CameraReviews.com
menu
Hi Camera Lovers 👋 If you buy a camera through our referral links, you support our site at no cost to you 😉 Full info here.

Canon EOS M200 vs Sony a6000 Comparison

Optics
Video
Features
Storage & Battery

Canon EOS M200

canon eos m200
Winner!
62%

Sony a6000

sony a6000
57%
Canon EOS M200
vs
Sony a6000
Price
Brand
Canon
Sony
Model
EOS M200
a6000
Released
2019
2014
Announcement Date
September 25, 2019
February 12, 2014
Camera Type
Mirrorless
Mirrorless
Camera Size
Camera Weight

The Canon EOS M200 edges out the Sony a6000 with a score of 62/100, compared to the a6000’s 57/100. Both cameras are mirrorless and were launched at different times; the M200 in 2019 and the a6000 in 2014. While they share similar dimensions, the M200 is lighter at 229g, making it more portable than the a6000, which weighs 344g.

The EOS M200 is a better choice due to its higher score, lighter weight, and more recent release. However, the Sony a6000 has its advantages, remaining a viable alternative for those seeking a more affordable camera.

Canon EOS M200 vs Sony a6000 Overview and Optics

The Sony a6000 outperforms the Canon EOS M200 in optics with a 67/100 score. Both cameras possess 24-megapixel CMOS sensors and APS-C sensor sizes, with neither offering image stabilization. They also differ in lens mounts, with the M200 using Canon EF-M and the a6000 using Sony E.

The Sony a6000 excels in several areas. Its shooting speed of 11 frames per second (fps) is almost double the M200’s 6.1 fps, allowing for faster continuous shooting. The a6000 also has a higher DXOMARK sensor score of 82, compared to the M200’s 58, indicating better overall image quality. Additionally, the a6000’s Bionz X processor contributes to faster performance and improved noise reduction.

The Canon EOS M200, however, has its advantages. Its Digic 8 processor provides better color reproduction and lower power consumption. The M200’s Canon EF-M lens mount offers compatibility with Canon’s extensive range of EF and EF-S lenses, giving users more options for various photography situations.

While the Sony a6000 has a higher optics score and excels in shooting speed and sensor quality, the Canon EOS M200’s advantages in color reproduction and lens compatibility should not be overlooked. Both cameras offer unique benefits, and the right choice depends on the photographer’s specific needs and preferences.

Optics
Optics
63%
67%
Megapixels
24 MP
24.3 MP
Image Resolution
6000 x 4000 px
6000 x 4000 px
Sensor Type
CMOS
CMOS
Sensor Size
14.9 x 22.3 mm
15.6 x 23.5 mm
Sensor Format
APS-C
APS-C
Frame Rate
6.1 fps
11 fps
Lens Mount
Canon EF-M
Sony E
Image Processor
Digic 8
Bionz X
Aspect Ratio
3:2
3:2
Minimum ISO (Native)
100
100
Maximum ISO (Native)
25,600
25,600
Minimum ISO (Expanded)
100
50
Maximum ISO (Expanded)
25600
25600
Minimum Shutter Speed
30 s
30 s
Maximum Shutter Speed
1/ 4000 s
1/ 4000 s
Autofocus Points
143
179
In-body Stabilization
Viewfinder Type
None
Electronic
Viewfinder Resolution
N/A
1,440,000 dots

Canon EOS M200 vs Sony a6000 Video Performance

The Canon EOS M200 outperforms the Sony a6000 in video capabilities with a video score of 83/100, as opposed to the Sony a6000’s score of 56/100. This 27-point difference highlights the superior video performance of the Canon EOS M200.

Both cameras share some common video specifications. They both offer a maximum video frame rate of 60fps, allowing for smooth video capture. However, the Canon EOS M200 surpasses the Sony a6000 in other areas, making it the better choice for video recording.

The Canon EOS M200 boasts a maximum video resolution of 4K and dimensions of 3840 x 2160. In contrast, the Sony a6000 only offers Full HD video resolution with dimensions of 1920 x 1080. This means that the Canon EOS M200 can capture videos with significantly higher quality and detail than the Sony a6000.

Another advantage of the Canon EOS M200 is its built-in time-lapse functionality. This feature allows for creative video capture, which is not available in the Sony a6000. The lack of time-lapse functionality in the Sony a6000 limits its versatility in comparison to the Canon EOS M200.

While the Sony a6000 has no specific advantages in video capabilities over the Canon EOS M200, it still provides decent video quality with its Full HD resolution and 60fps frame rate. However, when considering the overall video performance, the Canon EOS M200 clearly stands out as the superior choice, offering 4K resolution, larger video dimensions, and built-in time-lapse functionality.

Video
Video
83%
56%
Video
Max Video Resolution
4K
Full HD
Max Video Dimensions
3840 x 2160 px
1920 x 1080 px
Max Video Frame Rate
60 p
60 p
Time-Lapse Built In
Video File Format
MPEG-4
MPEG-4

Canon EOS M200 vs Sony a6000 Features and Benefits

The Canon EOS M200 emerges as the winner in the features comparison with a score of 70/100, while the Sony a6000 scores 41/100. Both cameras share some common specifications: a 3-inch screen size, flip screen, no GPS, and WIFI capabilities.

The Canon EOS M200 has a higher screen resolution of 1,040,000 dots compared to the Sony a6000’s 921,600 dots, providing a sharper and clearer display. Additionally, the M200 is equipped with a touchscreen, making menu navigation and settings adjustments easier and more intuitive. The M200 also has Bluetooth connectivity, allowing for seamless pairing with compatible devices for quick image sharing and remote camera control.

On the other hand, the Sony a6000, despite its lower feature score, has strengths of its own. The flip screen, also found in the M200, provides flexibility in shooting from different angles and is particularly useful for capturing self-portraits or vlogging. However, it lacks a touchscreen and Bluetooth connectivity, which are present in the Canon EOS M200.

To sum up, the Canon EOS M200 offers a better overall feature set with a higher screen resolution, touchscreen, and Bluetooth connectivity. While the Sony a6000 shares some similarities with the M200, such as the flip screen and WIFI, it falls short with its lower screen resolution and absence of a touchscreen and Bluetooth. The Canon EOS M200’s superior features make it a more attractive option for photographers seeking a user-friendly and versatile camera.

Features
Features
70%
41%
Built-in Flash
External Flash
GPS
Weather Sealing
Screen Type
TFT LCD
LCD
Touch Screen
Screen Size
3"
3"
Screen Resolution
1,040,000 dots
921,600 dots
Flip Screen
Live View
Wi-Fi
Bluetooth

Canon EOS M200 vs Sony a6000 Storage and Battery

The Canon EOS M200 and the Sony a6000 both score 21/100 in storage and battery, showing no significant difference between the two cameras. They share common specs, such as one memory card slot and compatibility with SD, SDHC, and SDXC cards. Both cameras do not have USB charging capabilities.

The Sony a6000 has a slightly better battery life, with 360 shots compared to the Canon EOS M200’s 315 shots. The a6000 uses the NP-FW50 battery type, which contributes to its longer battery life. On the other hand, the Canon EOS M200 accepts only UHS-I compatible SD cards, while the Sony a6000 also accepts Memory Stick Pro Duo and Pro-HG Duo cards, offering slightly more storage flexibility.

Despite these minor differences, neither camera stands out in terms of storage and battery. The choice between them should depend on other factors, such as general specifications, optics, video, and features.

Storage and Battery
Storage and Battery
21%
21%
Memory Card
SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-I compatible)
SD / SDHC / SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo / Pro-HG Duo
Dual Memory Card Slots
Battery Type
LP-E12
NP-FW50
Battery Life
315 shots
360 shots
USB Charging
DXOMARK Scores
Sensor scores tested by DXOMARK
Overall Score
N/A
82%
Portrait (Color Depth)
N/A
24.1 bits
Landscape (Dynamic Range)
N/A
13.1 EVs
Sports (Low-Light ISO)
N/A
1347
Scores

Canon EOS M200 vs Sony a6000 – Our Verdict

Canon EOS M200 vs Sony a6000 Comparison image.

Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Canon EOS M200 or the Sony a6000:

User Scores
Spotted a mistake with these camera specs? Please let us know so we can update it!