outshining the D3100’s score of 67, further proving its superiority in image quality.

Although the D3100 falls short in many aspects, it has one advantage: its Nikon F DX lens mount. This mount is specifically designed for APS-C sensor cameras, ensuring compatibility with a wide range of lenses tailored for the sensor size. The D3500 uses a Nikon F lens mount, which is compatible with both APS-C and full-frame lenses. This difference may be beneficial to those who prefer using lenses specifically designed for APS-C cameras.

Considering the improvements in image quality, shooting speed, and processing power, the Nikon D3500 is the clear winner in optics. The D3100’s advantage in lens compatibility may appeal to some users, but it does not outweigh the D3500’s superior performance.

When it comes to video capabilities, the Nikon D3100 lacks this feature entirely. On the other hand, the Nikon D3500 provides users with video recording options, making it a more versatile choice for those interested in capturing both still images and video footage.

The Nikon D3500 has a video score of 56 out of 100, which, while not exceptional, offers decent video performance for its price range. The camera can record Full HD videos with a maximum resolution of 1920×1080 pixels, providing clear and detailed footage. Additionally, the D3500 can capture videos at a maximum frame rate of 60fps, ensuring smooth motion capture for fast-moving subjects or scenes.

However, it is important to note that the Nikon D3500 does not have built-in time-lapse functionality. This means that users will need to rely on external software or devices to create time-lapse videos if desired.

Considering the absence of video capabilities in the Nikon D3100, the Nikon D3500 stands as the better option for those seeking a camera with video recording features. While its video performance may not be top-of-the-line, the D3500 still offers reliable Full HD video recording at a smooth 60fps, making it a suitable choice for casual videographers and photographers alike.

The Nikon D3500 outperforms the Nikon D3100 with a feature score of 54/100 compared to the D3100’s 36/100. Both cameras share several specifications, such as a 3-inch screen size, lack of touchscreen, flip screen, GPS, and WIFI. However, the D3500 excels in certain aspects, making it the better choice for photographers.

The D3500 boasts a significantly higher screen resolution of 921,600 dots compared to the D3100’s 230,000 dots. This improvement provides photographers with a sharper and clearer image preview, aiding in precise focus and composition. Additionally, the D3500 is equipped with Bluetooth connectivity, allowing for seamless transfer of images to compatible devices. This feature is absent in the D3100, making the image transfer process more cumbersome.

The D3100, on the other hand, does not offer any significant advantages over the D3500. Both cameras lack in certain features, such as a touchscreen, flip screen, GPS, and WIFI, but the D3500 still prevails with its superior screen resolution and Bluetooth connectivity.

Considering the differences in feature scores and specifications, the Nikon D3500 is the clear winner in this comparison. Its higher screen resolution and Bluetooth connectivity provide photographers with a more convenient and efficient shooting experience. The Nikon D3100, while sharing some common features with the D3500, falls short in areas that make a noticeable difference in overall performance. Therefore, the Nikon D3500 is the better choice for photographers seeking a camera with enhanced features.

The Nikon D3100 wins the storage and battery comparison with a score of 53/100, while the Nikon D3500 scores 48/100. Both cameras have one memory card slot, accepting SD, SDHC, and SDXC cards, and neither offers USB charging.

The D3100 surpasses the D3500 in battery life, providing 4500 shots per charge, which is significantly more than the D3500’s 1550 shots. This difference makes the D3100 a more reliable option for extended photography sessions.

On the other hand, the D3500 uses the EN-EL14a battery type, which is an updated version of the D3100’s EN-EL14. However, this advantage does not translate to better performance in this comparison.

Ultimately, the Nikon D3100 proves to be the better choice in terms of storage and battery life, making it ideal for photographers who require longer shooting times. The Nikon D3500, despite having an updated battery type, falls short in comparison due to its lower battery life.

Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Nikon D3100 or the Nikon D3500:

• Nikon D3500 vs D5600
• Nikon D3500 vs D5300
• Nikon D3500 vs Z50
• Nikon D3500 vs D5100
• Nikon D3500 vs D7500
• Nikon D3300 vs D3500