Sony a6000 vs a6600 Comparison

The Sony a6600 outperforms the Sony a6000 with a score of 75/100 compared to the a6000’s 57/100. Both cameras are mirrorless and share the same dimensions of 120 x 67mm, but the a6600 is slightly thicker at 69mm compared to the a6000’s 45mm. The a6600 is also heavier, weighing 503g, while the a6000 weighs 344g.

The a6600’s higher score signifies its superior features and performance, justifying its higher launch price of $1200 compared to the a6000’s $799. The a6000, however, has the advantage of being lighter and more compact, making it more suitable for those prioritizing portability.

When considering these specifications, the Sony a6600 is the clear winner in terms of overall performance, while the Sony a6000 remains a viable option for those seeking a lighter and more affordable camera.

Sony a6000 vs a6600 Overview and Optics

The Sony a6600 outperforms the Sony a6000 in optics with a score of 76/100, a 9-point difference from the a6000’s score of 67/100. Both cameras share several specifications, including 24-megapixel resolution, 11 fps shooting speed, CMOS sensor type, Bionz X processor, a DXOMARK score of 82 for the sensor, APS-C sensor size, and a Sony E lens mount.

The a6600’s superior performance is primarily due to its in-body image stabilization feature, which the a6000 lacks. This image stabilization compensates for camera shake, resulting in sharper images, especially in low-light conditions or when using longer focal lengths. This advantage makes the a6600 more versatile and suitable for various photography situations, from handheld shooting to capturing fast-moving subjects.

On the other hand, the a6000 still delivers excellent image quality despite its lower score. Its 24.3-megapixel resolution, slightly higher than the a6600’s 24.2 megapixels, allows for detailed and high-quality images. However, this minor difference in resolution does not significantly impact the overall image quality or performance of the two cameras.

Ultimately, the Sony a6600 offers better optical performance than the Sony a6000, primarily due to its image stabilization feature. This advantage makes it a more versatile and reliable camera for various photography situations. While the a6000 still provides great image quality, its lack of image stabilization may limit its performance in specific shooting conditions. Therefore, the a6600 is the better choice for photographers seeking enhanced stability and versatility in their camera’s optics.

The Sony a6600 outperforms the Sony a6000 in video capabilities, scoring 91/100 compared to the a6000’s 56/100. Both cameras have some common specifications, but the a6600 surpasses the a6000 in various aspects.

Both the Sony a6000 and a6600 offer max video resolutions, with the a6000 providing Full HD at 1920 x 1080 and the a6600 offering 4K at 3840 x 2160. They also have max video frame rates, with the a6000 reaching 60fps and the a6600 going up to 100fps. However, the a6600’s higher resolution and frame rate clearly make it a superior choice for video recording.

The a6600’s advantage extends to its built-in time-lapse functionality, which the a6000 lacks. This feature allows users to create stunning time-lapse videos without needing additional equipment or software, making the a6600 more versatile and convenient for videographers.

Although the Sony a6000 does not excel in video capabilities compared to the a6600, it still offers decent video quality at Full HD resolution and 60fps. This may be sufficient for casual users or those who do not prioritize video recording in their photography needs. However, the a6600 is undoubtedly the better option for those seeking professional-level video quality and additional features.

When comparing the Sony a6000 and a6600, it is evident that the a6600 is the superior choice for video capabilities due to its higher resolution, faster frame rate, and built-in time-lapse functionality. The a6000 may be suitable for casual users, but the a6600 is the clear winner for those seeking exceptional video quality and performance.

The Sony a6600 triumphs over the Sony a6000 with a feature score of 81/100 compared to the a6000’s 41/100. Both cameras share some common specifications, such as a 3-inch screen size, 921,600-dot screen resolution, flip screen, no GPS, and WIFI capabilities.

The Sony a6600 outperforms the a6000 in several aspects. First, it has a touchscreen, which makes it more user-friendly and efficient for photographers to navigate through settings and features. Second, the a6600 includes Bluetooth connectivity, allowing seamless connection with other devices and easier sharing of images.

On the other hand, the Sony a6000 does not offer any significant advantages over the a6600. It lacks both a touchscreen and Bluetooth connectivity. Its only redeeming quality is its flip screen, which is also present in the a6600.

Considering the above points, it is evident that the Sony a6600 is superior to the Sony a6000 in terms of features. The touchscreen and Bluetooth capabilities make it more versatile and convenient for photographers, while the a6000 does not provide any unique benefits. Therefore, the higher feature score of the a6600 accurately reflects its better performance compared to the a6000.

The Sony a6600 outperforms the Sony a6000 in storage and battery with a score of 48/100 compared to the a6000’s 21/100. Both cameras have one memory card slot and accept SD/SDHC/SDXC and Memory Stick Pro Duo cards. However, the a6600 has a significant advantage in battery life, offering 810 shots per charge compared to the a6000’s 360 shots. The a6600 uses the NP-FZ100 battery, while the a6000 relies on the NP-FW50 battery.

Additionally, the Sony a6600 offers USB charging, making it more convenient for on-the-go users. The a6000 lacks this feature. The only advantage the a6000 has in this category is its compatibility with Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo cards, which the a6600 does not support.

Considering the longer battery life and USB charging capabilities, the Sony a6600 proves to be the superior choice in terms of storage and battery. While the a6000 has the slight edge in memory card compatibility, it falls short in other aspects, making the a6600 the clear winner.

Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Sony a6000 or the Sony a6600:

• Sony a6400 vs a6600
• Fujifilm X-T5 vs Sony a6600
• Sony a6600 vs a7C
• Sony a6000 vs a6400
• Canon EOS M50 vs Sony a6000
• Sony a6600 vs a7 III