If you buy a product through one of our referral links we will earn a commission (without costing you anything).
Prices last updated on .
As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
If you buy a product through one of our referral links we will earn a commission (without costing you anything).
Prices last updated on .
As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
The Nikon Z6 II takes the lead with a score of 83/100, while the Nikon Z50 trails behind at 73/100. Both cameras are mirrorless and were released in consecutive years, 2019 and 2020. They share similarities in their design, with the Z6 II being slightly larger and heavier at 134 x 101 x 70mm and 705g compared to the Z50’s 127 x 94 x 60mm and 450g.
The Z6 II outperforms the Z50 with its higher score, reflecting its overall superior performance. However, the Z50 has an advantage in terms of price, with a launch price of $859 compared to the Z6 II’s $1995. This makes the Z50 a more budget-friendly option for those looking for a quality Nikon mirrorless camera.
Considering the specifications, the Nikon Z6 II is the better camera, justifying its higher price. On the other hand, the Nikon Z50 offers a more affordable alternative without compromising too much on quality. Ultimately, the choice depends on the user’s preferences and budget.
Nikon Z50 vs Z6 II Overview and Optics
The Nikon Z6 II outperforms the Nikon Z50 in terms of optics, with a score of 83/100 compared to the Z50’s 72/100. Both cameras share several specifications, including a CMOS sensor, Nikon Z lens mount, and an Expeed 6 processor. However, the Z6 II has a dual Expeed 6 processor, which contributes to its superior performance.
The Z6 II’s advantages include a higher megapixel count at 24.5 compared to the Z50’s 21, a faster shooting speed of 14 frames per second versus the Z50’s 11, and the presence of image stabilization. Additionally, the Z6 II features a full-frame sensor, compared to the Z50’s APS-C sensor, which allows for better low-light performance and a shallower depth of field. Despite having a slightly lower DXOMARK score of 94 compared to the Z50’s 97, the Z6 II’s overall optical performance is better due to these factors.
On the other hand, the Z50 has a higher DXOMARK score for its sensor, which may provide marginally better image quality in certain situations. However, this advantage is not significant enough to outweigh the Z6 II’s superior specifications.
In comparing the optics of the Nikon Z50 and Z6 II, it is clear that the Z6 II is the better camera. Its higher megapixel count, faster shooting speed, image stabilization, and full-frame sensor contribute to its superior performance. While the Z50 has a slightly higher DXOMARK score for its sensor, this advantage is not enough to make it a better camera than the Z6 II.
Optics
Nikon Z50
Nikon Z6 II
Megapixels
21 MP
24.5 MP
Image Resolution
5568 x 3712 px
6048 x 4024 px
Sensor Type
CMOS
CMOS
Sensor Size
23.5 x 15.7 mm
35.9 x 23.9 mm
Sensor Format
APS-C
Full Frame
Frame Rate
11 fps
14 fps
Lens Mount
Nikon Z
Nikon Z
Image Processor
Expeed 6
Dual Expeed 6
Aspect Ratio
3:2
3:2
Minimum ISO (Native)
100
100
Maximum ISO (Native)
51,200
51,200
Minimum ISO (Expanded)
100
50
Maximum ISO (Expanded)
204800
204800
Minimum Shutter Speed
30 s
30 s
Maximum Shutter Speed
1/ 4000 s
1/ 8000 s
Autofocus Points
209
273
In-body Stabilization
Viewfinder Type
Electronic
Electronic
Viewfinder Resolution
2,360,000 dots
3,690,000 dots
Nikon Z50 vs Z6 II Video Performance
The Nikon Z50 and Nikon Z6 II both receive a video score of 91/100, indicating that their video capabilities are quite similar. Both cameras share several key specifications, including a maximum video resolution of 4K, maximum video dimensions of 3840 x 2160, and a maximum video frame rate of 120fps. Additionally, both cameras have built-in time-lapse functionality.
Despite the tie in the overall video score, there are areas where one camera may have an advantage over the other. The Nikon Z6 II is the better camera in terms of video capabilities due to its full-frame sensor, which provides better low-light performance and a shallower depth of field. This full-frame sensor allows for better overall video quality, making the Z6 II more suitable for professional videography.
On the other hand, the Nikon Z50 has its own advantages, particularly in terms of portability and price. The Z50 is a smaller and lighter camera, making it easier to carry and handle during extended video shooting sessions. Additionally, the Z50 is more affordable than the Z6 II, making it a more attractive option for those on a budget or just starting out in videography.
Considering these factors, the Nikon Z6 II is the superior choice for those seeking top-notch video quality and professional features, while the Nikon Z50 offers a more budget-friendly and portable option with similar video specifications. Ultimately, the best camera for video capabilities depends on the individual’s needs, preferences, and budget.
Video
Nikon Z50
Nikon Z6 II
Video
Max Video Resolution
4K
4K
Max Video Dimensions
3840 x 2160 px
3840 x 2160 px
Max Video Frame Rate
120 p
120 p
Time-Lapse Built In
Video File Format
MPEG-4, MOV
MOV, MP4
Nikon Z50 vs Z6 II Features and Benefits
The Nikon Z6 II wins the features comparison by a slight margin, with a score of 87/100, while the Nikon Z50 scores 86/100. Both cameras share several specifications, such as a 3.2-inch screen size, touchscreen capability, lack of GPS, and the presence of WIFI and Bluetooth connectivity.
The Nikon Z6 II outperforms the Nikon Z50 in screen resolution, boasting 2,100,000 dots compared to the Z50’s 1,040,000 dots. This higher resolution provides a sharper and clearer display, enhancing the user experience when reviewing images or navigating menus.
On the other hand, the Nikon Z50 has one advantage over the Z6 II: a flip screen. This feature allows users to shoot from various angles more comfortably and is particularly useful for vlogging or taking selfies. However, this single benefit does not outweigh the overall superiority of the Z6 II.
Taking these factors into account, the Nikon Z6 II emerges as the better camera in terms of features. Its higher screen resolution offers a superior viewing experience, while the shared specifications, such as touchscreen, WIFI, and Bluetooth, ensure both cameras provide a modern and convenient user experience. The Nikon Z50’s flip screen is a notable advantage, but it is not enough to surpass the Z6 II in this comparison.
Ultimately, the Nikon Z6 II’s slightly higher score reflects its better features, making it the winner in this head-to-head comparison.
Features
Nikon Z50
Nikon Z6 II
Built-in Flash
External Flash
GPS
Weather Sealing
Screen Type
TFT LCD
TFT LCD
Touch Screen
Screen Size
3.2"
3.2"
Screen Resolution
1,040,000 dots
2,100,000 dots
Flip Screen
Live View
Wi-Fi
Bluetooth
Nikon Z50 vs Z6 II Storage and Battery
The Nikon Z6 II outperforms the Nikon Z50 in storage and battery with a score of 71/100, compared to the Z50’s 35/100. Both cameras share the feature of USB charging, but the Z6 II has the advantage with two memory card slots, accepting SD, CFexpress Type B, and XQD (UHS-II compatible) cards. The Z50 only has one slot for SD, SDHC, and SDXC (UHS-I compatible) cards.
The Z6 II also boasts a longer battery life of 410 shots, utilizing the EN-EL15c battery type, while the Z50 provides 320 shots with its EN-EL25 battery. The Z50 does not surpass the Z6 II in any storage or battery aspects.
Considering these factors, the Nikon Z6 II is the clear winner in terms of storage and battery performance, offering more versatility and extended usage. The Nikon Z50 falls short in this comparison, but remains a viable option for casual photographers who prioritize simplicity and affordability.
If you buy a product through one of our referral links we will earn a commission (without costing you anything).
Prices last updated on .
As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
If you buy a product through one of our referral links we will earn a commission (without costing you anything).
Prices last updated on .
As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.