Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II vs OM-D E-M1 Mark III Comparison
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III
Price | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Brand | Olympus | Olympus | |
Model | OM-D E-M1 Mark II | OM-D E-M1 Mark III | |
Released Refers to the year this camera was officially made available for sale. | 2016 | 2020 | |
Announcement Date Refers to the date the manufacturer publicly announced the upcoming release and general specs of this camera. | September 19, 2016 | February 12, 2020 | |
Camera Type |  Mirrorless | Mirrorless | |
Camera Size | |||
Camera Weight |
The Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III emerges as the winner with a score of 72/100, while the OM-D E-M1 Mark II scores 68/100. Both cameras share common features: they are mirrorless, have the same camera size (134 x 91mm), and similar weights (Mark III is slightly heavier at 580g).
The Mark III boasts a better score due to its more recent release year (2020) and a lower launch price of $1799 compared to the Mark II’s $2000. Despite being an older model, the Mark II still has some advantages, such as being 6g lighter than the Mark III.
Ultimately, the Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III is the superior choice, given its better score, more recent technology, and lower price. However, the Mark II remains a viable option for those prioritizing a lighter camera.
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II vs OM-D E-M1 Mark III Overview and Optics
The Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and the Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III both receive a score of 68/100 for their optics, showing that they have many similarities in their specifications. Both cameras feature a 20-megapixel CMOS sensor, a Micro Four Thirds sensor size, and a Micro 4/3 lens mount. They also have the same shooting speed of 60 frames per second and share an identical DXOMARK score for the sensor at 80. Additionally, both cameras come with built-in image stabilization.
Despite sharing the same score, the E-M1 Mark III has a slight edge over the E-M1 Mark II due to its newer TruePic IX processor. This updated processor allows for improved image processing and noise reduction, leading to better image quality in certain conditions. The E-M1 Mark III also benefits from the latest features and technology that Olympus has to offer.
On the other hand, the E-M1 Mark II has a slightly higher megapixel count at 20.4 compared to the 20 megapixels of the E-M1 Mark III. This difference may provide a marginal advantage in image resolution, but it is unlikely to be noticeable in most situations. Both cameras still produce high-quality images that cater to various photography needs.
Given that the optics of these two cameras are nearly identical, the choice between the Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and the Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III comes down to personal preference and budget. The E-M1 Mark III offers a newer processor and updated features, while the E-M1 Mark II has a slightly higher megapixel count. Ultimately, both cameras provide excellent optics and performance for photographers of all levels.
|
Optics
|
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II
|
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III
|
|
|
|
|
||
Megapixels The higher the number of megapixels, the more detail the cameras sensor can capture. | 20.4 MP | 20 MP | |
|---|---|---|---|
Image Resolution Image resolution is measured in pixels and megapixels, width by height. The higher the number, the higher its resolution. | 5184 x 3888 px | 5184 x 3888 px | |
Sensor Type The camera sensor captures light and records the image. Sensors vary in physical size, the number of pixels, and quality. | CMOS | CMOS | |
Sensor Size The sensor size contributes to the overall quality as well as the dynamic and tonal range a camera can capture. As a rule of thumb, the more surface there is to read the light, the more information it will capture. | 13 x 17.4 mm | 17.4 x 13 mm | |
Sensor Format Refers to the most commonly used sensor sizes. |  Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds | |
Frame Rate The number of sequential frames per second the camera can write to the memory card when shooting in burst or continuous mode. | 60 fps | 60 fps | |
Lens Mount The lens mount will tell you what type of lens range you can fit onto the camera body. Often the same camera company will have different lens ranges for different cameras. | Micro 4/3 | Micro 4/3 | |
Image Processor The image processor in the camera converts the information collected on the sensor for digital storage on the memory card. | TruePic VIII | TruePic IX | |
Aspect Ratio The aspect ratio refers to the proportional difference between width and height. The most popular aspect ratios are 3:2 and 4:3. |  4:3 | 4:3 | |
Minimum ISO (Native) Refers to the lowest native (or 'base') ISO setting. Lower ISO are less sensitive to light but make a cleaner image. | 200 | 200 | |
Maximum ISO (Native) Refers to the highest native (or 'base') ISO setting. Higher ISO is necessary for low-light situations or night photography, but higher ISOs often introduce grain or noise. | 25,600 | 25,600 | |
Minimum ISO (Expanded) Expanded (or extended) ISO is a digitally enhanced feature available on some cameras. It allows you to push beyond the native ISO range if necessary. | 64 | 64 | |
Maximum ISO (Expanded) Expanded (or extended) ISO is a digitally enhanced feature available on some cameras. It allows you to push beyond the native ISO range if necessary. | 25600 | 25600 | |
Minimum Shutter Speed The minimum shutter speed will tell you the longest exposure your camera can take without using an external accessory. | 60 s | 60 s | |
Maximum Shutter Speed The maximum shutter speed tells you the length inside 1 second the camera will capture. These can sometimes be extended with accessories such as extra external batteries. | 1/ 32000 s | 1/ 8000 s | |
Autofocus Points Autofocus points show where the camera is focusing graphically as squares or brackets in Live View or on an electronic viewfinder. These points are also used for light meter readings. | 121 | 121 | |
In-body Stabilization In-body Stabilization means the camera has a certain technology embedded that counteracts camera shake. |   | | |
Viewfinder Type The viewfinder type is either electronic or optical. Electronic viewfinders will have a small screen in the viewfinder. Optical viewfinders will use prisms and mirrors to look through the lens. | Electronic | Electronic | |
Viewfinder Resolution | 2,360,000 dots | 2,360,000 dots |
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II vs OM-D E-M1 Mark III Video Performance
The Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III outperforms the Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II in video capabilities with a score of 83/100 as compared to the latter’s 70/100. Both cameras share certain features, such as 4K maximum video resolution and 4096 x 2160 maximum video dimensions. Additionally, both cameras have time-lapse functionality built in, making them suitable for capturing stunning time-lapse videos.
The E-M1 Mark III surpasses the E-M1 Mark II with its superior maximum video frame rate of 60fps, double the E-M1 Mark II’s 24fps. This higher frame rate enables smoother video playback and provides more flexibility for slow-motion effects in post-production. This significant advantage makes the E-M1 Mark III a more appealing choice for videographers who require high-quality video performance.
On the other hand, the E-M1 Mark II does not offer any notable advantages over the E-M1 Mark III in terms of video capabilities. Its lower frame rate puts it at a disadvantage compared to its successor. However, the E-M1 Mark II may still be suitable for casual video recording or for those who do not require a high frame rate for their projects.
Taking all factors into consideration, the Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III stands out as the better option for videography due to its higher video score and superior maximum video frame rate. The E-M1 Mark II, while still a capable camera, falls short in comparison to the E-M1 Mark III in this aspect. Therefore, those seeking a camera with better video performance should opt for the Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III.
|
Video
|
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II
|
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III
|
|
|
|
|
||
Video Indicates if this camera is capable of recording video. |  | | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max Video Resolution The best resolution this camera can capture video in. Modern cameras can capture up to 8K video. |  4K | 4K | |
Max Video Dimensions Video resolution measured by the greatest number of pixels possible in each frame, width by height. A higher resolution means more detail or clarity in your video. | 4096 x 2160 px | 4096 x 2160 px | |
Max Video Frame Rate How many frames per second your video will capture. Most cameras have options for multiple frame rates, depending on the resolution you shoot in. For a general video, 24p or 30p is the standard, but more serious filmmakers may need a higher frame rate for creative effect. | 24 p | 60 p | |
Time-Lapse Built In A built in time-lapse mode will allow continuous shooting throughout a prolonged period of time to be compressed into a sped up video. |  | | |
Video File Format Different cameras can record in various video file formats. The File format you record in can impact how you edit and use the files. | MOV, AVI | MPEG-4, MOV |
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II vs OM-D E-M1 Mark III Features and Benefits
The Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III outperforms the Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II with a feature score of 83/100, compared to the Mark II’s 70/100. Both cameras share several specifications, including a 3-inch screen size, a screen resolution of 1,037,000 dots, a touchscreen, a flip screen, and WiFi capabilities. However, the Mark III surpasses the Mark II in certain areas, while the Mark II has minimal advantages over the Mark III.
The Mark III’s higher score results from its additional Bluetooth connectivity, which the Mark II lacks. This feature allows users to easily transfer files and remotely control the camera. Consequently, the Mark III provides a more convenient and seamless shooting experience.
On the other hand, the Mark II does not offer any significant advantages over the Mark III. Both cameras share the same screen size, resolution, and other features. Therefore, the Mark II does not outshine the Mark III in any specific aspect.
Considering these points, the Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III is a superior camera compared to the Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II. Its higher feature score and the inclusion of Bluetooth connectivity make it a more desirable choice for photographers seeking advanced features and greater convenience. The Mark II, with its lower score and lack of notable advantages, does not provide a compelling reason for potential buyers to choose it over the Mark III.
|
Features
|
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II
|
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III
|
|
|
|
|
||
Built-in Flash A built-in flash will often be positioned right above the lens. This will automatically pop up when you activate it. |   | | |
|---|---|---|---|
External Flash External flashes are often connected through a hot shoe at the top of a camera, or a cable at the side of the camera. |  | | |
GPS GPS features in a camera will include location metadata to each of your photographs. |  | | |
Weather Sealing Weather sealing capabilities will give you more confidence when shooting in unfavourable conditions. |  | | |
Screen Type | LCD | TFT LCD | |
Touch Screen Touchscreen allows you to change camera settings and access menus with a swipe of your finger, instead of using buttons. |  | | |
Screen Size |  3" | 3" | |
Screen Resolution Screen dots indicate the resolution of the LCD screen by including each sub pixel. | 1,037,000 dots | 1,037,000 dots | |
Flip Screen A flip screen (or articulating screen) is a second screen which can flip out from the side or top of the camera. This rotating screen allows you more freedom to take photos at different angles. |  | | |
Live View Live View feature allows you to see a continuous live video of what is being seen through your lens. |  | | |
Wi-Fi |  | | |
Bluetooth Bluetooth capabilities allow you wireless control of your camera with other external devices. |  | | |
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II vs OM-D E-M1 Mark III Storage and Battery
The Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III outperforms the Mark II in storage and battery with a score of 71/100 compared to the Mark II’s 57/100. Both cameras have two memory card slots and accept SD, SDHC, and SDXC cards. However, the Mark III has an advantage with one slot supporting the faster UHS-II standard, providing quicker data transfer for high-resolution images and videos.
In terms of battery life, the Mark II offers slightly more shots per charge at 440, while the Mark III provides 420. Both cameras utilize the same BLH-1 battery type. The Mark III, however, features USB charging, allowing for more convenient and flexible charging options.
Considering these aspects, the Mark III holds an advantage in storage and charging capabilities, while the Mark II has a minor edge in battery life. The faster UHS-II compatibility and USB charging make the Mark III a more versatile choice for photographers who prioritize storage and power options.
|
Storage and Battery
|
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II
|
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III
|
|
|
|
|
||
Memory Card | SD / SDHC / SDXC | SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-II compatible on one slot) | |
|---|---|---|---|
Dual Memory Card Slots |  | | |
Battery Type | BLH-1 | BLH-1 | |
Battery Life Approximately how long this cameras battery will last measured by how many photographs you will be able to take. | 440 shots | 420 shots | |
USB Charging |  | |
|
DXOMARK Scores
Sensor scores tested by DXOMARK |
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II
|
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III
|
|
Overall Score DXOMARK overall sensor score. | N/A | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Portrait (Color Depth) As described by DXOMARK 'The Portrait score in our camera sensor reviews defines color depth performance and its unit is a number of bits. A color depth of 22 bits is excellent; differences below 1 bit are barely noticeable.' | 23.7 bits | N/A | |
Landscape (Dynamic Range) As described by DXOMARK 'The Landscape score in our camera sensor tests defines the maximum dynamic range of the camera sensor and its unit is an exposure value (EV). A value of 12 EV is excellent with differences below 0.5 EV usually not noticeable.' | 12.8 EVs | N/A | |
Sports (Low-Light ISO) Described by DXOMARK as 'The maximal value of ISO sensitivity needed to reach a given value of Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR). The greater the value, the better' | 1312 | N/A |
|
Scores
|
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II
|
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III
|
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II vs OM-D E-M1 Mark III Alternatives
If you’re still not sure which camera to go for, here are some more popular comparisons to inspire you:
- Sony a7 IV vs Sony a7R IV
- Canon EOS R7 vs Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III
- Canon EOS Rebel T8i / 850D vs Nikon D3500
- Fujifilm GFX 50S II vs Fujifilm GFX100S
- Fujifilm GFX 50S II vs Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV
- Fujifilm X-E3 vs Sony a6300
- Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III
- Fujifilm X-T5 vs Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark III
|
User Scores
|
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II
|
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III
|
|
B&H photo video | N/A |
|---|