Canon EF 100mm F/2.8 Macro USM vs Canon EF 135mm F/2L USM — Which Is Better?
Side by side37 specifications |
Canon · f/2.8 · Canon EF mount
Canon EF 100mm F/2.8 Macro USM
51
SCORE
|
Canon · f/2 · Canon EF mount
Canon EF 135mm F/2L USM
61
WINNER
|
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | |
| General | ||
Read the General ComparisonGeneralThe Canon EF 100mm F/2.8 Macro USM and the Canon EF 135mm F/2L USM are full-frame prime lenses for the same Canon EF mount, built for different subjects. The 100mm, from 2000, specialises in close-up work. The 135mm, from 1996, is an L-series telephoto for portraits and distant subjects. | ||
| Release Year | 2000 | 1996 |
Production Status ⓘCurrent status of lens manufacturing (e.g., in production, discontinued). |
||
Pro Branding ⓘSpecific branding codes used for professional-tier lenses. |
N/A | L |
Lens Mount ⓘThe lens mount will tell you what type of lens range you can fit onto the camera body. Often the same camera company will have different lens ranges for different cameras. |
Canon EF | Canon EF |
System ⓘIndicates which camera system the lens is designed to attach to. |
Canon EOS | Canon EOS |
Maximum Format ⓘLargest sensor size compatible with the lens. |
||
| Physical | 43/100 | 78/100 |
Read the Physical ComparisonPhysicalThe 135mm F/2L is the heavier lens at 1 lb 10.5 oz (750 g), against 1 lb 5.2 oz (600 g) for the 100mm Macro, adding 150 g to the bag. It is slightly shorter at 4.41 in (112 mm) versus 4.69 in (119 mm), but wider at 83 mm against 79 mm. Both accept front filters, but the threads differ: 72mm on the 135mm and 58mm on the 100mm, so direct-fit filters must be bought to match each lens. | ||
| Lens Weight | 600 g | 750 g |
Lens Diameter ⓘWidth of the lens at its widest point |
79 mm | 83 mm |
Lens Length ⓘHow long the lens is from front to back. |
119 mm | 112 mm |
Front Filter Compatible ⓘSome lenses are compatible with front filters, some are compatible with back filters and some are compatible with both. Front filters are usually more convenient to add and remove. |
||
Front Filter Size ⓘDiameter of attachable filters. |
58 mm | 72 mm |
| Optics | 80/100 | 80/100 |
Read the Optics ComparisonOpticsThe 100mm Macro is the clear choice for close-ups: it supports life-size 1x magnification and focuses as close as 1 ft (31 cm), so a small subject can fill the frame. The 135mm focuses only to 3 ft (90 cm) with 0.19x magnification, which suits portraits rather than true close-up work. The 135mm offers a brighter f/2 maximum aperture against f/2.8, which helps keep shutter speeds up in dim venues. Its longer 135mm focal length frames distant subjects more tightly than the 100mm. Both lenses offer autofocus with a manual focusing ring, and both share an 8-blade automatic diaphragm. | ||
Focal Range ⓘShortest to longest focal length of the lens (zoom range start - end ) |
100 mm | 135 mm |
Aperture Range ⓘLargest aperture at the lens's shortest focal length to longest focal length (aperture range start - end) |
2.8 | 2 |
| Focal Length Angle of View | 24.415582858783463° | 18.21° |
Flange Focal Distance ⓘDistance from lens mount to sensor. |
44 mm | 44 mm |
Diaphragm Type ⓘStructure and design of the aperture |
||
Blades ⓘNumber of diaphragm blades in aperture |
8020 | 8020 |
Zoom Lens ⓘZoom allows you to vary the focal length, change between long shots and close-ups |
✗ | ✗ |
Closest Focusing Distance ⓘMinimum distance for a subject to be in focus. |
31 cm01500 | 90 cm01500 |
Maximum Magnification ⓘLargest size a subject can be reproduced |
1x | 0.19x |
| Autofocus Mode | ||
| Manual Mode | ||
| Manual Focusing Ring | ||
| Features | Unscored | 19/100 |
Read the Features ComparisonFeaturesTeleconverter support is the practical difference: the 135mm F/2L accepts teleconverters to extend its effective focal length, while the 100mm Macro does not. For stage or field distances, that stretches its reach beyond the native 135mm. Neither lens offers image stabilization, weather sealing or a fluorine coating, so handheld work in low light relies on shutter speed and support rather than help from the lens. | ||
Weather Sealing ⓘWeather sealing capabilities will give you more confidence when shooting in unfavourable conditions. |
✗ | ✗ |
Fluorine Coating ⓘCoating to repel water and oil from lens elements. |
✗ | ✗ |
| Built In Lens Hood | ✗ | ✗ |
| Lens Hood Type | ||
Teleconverter ⓘA teleconverter (extender) is an extra piece of equipment that fits between the lens and the camera body to enhance magnification |
No | |
| Image Stabilization | ✗ | ✗ |
| Construction | 23/100 | 15/100 |
Read the Construction ComparisonConstructionThe 100mm Macro focuses internally, so the barrel does not extend while focusing, which is convenient when working close to a subject. The 135mm F/2L does not focus internally, so its barrel moves as focus changes. The 135mm F/2L builds its 10 elements in 8 groups around one low-dispersion element, a design that helps control chromatic aberration. The 100mm Macro uses 12 elements in 8 groups with no low-dispersion elements. | ||
Elements ⓘLens elements refer to individual pieces of glass within the lens. |
12 | 10 |
| Groups | 8 | 8 |
Aspherical Elements ⓘThe number of aspherical lens elements which can help correct aberrations such as spherical aberration. |
0 | 0 |
Bi Aspherical Elements ⓘElements with two non-spherical surfaces |
0 | 0 |
Low Dispersion ⓘElements that reduce chromatic aberration |
0 | 1 |
Super Low Dispersion ⓘAdvanced elements further reducing chromatic aberration |
0 | 0 |
CA Reduction ⓘBuilt-in features to reduce chromatic aberration |
0 | 0 |
Internal Focusing ⓘInternal Focusing means that the lens does not change in size during focusing, and the front element does not rotate. |
No | |
Read: Verdict
Verdict
Buy the 100mm Macro for close-up photography: flowers, insects, product shots and detail work all benefit from its life-size magnification and 31 cm close focus. Buy the 135mm F/2L for portraits, indoor sports and stage work, where its f/2 aperture and longer reach serve dim venues, with teleconverter support for extra distance. Both fit the same EOS EF bodies, so the choice rests on subject matter.

