Nikon D3300 vs D5200 Comparison

The Nikon D5200 takes the lead with a score of 56/100, just one point ahead of the Nikon D3300 at 55/100. Both cameras are DSLR models and share similar specifications. They were released in 2012 and 2014, respectively, with the D5200 being slightly more expensive at launch ($897) compared to the D3300 ($650).

The D5200 has a slight advantage in size, measuring 129 x 98 x 78mm, while the D3300 is a bit smaller at 124 x 98 x 76mm. However, the D3300 is lighter, weighing 430g (0.95lbs) versus the D5200 at 555g (1.22lbs).

Considering their close scores, both cameras offer good quality and performance, with the D5200 having a slight edge in size and the D3300 being advantageous in terms of weight and affordability. Ultimately, the choice between these two cameras depends on individual preferences and priorities.

Nikon D3300 vs D5200 Overview and Optics

The Nikon D5200 wins in the optics comparison with a score of 65/100, while the Nikon D3300 follows closely with 64/100. Both cameras share several specifications, such as 24-megapixel resolution, 5fps shooting speed, CMOS sensor type, APS-C sensor size, Nikon F DX lens mount, and lack of image stabilization.

The D5200’s advantage comes from its higher DXOMARK sensor score of 84, compared to the D3300’s 82. This difference indicates the D5200’s sensor provides slightly better image quality and performance. Additionally, the D5200 features the Expeed 3 processor, which contributes to its edge in optics.

On the other hand, the D3300 has the Expeed 4 processor, an upgrade from the D5200’s Expeed 3. Although this improved processor does not directly translate into better optics, it does provide faster image processing and improved overall camera performance.

While the D5200 takes the lead in optics due to its higher sensor score, the D3300’s upgraded processor ensures a snappier performance. Both cameras offer strong optics for their respective price points, with only a slight edge given to the D5200. Ultimately, the choice between the two cameras depends on the user’s priorities: if optics is the primary concern, the D5200 is the winner; if faster performance is valued, the D3300 is a strong contender.

The Nikon D5200 outperforms the Nikon D3300 in video capabilities, as evidenced by its higher video score of 70/100 compared to the D3300’s 56/100. Both cameras share some common specifications, such as Full HD maximum video resolution, 1920 x 1080 maximum video dimensions, and a maximum video frame rate of 60fps. Despite these similarities, the D5200 has distinct advantages that contribute to its higher score.

The most notable advantage of the Nikon D5200 is the built-in time-lapse functionality, which the D3300 lacks. This feature allows the D5200 to capture a series of images at specified intervals and combine them into a single video, showcasing the passage of time in a creative and engaging manner. This added functionality makes the D5200 a more versatile and appealing option for videographers.

The Nikon D3300, on the other hand, does not offer any significant video-related advantages over the D5200. Its lower score reflects this, as it lacks the time-lapse feature and does not provide any additional video capabilities that would make it a more competitive option in comparison to the D5200.

Taking these factors into account, the Nikon D5200 is the clear winner in terms of video capabilities. Its built-in time-lapse functionality sets it apart from the D3300 and makes it a more versatile and attractive option for those looking to capture high-quality videos. While the D3300 still offers respectable video performance, it falls short in comparison to the D5200’s more advanced features and higher video score.

The Nikon D5200 emerges as the winner in the comparison of features, scoring 55/100, while the Nikon D3300 scores 41/100. Both cameras share several specifications, including a 3-inch screen size, 921,000-dot screen resolution, and the absence of touchscreen, GPS, WiFi, and Bluetooth capabilities.

The Nikon D5200 surpasses the D3300 in one key aspect: it has a flip screen, which allows for more versatile shooting angles and improved composition. This feature makes the D5200 more suitable for photographers who often capture images from unconventional perspectives or require more flexibility in framing their shots.

On the other hand, the Nikon D3300 does not outperform the D5200 in any specific feature. Both cameras are evenly matched in terms of screen size, resolution, and connectivity options. However, the lower score of the D3300 does not necessarily mean it is an inferior camera; it simply lacks the flip screen advantage that the D5200 offers.

In comparing the Nikon D3300 and D5200, the D5200 is the better choice for photographers seeking additional flexibility in their shooting angles due to its flip screen feature. Otherwise, both cameras are on par with each other in terms of screen size, resolution, and connectivity options.

The Nikon D3300 outperforms the Nikon D5200 in storage and battery with a score of 32/100 compared to 27/100. Both cameras share similarities in their storage capabilities, having a single memory card slot and accepting SD, SDHC, and SDXC cards. However, the D3300 has a clear advantage in battery life, offering 700 shots per charge compared to the D5200’s 500 shots. This is due to the D3300 using a more efficient EN-EL14a battery type, while the D5200 utilizes the EN-EL14 battery.

Despite its lower score, the Nikon D5200 does not have any specific advantages in this category. Neither camera supports USB charging. Therefore, the Nikon D3300 clearly takes the lead in storage and battery performance, providing users with longer shooting sessions and less frequent battery replacements. This difference could be significant for photographers who require extended battery life for their projects.

Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Nikon D3300 or the Nikon D5200:

• Nikon D3300 vs D3400
• Nikon D3300 vs D3500
• Nikon D3200 vs D3300
• Nikon D3300 vs D5500
• Nikon D3300 vs D7100
• Nikon D3400 vs D5200