Nikon D3300 vs D7200 Comparison

The Nikon D7200 emerges as the winner with a score of 68/100, while the Nikon D3300 trails behind with a score of 55/100. Both cameras are DSLR models, released in 2014 and 2015 respectively. They share similar dimensions, with the D7200 being slightly larger at 136 x 107 x 76mm compared to the D3300’s 124 x 98 x 76mm.

The D7200 outperforms the D3300 due to its superior features and functionality, justifying its higher launch price of $1200 against the D3300’s $650. However, the D3300 boasts a lighter weight of 430g, making it more portable than the D7200, which weighs 765g.

Taking these factors into consideration, the Nikon D7200 is the better camera for professional use, while the Nikon D3300 offers a more budget-friendly and lightweight option for casual photographers.

Nikon D3300 vs D7200 Overview and Optics

The Nikon D7200 takes the lead in optics with a score of 71/100, compared to the Nikon D3300’s score of 64/100. Both cameras share common specifications, such as 24.2 megapixels, a CMOS sensor, Expeed 4 processor, APS-C sensor size, Nikon F DX lens mount, and the absence of image stabilization.

The D7200’s higher score is due to its superior shooting speed of 6 frames per second (fps) compared to the D3300’s 5 fps. This makes the D7200 more suitable for capturing fast-moving subjects, such as sports or wildlife photography. Additionally, the D7200 boasts a higher DXOMARK sensor score of 87, suggesting improved image quality and better low-light performance than the D3300’s score of 82.

While the D3300 falls short in the aforementioned aspects, it still presents some advantages over the D7200. Its lighter weight makes it more portable and convenient for travel photography. Furthermore, the D3300 is more affordable, making it an attractive option for those on a budget or beginners who are just starting in the world of photography.

To sum up, the Nikon D7200 outperforms the D3300 in terms of optics, with a faster shooting speed and better image quality. This makes it a more suitable choice for photographers who require these features, such as sports or wildlife enthusiasts. On the other hand, the D3300 remains a viable option for those seeking a lightweight, budget-friendly camera that still delivers decent image quality.

The Nikon D7200 outperforms the Nikon D3300 in video capabilities with a score of 70 out of 100, compared to the D3300’s score of 56. Both cameras share some common specifications, such as Full HD video resolution, maximum video dimensions of 1920 x 1080, and a maximum video frame rate of 60fps. However, there are key differences that make the D7200 a superior choice for videography.

One significant advantage of the Nikon D7200 is the built-in time-lapse functionality. This feature allows users to create stunning time-lapse videos without the need for additional software or equipment. The D3300, on the other hand, lacks this built-in capability, requiring users to invest in external resources to achieve similar results.

Although the Nikon D3300 does not surpass the D7200 in any specific video-related features, it still provides respectable video quality for its price range. The D3300’s video capabilities are suitable for casual users and those just starting in videography. However, for more advanced users or professionals, the D7200’s higher video score and additional features make it the better choice.

Considering the differences in video capabilities, the Nikon D7200 is the clear winner in this comparison. Its built-in time-lapse functionality sets it apart from the D3300 and makes it a more versatile option for various videography needs. While the D3300 offers acceptable video quality for casual users, the D7200 caters to a broader range of users, from beginners to professionals, providing a more comprehensive video experience.

The Nikon D7200 emerges as the winner in the feature comparison, scoring 59 out of 100, while the Nikon D3300 scores 41 out of 100. Both cameras share some common specifications, such as a 3-inch screen size, lack of touchscreen, flip screen, GPS, and Bluetooth. However, the D7200 surpasses the D3300 in certain aspects, making it the superior camera in terms of features.

The Nikon D7200 has a higher screen resolution of 1,228,800 dots, compared to the D3300’s 921,000 dots. This results in a clearer and sharper display, enhancing the user’s experience while framing shots or reviewing images. Additionally, the D7200 has built-in Wi-Fi, allowing for easy transfer of images and remote control of the camera through a smartphone or tablet. This feature is absent in the D3300, making the D7200 more convenient for sharing images and versatile in its use.

The Nikon D3300, despite scoring lower in features, has its advantages. Its lower score does not necessarily mean it is a bad camera, but rather, it lacks certain features present in the D7200. The D3300 is a more budget-friendly option and may be suitable for those looking for a reliable camera without the need for advanced features like Wi-Fi connectivity.

Taking these points into consideration, the Nikon D7200 stands out as the better camera in terms of features, offering a higher screen resolution and Wi-Fi connectivity. However, the D3300 remains a viable option for those seeking a more affordable camera without the need for additional features.

The Nikon D7200 outperforms the Nikon D3300 in storage and battery with a score of 79/100, compared to the D3300’s 32/100. Both cameras accept SD, SDHC, and SDXC memory cards and lack USB charging capabilities.

The D7200 excels with two memory card slots and a battery life of 1110 shots, using the EN-EL15 battery type. This provides users with more storage flexibility and longer shooting sessions. On the other hand, the D3300 has only one memory card slot and a battery life of 700 shots, using the EN-EL14a battery type.

Despite the D3300’s lower score, it still offers decent battery life for casual photography. However, the D7200’s superior battery life and additional memory card slot make it more suitable for professional use and extended shooting scenarios. Both cameras cater to different needs, with the D7200 being the better choice for storage and battery capabilities.

Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Nikon D3300 or the Nikon D7200:

• Nikon D7200 vs D750
• Nikon D7100 vs D7200
• Nikon D500 vs D7200
• Nikon D7200 vs D7500
• Nikon D5600 vs D7200
• Nikon D3300 vs D3400