Sigma fp vs FP L Comparison

The Sigma fp L triumphs over the Sigma fp with a score of 69/100, compared to the fp’s 66/100. Both cameras are mirrorless and share the same dimensions of 113 x 70 x 45mm. The fp L is slightly heavier at 427g, while the fp weighs 422g.

The fp L’s higher score is justified by its improvements over the fp. Launched in 2021 at $2499, it offers advanced features compared to the fp, which was released in 2019 with a launch price of $1899.

However, the Sigma fp still holds its own with its lighter weight and more affordable price. For those seeking a budget-friendly option, the fp remains a viable choice.

Taking all factors into account, the Sigma fp L outperforms the fp, making it the superior choice for photographers seeking enhanced features and performance. On the other hand, the fp provides a cost-effective alternative for those prioritizing price and weight.

Sigma fp vs FP L Overview and Optics

The Sigma fp L outperforms the Sigma fp in optics with a score of 71/100 compared to the Sigma fp’s 67/100. Both cameras share several specifications, including a CMOS sensor, full frame sensor size, Leica L lens mount, and lack of image stabilization. Their DXOMARK scores for the sensors are equal at 72.

The Sigma fp L’s superior optics are primarily due to its higher megapixel count of 61, compared to the Sigma fp’s 25. This significant increase in resolution allows the fp L to capture more detail and produce sharper images. Additionally, the fp L maintains the same sensor quality as the fp, as evidenced by their equal DXOMARK scores, despite the higher megapixel count. This means the fp L does not sacrifice sensor performance for increased resolution.

The Sigma fp, however, has a faster shooting speed of 18 frames per second (fps) compared to the fp L’s 10 fps. This makes the fp better suited for capturing fast-moving subjects and action photography. Despite this advantage, the fp’s lower resolution limits its overall image quality compared to the fp L.

Considering the optics, the Sigma fp L is the better choice for photographers seeking high-resolution images without compromising sensor performance. The Sigma fp, on the other hand, is better for those prioritizing faster shooting speeds for action photography. Ultimately, the decision between these cameras depends on the specific needs and preferences of the photographer.

When comparing the video capabilities of the Sigma fp and the Sigma fp L, both cameras have an equal score of 91 out of 100. This shows that they are on par in terms of their video performance. Both cameras share key specifications, including a maximum video resolution of 4K, maximum video dimensions of 3840 x 2160, a maximum video frame rate of 120fps, and time-lapse functionality built in.

The Sigma fp has the same video capabilities as the Sigma fp L, making it a strong contender in this comparison. It offers high-quality 4K video recording, fast frame rates for smooth action footage, and the convenience of time-lapse functionality. These features make the Sigma fp a reliable choice for videographers looking for a compact and capable camera.

On the other hand, the Sigma fp L, despite having the same score, does not outperform the Sigma fp in any specific area of video performance. However, it is essential to note that it maintains the same high-quality video capabilities as the Sigma fp. This means that the Sigma fp L is also a reliable choice for videographers who value high-quality video performance in a compact camera.

In comparing the video capabilities of the Sigma fp and the Sigma fp L, it is clear that both cameras are equally proficient in delivering high-quality video performance. With an identical score of 91 and shared specifications, neither camera has a distinct advantage over the other in terms of video capabilities. As a result, both the Sigma fp and the Sigma fp L are excellent choices for those seeking a compact camera with impressive video performance.

The Sigma fp and Sigma fp L both have a feature score of 74/100, making them equal in this aspect. They share common specifications, including a 3.2-inch screen size, 2,100,000-dot screen resolution, touchscreen, flip screen, and the absence of GPS, Wi-Fi, and Bluetooth.

The winning camera cannot be determined based on the feature score, as both cameras have identical scores and specifications. However, there might be other factors to consider when choosing between these two cameras, such as price, sensor size, and overall performance.

Despite having the same features, the Sigma fp L might be better for some users due to its higher resolution sensor, allowing for more detailed images. On the other hand, the Sigma fp could be a better option for those who prioritize compact size and lighter weight for easy portability.

It is essential to evaluate individual needs and preferences when choosing between these two cameras. The feature score does not necessarily dictate which camera is better, but rather provides a basis for comparison. Both cameras have their advantages, and the choice ultimately comes down to the specific requirements of the user.

In comparing the Sigma fp and Sigma fp L, it is clear that their features are identical, resulting in the same feature score. The choice between these two cameras depends on factors beyond the feature score, such as sensor size, image quality, and overall performance. It is crucial to assess individual needs and preferences before making a decision.

The Sigma fp outperforms the Sigma fp L in storage and battery with a score of 29/100, compared to the fp L’s 27/100. Both cameras have one memory card slot and accept SD, SDHC, and SDXC cards, with compatibility for UHS-II. They also share the same battery type, BP-51, and support USB charging.

The Sigma fp has a superior battery life of 280 shots, offering 40 more shots than the fp L’s 240 shots. This advantage allows for more extended shooting sessions without needing to replace or recharge the battery. In contrast, the Sigma fp L does not have any notable benefits in storage and battery compared to the Sigma fp.

Considering the storage and battery aspects, the Sigma fp is the better option due to its longer battery life. The two cameras share similar storage capabilities, but the fp’s advantage in battery life gives it the edge over the fp L.

Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Sigma fp or the Sigma fp L:

• Olympus PEN E-PL7 vs Sigma fp