Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II vs OM-D E-M5 Mark III Comparison
Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II
Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark III
Price | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Brand | Olympus | Olympus | |
Model | OM-D E-M5 Mark II | OM-D E-M5 Mark III | |
Released Refers to the year this camera was officially made available for sale. | 2015 | 2019 | |
Announcement Date Refers to the date the manufacturer publicly announced the upcoming release and general specs of this camera. | February 05, 2015 | October 17, 2019 | |
Camera Type |  Mirrorless | Mirrorless | |
Camera Size | |||
Camera Weight |
The Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark III emerges as the winner with a score of 65/100, while its predecessor, the Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II, scores 59/100. Both cameras are mirrorless and share similar dimensions, with the Mark III being slightly larger at 125 x 85 x 50mm compared to the Mark II’s 124 x 85 x 45mm.
The Mark III outshines the Mark II with its lighter weight of 414g, making it more convenient for photographers. Additionally, it was released in 2019, making it a more recent model with updated features. However, the Mark II has its advantages, such as a lower launch price of $1100 compared to the Mark III’s $1199.
Taking these factors into account, the Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark III is a better camera due to its higher score, lighter weight, and updated features. The Mark II may still appeal to budget-conscious photographers.
Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II vs OM-D E-M5 Mark III Overview and Optics
The Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark III wins the optics comparison with a score of 60/100, while the Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II scores 58/100. Both cameras share several optical specifications, such as having a CMOS sensor, a Micro Four Thirds sensor size, a Micro 4/3 lens mount, and image stabilization.
The Mark III outperforms the Mark II in several aspects. It has a higher megapixel count (20 vs. 16.1), allowing for more detailed images. The Mark III also boasts a faster shooting speed (30 vs. 10), enabling users to capture fast-moving subjects more effectively. Additionally, the Mark III features an improved processor, the TruePic VIII, compared to the Mark II’s TruePic VII, which results in better image processing and overall performance.
However, the Mark II has a higher DXOMARK score for the sensor (73 vs. 55), indicating that it may produce better image quality in certain situations. This advantage is not enough to outweigh the benefits of the Mark III, but it is still a noteworthy aspect of the Mark II.
Considering these points, the Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark III stands out as the better option for optics due to its higher megapixel count, faster shooting speed, and improved processor. The Mark II’s higher DXOMARK sensor score is worth noting, but it does not make up for the other advantages of the Mark III. Ultimately, photographers seeking better optical performance should opt for the Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark III.
|
Optics
|
Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II
|
Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark III
|
|
|
|
|
||
Megapixels The higher the number of megapixels, the more detail the cameras sensor can capture. | 16.1 MP | 20 MP | |
|---|---|---|---|
Image Resolution Image resolution is measured in pixels and megapixels, width by height. The higher the number, the higher its resolution. | 4608 x 3456 px | 5184 x 3888 px | |
Sensor Type The camera sensor captures light and records the image. Sensors vary in physical size, the number of pixels, and quality. | CMOS | CMOS | |
Sensor Size The sensor size contributes to the overall quality as well as the dynamic and tonal range a camera can capture. As a rule of thumb, the more surface there is to read the light, the more information it will capture. | 13 x 17.3 mm | 17.4 x 13 mm | |
Sensor Format Refers to the most commonly used sensor sizes. |  Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds | |
Frame Rate The number of sequential frames per second the camera can write to the memory card when shooting in burst or continuous mode. | 10 fps | 30 fps | |
Lens Mount The lens mount will tell you what type of lens range you can fit onto the camera body. Often the same camera company will have different lens ranges for different cameras. | Micro 4/3 | Micro 4/3 | |
Image Processor The image processor in the camera converts the information collected on the sensor for digital storage on the memory card. | TruePic VII | TruePic VIII | |
Aspect Ratio The aspect ratio refers to the proportional difference between width and height. The most popular aspect ratios are 3:2 and 4:3. |  4:3 | 4:3 | |
Minimum ISO (Native) Refers to the lowest native (or 'base') ISO setting. Lower ISO are less sensitive to light but make a cleaner image. | 200 | 200 | |
Maximum ISO (Native) Refers to the highest native (or 'base') ISO setting. Higher ISO is necessary for low-light situations or night photography, but higher ISOs often introduce grain or noise. | 25,600 | 6,400 | |
Minimum ISO (Expanded) Expanded (or extended) ISO is a digitally enhanced feature available on some cameras. It allows you to push beyond the native ISO range if necessary. | 100 | 64 | |
Maximum ISO (Expanded) Expanded (or extended) ISO is a digitally enhanced feature available on some cameras. It allows you to push beyond the native ISO range if necessary. | 25600 | 25600 | |
Minimum Shutter Speed The minimum shutter speed will tell you the longest exposure your camera can take without using an external accessory. | 60 s | 60 s | |
Maximum Shutter Speed The maximum shutter speed tells you the length inside 1 second the camera will capture. These can sometimes be extended with accessories such as extra external batteries. | 1/ 8000 s | 1/ 8000 s | |
Autofocus Points Autofocus points show where the camera is focusing graphically as squares or brackets in Live View or on an electronic viewfinder. These points are also used for light meter readings. | 81 | 121 | |
In-body Stabilization In-body Stabilization means the camera has a certain technology embedded that counteracts camera shake. |   | | |
Viewfinder Type The viewfinder type is either electronic or optical. Electronic viewfinders will have a small screen in the viewfinder. Optical viewfinders will use prisms and mirrors to look through the lens. | Electronic | Electronic | |
Viewfinder Resolution | 2,360,000 dots | 2,360,000 dots |
Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II vs OM-D E-M5 Mark III Video Performance
The Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark III outperforms its predecessor, the OM-D E-M5 Mark II, in video capabilities with a score of 91/100, a significant 21-point lead over the Mark II’s 70/100. Both cameras share some common video features, such as built-in time-lapse functionality. However, the Mark III surpasses the Mark II in several aspects.
The Mark III boasts a maximum video resolution of 4K, while the Mark II only offers Full HD. This higher resolution in the Mark III results in sharper and more detailed footage, making it a better choice for videographers seeking top-quality videos. Additionally, the Mark III’s maximum video dimensions are 4096 x 2160, compared to the Mark II’s 1920 x 1080, further enhancing the visual quality.
Another advantage of the Mark III is its higher maximum video frame rate. It can achieve 120fps, whereas the Mark II is limited to 60fps. This difference allows the Mark III to produce smoother slow-motion videos, providing more creative options for users.
Despite its lower score, the Mark II still has some merits. Its Full HD resolution and 60fps frame rate are sufficient for everyday video recording and casual use. However, it falls short when compared to the Mark III’s advanced video features.
Taking all these factors into account, the Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark III clearly excels in video capabilities. The Mark II may be suitable for casual users, but for those seeking higher quality and more creative options, the Mark III is the superior choice.
|
Video
|
Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II
|
Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark III
|
|
|
|
|
||
Video Indicates if this camera is capable of recording video. |  | | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max Video Resolution The best resolution this camera can capture video in. Modern cameras can capture up to 8K video. |  Full HD |  4K | |
Max Video Dimensions Video resolution measured by the greatest number of pixels possible in each frame, width by height. A higher resolution means more detail or clarity in your video. | 1920 x 1080 px | 4096 x 2160 px | |
Max Video Frame Rate How many frames per second your video will capture. Most cameras have options for multiple frame rates, depending on the resolution you shoot in. For a general video, 24p or 30p is the standard, but more serious filmmakers may need a higher frame rate for creative effect. | 60 p | 120 p | |
Time-Lapse Built In A built in time-lapse mode will allow continuous shooting throughout a prolonged period of time to be compressed into a sped up video. |  | | |
Video File Format Different cameras can record in various video file formats. The File format you record in can impact how you edit and use the files. | MOV, AVI | MPEG-4, MOV |
Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II vs OM-D E-M5 Mark III Features and Benefits
The Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark III emerges as the winner with a feature score of 83/100, outperforming the Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II, which scores 70/100. Both cameras share several specifications, such as a 3-inch screen size, touchscreen capability, flip screen, absence of GPS, and WIFI connectivity.
The E-M5 Mark III’s superiority lies in its higher screen resolution of 1,040,000 dots, compared to the E-M5 Mark II’s 1,037,000 dots. This difference provides a slightly better image viewing experience. Additionally, the E-M5 Mark III includes Bluetooth connectivity, a feature absent in the E-M5 Mark II. This addition allows for seamless pairing with compatible devices and enhances the camera’s overall usability.
On the other hand, the E-M5 Mark II does not surpass the E-M5 Mark III in any specific feature. Both cameras share many similarities, but the Mark III’s improved screen resolution and Bluetooth connectivity give it an edge over its predecessor.
Considering these points, the Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark III proves to be a better choice for photographers seeking enhanced features and connectivity. Its higher feature score reflects its superior specifications, making it a more appealing option for users. While the E-M5 Mark II remains a reliable camera, the E-M5 Mark III stands out with its additional offerings and improved viewing experience.
|
Features
|
Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II
|
Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark III
|
|
|
|
|
||
Built-in Flash A built-in flash will often be positioned right above the lens. This will automatically pop up when you activate it. |   | | |
|---|---|---|---|
External Flash External flashes are often connected through a hot shoe at the top of a camera, or a cable at the side of the camera. |  | | |
GPS GPS features in a camera will include location metadata to each of your photographs. |  | | |
Weather Sealing Weather sealing capabilities will give you more confidence when shooting in unfavourable conditions. |  | | |
Screen Type | LCD | LCD | |
Touch Screen Touchscreen allows you to change camera settings and access menus with a swipe of your finger, instead of using buttons. |  | | |
Screen Size |  3" | 3" | |
Screen Resolution Screen dots indicate the resolution of the LCD screen by including each sub pixel. | 1,037,000 dots | 1,040,000 dots | |
Flip Screen A flip screen (or articulating screen) is a second screen which can flip out from the side or top of the camera. This rotating screen allows you more freedom to take photos at different angles. |  | | |
Live View Live View feature allows you to see a continuous live video of what is being seen through your lens. |  | | |
Wi-Fi |  | | |
Bluetooth Bluetooth capabilities allow you wireless control of your camera with other external devices. |  | | |
Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II vs OM-D E-M5 Mark III Storage and Battery
The Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark III wins in the storage and battery category with a score of 35/100, while the Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II scores 21/100. Both cameras share similarities in storage and battery specifications. They each have one memory card slot and support SD, SDHC, and SDXC memory cards.
The Mark III outperforms the Mark II in two aspects. Firstly, it is UHS-II compatible, allowing for faster data transfer and overall better performance. Secondly, the Mark III offers USB charging, providing more convenience and flexibility in charging the camera’s battery.
On the other hand, the Mark II does not have any advantages over the Mark III in terms of storage and battery. Both cameras have the same battery life of 310 shots, and the only difference between their battery types is the model number.
Taking these factors into account, the Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark III proves to be the superior choice for storage and battery capabilities, offering faster memory card performance and the convenience of USB charging. The Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II does not provide any advantages in this category, making the Mark III the clear winner.
|
Storage and Battery
|
Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II
|
Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark III
|
|
|
|
|
||
Memory Card | SD / SDHC / SDXC | SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-II compatible) | |
|---|---|---|---|
Dual Memory Card Slots |  | | |
Battery Type | BLN-1 | BLS-50 | |
Battery Life Approximately how long this cameras battery will last measured by how many photographs you will be able to take. | 310 shots | 310 shots | |
USB Charging |  | |
|
DXOMARK Scores
Sensor scores tested by DXOMARK |
Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II
|
Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark III
|
|
Overall Score DXOMARK overall sensor score. | N/A | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Portrait (Color Depth) As described by DXOMARK 'The Portrait score in our camera sensor reviews defines color depth performance and its unit is a number of bits. A color depth of 22 bits is excellent; differences below 1 bit are barely noticeable.' | 23 bits | N/A | |
Landscape (Dynamic Range) As described by DXOMARK 'The Landscape score in our camera sensor tests defines the maximum dynamic range of the camera sensor and its unit is an exposure value (EV). A value of 12 EV is excellent with differences below 0.5 EV usually not noticeable.' | 12.4 EVs | N/A | |
Sports (Low-Light ISO) Described by DXOMARK as 'The maximal value of ISO sensitivity needed to reach a given value of Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR). The greater the value, the better' | 896 | N/A |
|
Scores
|
Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II
|
Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark III
|
Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II vs OM-D E-M5 Mark III – Our Verdict
Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II or the Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark III:
|
User Scores
|
Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II
|
Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark III
|
|
B&H photo video | N/A |
|---|