CameraReview

Canon EF 100mm F/2 USM vs Canon EF 100mm F/2.8 Macro USM — Which Is Better?

Canon EF 100mm F/2 USM versus Canon EF 100mm F/2.8 Macro USM
Side by side36 specifications
Canon · f/2 · Canon EF mount Canon EF 100mm F/2 USM
51
SCORE
Canon · f/2.8 · Canon EF mount Canon EF 100mm F/2.8 Macro USM
51
SCORE
Canon EF 100mm F/2 USM
Canon EF 100mm F/2.8 Macro USM
General
Read the General Comparison

General

The Canon EF 100mm F/2 USM and the Canon EF 100mm F/2.8 Macro USM are both full-frame prime lenses for the Canon EF mount on the Canon EOS system, released in 1991 and 2000 respectively. They share the same 100mm focal length, so both frame portraits, details and compressed landscapes identically from the same position.

The real choice between them is speed versus close-up reach. The F/2 offers a wider maximum aperture, while the Macro delivers life-size magnification for close-up work.

Release Year 19912000
Production Status
ⓘ
Current status of lens manufacturing (e.g., in production, discontinued).
DiscontinuedIn Production
Lens Mount
ⓘ
The lens mount will tell you what type of lens range you can fit onto the camera body. Often the same camera company will have different lens ranges for different cameras.
Canon EFCanon EF
System
ⓘ
Indicates which camera system the lens is designed to attach to.
Canon EOSCanon EOS
Maximum Format
ⓘ
Largest sensor size compatible with the lens.
Full FrameFull Frame
Physical43/10043/100
Read the Physical Comparison

Physical

The F/2 is the smaller, lighter lens to carry and pack. It measures 74 mm long and weighs 460 g, while the Macro runs 119 mm long and weighs 600 g. Diameters are closer, at 75 mm against 79 mm.

A useful match is that both accept front filters and both use the same 58 mm thread, so one set of 58 mm polarisers and ND filters fits either lens without adapters.

Lens Weight 460 g600 g
Lens Diameter
ⓘ
Width of the lens at its widest point
75 mm79 mm
Lens Length
ⓘ
How long the lens is from front to back.
74 mm119 mm
Front Filter Compatible
ⓘ
Some lenses are compatible with front filters, some are compatible with back filters and some are compatible with both. Front filters are usually more convenient to add and remove.
YesYes
Front Filter Size
ⓘ
Diameter of attachable filters.
58 mm58 mm
Optics80/10080/100
Read the Optics Comparison

Optics

The Macro USM is the clear choice for close-up photography: it focuses as near as 31 cm and reaches 1x life-size magnification, enough to fill the frame with a flower, insect or jewellery detail. The F/2 focuses no closer than 90 cm and stops at 0.14x magnification, which limits it to conventional subject distances.

The F/2 answers with a wider f/2 maximum aperture against f/2.8 on the Macro. That admits more light for portraits and dim indoor venues, with shallower depth of field for background separation. Both lenses offer autofocus plus a manual focusing ring for fine control.

Focal Range
ⓘ
Shortest to longest focal length of the lens (zoom range start - end )
100 mm100 mm
Aperture Range
ⓘ
Largest aperture at the lens's shortest focal length to longest focal length (aperture range start - end)
22.8
Focal Length Angle of View 24.415582858783463°24.415582858783463°
Flange Focal Distance
ⓘ
Distance from lens mount to sensor.
44 mm44 mm
Diaphragm Type
ⓘ
Structure and design of the aperture
AutomaticAutomatic
Blades
ⓘ
Number of diaphragm blades in aperture
80208020
Zoom Lens
ⓘ
Zoom allows you to vary the focal length, change between long shots and close-ups
✗✗
Closest Focusing Distance
ⓘ
Minimum distance for a subject to be in focus.
90 cm0150031 cm01500
Maximum Magnification
ⓘ
Largest size a subject can be reproduced
0.14x1x
Autofocus Mode YesYes
Manual Mode YesYes
Manual Focusing Ring YesYes
Features
Read the Features Comparison

Features

Protection and assistive features match: neither lens offers image stabilization, weather sealing, a fluorine coating or teleconverter support. Without stabilization, handheld work at 100mm relies on shutter speed and technique, so both lenses benefit from a faster shutter or a support in low light.

Weather Sealing
ⓘ
Weather sealing capabilities will give you more confidence when shooting in unfavourable conditions.
✗✗
Fluorine Coating
ⓘ
Coating to repel water and oil from lens elements.
✗✗
Built In Lens Hood ✗✗
Lens Hood Type RoundRound
Teleconverter
ⓘ
A teleconverter (extender) is an extra piece of equipment that fits between the lens and the camera body to enhance magnification
✗✗
Image Stabilization ✗✗
Construction23/10023/100
Read the Construction Comparison

Construction

The Macro carries the larger optical formula, 12 elements in 8 groups against 8 elements in 6 groups for the F/2. Neither lens uses aspherical or special dispersion elements in its design.

Both use internal focusing, so the barrel does not extend as focus changes. That helps when working close to a subject and keeps the lens at a constant length.

Elements
ⓘ
Lens elements refer to individual pieces of glass within the lens.
812
Groups 68
Aspherical Elements
ⓘ
The number of aspherical lens elements which can help correct aberrations such as spherical aberration.
00
Bi Aspherical Elements
ⓘ
Elements with two non-spherical surfaces
00
Low Dispersion
ⓘ
Elements that reduce chromatic aberration
00
Super Low Dispersion
ⓘ
Advanced elements further reducing chromatic aberration
00
CA Reduction
ⓘ
Built-in features to reduce chromatic aberration
00
Internal Focusing
ⓘ
Internal Focusing means that the lens does not change in size during focusing, and the front element does not rotate.
YesYes
Read: Verdict

Verdict

Buy the Canon EF 100mm F/2.8 Macro USM for close-up photography: its 31 cm close focus and life-size 1x magnification open up macro work the F/2 cannot do. Buy the Canon EF 100mm F/2 USM for portraits and available-light shooting, where its f/2 aperture admits more light than the Macro's f/2.8 for dim interiors and evening events. Beyond those roles, both share the Canon EF mount and full-frame coverage.

Your comparison

Choose two to four lenses.