CameraReviews.com
menu
Hi Camera Lovers 👋 If you buy a camera through our referral links, you support our site at no cost to you 😉 Full info here.

Nikon D3300 vs D810 Comparison

Optics
Video
Features
Storage & Battery

Nikon D3300

nikon d3300
55%

Nikon D810

nikon d810
Winner!
72%
Nikon D3300
vs
Nikon D810
Price
Brand
Nikon
Nikon
Model
D3300
D810
Released
2014
2014
Announcement Date
January 07, 2014
June 26, 2014
Camera Type
DSLR
DSLR
Camera Size
Camera Weight

The Nikon D810 outperforms the Nikon D3300 with a score of 72/100, compared to the D3300’s 55/100. Both cameras are DSLR models released in 2014, with the D810 announced on June 26th and the D3300 on January 7th. They share similarities in their camera type and release year.

The Nikon D810 excels with its higher score, due to its advanced features and superior performance. However, the D3300 has some advantages, such as its lower launch price of $650, compared to the D810’s $3300, and its lighter weight of 430g (0.95lbs) versus the D810’s 980g (2.16lbs).

Considering these factors, the Nikon D810 is the clear winner in terms of performance and features, while the Nikon D3300 offers a more budget-friendly and lightweight option for those who prioritize affordability and portability.

Nikon D3300 vs D810 Overview and Optics

The Nikon D810 outperforms the Nikon D3300 in optics, with a score of 76/100 compared to the D3300’s 64/100. Both cameras share common specifications, such as shooting speed at 5 frames per second, the CMOS sensor type, Expeed 4 processor, and lack of image stabilization. They also both use the Nikon F lens mount, although the D3300 uses the DX version, while the D810 uses the FX version.

The D810’s superiority in optics is due to its higher megapixel count of 36.3, compared to the D3300’s 24.2 megapixels. This allows for greater detail and larger image sizes. Additionally, the D810 has a full-frame sensor, which provides better low-light performance, dynamic range, and depth of field control. Its DXOMARK sensor score of 97 further supports its advantage over the D3300, which has a score of 82.

The D3300, however, has its strengths. Its APS-C sensor size allows for a more compact and lightweight camera body, making it easier to carry and handle. Additionally, the smaller sensor size results in a crop factor, which effectively increases the focal length of lenses, potentially benefiting those who prefer telephoto photography.

In terms of optics, the Nikon D810 is the clear winner, offering higher resolution, better low-light performance, and increased dynamic range. However, the Nikon D3300 is not without merit, as its compact size and crop factor may appeal to some photographers. Ultimately, the choice between these two cameras will depend on the individual’s priorities and preferences.

Optics
Optics
64%
76%
Megapixels
24.2 MP
36.3 MP
Image Resolution
6000 x 4000 px
7360 x 4912 px
Sensor Type
CMOS
CMOS
Sensor Size
15.4 x 23.2 mm
24 x 35.9 mm
Sensor Format
APS-C
Full Frame
Frame Rate
5 fps
5 fps
Lens Mount
Nikon F DX
Nikon F FX
Image Processor
Expeed 4
Expeed 4
Aspect Ratio
3:2
3:2
Minimum ISO (Native)
100
64
Maximum ISO (Native)
12,800
32,000
Minimum ISO (Expanded)
100
32
Maximum ISO (Expanded)
25600
51200
Minimum Shutter Speed
30 s
30 s
Maximum Shutter Speed
1/ 4000 s
1/ 8000 s
Autofocus Points
11
51
In-body Stabilization
Viewfinder Type
Optical (pentamirror)
Optical (tunnel)

Nikon D3300 vs D810 Video Performance

The Nikon D810 outperforms the Nikon D3300 in video capabilities with a score of 70/100, a 14-point difference from the D3300’s score of 56/100. Both cameras share common specifications, such as Full HD video resolution, maximum video dimensions of 1920 x 1080, and a maximum video frame rate of 60fps.

The D810’s higher score is due to its built-in time-lapse functionality, which the D3300 lacks. This feature allows the D810 to capture a series of images over a specified period and then combine them into a single video file. This function is useful for creatives who want to record changes in a scene over time, such as the movement of clouds or the setting sun. The availability of time-lapse functionality in the D810 makes it a more versatile option for videographers.

On the other hand, the D3300 does not have any specific advantages over the D810 in terms of video capabilities, as they share the same core video features. However, the D3300’s lower score does not necessarily mean it is a poor choice for video recording. It is still capable of producing high-quality videos, but it does not offer the additional time-lapse functionality found in the D810.

When comparing the video capabilities of the Nikon D3300 and D810, the D810 is the clear winner due to its built-in time-lapse function. While both cameras share similar core features, the D810’s additional functionality gives it an edge over the D3300. Videographers who require time-lapse capabilities should opt for the D810, while those who do not need this feature can still capture quality videos with the D3300.

Video
Video
56%
70%
Video
Max Video Resolution
Full HD
Full HD
Max Video Dimensions
1920 x 1080 px
1920 x 1080 px
Max Video Frame Rate
60 p
60 p
Time-Lapse Built In
Video File Format
MOV
MOV

Nikon D3300 vs D810 Features and Benefits

The Nikon D810 outperforms the Nikon D3300 with a feature score of 59/100 compared to the D3300’s 41/100. While both cameras share some specifications, the D810 surpasses the D3300 in multiple aspects.

The Nikon D3300 and D810 have several common features. Both cameras have a screen size of 3 inches and 3.2 inches, respectively. Neither camera has a touchscreen, flip screen, GPS, or Bluetooth capabilities. Despite these similarities, the D810 offers superior performance in other areas.

The D810’s screen resolution of 1,229,000 dots is higher than the D3300’s 921,000 dots, providing a clearer and more detailed image preview. Furthermore, the D810 includes Wi-Fi connectivity, allowing users to transfer photos and control the camera remotely. This feature is absent in the D3300, making the D810 more versatile in terms of file sharing and remote operation.

Although the D3300 has a lower feature score, it may still appeal to some users due to its simplicity and cost-effectiveness. The lack of advanced features may be preferable for beginners or those who prioritize ease of use over advanced functionality.

To conclude, the Nikon D810 offers a higher feature score, increased screen resolution, and Wi-Fi connectivity, making it a superior camera in terms of functionality. However, the Nikon D3300 may still be a suitable choice for users seeking a more straightforward and affordable option.

Features
Features
41%
59%
Built-in Flash
External Flash
GPS
Weather Sealing
Screen Type
LCD
LCD
Touch Screen
Screen Size
3"
3.2"
Screen Resolution
921,000 dots
1,229,000 dots
Flip Screen
Live View
Wi-Fi
Bluetooth

Nikon D3300 vs D810 Storage and Battery

The Nikon D810 outperforms the Nikon D3300 in the storage and battery category with a score of 79/100 compared to the D3300’s 32/100. Both cameras share common specifications, such as accepting SD, SDHC, and SDXC memory cards and lacking USB charging capabilities.

The D810 excels with its two memory card slots, providing greater storage capacity and flexibility. Additionally, it accepts Compact Flash and UDMA cards, offering more compatibility options. The D810 also boasts a longer battery life of 1200 shots, using the EN-EL15 battery type, which surpasses the D3300’s 700 shots with the EN-EL14a battery.

The D3300, however, does not have any advantages over the D810 in terms of storage and battery. With only one memory card slot and a shorter battery life, it falls short in comparison.

Considering these factors, the Nikon D810 clearly outshines the Nikon D3300 in storage and battery performance, making it the superior choice for photographers requiring extended shooting capabilities and versatile storage options.

Storage and Battery
Storage and Battery
32%
79%
Memory Card
SD / SDHC / SDXC
SD / SDHC / SDXC, Compact Flash, UDMA
Dual Memory Card Slots
Battery Type
EN-EL14a
EN-EL15
Battery Life
700 shots
1,200 shots
USB Charging
DXOMARK Scores
Sensor scores tested by DXOMARK
Overall Score
82%
97%
Portrait (Color Depth)
24.3 bits
25.7 bits
Landscape (Dynamic Range)
12.8 EVs
14.8 EVs
Sports (Low-Light ISO)
1385
2853
Scores

Nikon D3300 vs D810 – Our Verdict

Nikon D3300 vs D810 Comparison image.

Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Nikon D3300 or the Nikon D810:

User Scores
B&H photo video
Spotted a mistake with these specs? Please let us know so we can update it!