CameraReviews.com
menu
Hi Camera Lovers 👋 If you buy a camera through our referral links, you support our site at no cost to you 😉 Full info here.

Sony a6400 vs Sony NEX-5T
Comparison

Optics
Video
Features
Storage & Battery

Sony a6400

sony a6400
Winner!
70%

Sony NEX-5T

Sony NEX-5T
53%
Sony a6400
vs
Sony NEX-5T
Price
Brand
Sony
Sony
Model
a6400
NEX-5T
Released
2019
2013
Announcement Date
January 15, 2019
August 27, 2013
Camera Type
Mirrorless
Mirrorless
Camera Size
Camera Weight
Optics
Optics
68%
55%
Megapixels
24.2 MP
16.1 MP
Image Resolution
6000 x 4000 px
4912 x 3264 px
Sensor Type
CMOS
CMOS
Sensor Size
15.6 x 23.5 mm
15.6 x 23.4 mm
Sensor Format
APS-C
APS-C
Frame Rate
11 fps
10 fps
Lens Mount
Sony E
Sony E
Image Processor
Bionz X
Bionz
Aspect Ratio
3:2
4:3
Minimum ISO (Native)
100
100
Maximum ISO (Native)
32,000
25,600
Minimum ISO (Expanded)
100
100
Maximum ISO (Expanded)
102400
25600
Minimum Shutter Speed
30 s
30 s
Maximum Shutter Speed
1/ 4000 s
1/ 4000 s
Autofocus Points
425
99
In-body Stabilization
Viewfinder Type
Electronic
None
Viewfinder Resolution
2,359,296 dots
N/A
Video
Video
91%
56%
Video
Max Video Resolution
4K
Full HD
Max Video Dimensions
3840 x 2160 px
1920 x 1080 px
Max Video Frame Rate
120 p
60 p
Time-Lapse Built In
Video File Format
MPEG-4, AVCHD Ver. 2.0, XAVC S
MPEG-4
Features
Features
81%
54%
Built-in Flash
External Flash
GPS
Weather Sealing
Screen Type
LCD
LCD
Touch Screen
Screen Size
3"
3"
Screen Resolution
921,600 dots
921,600 dots
Flip Screen
Live View
Wi-Fi
Bluetooth
Storage and Battery
Storage and Battery
37%
21%
Memory Card
SD / SDHC / SDXC, Memory Stick Duo (UHS-I compatible)
SD / SDHC / SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo / Pro-HG Duo
Dual Memory Card Slots
Battery Type
NP-FW50
NP-FW50
Battery Life
410 shots
330 shots
USB Charging
DXOMARK Scores
Sensor scores tested by DXOMARK
Overall Score
83%
78%
Portrait (Color Depth)
24 bits
23.6 bits
Landscape (Dynamic Range)
13.6 EVs
13 EVs
Sports (Low-Light ISO)
1431
1015
Scores
Main Features
92%
N/A
Extra Features
80%
N/A
Construction and Durability
93%
N/A
Handling and Ergonomics
87%
N/A
Value for Money
85%
N/A
Total Score
87%
N/A
User Scores
Spotted a mistake with these specs? Please let us know so we can update it!