Canon EF 100mm F/2 USM vs Canon EF 100mm F/2.8 Macro USM — Which Is Better?
Side by side36 specifications |
Canon · f/2 · Canon EF mount
Canon EF 100mm F/2 USM
51
SCORE
|
Canon · f/2.8 · Canon EF mount
Canon EF 100mm F/2.8 Macro USM
51
SCORE
|
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | |
| General | ||
Read the General ComparisonGeneralThe Canon EF 100mm F/2 USM and the Canon EF 100mm F/2.8 Macro USM are both full-frame prime lenses for the Canon EF mount on the Canon EOS system, released in 1991 and 2000 respectively. They share the same 100mm focal length, so both frame portraits, details and compressed landscapes identically from the same position. The real choice between them is speed versus close-up reach. The F/2 offers a wider maximum aperture, while the Macro delivers life-size magnification for close-up work. | ||
| Release Year | 1991 | 2000 |
Production Status ⓘCurrent status of lens manufacturing (e.g., in production, discontinued). |
||
Lens Mount ⓘThe lens mount will tell you what type of lens range you can fit onto the camera body. Often the same camera company will have different lens ranges for different cameras. |
Canon EF | Canon EF |
System ⓘIndicates which camera system the lens is designed to attach to. |
Canon EOS | Canon EOS |
Maximum Format ⓘLargest sensor size compatible with the lens. |
||
| Physical | 43/100 | 43/100 |
Read the Physical ComparisonPhysicalThe F/2 is the smaller, lighter lens to carry and pack. It measures 74 mm long and weighs 460 g, while the Macro runs 119 mm long and weighs 600 g. Diameters are closer, at 75 mm against 79 mm. A useful match is that both accept front filters and both use the same 58 mm thread, so one set of 58 mm polarisers and ND filters fits either lens without adapters. | ||
| Lens Weight | 460 g | 600 g |
Lens Diameter ⓘWidth of the lens at its widest point |
75 mm | 79 mm |
Lens Length ⓘHow long the lens is from front to back. |
74 mm | 119 mm |
Front Filter Compatible ⓘSome lenses are compatible with front filters, some are compatible with back filters and some are compatible with both. Front filters are usually more convenient to add and remove. |
||
Front Filter Size ⓘDiameter of attachable filters. |
58 mm | 58 mm |
| Optics | 80/100 | 80/100 |
Read the Optics ComparisonOpticsThe Macro USM is the clear choice for close-up photography: it focuses as near as 31 cm and reaches 1x life-size magnification, enough to fill the frame with a flower, insect or jewellery detail. The F/2 focuses no closer than 90 cm and stops at 0.14x magnification, which limits it to conventional subject distances. The F/2 answers with a wider f/2 maximum aperture against f/2.8 on the Macro. That admits more light for portraits and dim indoor venues, with shallower depth of field for background separation. Both lenses offer autofocus plus a manual focusing ring for fine control. | ||
Focal Range ⓘShortest to longest focal length of the lens (zoom range start - end ) |
100 mm | 100 mm |
Aperture Range ⓘLargest aperture at the lens's shortest focal length to longest focal length (aperture range start - end) |
2 | 2.8 |
| Focal Length Angle of View | 24.415582858783463° | 24.415582858783463° |
Flange Focal Distance ⓘDistance from lens mount to sensor. |
44 mm | 44 mm |
Diaphragm Type ⓘStructure and design of the aperture |
||
Blades ⓘNumber of diaphragm blades in aperture |
8020 | 8020 |
Zoom Lens ⓘZoom allows you to vary the focal length, change between long shots and close-ups |
✗ | ✗ |
Closest Focusing Distance ⓘMinimum distance for a subject to be in focus. |
90 cm01500 | 31 cm01500 |
Maximum Magnification ⓘLargest size a subject can be reproduced |
0.14x | 1x |
| Autofocus Mode | ||
| Manual Mode | ||
| Manual Focusing Ring | ||
| Features | ||
Read the Features ComparisonFeaturesProtection and assistive features match: neither lens offers image stabilization, weather sealing, a fluorine coating or teleconverter support. Without stabilization, handheld work at 100mm relies on shutter speed and technique, so both lenses benefit from a faster shutter or a support in low light. | ||
Weather Sealing ⓘWeather sealing capabilities will give you more confidence when shooting in unfavourable conditions. |
✗ | ✗ |
Fluorine Coating ⓘCoating to repel water and oil from lens elements. |
✗ | ✗ |
| Built In Lens Hood | ✗ | ✗ |
| Lens Hood Type | ||
Teleconverter ⓘA teleconverter (extender) is an extra piece of equipment that fits between the lens and the camera body to enhance magnification |
✗ | ✗ |
| Image Stabilization | ✗ | ✗ |
| Construction | 23/100 | 23/100 |
Read the Construction ComparisonConstructionThe Macro carries the larger optical formula, 12 elements in 8 groups against 8 elements in 6 groups for the F/2. Neither lens uses aspherical or special dispersion elements in its design. Both use internal focusing, so the barrel does not extend as focus changes. That helps when working close to a subject and keeps the lens at a constant length. | ||
Elements ⓘLens elements refer to individual pieces of glass within the lens. |
8 | 12 |
| Groups | 6 | 8 |
Aspherical Elements ⓘThe number of aspherical lens elements which can help correct aberrations such as spherical aberration. |
0 | 0 |
Bi Aspherical Elements ⓘElements with two non-spherical surfaces |
0 | 0 |
Low Dispersion ⓘElements that reduce chromatic aberration |
0 | 0 |
Super Low Dispersion ⓘAdvanced elements further reducing chromatic aberration |
0 | 0 |
CA Reduction ⓘBuilt-in features to reduce chromatic aberration |
0 | 0 |
Internal Focusing ⓘInternal Focusing means that the lens does not change in size during focusing, and the front element does not rotate. |
||
Read: Verdict
Verdict
Buy the Canon EF 100mm F/2.8 Macro USM for close-up photography: its 31 cm close focus and life-size 1x magnification open up macro work the F/2 cannot do. Buy the Canon EF 100mm F/2 USM for portraits and available-light shooting, where its f/2 aperture admits more light than the Macro's f/2.8 for dim interiors and evening events. Beyond those roles, both share the Canon EF mount and full-frame coverage.

