Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2000 / FZ2500 vs Sony Cyber-shot RX10 IV Comparison
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2000 / FZ2500
Sony Cyber-shot RX10 IV
Price | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Brand | Panasonic | Sony | |
Model | Lumix DMC-FZ2000 / FZ2500 | Cyber-shot RX10 IV | |
Released Refers to the year this camera was officially made available for sale. | 2016 | 2017 | |
Announcement Date Refers to the date the manufacturer publicly announced the upcoming release and general specs of this camera. | September 19, 2016 | December 09, 2017 | |
Camera Type |  Bridge | Bridge | |
Camera Size | |||
Camera Weight |
The Sony Cyber-shot RX10 IV takes the lead in our comparison with a score of 70/100, while the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2000 / FZ2500 trails behind with 63/100. Both cameras are bridge type and were released a year apart, with the Panasonic in 2016 and the Sony in 2017. They share similarities in size, with the Lumix measuring 138 x 102 x 135mm and the RX10 IV at 133 x 94 x 145mm.
The Sony RX10 IV outshines the Panasonic Lumix FZ2000/FZ2500 with its higher score, reflecting its superior performance and features. However, the Lumix has an advantage in weight, being lighter at 915g compared to the Sony’s 1095g. This makes the Panasonic more portable and convenient for on-the-go photography.
Despite the Panasonic’s lower score and older release date, it still offers a competitive option with a lower launch price of $1199, compared to the Sony’s $1699. This makes the Lumix a more budget-friendly choice for those seeking a capable bridge camera.
Taking all factors into consideration, the Sony Cyber-shot RX10 IV is the better camera with its higher score, but the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2000 / FZ2500 remains a viable alternative for those prioritizing weight and cost.
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2000 / FZ2500 vs Sony Cyber-shot RX10 IV Overview and Optics
The Sony Cyber-shot RX10 IV outperforms the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2000 / FZ2500 in optics with a score of 68/100 compared to the Panasonic’s 62/100. Both cameras share similarities in specifications, such as 20-megapixel CMOS sensors, 1″ sensor sizes, fixed lens mounts, and image stabilization.
The RX10 IV’s superiority in optics is evident in its faster shooting speed of 24 frames per second (fps), compared to the FZ2000/FZ2500’s 12 fps. Additionally, the Sony camera’s Bionz X processor contributes to its advanced image processing capabilities, resulting in a higher DXOMARK score of 82, while the Panasonic’s Venus Engine processor yields a score of 70.
However, the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2000/FZ2500 does have its advantages. Although it has a lower optics score, it remains a solid choice for those seeking a high-quality camera with a slightly lower price tag. The Panasonic camera’s specifications, such as the 20-megapixel CMOS sensor and image stabilization, are still competitive and provide satisfactory results for various photography purposes.
Taking all factors into account, the Sony Cyber-shot RX10 IV is the better option in terms of optics, with a faster shooting speed and superior image processing capabilities. Nonetheless, the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2000/FZ2500 is a viable alternative for those prioritizing budget constraints without sacrificing too much on performance.
|
Optics
|
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2000 / FZ2500
|
Sony Cyber-shot RX10 IV
|
|
|
|
|
||
Megapixels The higher the number of megapixels, the more detail the cameras sensor can capture. | 20 MP | 20 MP | |
|---|---|---|---|
Image Resolution Image resolution is measured in pixels and megapixels, width by height. The higher the number, the higher its resolution. | 5472 x 3648 px | 5472 x 3648 px | |
Sensor Type The camera sensor captures light and records the image. Sensors vary in physical size, the number of pixels, and quality. | CMOS | CMOS | |
Sensor Size The sensor size contributes to the overall quality as well as the dynamic and tonal range a camera can capture. As a rule of thumb, the more surface there is to read the light, the more information it will capture. | 13.2 x 8.8 mm | 13.2 x 8.8 mm | |
Sensor Format Refers to the most commonly used sensor sizes. |  1" | 1" | |
Frame Rate The number of sequential frames per second the camera can write to the memory card when shooting in burst or continuous mode. | 12 fps | 24 fps | |
Lens Mount The lens mount will tell you what type of lens range you can fit onto the camera body. Often the same camera company will have different lens ranges for different cameras. | Fixed | Fixed | |
Image Processor The image processor in the camera converts the information collected on the sensor for digital storage on the memory card. | Venus Engine | Bionz X | |
Aspect Ratio The aspect ratio refers to the proportional difference between width and height. The most popular aspect ratios are 3:2 and 4:3. |  3:2 | 3:2 | |
Minimum ISO (Native) Refers to the lowest native (or 'base') ISO setting. Lower ISO are less sensitive to light but make a cleaner image. | 125 | 100 | |
Maximum ISO (Native) Refers to the highest native (or 'base') ISO setting. Higher ISO is necessary for low-light situations or night photography, but higher ISOs often introduce grain or noise. | 12,800 | 12,800 | |
Minimum ISO (Expanded) Expanded (or extended) ISO is a digitally enhanced feature available on some cameras. It allows you to push beyond the native ISO range if necessary. | 80 | 64 | |
Maximum ISO (Expanded) Expanded (or extended) ISO is a digitally enhanced feature available on some cameras. It allows you to push beyond the native ISO range if necessary. | 25600 | 25600 | |
Minimum Shutter Speed The minimum shutter speed will tell you the longest exposure your camera can take without using an external accessory. | 60 s | 30 s | |
Maximum Shutter Speed The maximum shutter speed tells you the length inside 1 second the camera will capture. These can sometimes be extended with accessories such as extra external batteries. | 1/ 4000 s | 1/ 2000 s | |
Autofocus Points Autofocus points show where the camera is focusing graphically as squares or brackets in Live View or on an electronic viewfinder. These points are also used for light meter readings. | 49 | 315 | |
In-body Stabilization In-body Stabilization means the camera has a certain technology embedded that counteracts camera shake. |   | | |
Viewfinder Type The viewfinder type is either electronic or optical. Electronic viewfinders will have a small screen in the viewfinder. Optical viewfinders will use prisms and mirrors to look through the lens. | Electronic | Electronic | |
Viewfinder Resolution | 2,360,000 dots | 2 dots |
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2000 / FZ2500 vs Sony Cyber-shot RX10 IV Video Performance
The Sony Cyber-shot RX10 IV outperforms the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2000 / FZ2500 in video capabilities with a score of 77/100 compared to 69/100. Both cameras share some common specifications, such as 4K max video resolution and the lack of built-in time-lapse functionality.
The RX10 IV has a higher max video frame rate at 120fps, double the FZ2000 / FZ2500’s 60fps. This higher frame rate allows for smoother and more detailed slow-motion video capture, making the RX10 IV a better choice for those who prioritize this feature.
On the other hand, the FZ2000 / FZ2500 has a slightly larger max video dimensions at 4096 x 2160, compared to the RX10 IV’s 3840 x 2160. However, this difference in dimensions is relatively small and may not significantly impact the overall video quality.
Despite the larger dimensions, the FZ2000 / FZ2500 falls short in its video capabilities due to its lower frame rate. The RX10 IV’s higher frame rate offers more flexibility in capturing fast-paced action and producing smoother slow-motion footage.
In terms of video performance, the Sony Cyber-shot RX10 IV is the better option with its higher score and superior frame rate capabilities. The Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2000 / FZ2500 has a minor advantage in video dimensions but is not enough to outweigh the benefits of the RX10 IV.
|
Video
|
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2000 / FZ2500
|
Sony Cyber-shot RX10 IV
|
|
|
|
|
||
Video Indicates if this camera is capable of recording video. |  | | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max Video Resolution The best resolution this camera can capture video in. Modern cameras can capture up to 8K video. |  4K | 4K | |
Max Video Dimensions Video resolution measured by the greatest number of pixels possible in each frame, width by height. A higher resolution means more detail or clarity in your video. | 4096 x 2160 px | 3840 x 2160 px | |
Max Video Frame Rate How many frames per second your video will capture. Most cameras have options for multiple frame rates, depending on the resolution you shoot in. For a general video, 24p or 30p is the standard, but more serious filmmakers may need a higher frame rate for creative effect. | 60 p | 120 p | |
Time-Lapse Built In A built in time-lapse mode will allow continuous shooting throughout a prolonged period of time to be compressed into a sped up video. |   | | |
Video File Format Different cameras can record in various video file formats. The File format you record in can impact how you edit and use the files. | MPEG-4, AVCHD | AVCHD, XAVC S |
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2000 / FZ2500 vs Sony Cyber-shot RX10 IV Features and Benefits
The Sony Cyber-shot RX10 IV emerges as the winner in the feature comparison, scoring 83/100, while the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2000 / FZ2500 scores 70/100. Both cameras share several common specifications, including a 3-inch screen size, touchscreen functionality, flip screen, GPS absence, and the presence of WIFI and Bluetooth.
The Sony RX10 IV surpasses the Panasonic FZ2000 / FZ2500 with a higher screen resolution of 1,440,000 dots, compared to the Panasonic’s 1,040,000 dots. This higher resolution provides the Sony RX10 IV with a sharper and clearer display, enhancing the user experience while composing shots and reviewing images.
On the other hand, the Panasonic FZ2000 / FZ2500 still has its merits despite its lower feature score. Its features are on par with the Sony RX10 IV in many aspects, such as screen size, touchscreen, flip screen, and connectivity options. While the screen resolution is lower, it remains adequate for most users and should not be a dealbreaker.
In comparing the features of these cameras, the Sony Cyber-shot RX10 IV proves to be the superior choice due to its higher screen resolution, which offers a better user experience. The Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2000 / FZ2500, while scoring lower, maintains competitive features and may still be a suitable option for users who prioritize other aspects of a camera over screen resolution.
|
Features
|
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2000 / FZ2500
|
Sony Cyber-shot RX10 IV
|
|
|
|
|
||
Built-in Flash A built-in flash will often be positioned right above the lens. This will automatically pop up when you activate it. |  | | |
|---|---|---|---|
External Flash External flashes are often connected through a hot shoe at the top of a camera, or a cable at the side of the camera. |  | | |
GPS GPS features in a camera will include location metadata to each of your photographs. |  | | |
Weather Sealing Weather sealing capabilities will give you more confidence when shooting in unfavourable conditions. |  | | |
Screen Type | LCD | TFT LCD | |
Touch Screen Touchscreen allows you to change camera settings and access menus with a swipe of your finger, instead of using buttons. |  | | |
Screen Size |  3" | 3" | |
Screen Resolution Screen dots indicate the resolution of the LCD screen by including each sub pixel. | 1,040,000 dots | 1,440,000 dots | |
Flip Screen A flip screen (or articulating screen) is a second screen which can flip out from the side or top of the camera. This rotating screen allows you more freedom to take photos at different angles. |  | | |
Live View Live View feature allows you to see a continuous live video of what is being seen through your lens. |  | | |
Wi-Fi |  | | |
Bluetooth Bluetooth capabilities allow you wireless control of your camera with other external devices. |  | | |
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2000 / FZ2500 vs Sony Cyber-shot RX10 IV Storage and Battery
The Sony Cyber-shot RX10 IV outperforms the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2000 / FZ2500 in storage and battery, scoring 37/100 compared to the Panasonic’s 35/100. Both cameras have one memory card slot and accept SD, SDHC, and SDXC cards. They also support USB charging.
The RX10 IV has an advantage in battery life, providing 400 shots per charge with its NP-FW50 battery, while the FZ2000/2500 offers 350 shots using the DMW-BLC12 battery. Additionally, the Sony model accepts Memory Stick Duo, Pro Duo, and Pro-HG Duo cards, giving users more flexibility in storage options.
Although the Panasonic Lumix FZ2000/2500 has a slightly lower score, it still provides adequate battery life and storage capabilities for most users. Both cameras offer reliable performance in these aspects, but the Sony RX10 IV holds a slight edge due to its longer battery life and expanded memory card compatibility.
|
Storage and Battery
|
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2000 / FZ2500
|
Sony Cyber-shot RX10 IV
|
|
|
|
|
||
Memory Card | SD / SDHC / SDXC | SD / SDHC / SDXC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro-HG Duo | |
|---|---|---|---|
Dual Memory Card Slots |  | | |
Battery Type | DMW-BLC12 | NP-FW50 | |
Battery Life Approximately how long this cameras battery will last measured by how many photographs you will be able to take. | 350 shots | 400 shots | |
USB Charging |  | |
|
DXOMARK Scores
Sensor scores tested by DXOMARK |
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2000 / FZ2500
|
Sony Cyber-shot RX10 IV
|
|
Overall Score DXOMARK overall sensor score. | N/A | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Portrait (Color Depth) As described by DXOMARK 'The Portrait score in our camera sensor reviews defines color depth performance and its unit is a number of bits. A color depth of 22 bits is excellent; differences below 1 bit are barely noticeable.' | 23 bits | N/A | |
Landscape (Dynamic Range) As described by DXOMARK 'The Landscape score in our camera sensor tests defines the maximum dynamic range of the camera sensor and its unit is an exposure value (EV). A value of 12 EV is excellent with differences below 0.5 EV usually not noticeable.' | 12.6 EVs | N/A | |
Sports (Low-Light ISO) Described by DXOMARK as 'The maximal value of ISO sensitivity needed to reach a given value of Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR). The greater the value, the better' | 538 | N/A |
|
Scores
|
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2000 / FZ2500
|
Sony Cyber-shot RX10 IV
|
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2000 / FZ2500 vs Sony Cyber-shot RX10 IV – Our Verdict
Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2000 / FZ2500 or the Sony Cyber-shot RX10 IV:
- Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 II vs Lumix DMC-FZ2000 / FZ2500
- Nikon Coolpix P1000 vs Sony Cyber-shot RX10 IV
- Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2000 / FZ2500 vs Lumix FZ80 / FZ82
- Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III vs Cyber-shot RX10 IV
- Leica V-Lux 5 vs Sony Cyber-shot RX10 IV
- Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2000 / FZ2500 vs Lumix FZ300 / FZ330
|
User Scores
|
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2000 / FZ2500
|
Sony Cyber-shot RX10 IV
|
|
B&H photo video |
|---|