Canon EOS 6D Mark II vs Canon EOS 80D — Which Is Better?

Canon EOS 6D Mark II vs EOS 80D Overview and Optics

The Canon EOS 6D Mark II emerges as the winner in optics with a score of 69/100, a 6-point lead over the Canon EOS 80D, which scored 63/100. Both cameras share several specifications, including a CMOS sensor, the absence of image stabilization, and compatibility with Canon EF lenses. However, specific differences set them apart.

The 6D Mark II boasts a higher megapixel count of 26.2, compared to the 80D’s 24.2 megapixels, resulting in slightly better image resolution. Furthermore, the 6D Mark II features a full-frame sensor, which offers a broader dynamic range, improved low-light performance, and a shallower depth of field. Its DXOMARK sensor score of 85 reinforces its superiority over the 80D, which has a score of 79. The 6D Mark II also utilizes a more advanced Digic 7 processor, enhancing image processing capabilities.

On the other hand, the Canon EOS 80D holds a slight advantage in shooting speed, capturing 7 frames per second (fps) compared to the 6D Mark II’s 6.5 fps. This difference may benefit action and sports photographers who require faster shooting. Additionally, the 80D uses the Canon EF-S lens mount, which accommodates a wider range of affordable lenses designed specifically for APS-C sensor cameras.

Taking these factors into account, the Canon EOS 6D Mark II is the superior choice for photographers prioritizing image quality and low-light performance, while the Canon EOS 80D may be more suitable for those seeking faster shooting speeds and a broader lens selection at a lower cost.

The Canon EOS 80D emerges as the superior camera for video capabilities, scoring 70/100 compared to the Canon EOS 6D Mark II’s score of 57/100. Both cameras share common specifications, such as Full HD video resolution and maximum video dimensions of 1920 x 1080. Additionally, both models are equipped with built-in time-lapse functionality.

The 80D outshines the 6D Mark II in terms of maximum video frame rate, offering 60fps compared to the latter’s 30fps. This significant difference allows the 80D to capture smoother and sharper video, especially during fast-paced scenes or action shots. The higher frame rate makes the 80D a better choice for videographers who prioritize fluid motion and detail in their footage.

On the other hand, the 6D Mark II does not surpass the 80D in any specific video-related specifications. Its lower video score results from its inferior frame rate, which limits its ability to capture fast-moving subjects as effectively as the 80D.

In comparing the video capabilities of the Canon EOS 6D Mark II and the Canon EOS 80D, it is clear that the 80D is the superior choice for those prioritizing video performance. Its higher video score, attributed to its 60fps maximum frame rate, ensures smoother and more detailed footage, while both cameras share other key video features. The 6D Mark II, with its 30fps frame rate, may be suitable for casual video shooters but falls short for those seeking optimal video quality.

The Canon EOS 6D Mark II emerges as the winner with a feature score of 83/100, compared to the Canon EOS 80D’s score of 70/100. Both cameras share several specifications, such as a 3-inch screen size, 1,040,000-dot screen resolution, touchscreen functionality, flip screen, and WiFi connectivity.

The 6D Mark II outperforms the 80D in certain aspects. It has GPS, which the 80D lacks, and it also includes Bluetooth connectivity. These additional features make the 6D Mark II more versatile and user-friendly, providing more convenience and options for photographers.

On the other hand, the 80D has some advantages, despite its lower feature score. It offers a faster continuous shooting speed of 7 fps compared to the 6D Mark II’s 6.5 fps, making it more suitable for capturing fast-moving subjects. Additionally, the 80D has a higher number of autofocus points (45) compared to the 6D Mark II (45), which can contribute to better focus accuracy and tracking performance.

Taking these factors into account, the Canon EOS 6D Mark II stands out as the superior camera in terms of features. Its GPS and Bluetooth capabilities enhance its overall usability and convenience for photographers. However, the Canon EOS 80D should not be overlooked, as it performs better in continuous shooting and autofocus, making it a strong contender for specific photography needs. Both cameras have their strengths, and the choice ultimately depends on the individual photographer’s requirements and preferences.

The Canon EOS 6D Mark II wins the storage and battery comparison with a score of 45/100, while the Canon EOS 80D scores slightly lower at 43/100. Both cameras have one memory card slot and accept SD, SDHC, and SDXC (UHS-I compatible) cards. They also use the same battery type, LP-E6N, and neither offers USB charging.

The 6D Mark II has a longer battery life, capable of taking 1200 shots, giving it an advantage over the 80D, which can only take 960 shots per charge. This makes the 6D Mark II more suitable for extended shooting sessions without needing to replace the battery.

Although the 80D has a shorter battery life, it still performs well and is only slightly behind the 6D Mark II. The difference in battery life may not be significant enough to affect the user experience, especially if the photographer carries spare batteries.

Considering the storage and battery specifications, the Canon EOS 6D Mark II is the better choice due to its longer battery life. However, the Canon EOS 80D remains a decent option for those who don’t require an extended battery life and are willing to carry extra batteries.