Sony a6000 vs a6400 Comparison

The Sony a6400 comes out as the winner with a score of 70/100, while the Sony a6000 trails behind at 57/100. Both cameras are mirrorless and share the same dimensions of 120 x 67mm. However, the a6400 is slightly thicker (60mm) and heavier (403g) than the a6000 (45mm and 344g).

The a6400’s higher score showcases its superior features, such as better autofocus, image quality, and battery life. Despite being released five years apart, both cameras have similar launch prices, with the a6000 at $799 and the a6400 at $900.

The a6000, however, has its advantages. It is lighter and more compact, making it a better choice for those prioritizing portability. Ultimately, the Sony a6400 is a more advanced option, but the a6000 remains a solid choice for those seeking a lightweight and budget-friendly camera.

Sony a6000 vs a6400 Overview and Optics

The Sony a6400 wins the optics comparison with a score of 68/100, while the Sony a6000 scores 67/100. Both cameras share several specifications, such as 11 fps shooting speed, CMOS sensor type, Bionz X processor, APS-C sensor size, Sony E lens mount, and lack of image stabilization.

The a6400 has a slight advantage over the a6000, mainly due to its higher DXOMARK score for the sensor (83) compared to the a6000’s 82. This one-point difference suggests that the a6400 has a marginally better sensor performance, which can result in improved image quality.

On the other hand, the a6000 has a slightly higher megapixel count (24.3) compared to the a6400’s 24.2 megapixels. However, this small difference is not significant enough to give the a6000 a noticeable advantage in image resolution.

In terms of optics, both cameras are highly comparable, with the Sony a6400 having a slight edge due to its marginally better sensor performance. However, the difference is minimal, and both cameras are capable of producing high-quality images. The choice between the two cameras should be based on other factors, such as price, additional features, and personal preference.

The Sony a6400 emerges as the clear winner in the video capabilities comparison with a score of 91, significantly outperforming the Sony a6000, which only scores 56. Both cameras share some common specifications, but the a6400 excels in critical areas.

In terms of shared features, both cameras have a maximum video resolution of Full HD and max video dimensions of 1920 x 1080. However, the Sony a6400 surpasses the a6000 with its ability to shoot 4K video at max dimensions of 3840 x 2160. This higher resolution provides users with sharper, more detailed footage, making the a6400 an ideal choice for videographers seeking superior image quality.

Another area where the Sony a6400 outshines the a6000 is the maximum video frame rate. The a6400 boasts a remarkable 120fps, doubling the a6000’s 60fps. This higher frame rate allows for smoother slow-motion footage and greater creative control over video projects.

The Sony a6400 also has time-lapse functionality built-in, a feature absent in the a6000. This capability enables users to capture stunning time-lapse videos without requiring additional equipment or software.

While the Sony a6000 falls short in these areas, it remains a competent choice for casual users or those with limited video requirements. Its Full HD resolution and 60fps frame rate still deliver satisfactory results for everyday use.

Ultimately, the Sony a6400’s superior video capabilities, such as 4K resolution, 120fps frame rate, and built-in time-lapse functionality, make it the preferred choice for videographers and enthusiasts seeking top-notch performance. On the other hand, the Sony a6000 remains a viable option for casual users who prioritize simplicity and budget-friendly options over advanced video features.

The Sony a6400 is the winner in the features comparison, scoring 81 out of 100 points, while the Sony a6000 scores 35 points. Both cameras share several specifications, such as a 3-inch screen size, 921,600 dots screen resolution, flip screen, no GPS, and Wi-Fi connectivity.

The Sony a6400 surpasses the a6000 with its touchscreen feature and Bluetooth connectivity. The touchscreen simplifies navigating menus, selecting focus points, and reviewing images. Bluetooth enables easy pairing with smartphones and other devices for transferring files or remote control. These additional features make the a6400 a more user-friendly and versatile camera.

The Sony a6000, however, has no notable advantages over the a6400 in terms of features. Both cameras have similar screen specifications, and the a6000 lacks the touchscreen and Bluetooth capabilities found in the a6400. The a6000 does offer a flip screen and Wi-Fi connectivity, but these are also present in the a6400.

In comparing these cameras, the Sony a6400 clearly outperforms the a6000 in terms of features. Its touchscreen and Bluetooth connectivity provide users with a more convenient and efficient experience. While the a6000 shares some specifications with the a6400, it does not offer any unique advantages over its counterpart. Therefore, the Sony a6400 is the better choice for photographers seeking a camera with more advanced features.

The Sony a6400 outperforms the Sony a6000 in storage and battery with a score of 37/100 compared to the a6000’s score of 21/100. Both cameras share similarities in this aspect, including a single memory card slot and compatibility with SD, SDHC, SDXC, and Memory Stick Pro Duo cards. However, the a6400 accepts UHS-I compatible Memory Stick Duo cards as well.

The a6400’s superiority lies in its longer battery life, capable of capturing 410 shots, compared to the a6000’s 360 shots. Both cameras utilize the NP-FW50 battery type, but the a6400 has the added advantage of USB charging, making it more convenient for on-the-go users.

While the a6000 falls short in this comparison, it still offers decent battery life and storage options for casual photography enthusiasts.

Taking these factors into account, the Sony a6400 is the clear winner in the storage and battery category, providing better battery life and the added convenience of USB charging. The a6000, although not as advanced, remains a viable option for those seeking a more budget-friendly choice.

If you’re still unsure which camera is best for you, get inspired with some of our other popular comparisons:

• Sony a6000 vs Canon M50
• Sony a6500 vs a6600
• Nikon D5500 vs D7200
• Nikon D5600 vs D7200
• Canon SL3 vs T8i
• Sony a6000 vs a6100
• Sony a7S vs Sony a7S II