Canon EOS M vs Sony a7R II Comparison
Canon EOS M
Sony a7R II
MirrorlessMirrorlessThe Sony a7R II emerges as the winner with a score of 70/100, while the Canon EOS M scores 44/100. Both cameras are mirrorless and share some common features, such as their launch prices and announcement dates. The Sony a7R II, announced in 2015, is better due to its higher score, which reflects its superior performance.
The Canon EOS M, released in 2012, has advantages in its compact size (109 x 66 x 32mm) and lightweight design (298g), making it more portable. However, the Sony a7R II’s score of 70/100 indicates that it is a better camera overall.
Taking into account the scores and specifications, the Sony a7R II is the better choice for those seeking higher performance, while the Canon EOS M offers portability and a lower price point.
Canon EOS M vs Sony a7R II Overview and Optics
The Sony a7R II outperforms the Canon EOS M in optics, with a score of 81/100 compared to the Canon’s 42/100. Both cameras share some common specifications, including a CMOS sensor type and the ability to shoot at relatively fast speeds. However, the similarities end there, as the Sony a7R II boasts superior features that contribute to its higher score.
The Sony a7R II has a 42.4-megapixel resolution, while the Canon EOS M only has 18 megapixels. This difference allows the Sony camera to capture more detail in images. Additionally, the Sony a7R II has a faster shooting speed of 5 frames per second compared to the Canon’s 4.3. The Sony a7R II also has a higher DXOMARK score for its sensor, at 98 points, while the Canon EOS M has a score of 65 points. This score indicates the Sony a7R II’s sensor performs better in terms of image quality.
Another advantage of the Sony a7R II is its full-frame sensor size, compared to the Canon EOS M’s APS-C sensor. This larger sensor allows the Sony camera to capture more light, resulting in better image quality. Moreover, the Sony a7R II has image stabilization, while the Canon EOS M does not, leading to sharper images in the Sony camera.
The only advantage the Canon EOS M has over the Sony a7R II is its lens mount, which is compatible with Canon EF-M lenses. This compatibility may be beneficial to those who already own Canon lenses.
Considering the higher score and superior specifications, the Sony a7R II is the clear winner in terms of optics. The Canon EOS M’s lens compatibility may appeal to some users, but the overall performance of the Sony a7R II makes it a better choice for those seeking top-notch image quality and features.
APS-C
Full Frame
3:23:2
Canon EOS M vs Sony a7R II Video Performance
The Sony a7R II emerges as the superior camera in terms of video capabilities, scoring 56/100, while the Canon EOS M lags behind with a score of 43/100. Both cameras share some common video specifications, such as a maximum video frame rate of 30fps and the absence of built-in time-lapse functionality.
The Sony a7R II’s advantage lies in its 4K video resolution, which provides a significant increase in video quality compared to the Canon EOS M’s Full HD resolution. With a maximum video dimension of 3840 x 2160, the a7R II captures more detail and produces sharper images, making it a better choice for videographers who prioritize high-quality footage.
While the Canon EOS M does not surpass the Sony a7R II in any specific video specification, it still offers Full HD resolution with a maximum video dimension of 1920 x 1080. This quality is suitable for casual videographers or those who do not require the highest possible resolution. The EOS M’s lower score does not imply that it is a poor camera; it simply means that it falls short in comparison to the a7R II’s video capabilities.
Considering the video specifications, the Sony a7R II is the better camera for videographers who seek top-notch resolution and image quality. On the other hand, the Canon EOS M is a decent option for those who do not require 4K resolution and are content with Full HD quality. The choice ultimately depends on the user’s specific needs and preferences.
Full HD
4K
Canon EOS M vs Sony a7R II Features and Benefits
The Canon EOS M and the Sony a7R II both have a feature score of 57/100, making them equal in this aspect. They share some common specifications, such as a 3-inch screen size and the lack of GPS and Bluetooth capabilities. However, there are differences in their features that make one camera better than the other in certain aspects.
The Sony a7R II has a higher screen resolution of 1,228,800 dots, compared to the Canon EOS M’s 1,040,000 dots. This means that the Sony a7R II’s display is sharper and provides clearer image previews. Additionally, the Sony a7R II has a flip screen, which is useful for shooting at unique angles and for capturing self-portraits. The Sony a7R II also has Wi-Fi capability, allowing for easy wireless transfer of images and remote control of the camera using a smartphone.
On the other hand, the Canon EOS M has a touchscreen feature, which the Sony a7R II lacks. This makes navigating menus and selecting focus points quicker and more intuitive on the Canon EOS M. However, this is the only advantage the Canon EOS M holds over the Sony a7R II in terms of features.
Taking these points into consideration, the Sony a7R II is the better camera in terms of features due to its higher screen resolution, flip screen, and Wi-Fi capability. The Canon EOS M’s touchscreen is its sole advantage, but it is not enough to outweigh the multiple benefits offered by the Sony a7R II. Therefore, the Sony a7R II is the recommended choice for those who prioritize advanced features in their camera.
3"3"
Canon EOS M vs Sony a7R II Storage and Battery
The Sony a7R II outperforms the Canon EOS M in storage and battery with a score of 16/100 versus 13/100. Both cameras have one memory card slot and accept SD, SDHC, and SDXC cards. However, the Sony a7R II has an advantage as it also supports Memory Stick Duo, Pro Duo, and Pro-HG Duo cards, providing more storage options.
In terms of battery life, the Sony a7R II lasts longer with 290 shots compared to the Canon EOS M’s 230 shots. Both cameras use different battery types: the Sony a7R II uses the NP-FW50, while the Canon EOS M uses the LP-E12. Neither camera offers USB charging.
Although the Canon EOS M falls short in storage and battery life, it still provides decent performance for casual photography. The Sony a7R II, with its greater storage flexibility and longer battery life, proves to be the better option for those who require more from their camera.
Canon EOS M vs Sony a7R II – Our Verdict
Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Canon EOS M or the Sony a7R II: