CameraReviews.com
menu
Hi Camera Lovers 👋 If you buy a camera through our referral links, you support our site at no cost to you 😉 Full info here.

Canon EOS M100 vs EOS M200 Comparison

Optics
Video
Features
Storage & Battery

Canon EOS M100

Canon EOS M100 camera image
62%
Draw!

Canon EOS M200

canon eos m200
62%
Canon EOS M100
vs
Canon EOS M200
Price
Brand
Canon
Canon
Model
EOS M100
EOS M200
Released
2017
2019
Announcement Date
August 29, 2017
September 25, 2019
Camera Type
Mirrorless
Mirrorless
Camera Size
Camera Weight

The Canon EOS M100 and the Canon EOS M200 are very closely related! Both cameras are mirrorless and share the same dimensions of 108 x 67 x 35mm.  However, the M200 has a significant advantage in weight, coming in at just 229g (0.50lbs) compared to the M100’s 436g (0.96lbs). This makes the M200 a more portable option for photographers on the go.

Canon EOS M100 vs M200 Overview and Optics

The Canon EOS M100 emerges as the winner in the optics comparison with a score of 64/100, while the Canon EOS M200 scores 63/100. Both cameras share several specifications, such as the 24.2 and 24-megapixel resolutions, 6.1 shooting speed, CMOS sensor type, APS-C sensor size, Canon EF-M lens mount, and the lack of image stabilization.

On the other hand, the EOS M200 features the newer Digic 8 processor. This processor offers improved autofocus performance, better face and eye detection, and enhanced video capabilities. In terms of optics, the EOS M200’s newer processor does provide some advantages in autofocus and video, but these are not enough to surpass the M100’s overall performance in optics.

Optics
Optics
64%
63%
Megapixels
24.2 MP
24 MP
Image Resolution
6000 x 4000 px
6000 x 4000 px
Sensor Type
CMOS
CMOS
Sensor Size
14.9 x 22.3 mm
14.9 x 22.3 mm
Sensor Format
APS-C
APS-C
Frame Rate
6.1 fps
6.1 fps
Lens Mount
Canon EF-M
Canon EF-M
Image Processor
Digic 7
Digic 8
Aspect Ratio
3:2
3:2
Minimum ISO (Native)
100
100
Maximum ISO (Native)
25,600
25,600
Minimum ISO (Expanded)
100
100
Maximum ISO (Expanded)
25600
25600
Minimum Shutter Speed
30 s
30 s
Maximum Shutter Speed
1/ 4000 s
1/ 4000 s
Autofocus Points
49
143
In-body Stabilization
Viewfinder Type
None
None

Canon EOS M100 vs EOS M200 Video Performance

The Canon EOS M200 emerges as the winner in the video capabilities comparison with a score of 83/100, 13 points higher than the Canon EOS M100, which scored 70/100. Both cameras share some common video features, including a maximum video frame rate of 60fps and built-in time-lapse functionality.

The EOS M200 outperforms the M100 in terms of video resolution and dimensions. It offers 4K video recording with maximum video dimensions of 3840 x 2160, providing users with higher quality footage and more detailed images. This feature makes the M200 a better choice for those looking to capture professional-grade videos or create content for platforms that support 4K resolution.

On the other hand, the EOS M100 has a maximum video resolution of Full HD and video dimensions of 1920 x 1080. While this is still suitable for casual video recording and sharing on social media, it does not match the quality and detail provided by the M200’s 4K capabilities. However, the M100 may still be a viable option for those who do not require 4K resolution and are content with Full HD videos.

Taking into account the video capabilities of both cameras, the Canon EOS M200 is the clear winner due to its superior 4K video resolution and larger video dimensions. This makes it a more suitable choice for users who prioritize video quality and detail. Meanwhile, the Canon EOS M100 remains a viable option for casual users who are satisfied with Full HD videos and do not require the additional benefits of 4K resolution.

Video
Video
70%
83%
Video
Max Video Resolution
Full HD
4K
Max Video Dimensions
1920 x 1080 px
3840 x 2160 px
Max Video Frame Rate
60 p
60 p
Time-Lapse Built In
Video File Format
MP4
MPEG-4

Canon EOS M100 vs EOS M200 Features and Benefits

The Canon EOS M100 and Canon EOS M200 both score 70/100 in features, indicating no clear winner in this category. They share several specifications, such as a 3-inch screen size, 1040000-dot screen resolution, touchscreen functionality, flip screen, and the absence of GPS. Both cameras also offer WIFI and Bluetooth connectivity.

Despite having the same feature score, the Canon EOS M200 stands out in some areas. The M200 has faster continuous shooting at 6.1 fps compared to the M100’s 4 fps, which allows it to capture fast-moving subjects more effectively. Additionally, the M200 has a higher extended ISO range of 51200, compared to the M100’s 25600, providing better low-light performance.

On the other hand, the Canon EOS M100 also has some advantages over the M200. The M100 is lighter, weighing 302g compared to the M200’s 299g, making it slightly more portable and comfortable for extended use. Moreover, the M100 has a longer battery life, allowing for 295 shots per charge, while the M200 only offers 315 shots per charge.

In comparing these cameras, the Canon EOS M200 excels in capturing fast-moving subjects and low-light photography, while the Canon EOS M100 offers a lighter body and longer battery life. Both cameras share many features, making them suitable for various photography needs. Ultimately, the choice between the Canon EOS M100 and M200 depends on the individual’s specific requirements and preferences.

Features
Features
70%
70%
Built-in Flash
External Flash
GPS
Weather Sealing
Screen Type
LCD
TFT LCD
Touch Screen
Screen Size
3"
3"
Screen Resolution
1,040,000 dots
1,040,000 dots
Flip Screen
Live View
Wi-Fi
Bluetooth

Canon EOS M100 vs EOS M200 Storage and Battery

The Canon EOS M200 emerges as the winner in the storage and battery category, scoring 21 points, while the Canon EOS M100 trails behind at 16 points. Both cameras share similarities in their storage specifications, having one memory card slot each and accepting SD, SDHC, and SDXC (UHS-I compatible) cards.

The M200 has a superior battery life of 315 shots, which surpasses the M100’s 295 shots. This advantage allows for more extended shooting sessions without the need to change or recharge the battery frequently. Both cameras use the same battery type, the LP-E12, and neither offers USB charging.

Although the M100 falls short in battery life, its storage capacity is on par with the M200, making it a suitable option for photographers who prioritize storage over battery life.

From this comparison, it is evident that the Canon EOS M200 offers better battery life than the M100, making it more suitable for extended shooting sessions. However, both cameras share similar storage capabilities, ensuring that users have ample space for their photography needs.

Storage and Battery
Storage and Battery
16%
21%
Memory Card
SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-I compatible)
SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-I compatible)
Dual Memory Card Slots
Battery Type
LP-E12
LP-E12
Battery Life
295 shots
315 shots
USB Charging
DXOMARK Scores
Sensor scores tested by DXOMARK
Overall Score
78%
N/A
Portrait (Color Depth)
23.5 bits
N/A
Landscape (Dynamic Range)
12.9 EVs
N/A
Sports (Low-Light ISO)
1272
N/A
Scores

Canon EOS M100 vs EOS M200 – Our Verdict

Canon EOS M100 vs EOS M200 Comparison image.

Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Canon EOS M100 or the Canon EOS M200:

User Scores
Spotted a mistake with these camera specs? Please let us know so we can update it!