Nikon Z50 vs Sony ZV-E10 Comparison

The Nikon Z50 comes out on top with a score of 73/100, while the Sony ZV-E10 trails behind with a score of 65/100. Both cameras are mirrorless, announced in 2019 and 2021 respectively. They also share similarities in size and weight; the Nikon Z50 measures 127 x 94 x 60mm and weighs 450g, while the Sony ZV-E10 measures 115 x 64 x 45mm and weighs 343g.

The Nikon Z50’s higher score is justified by its superior performance and features, despite having a higher launch price of $859 compared to the Sony ZV-E10’s $700. On the other hand, the Sony ZV-E10 offers a more compact and lightweight design, making it easier to carry around for casual users.

Taking these factors into account, the Nikon Z50 proves to be a better camera for those seeking top-notch performance and features, while the Sony ZV-E10 may be more suitable for users who prioritize portability and affordability.

Nikon Z50 vs Sony ZV-E10 Overview and Optics

The Nikon Z50 emerges as the winner in the optics comparison with a score of 72/100, while the Sony ZV-E10 trails close behind with 69/100. Both cameras share several common specifications, including an 11 frames per second shooting speed, a CMOS sensor, and the absence of image stabilization. They also have similar sensor sizes, with both using APS-C sensors. The aspect ratios differ, with the Nikon Z50 having a 3:2 ratio and the Sony ZV-E10 featuring a 4:3 ratio.

The Nikon Z50 outperforms the Sony ZV-E10 primarily due to its superior sensor performance, as evidenced by its DXOMARK score of 97 compared to the ZV-E10’s score of 86. This higher score translates to better image quality in various shooting conditions. Additionally, the Nikon Z50 employs the Expeed 6 processor and utilizes the Nikon Z lens mount, which offers a growing selection of high-quality lenses for users to choose from.

On the other hand, the Sony ZV-E10 boasts a higher megapixel count at 24, compared to the Nikon Z50’s 21 megapixels. This advantage allows the Sony camera to capture images with greater detail and resolution. Furthermore, the Sony ZV-E10 uses the Bionz X processor and the Sony E lens mount, which provides access to a vast array of compatible lenses.

Despite the Nikon Z50’s victory in the optics comparison, the Sony ZV-E10 remains a strong contender, particularly for those who prioritize higher resolution and access to a wide range of lenses. Ultimately, the choice between these two cameras depends on individual preferences and priorities, with the Nikon Z50 offering superior sensor performance and the Sony ZV-E10 delivering higher resolution and lens compatibility.

The Nikon Z50 and Sony ZV-E10 both have a video score of 91/100, indicating that these cameras have similar video capabilities. They share common features such as 4K video resolution, 120fps maximum video frame rate, and built-in time-lapse functionality.

The Nikon Z50 has an advantage with its max video dimensions of 3840 x 2160, offering slightly higher resolution compared to the Sony ZV-E10’s 3840 x 1920 dimensions. This means that the Z50 can capture more detail in its video recordings, providing a better overall image quality.

On the other hand, the Sony ZV-E10 does not outperform the Nikon Z50 in any specific video aspect, as they share the same maximum video resolution and frame rate. However, it is worth noting that both cameras have impressive video capabilities, and the difference in video dimensions is relatively minor.

After comparing the video capabilities of the Nikon Z50 and Sony ZV-E10, it is clear that the Z50 holds a slight edge in terms of video dimensions. This advantage allows for better image quality in video recordings. However, the overall video performance of both cameras is nearly identical, with the same video score, resolution, and frame rate. Therefore, users can expect high-quality video performance from both the Nikon Z50 and Sony ZV-E10, with only a minor difference in video dimensions between the two models.

The Nikon Z50 comes out ahead with a feature score of 86/100, compared to the Sony ZV-E10’s score of 68/100. Both cameras share common specifications, including a touchscreen, flip screen, WIFI, and Bluetooth connectivity. Neither camera has GPS functionality.

The Nikon Z50’s superiority lies in its larger 3.2-inch screen size and higher screen resolution of 1,040,000 dots, providing a clearer and more enjoyable viewing experience for users. This advantage makes the Z50 more suitable for users who prioritize image quality and display capabilities.

On the other hand, the Sony ZV-E10 has a slightly smaller 3-inch screen and a lower screen resolution of 920,000 dots. While this difference may not be significant for casual users, it is worth noting for those who require higher display quality. Despite the lower feature score, the ZV-E10 remains a viable option for users who prioritize compactness and portability, as the smaller screen size contributes to a lighter and more compact body.

Considering the feature specifications of both cameras, the Nikon Z50 stands out as the better option for users who prioritize image quality and display capabilities. The larger screen size and higher resolution make it a more enjoyable camera to use. However, the Sony ZV-E10 remains a suitable choice for users who value compactness and portability, despite its lower feature score. Ultimately, the choice between the two cameras depends on individual user preferences and priorities.

The Nikon Z50 outperforms the Sony ZV-E10 in storage and battery with a score of 35/100, while the Sony ZV-E10 scores 24/100. Both cameras have a single memory card slot and accept SD, SDHC, and SDXC cards. The Nikon Z50 also supports UHS-I compatibility, while the Sony ZV-E10 additionally accepts Memory Stick Pro Duo cards.

The Nikon Z50 has a battery life of 320 shots, using the EN-EL25 battery type, and offers USB charging. On the other hand, the Sony ZV-E10 has a longer battery life of 440 shots, using the NP-FW50 battery type. However, it does not provide USB charging.

Despite having a shorter battery life, the Nikon Z50 proves to be more convenient due to its USB charging capability. The Sony ZV-E10, although having a longer battery life, lacks this feature, making it less versatile in terms of charging options.

To conclude, the Nikon Z50 offers better storage and battery performance, with the added advantage of USB charging. The Sony ZV-E10’s longer battery life does not compensate for its lack of USB charging, resulting in a lower score in this comparison.

Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Nikon Z50 or the Sony ZV-E10:

• Nikon Z50 vs Sony a6400
• Nikon Z5 vs Z50
• Nikon Z30 vs Z50
• Canon EOS R10 vs Nikon Z50
• Canon EOS R50 vs Nikon Z50
• Nikon D7500 vs Z50