Nikon D3200 vs D5200 Comparison

The Nikon D5200 comes out on top with a score of 56/100, slightly ahead of the Nikon D3200 at 54/100. Both cameras are DSLRs released in 2012, with the D3200 announced on 04/19/2012 and the D5200 on 11/06/2012. They share similar sizes, with the D3200 measuring 125 x 96 x 77mm and weighing 505g, while the D5200 is slightly larger and heavier at 129 x 98 x 78mm and 555g.

The D5200’s higher score reflects its superior performance, offering more advanced features and better image quality than the D3200. However, the D3200 has its advantages, such as a lower launch price of $699 compared to the D5200’s $897.

Taking these factors into account, the Nikon D5200 is the better choice for those seeking higher quality and advanced features, while the Nikon D3200 is more suitable for budget-conscious photographers who still want a reliable DSLR.

Nikon D3200 vs D5200 Overview and Optics

The Nikon D5200 takes the lead in optics, scoring 65/100, while the Nikon D3200 trails slightly behind with a score of 63/100. Both cameras share some key specifications, such as a 24-megapixel CMOS sensor, Expeed 3 processor, APS-C sensor size, Nikon F DX lens mount, and lack of image stabilization.

The D5200’s higher score results from a few advantages over the D3200. Firstly, it has a faster shooting speed of 5 frames per second compared to the D3200’s 4 frames per second. This allows the D5200 to capture fast-moving subjects more effectively. Additionally, the D5200 has a higher DXOMARK score for its sensor, boasting an 84 compared to the D3200’s 81. This translates to better image quality, particularly in terms of dynamic range and low-light performance.

Despite these advantages, the D3200 does have a slight edge in one aspect: it has a marginally higher resolution of 24.2 megapixels compared to the D5200’s 24.1 megapixels. However, this difference is negligible and unlikely to impact the overall image quality significantly.

Taking these factors into account, it is clear that the Nikon D5200 offers superior optics compared to the Nikon D3200, with improvements in shooting speed and sensor performance. The D3200, on the other hand, has a minor advantage in terms of resolution but falls short in other areas. Consequently, the D5200 emerges as the better choice for those prioritizing optical performance.

The Nikon D5200 is the superior camera in terms of video capabilities, outscoring the Nikon D3200 by a significant 27 points with a video score of 70/100 compared to the D3200’s 43/100. Both cameras share some common specifications, such as Full HD video resolution and maximum video dimensions of 1920 x 1080. However, the D5200 surpasses the D3200 in other aspects, which contributes to its higher score.

The winning camera, the Nikon D5200, offers a higher maximum video frame rate of 60fps, which allows for smoother video playback and better slow-motion effects. Additionally, the D5200 has built-in time-lapse functionality, providing users the ability to create stunning time-lapse videos without the need for external accessories or software. These features make the D5200 a more versatile and capable camera for video enthusiasts.

On the other hand, the Nikon D3200 has a lower maximum video frame rate of 30fps. While this may be sufficient for casual video recording, it lacks the smoothness and slow-motion capabilities that the D5200 provides. The absence of built-in time-lapse functionality also limits the creative options available to D3200 users.

In comparing the video capabilities of these two cameras, it is evident that the Nikon D5200 offers a more comprehensive and advanced set of features, making it the better choice for those who prioritize video quality and functionality. The Nikon D3200, while still a capable camera, falls short in comparison, particularly for users seeking advanced video options and a higher frame rate.

The Nikon D5200 emerges as the winner in the features comparison, with a score of 68/100, surpassing the Nikon D3200’s score of 41/100 by 27 points. Both cameras share several specifications, including a 3-inch screen size, a screen resolution of 921,000 dots, and the absence of a touchscreen, GPS, WiFi, and Bluetooth. Despite these similarities, the D5200 offers certain advantages over the D3200.

The D5200’s winning edge lies in its flip screen feature, which the D3200 lacks. A flip screen allows for more flexible and convenient shooting, especially when capturing images or videos from challenging angles. This feature proves to be particularly useful for vloggers and photographers who require more versatility in their camera’s screen positioning.

On the other hand, the D3200 does not have any distinct advantages over the D5200 in terms of features. Both cameras possess the same screen size and resolution, and neither offers a touchscreen, GPS, WiFi, or Bluetooth. As a result, the D3200 falls short in this comparison.

Taking all factors into account, the Nikon D5200 outshines the Nikon D3200 in the features department, primarily due to its flip screen capability. The D3200, however, does not offer any additional benefits over the D5200. Consequently, the D5200 proves to be a more versatile and user-friendly choice for those prioritizing camera features.

The Nikon D3200 and Nikon D5200 both score 27/100 for storage and battery. These cameras share common specifications, such as one memory card slot, compatibility with SD, SDHC, and SDXC memory cards, and the use of the EN-EL14 battery type. Additionally, neither camera offers USB charging.

The D3200 has a slight advantage in battery life, providing 540 shots compared to the D5200’s 500 shots. This means the D3200 allows for more photos to be taken before needing to recharge or replace the battery.

The D5200, on the other hand, is compatible with UHS-I memory cards, which can offer faster read and write speeds compared to non-UHS-I cards. This may result in quicker file transfers and better overall performance.

Considering the storage and battery aspects, the Nikon D3200 and D5200 are quite similar, with only minor differences in battery life and memory card compatibility. The D3200 is better for longer shooting sessions, while the D5200 may offer improved performance with UHS-I cards.

Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Nikon D3200 or the Nikon D5200:

• Nikon D3200 vs D3300
• Nikon D3200 vs D5100
• Nikon D3400 vs D5200
• Nikon D3200 vs D5300
• Nikon D3200 vs D5000
• Nikon D5200 vs D5300