Sigma fp vs Sony a7C Comparison

The Sony a7C outperforms the Sigma fp with a score of 78/100 compared to 66/100. Both cameras are mirrorless and were released a year apart, with the Sigma fp in 2019 and the Sony a7C in 2020. They share similarities in size and weight: the Sigma fp measures 113 x 70 x 45mm and weighs 422g, while the Sony a7C measures 124 x 71 x 60mm and weighs 509g.

The Sony a7C’s higher score shows its superior performance. It is a more recent model, and its launch price of $1799 is lower than the Sigma fp’s $1899, making it more affordable. The Sigma fp, on the other hand, has the advantage of being slightly lighter and more compact.

Considering the scores, release dates, and prices, the Sony a7C offers better value and performance than the Sigma fp. While the Sigma fp has its merits in size and weight, the Sony a7C is a more well-rounded choice for photographers.

Sigma fp vs Sony a7C Overview and Optics

The Sony a7C outperforms the Sigma fp in optics, scoring 80/100 compared to the Sigma fp’s 67/100. Both cameras share some common specifications, including a CMOS sensor type, full-frame sensor size, and similar megapixel counts, with the Sigma fp having 25 megapixels and the Sony a7C having 24.2 megapixels.

The Sony a7C has a superior DXOMARK sensor score of 95, while the Sigma fp has a lower score of 72. This difference highlights the better image quality produced by the Sony a7C. Additionally, the Sony a7C is equipped with the Bionz X processor, which contributes to its faster image processing capabilities. The Sigma fp’s processor remains unspecified. The Sony a7C also has the advantage of built-in image stabilization, which the Sigma fp lacks, resulting in steadier shots and improved low-light performance.

Despite the lower overall score, the Sigma fp does have some advantages over the Sony a7C. It has a faster shooting speed of 18 compared to the Sony a7C’s 10, allowing for quicker capture of action shots. The Sigma fp also has a slightly higher megapixel count, which can provide more detailed images in certain situations.

The optics of the Sony a7C are superior to those of the Sigma fp due to its higher DXOMARK sensor score, better processor, and built-in image stabilization. The Sigma fp, on the other hand, has a faster shooting speed and a marginally higher megapixel count. Both cameras have their strengths and weaknesses, but the Sony a7C is the clear winner when it comes to optics performance.

The Sigma fp outperforms the Sony a7C in video capabilities, scoring 91 out of 100, while the Sony a7C scores 70. Both cameras share some common specifications, such as 4K maximum video resolution, 3840 x 2160 maximum video dimensions, and built-in time-lapse functionality.

The Sigma fp excels with a maximum video frame rate of 120fps, providing smoother slow-motion footage and more flexibility in post-production. This high frame rate allows for greater creative possibilities, making it the superior choice for videographers who prioritize capturing fast-paced action or creating dramatic slow-motion sequences.

On the other hand, the Sony a7C has a maximum video frame rate of 30fps, which is still suitable for general video recording. While it may not offer the same slow-motion capabilities as the Sigma fp, it can still deliver high-quality 4K footage and time-lapse videos, which may be sufficient for users with less demanding video needs.

In comparing the video capabilities of the Sigma fp and Sony a7C, it is clear that the Sigma fp’s higher video score of 91 is a result of its superior maximum video frame rate. Videographers seeking advanced slow-motion features and greater flexibility in post-production will find the Sigma fp to be a better option. The Sony a7C, with its video score of 70, is still a capable camera for those with less demanding video requirements, offering high-quality 4K resolution and time-lapse functionality.

The Sony a7C wins the features comparison with a score of 81/100, outperforming the Sigma fp, which scores 74/100. Both cameras share some common specifications, including a touchscreen, flip screen, and the absence of GPS. However, there are notable differences between the two cameras that contribute to the Sony a7C’s higher score.

The Sony a7C boasts a smaller screen size of 3 inches compared to the Sigma fp’s 3.2 inches. Despite the smaller size, the a7C’s screen resolution is significantly lower at 921,600 dots, while the Sigma fp features a higher screen resolution of 2,100,000 dots. This difference in resolution may not be a significant factor for some users, but it is worth considering.

The winning camera, the Sony a7C, offers additional features that the Sigma fp lacks, such as WiFi and Bluetooth capabilities. These connectivity options allow for easier file transfer and remote camera control, providing a more convenient user experience.

On the other hand, the Sigma fp has a larger screen and higher screen resolution, which may be appealing to users who prioritize image clarity and detail while composing and reviewing shots. However, the absence of WiFi and Bluetooth may be a disadvantage for those who value connectivity and convenience.

Taking these points into account, the Sony a7C emerges as the better camera in terms of features, primarily due to its WiFi and Bluetooth capabilities. Meanwhile, the Sigma fp offers a larger screen and higher resolution, but its lack of connectivity options may be a drawback for some users. Ultimately, the choice between these two cameras will depend on individual preferences and priorities.

The Sony a7C outperforms the Sigma fp in storage and battery, scoring 45/100 compared to the Sigma fp’s 29/100. Both cameras have one memory card slot and accept SD, SDHC, and SDXC (UHS-II compatible) memory cards. They also offer USB charging capabilities.

The Sony a7C’s superiority lies in its longer battery life, providing 740 shots per charge with its NP-FZ100 battery, more than twice the capacity of the Sigma fp’s 280 shots with its BP-51 battery. This advantage makes the Sony a7C more suitable for extended shooting sessions and reduces the need for frequent battery changes.

On the other hand, the Sigma fp does not surpass the Sony a7C in storage and battery performance. Both cameras share the same memory card compatibility and USB charging feature, leaving the Sigma fp at a disadvantage due to its shorter battery life.

To sum up, the Sony a7C is the better choice for those prioritizing longer battery life, while the Sigma fp falls short in this aspect. Both cameras, however, offer similar storage options and convenient USB charging.

Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Sigma fp or the Sony a7C:

• Sony a7 III vs a7C
• Sony a6600 vs a7C
• Sony a7 IV vs a7C
• Canon EOS M6 Mark II vs Sony a7C
• Sony a6400 vs a7C
• Canon EOS R7 vs Sony a7C