CameraReviews.com
menu
Hi Camera Lovers 👋 If you buy a camera through our referral links, you support our site at no cost to you 😉 Full info here.

Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV vs OM-D E-M5 Mark II Comparison

Optics
Video
Features
Storage & Battery

Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV

olympus omd em10 mark iv
Winner!
63%

Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II

Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II
59%
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV
vs
Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II
Price
Brand
Olympus
Olympus
Model
OM-D E-M10 Mark IV
OM-D E-M5 Mark II
Released
2020
2015
Announcement Date
August 04, 2020
February 05, 2015
Camera Type
Mirrorless
Mirrorless
Camera Size
Camera Weight

The Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV outperforms the Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II with a score of 63/100 compared to 59/100. Both cameras are mirrorless and share similar dimensions, with the E-M10 Mark IV measuring 122 x 84 x 49mm and the E-M5 Mark II at 124 x 85 x 45mm.

The E-M10 Mark IV has the advantage of being lighter, weighing 383g (0.84lbs) as opposed to the E-M5 Mark II’s 469g (1.03lbs). Additionally, the E-M10 Mark IV is more recent, released in 2020, and has a lower launch price of $699 compared to the E-M5 Mark II’s $1100 in 2015.

Despite its lower score, the E-M5 Mark II still offers a compact design with a slightly smaller depth. However, considering the E-M10 Mark IV’s higher score, lighter weight, and more affordable price, it emerges as the superior choice between the two.

Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV vs OM-D E-M5 Mark II Overview and Optics

The Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV wins the optics comparison with a score of 63/100, while the Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II scores 58/100. Both cameras share several specifications, such as the CMOS sensor type, Micro Four Thirds sensor size, Micro 4/3 lens mount, and image stabilization. Additionally, both cameras have a DXOMARK score of 73 for their sensors.

The E-M10 Mark IV has advantages in megapixels and shooting speed. With 20 megapixels, it captures more detail than the E-M5 Mark II, which has 16.1 megapixels. This difference allows for better image quality and larger prints. The E-M10 Mark IV also has a faster shooting speed of 15 frames per second compared to the E-M5 Mark II, which shoots at 10 frames per second. This increased speed is beneficial for capturing fast-moving subjects and action shots.

The E-M5 Mark II, despite its lower score, has a more advanced processor, the TruePic VII, compared to the E-M10 Mark IV’s TruePic VIII. This results in better color reproduction and noise reduction. However, the difference in the processor does not significantly impact the overall image quality.

In conclusion, the Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV outperforms the E-M5 Mark II in terms of optics, primarily due to its higher megapixel count and faster shooting speed. The E-M5 Mark II’s advantage in processor technology is not enough to compensate for its lower megapixel count and slower shooting speed. Therefore, the E-M10 Mark IV is the better choice for those seeking superior optics performance.

Optics
Optics
63%
58%
Megapixels
20 MP
16.1 MP
Image Resolution
5184 x 3888 px
4608 x 3456 px
Sensor Type
CMOS
CMOS
Sensor Size
13 x 17.4 mm
13 x 17.3 mm
Sensor Format
Micro Four Thirds
Micro Four Thirds
Frame Rate
15 fps
10 fps
Lens Mount
Micro 4/3
Micro 4/3
Image Processor
TruePic VIII
TruePic VII
Aspect Ratio
4:3
4:3
Minimum ISO (Native)
200
200
Maximum ISO (Native)
6,400
25,600
Minimum ISO (Expanded)
80
100
Maximum ISO (Expanded)
25600
25600
Minimum Shutter Speed
60 s
60 s
Maximum Shutter Speed
1/ 4000 s
1/ 8000 s
Autofocus Points
121
81
In-body Stabilization
Viewfinder Type
Electronic
Electronic
Viewfinder Resolution
2,360,000 dots
2,360,000 dots

Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV vs OM-D E-M5 Mark II Video Performance

The Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV outperforms the Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II in video capabilities with a video score of 83/100 compared to 70/100. Both cameras share some common features, such as a maximum video frame rate of 60fps and built-in time-lapse functionality.

The E-M10 Mark IV surpasses the E-M5 Mark II in terms of video resolution and dimensions. It offers 4K video resolution (3840 x 2160) which is significantly higher than the E-M5 Mark II’s Full HD resolution (1920 x 1080). This difference in resolution enables the E-M10 Mark IV to produce sharper and more detailed videos, making it the superior choice for videographers.

While the E-M5 Mark II’s video capabilities are not as advanced as the E-M10 Mark IV’s, it still provides a respectable Full HD resolution and shares the same maximum video frame rate of 60fps. This means that both cameras can capture smooth and fluid motion in their videos, even though the E-M5 Mark II’s resolution is lower.

To conclude, the Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV is the winner in terms of video capabilities due to its higher video score and superior 4K resolution. The E-M5 Mark II, while not as proficient in video quality, still offers a solid Full HD resolution and shares the same 60fps maximum video frame rate. Therefore, those who prioritize video quality should opt for the E-M10 Mark IV, while the E-M5 Mark II remains a decent option for those who do not require 4K resolution.

Video
Video
83%
70%
Video
Max Video Resolution
4K
Full HD
Max Video Dimensions
3840 x 2160 px
1920 x 1080 px
Max Video Frame Rate
60 p
60 p
Time-Lapse Built In
Video File Format
MPEG-4, MOV
MOV, AVI

Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV vs OM-D E-M5 Mark II Features and Benefits

The Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV wins the comparison with a feature score of 70/100, a 13-point difference from the Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II, which scores 57/100. Both cameras have common specifications, including a 3-inch screen, touchscreen capabilities, flip screen, GPS absence, and WIFI connectivity. However, the E-M10 Mark IV outperforms the E-M5 Mark II in certain areas.

The E-M10 Mark IV has a higher screen resolution of 1,040,000 dots compared to the E-M5 Mark II’s 1,037,000 dots. Moreover, the E-M10 Mark IV has Bluetooth connectivity, while the E-M5 Mark II lacks this feature. These advantages make the E-M10 Mark IV a more attractive option for photographers who prioritize screen quality and wireless connectivity.

On the other hand, the E-M5 Mark II has its own merits. Although the E-M5 Mark II has a lower feature score, it still offers a quality touchscreen experience with its 3-inch flip screen and WIFI connectivity. The absence of Bluetooth may not be a dealbreaker for some users who primarily rely on WIFI for transferring files and remote control.

To conclude, the Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV proves to be a better choice due to its higher feature score, superior screen resolution, and the added benefit of Bluetooth connectivity. While the E-M5 Mark II may not be the winner, it still provides adequate features for photographers who can compromise on Bluetooth and a slightly lower screen resolution.

Features
Features
70%
70%
Built-in Flash
External Flash
GPS
Weather Sealing
Screen Type
TFT LCD
LCD
Touch Screen
Screen Size
3"
3"
Screen Resolution
1,040,000 dots
1,037,000 dots
Flip Screen
Live View
Wi-Fi
Bluetooth

Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV vs OM-D E-M5 Mark II Storage and Battery

The Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV outperforms the OM-D E-M5 Mark II in storage and battery with a score of 35/100 compared to 21/100. Both cameras share similarities, including one memory card slot and compatibility with SD, SDHC, and SDXC memory cards. However, the E-M10 Mark IV has the advantage of UHS-II compatibility.

The E-M10 Mark IV also offers better battery life with 360 shots, using the BLS-50 battery type, and features USB charging. In contrast, the E-M5 Mark II has a slightly lower battery life of 310 shots and uses the BLN-1 battery type, without USB charging capabilities.

Despite the lower score, the E-M5 Mark II still provides adequate battery life and storage options for most photography needs. However, the E-M10 Mark IV’s superior battery life, UHS-II compatibility, and USB charging make it a more convenient choice for extended use and faster data transfer.

Storage and Battery
Storage and Battery
35%
21%
Memory Card
SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-II compatible)
SD / SDHC / SDXC
Dual Memory Card Slots
Battery Type
BLS-50
BLN-1
Battery Life
360 shots
310 shots
USB Charging
DXOMARK Scores
Sensor scores tested by DXOMARK
Overall Score
N/A
73%
Portrait (Color Depth)
N/A
23 bits
Landscape (Dynamic Range)
N/A
12.4 EVs
Sports (Low-Light ISO)
N/A
896
Scores

Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV vs OM-D E-M5 Mark II – Our Verdict

Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV vs OM-D E-M5 Mark II Comparison image.

Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV or the Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II:

User Scores
Spotted a mistake with these camera specs? Please let us know so we can update it!