Nikon D3100 vs D90 Comparison

The Nikon D90 edges out the Nikon D3100 with a score of 44/100 compared to 41/100. Both cameras are DSLRs, announced in 2008 and 2010, respectively. They share similar dimensions, with the D3100 measuring 124 x 96 x 75mm and weighing 505g, while the D90 is slightly larger at 132 x 103 x 77mm and heavier at 703g.

The D90’s higher score reveals its superiority in certain aspects. It was initially more expensive, launching at $1235 compared to the D3100’s $699. This price difference suggests the D90 offers more advanced features or better performance.

However, the D3100 has its advantages as well. It is smaller and lighter than the D90, making it more convenient for travel or extended use. Furthermore, its later release date implies it may have some updated technology compared to the D90.

Taking these factors into account, the Nikon D90’s higher score indicates it is a better camera in some aspects, while the Nikon D3100 offers advantages in size and weight for those prioritizing portability.

Nikon D3100 vs D90 Overview and Optics

The Nikon D90 wins in the optics comparison with a score of 46/100, while the Nikon D3100 scores 41/100. Both cameras share some common specifications, such as the CMOS sensor type, APS-C sensor size, Nikon F DX lens mount, and the lack of image stabilization. However, there are key differences between them that contribute to the D90’s higher score.

The Nikon D90 has a shooting speed of 4.5 frames per second, which is faster than the D3100’s 3 frames per second. This allows the D90 to capture fast-moving subjects more efficiently, making it a better choice for action and sports photography. Moreover, the D90 has a higher DXOMARK score for its sensor at 73, compared to the D3100’s score of 67. This means that the D90’s sensor provides better overall image quality, including better dynamic range, color depth, and low-light performance.

On the other hand, the Nikon D3100 has a higher megapixel count at 14.8, compared to the D90’s 12.3 megapixels. This allows the D3100 to capture more detailed images, which can be advantageous for large prints and cropping. Additionally, the D3100 features a newer Expeed 2 processor, which provides faster image processing and better noise reduction compared to the D90’s Expeed processor.

Taking these factors into account, the Nikon D90 is the better camera in terms of optics due to its faster shooting speed and superior sensor performance. However, the Nikon D3100 still offers advantages in terms of megapixel count and processing power, making it a viable option for certain photographers. Ultimately, the choice between these two cameras depends on the specific needs and priorities of the user.

In comparing the Nikon D3100 and Nikon D90, we must address their video capabilities. However, it is important to note that both cameras lack video functionality. Therefore, there is no difference between the two in terms of video capabilities. The absence of video functionality does not make one camera better than the other, as their scores reflect their overall performance, not just their video capabilities.

The Nikon D90 wins in the features category with a score of 41/100, compared to the Nikon D3100’s score of 36/100. Both cameras share several specifications, such as a 3-inch screen size, lack of touchscreen, flip screen, GPS, WIFI, and Bluetooth.

The Nikon D90 is superior to the D3100 in terms of screen resolution, boasting 920,000 dots compared to the D3100’s 230,000 dots. This higher resolution provides clearer and sharper images on the camera’s screen, allowing photographers to better review their shots and make necessary adjustments.

Though the Nikon D3100 has a lower feature score, it does not possess any specific advantages over the D90 in this comparison. Both cameras lack modern features such as touchscreens, flip screens, GPS, WIFI, and Bluetooth, which are now common in newer camera models. The D3100’s lower score is due to its inferior screen resolution.

Considering the features of both cameras, the Nikon D90 is the better choice for photographers who prioritize screen resolution and image clarity. The D3100, however, does not offer any unique advantages in this comparison. It is essential for potential buyers to consider other aspects such as general specifications, optics, and video capabilities when making a decision between these two cameras. Ultimately, the Nikon D90’s higher feature score reflects its superiority in terms of screen resolution, making it the preferable choice in this category.

The Nikon D3100 outperforms the Nikon D90 in storage and battery with a score of 53/100 compared to the D90’s 37/100. Both cameras have one memory card slot and do not support USB charging. They also share compatibility with SD and SDHC memory cards.

The D3100 surpasses the D90 in two key aspects: battery life and memory card compatibility. The D3100’s battery life of 4500 shots is significantly longer than the D90’s 850 shots, making it more convenient for extended use. Additionally, the D3100 is compatible with SDXC memory cards, providing users with more storage options compared to the D90, which only accepts SD and SDHC cards.

While the D90 falls short in these areas, it does share some common ground with the D3100 in terms of storage and battery specifications. However, the D3100’s superior battery life and expanded memory card compatibility make it a better choice for those prioritizing these features.

Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Nikon D3100 or the Nikon D90:

• Nikon D7200 vs D90
• Canon EOS Rebel T3 / 1100D vs Nikon D3100
• Nikon D850 vs D90
• Nikon D7000 vs D90
• Nikon D5600 vs D90
• Nikon D80 vs D90