CameraReviews.com
menu
Hi Camera Lovers 👋 If you buy a camera through our referral links, you support our site at no cost to you 😉 Full info here.

Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV vs OM-D E-M5 Mark II Comparison

Optics
Video
Features
Storage & Battery

Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV

Olympus OM-D E‑M10 Mark IV camera image
Winner!
63%

Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II

Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II
59%
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV
vs
Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II
Price
Brand
Olympus
Olympus
Model
OM-D E-M10 Mark IV
OM-D E-M5 Mark II
Released
Refers to the year this camera was officially made available for sale.
2020
2015
Announcement Date
Refers to the date the manufacturer publicly announced the upcoming release and general specs of this camera.
August 04, 2020
February 05, 2015
Camera Type
Mirrorless
Mirrorless
Camera Size
Camera Weight

The Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV outperforms the Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II with a score of 63/100 compared to 59/100. Both cameras are mirrorless and share similar dimensions, with the E-M10 Mark IV measuring 122 x 84 x 49mm and the E-M5 Mark II at 124 x 85 x 45mm.

The E-M10 Mark IV has the advantage of being lighter, weighing 383g (0.84lbs) as opposed to the E-M5 Mark II’s 469g (1.03lbs). Additionally, the E-M10 Mark IV is more recent, released in 2020, and has a lower launch price of $699 compared to the E-M5 Mark II’s $1100 in 2015.

Despite its lower score, the E-M5 Mark II still offers a compact design with a slightly smaller depth. However, considering the E-M10 Mark IV’s higher score, lighter weight, and more affordable price, it emerges as the superior choice between the two.

Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV vs OM-D E-M5 Mark II Overview and Optics

The Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV wins the optics comparison with a score of 63/100, while the Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II scores 58/100. Both cameras share several specifications, such as the CMOS sensor type, Micro Four Thirds sensor size, Micro 4/3 lens mount, and image stabilization. Additionally, both cameras have a DXOMARK score of 73 for their sensors.

The E-M10 Mark IV has advantages in megapixels and shooting speed. With 20 megapixels, it captures more detail than the E-M5 Mark II, which has 16.1 megapixels. This difference allows for better image quality and larger prints. The E-M10 Mark IV also has a faster shooting speed of 15 frames per second compared to the E-M5 Mark II, which shoots at 10 frames per second. This increased speed is beneficial for capturing fast-moving subjects and action shots.

The E-M5 Mark II, despite its lower score, has a more advanced processor, the TruePic VII, compared to the E-M10 Mark IV’s TruePic VIII. This results in better color reproduction and noise reduction. However, the difference in the processor does not significantly impact the overall image quality.

In conclusion, the Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV outperforms the E-M5 Mark II in terms of optics, primarily due to its higher megapixel count and faster shooting speed. The E-M5 Mark II’s advantage in processor technology is not enough to compensate for its lower megapixel count and slower shooting speed. Therefore, the E-M10 Mark IV is the better choice for those seeking superior optics performance.

Optics
Optics
63%
58%
Megapixels
The higher the number of megapixels, the more detail the cameras sensor can capture.
20 MP
16.1 MP
Image Resolution
Image resolution is measured in pixels and megapixels, width by height. The higher the number, the higher its resolution.
5184 x 3888 px
4608 x 3456 px
Sensor Type
The camera sensor captures light and records the image. Sensors vary in physical size, the number of pixels, and quality.
CMOS
CMOS
Sensor Size
The sensor size contributes to the overall quality as well as the dynamic and tonal range a camera can capture. As a rule of thumb, the more surface there is to read the light, the more information it will capture.
13 x 17.4 mm
13 x 17.3 mm
Sensor Format
Refers to the most commonly used sensor sizes.
Micro Four Thirds
Micro Four Thirds
Frame Rate
The number of sequential frames per second the camera can write to the memory card when shooting in burst or continuous mode.
15 fps
10 fps
Lens Mount
The lens mount will tell you what type of lens range you can fit onto the camera body. Often the same camera company will have different lens ranges for different cameras.
Micro 4/3
Micro 4/3
Image Processor
The image processor in the camera converts the information collected on the sensor for digital storage on the memory card.
TruePic VIII
TruePic VII
Aspect Ratio
The aspect ratio refers to the proportional difference between width and height. The most popular aspect ratios are 3:2 and 4:3.
4:3
4:3
Minimum ISO (Native)
Refers to the lowest native (or 'base') ISO setting. Lower ISO are less sensitive to light but make a cleaner image.
200
200
Maximum ISO (Native)
Refers to the highest native (or 'base') ISO setting. Higher ISO is necessary for low-light situations or night photography, but higher ISOs often introduce grain or noise.
6,400
25,600
Minimum ISO (Expanded)
Expanded (or extended) ISO is a digitally enhanced feature available on some cameras. It allows you to push beyond the native ISO range if necessary.
80
100
Maximum ISO (Expanded)
Expanded (or extended) ISO is a digitally enhanced feature available on some cameras. It allows you to push beyond the native ISO range if necessary.
25600
25600
Minimum Shutter Speed
The minimum shutter speed will tell you the longest exposure your camera can take without using an external accessory.
60 s
60 s
Maximum Shutter Speed
The maximum shutter speed tells you the length inside 1 second the camera will capture. These can sometimes be extended with accessories such as extra external batteries.
1/ 4000 s
1/ 8000 s
Autofocus Points
Autofocus points show where the camera is focusing graphically as squares or brackets in Live View or on an electronic viewfinder. These points are also used for light meter readings.
121
81
In-body Stabilization
In-body Stabilization means the camera has a certain technology embedded that counteracts camera shake.
Viewfinder Type
The viewfinder type is either electronic or optical. Electronic viewfinders will have a small screen in the viewfinder. Optical viewfinders will use prisms and mirrors to look through the lens.
Electronic
Electronic
Viewfinder Resolution
2,360,000 dots
2,360,000 dots

Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV vs OM-D E-M5 Mark II Video Performance

The Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV outperforms the Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II in video capabilities with a video score of 83/100 compared to 70/100. Both cameras share some common features, such as a maximum video frame rate of 60fps and built-in time-lapse functionality.

The E-M10 Mark IV surpasses the E-M5 Mark II in terms of video resolution and dimensions. It offers 4K video resolution (3840 x 2160) which is significantly higher than the E-M5 Mark II’s Full HD resolution (1920 x 1080). This difference in resolution enables the E-M10 Mark IV to produce sharper and more detailed videos, making it the superior choice for videographers.

While the E-M5 Mark II’s video capabilities are not as advanced as the E-M10 Mark IV’s, it still provides a respectable Full HD resolution and shares the same maximum video frame rate of 60fps. This means that both cameras can capture smooth and fluid motion in their videos, even though the E-M5 Mark II’s resolution is lower.

To conclude, the Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV is the winner in terms of video capabilities due to its higher video score and superior 4K resolution. The E-M5 Mark II, while not as proficient in video quality, still offers a solid Full HD resolution and shares the same 60fps maximum video frame rate. Therefore, those who prioritize video quality should opt for the E-M10 Mark IV, while the E-M5 Mark II remains a decent option for those who do not require 4K resolution.

Video
Video
83%
70%
Video
Indicates if this camera is capable of recording video.
Max Video Resolution
The best resolution this camera can capture video in. Modern cameras can capture up to 8K video.
4K
Full HD
Max Video Dimensions
Video resolution measured by the greatest number of pixels possible in each frame, width by height. A higher resolution means more detail or clarity in your video.
3840 x 2160 px
1920 x 1080 px
Max Video Frame Rate
How many frames per second your video will capture. Most cameras have options for multiple frame rates, depending on the resolution you shoot in. For a general video, 24p or 30p is the standard, but more serious filmmakers may need a higher frame rate for creative effect.
60 p
60 p
Time-Lapse Built In
A built in time-lapse mode will allow continuous shooting throughout a prolonged period of time to be compressed into a sped up video.
Video File Format
Different cameras can record in various video file formats. The File format you record in can impact how you edit and use the files.
MPEG-4, MOV
MOV, AVI

Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV vs OM-D E-M5 Mark II Features and Benefits

The Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV wins the comparison with a feature score of 70/100, a 13-point difference from the Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II, which scores 57/100. Both cameras have common specifications, including a 3-inch screen, touchscreen capabilities, flip screen, GPS absence, and WIFI connectivity. However, the E-M10 Mark IV outperforms the E-M5 Mark II in certain areas.

The E-M10 Mark IV has a higher screen resolution of 1,040,000 dots compared to the E-M5 Mark II’s 1,037,000 dots. Moreover, the E-M10 Mark IV has Bluetooth connectivity, while the E-M5 Mark II lacks this feature. These advantages make the E-M10 Mark IV a more attractive option for photographers who prioritize screen quality and wireless connectivity.

On the other hand, the E-M5 Mark II has its own merits. Although the E-M5 Mark II has a lower feature score, it still offers a quality touchscreen experience with its 3-inch flip screen and WIFI connectivity. The absence of Bluetooth may not be a dealbreaker for some users who primarily rely on WIFI for transferring files and remote control.

To conclude, the Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV proves to be a better choice due to its higher feature score, superior screen resolution, and the added benefit of Bluetooth connectivity. While the E-M5 Mark II may not be the winner, it still provides adequate features for photographers who can compromise on Bluetooth and a slightly lower screen resolution.

Features
Features
70%
70%
Built-in Flash
A built-in flash will often be positioned right above the lens. This will automatically pop up when you activate it.
External Flash
External flashes are often connected through a hot shoe at the top of a camera, or a cable at the side of the camera.
GPS
GPS features in a camera will include location metadata to each of your photographs.
Weather Sealing
Weather sealing capabilities will give you more confidence when shooting in unfavourable conditions.
Screen Type
TFT LCD
LCD
Touch Screen
Touchscreen allows you to change camera settings and access menus with a swipe of your finger, instead of using buttons.
Screen Size
3"
3"
Screen Resolution
Screen dots indicate the resolution of the LCD screen by including each sub pixel.
1,040,000 dots
1,037,000 dots
Flip Screen
A flip screen (or articulating screen) is a second screen which can flip out from the side or top of the camera. This rotating screen allows you more freedom to take photos at different angles.
Live View
Live View feature allows you to see a continuous live video of what is being seen through your lens.
Wi-Fi
Bluetooth
Bluetooth capabilities allow you wireless control of your camera with other external devices.

Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV vs OM-D E-M5 Mark II Storage and Battery

The Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV outperforms the OM-D E-M5 Mark II in storage and battery with a score of 35/100 compared to 21/100. Both cameras share similarities, including one memory card slot and compatibility with SD, SDHC, and SDXC memory cards. However, the E-M10 Mark IV has the advantage of UHS-II compatibility.

The E-M10 Mark IV also offers better battery life with 360 shots, using the BLS-50 battery type, and features USB charging. In contrast, the E-M5 Mark II has a slightly lower battery life of 310 shots and uses the BLN-1 battery type, without USB charging capabilities.

Despite the lower score, the E-M5 Mark II still provides adequate battery life and storage options for most photography needs. However, the E-M10 Mark IV’s superior battery life, UHS-II compatibility, and USB charging make it a more convenient choice for extended use and faster data transfer.

Storage and Battery
Storage and Battery
35%
21%
Memory Card
SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-II compatible)
SD / SDHC / SDXC
Dual Memory Card Slots
Battery Type
BLS-50
BLN-1
Battery Life
Approximately how long this cameras battery will last measured by how many photographs you will be able to take.
360 shots
310 shots
USB Charging
DXOMARK Scores
Sensor scores tested by DXOMARK
Overall Score
DXOMARK overall sensor score.
N/A
73%
Portrait (Color Depth)
As described by DXOMARK 'The Portrait score in our camera sensor reviews defines color depth performance and its unit is a number of bits. A color depth of 22 bits is excellent; differences below 1 bit are barely noticeable.'
N/A
23 bits
Landscape (Dynamic Range)
As described by DXOMARK 'The Landscape score in our camera sensor tests defines the maximum dynamic range of the camera sensor and its unit is an exposure value (EV). A value of 12 EV is excellent with differences below 0.5 EV usually not noticeable.'
N/A
12.4 EVs
Sports (Low-Light ISO)
Described by DXOMARK as 'The maximal value of ISO sensitivity needed to reach a given value of Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR). The greater the value, the better'
N/A
896
Scores

Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV vs OM-D E-M5 Mark II – Our Verdict

Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV vs OM-D E-M5 Mark II Comparison image.

Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV or the Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II:

User Scores
B&H photo video
Spotted a mistake with these camera specs? Please let us know so we can update it!