Canon EOS M50 Mark II vs Sony a7 II Comparison
Canon EOS M50 Mark II
Sony a7 II
Price | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Brand | Canon | Sony | |
Model | EOS M50 Mark II | a7 II | |
Released Refers to the year this camera was officially made available for sale. | 2020 | 2014 | |
Announcement Date Refers to the date the manufacturer publicly announced the upcoming release and general specs of this camera. | October 14, 2020 | November 20, 2014 | |
Camera Type |  Mirrorless | Mirrorless | |
Camera Size | |||
Camera Weight |
The Sony a7 II outperforms the Canon EOS M50 Mark II with a score of 69/100 compared to 59/100. Both cameras are mirrorless and share similarities in their specifications. However, the Sony a7 II, released in 2014, has a higher launch price of $1600, while the Canon EOS M50 Mark II, released in 2020, launched at $750.
In terms of size and weight, the Canon EOS M50 Mark II is lighter and more compact, measuring 116 x 88 x 59mm and weighing 387g. The Sony a7 II is larger and heavier, measuring 127 x 96 x 60mm and weighing 599g.
Despite its age, the Sony a7 II proves to be a better camera due to its higher score. The Canon EOS M50 Mark II, on the other hand, offers a more budget-friendly option while also being lighter and more portable. Ultimately, both cameras have their advantages, and the choice depends on the user’s priorities and preferences.
Canon EOS M50 Mark II vs Sony a7 II Overview and Optics
The Sony a7 II emerges as the winner in the optics comparison, scoring 78/100, which is 19 points higher than the Canon EOS M50 Mark II’s score of 59/100. Both cameras share some common specifications, such as having 24 megapixels, a CMOS sensor, and a similar shooting speed.
The Sony a7 II outperforms the Canon EOS M50 Mark II in several aspects. Its full-frame sensor size provides better image quality and low-light performance compared to the Canon’s APS-C sensor. The Sony a7 II’s DXOMARK score for the sensor is 90, significantly higher than the Canon’s score of 58. Additionally, the Sony a7 II features image stabilization, ensuring sharper images in various shooting conditions. Its lens mount, the Sony E, also offers a wider range of compatible lenses.
On the other hand, the Canon EOS M50 Mark II has a faster shooting speed of 10, while the Sony a7 II has a shooting speed of 5. This advantage allows the Canon to capture fast-moving subjects more effectively. Moreover, the Canon’s Digic 8 processor may contribute to faster image processing and better performance in certain situations.
Taking these factors into account, the Sony a7 II is the superior camera in terms of optics, offering better image quality, a larger sensor size, and image stabilization. However, the Canon EOS M50 Mark II may be more suitable for those prioritizing a faster shooting speed and efficient image processing. Ultimately, the choice between these two cameras depends on the specific needs and preferences of the photographer.
|
Optics
|
Canon EOS M50 Mark II
|
Sony a7 II
|
|
|
|
|
||
Megapixels The higher the number of megapixels, the more detail the cameras sensor can capture. | 24 MP | 24.3 MP | |
|---|---|---|---|
Image Resolution Image resolution is measured in pixels and megapixels, width by height. The higher the number, the higher its resolution. | 6000 x 4000 px | 6000 x 4000 px | |
Sensor Type The camera sensor captures light and records the image. Sensors vary in physical size, the number of pixels, and quality. | CMOS | CMOS | |
Sensor Size The sensor size contributes to the overall quality as well as the dynamic and tonal range a camera can capture. As a rule of thumb, the more surface there is to read the light, the more information it will capture. | 14.9 x 22.3 mm | 23.9 x 35.8 mm | |
Sensor Format Refers to the most commonly used sensor sizes. |  APS-C |  Full Frame | |
Frame Rate The number of sequential frames per second the camera can write to the memory card when shooting in burst or continuous mode. | 10 fps | 5 fps | |
Lens Mount The lens mount will tell you what type of lens range you can fit onto the camera body. Often the same camera company will have different lens ranges for different cameras. | Canon EF-M | Sony E | |
Image Processor The image processor in the camera converts the information collected on the sensor for digital storage on the memory card. | Digic 8 | Bionz X | |
Aspect Ratio The aspect ratio refers to the proportional difference between width and height. The most popular aspect ratios are 3:2 and 4:3. |  3:2 | 3:2 | |
Minimum ISO (Native) Refers to the lowest native (or 'base') ISO setting. Lower ISO are less sensitive to light but make a cleaner image. | 100 | 50 | |
Maximum ISO (Native) Refers to the highest native (or 'base') ISO setting. Higher ISO is necessary for low-light situations or night photography, but higher ISOs often introduce grain or noise. | 25,600 | 51,200 | |
Minimum ISO (Expanded) Expanded (or extended) ISO is a digitally enhanced feature available on some cameras. It allows you to push beyond the native ISO range if necessary. | 100 | 50 | |
Maximum ISO (Expanded) Expanded (or extended) ISO is a digitally enhanced feature available on some cameras. It allows you to push beyond the native ISO range if necessary. | 51200 | 51200 | |
Minimum Shutter Speed The minimum shutter speed will tell you the longest exposure your camera can take without using an external accessory. | 30 s | 30 s | |
Maximum Shutter Speed The maximum shutter speed tells you the length inside 1 second the camera will capture. These can sometimes be extended with accessories such as extra external batteries. | 1/ 4000 s | 1/ 8000 s | |
Autofocus Points Autofocus points show where the camera is focusing graphically as squares or brackets in Live View or on an electronic viewfinder. These points are also used for light meter readings. | 143 | 117 | |
In-body Stabilization In-body Stabilization means the camera has a certain technology embedded that counteracts camera shake. |   |  | |
Viewfinder Type The viewfinder type is either electronic or optical. Electronic viewfinders will have a small screen in the viewfinder. Optical viewfinders will use prisms and mirrors to look through the lens. | Electronic | Electronic | |
Viewfinder Resolution | 2,360,000 dots | 2,359,000 dots |
Canon EOS M50 Mark II vs Sony a7 II Video Performance
The Canon EOS M50 Mark II outperforms the Sony a7 II in video capabilities, with a significant difference in their scores: 91/100 for the Canon and 56/100 for the Sony. This comparison will highlight the video specifications of both cameras, revealing their strengths and weaknesses.
Both cameras share some common features in terms of video capabilities. They are both capable of recording video, and they both offer manual control over video exposure settings. However, the similarities end here, as the Canon EOS M50 Mark II has superior video specifications.
The Canon EOS M50 Mark II boasts a maximum video resolution of 4K (3840 x 2160) and a maximum video frame rate of 120fps, allowing for smooth, high-quality footage. Additionally, it has a built-in time-lapse functionality, which adds to its versatility in capturing dynamic scenes. These features make the Canon EOS M50 Mark II the better choice for videographers seeking high-resolution and advanced video capabilities.
On the other hand, the Sony a7 II has a lower maximum video resolution of Full HD (1920 x 1080) and a maximum video frame rate of 60fps. While this may be sufficient for casual video recording, it does not match the Canon’s performance. Additionally, the Sony a7 II lacks built-in time-lapse functionality, further limiting its video capabilities compared to the Canon.
Given these differences in video specifications, the Canon EOS M50 Mark II is the clear winner in this comparison. Its superior video resolution, frame rate, and built-in time-lapse functionality make it a more versatile and powerful choice for video recording. The Sony a7 II, while still a capable camera, falls short in the video department, making it a less attractive option for those prioritizing video capabilities.
|
Video
|
Canon EOS M50 Mark II
|
Sony a7 II
|
|
|
|
|
||
Video Indicates if this camera is capable of recording video. |  | | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max Video Resolution The best resolution this camera can capture video in. Modern cameras can capture up to 8K video. |  4K |  Full HD | |
Max Video Dimensions Video resolution measured by the greatest number of pixels possible in each frame, width by height. A higher resolution means more detail or clarity in your video. | 3840 x 2160 px | 1920 x 1080 px | |
Max Video Frame Rate How many frames per second your video will capture. Most cameras have options for multiple frame rates, depending on the resolution you shoot in. For a general video, 24p or 30p is the standard, but more serious filmmakers may need a higher frame rate for creative effect. | 120 p | 60 p | |
Time-Lapse Built In A built in time-lapse mode will allow continuous shooting throughout a prolonged period of time to be compressed into a sped up video. |  | | |
Video File Format Different cameras can record in various video file formats. The File format you record in can impact how you edit and use the files. | MPEG-4 | XAVC S |
Canon EOS M50 Mark II vs Sony a7 II Features and Benefits
The Canon EOS M50 Mark II outperforms the Sony a7 II in features, scoring 70/100 compared to the Sony’s 57/100. Both cameras share several specifications, such as a 3-inch screen size, flip screen, no GPS, and WIFI connectivity. However, the Canon EOS M50 Mark II surpasses the Sony a7 II in certain aspects, while the Sony a7 II has its own advantages.
The Canon EOS M50 Mark II offers a touchscreen and Bluetooth connectivity, which the Sony a7 II lacks. The touchscreen provides easier navigation and control, enabling users to quickly adjust settings and focus points. Bluetooth connectivity allows for seamless connection to external devices, making it more convenient to transfer files and remotely control the camera.
On the other hand, the Sony a7 II has a higher screen resolution at 1,230,000 dots compared to the Canon’s 1,040,000 dots. This results in a sharper and clearer display, which can be beneficial for reviewing images and videos with greater precision.
Despite the higher screen resolution of the Sony a7 II, the Canon EOS M50 Mark II takes the lead in features due to its touchscreen and Bluetooth capabilities. These additional features provide enhanced usability and convenience for users, making the Canon EOS M50 Mark II a more attractive option.
Ultimately, the Canon EOS M50 Mark II’s higher feature score reflects its superiority in providing a more user-friendly and connected experience. Meanwhile, the Sony a7 II’s advantage in screen resolution might appeal to those who prioritize image and video clarity. However, the Canon EOS M50 Mark II stands out as the better option when considering the overall feature set.
|
Features
|
Canon EOS M50 Mark II
|
Sony a7 II
|
|
|
|
|
||
Built-in Flash A built-in flash will often be positioned right above the lens. This will automatically pop up when you activate it. |  | | |
|---|---|---|---|
External Flash External flashes are often connected through a hot shoe at the top of a camera, or a cable at the side of the camera. |  | | |
GPS GPS features in a camera will include location metadata to each of your photographs. |  | | |
Weather Sealing Weather sealing capabilities will give you more confidence when shooting in unfavourable conditions. |  | | |
Screen Type | TFT LCD | LCD | |
Touch Screen Touchscreen allows you to change camera settings and access menus with a swipe of your finger, instead of using buttons. |  | | |
Screen Size |  3" | 3" | |
Screen Resolution Screen dots indicate the resolution of the LCD screen by including each sub pixel. | 1,040,000 dots | 1,230,000 dots | |
Flip Screen A flip screen (or articulating screen) is a second screen which can flip out from the side or top of the camera. This rotating screen allows you more freedom to take photos at different angles. |  | | |
Live View Live View feature allows you to see a continuous live video of what is being seen through your lens. |  | | |
Wi-Fi |  | | |
Bluetooth Bluetooth capabilities allow you wireless control of your camera with other external devices. |  | | |
Canon EOS M50 Mark II vs Sony a7 II Storage and Battery
The Canon EOS M50 Mark II and the Sony a7 II score closely in storage and battery. These cameras share some specifications, such as having one memory card slot and no USB charging capability. However, there are differences that set them apart.
The Sony a7 II has a slight advantage in battery life, with 350 shots compared to the Canon EOS M50 Mark II’s 305 shots. Both cameras use different battery types, with the Sony a7 II using the NP-FW50 and the Canon EOS M50 Mark II using the LP-E12. This longer battery life makes the Sony a7 II more suitable for extended shooting sessions.
In terms of storage, the Sony a7 II accepts a wider variety of memory cards, including SD, SDHC, SDXC, Memory Stick Duo, Pro Duo, and Pro-HG Duo. The Canon EOS M50 Mark II only accepts SD, SDHC, and SDXC cards, all of which must be UHS-I compatible. This versatility in memory card compatibility gives the Sony a7 II an edge in storage options.
Despite their identical scores, the Sony a7 II slightly outperforms the Canon EOS M50 Mark II in battery life and storage compatibility. However, both cameras could benefit from improvements in these areas, such as additional memory card slots.
|
Storage and Battery
|
Canon EOS M50 Mark II
|
Sony a7 II
|
|
|
|
|
||
Memory Card | SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-I compatible) | SD / SDHC / SDXC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro-HG Duo | |
|---|---|---|---|
Dual Memory Card Slots |  | | |
Battery Type | LP-E12 | NP-FW50 | |
Battery Life Approximately how long this cameras battery will last measured by how many photographs you will be able to take. | 305 shots | 350 shots | |
USB Charging |  | |
|
DXOMARK Scores
Sensor scores tested by DXOMARK |
Canon EOS M50 Mark II
|
Sony a7 II
|
|
Overall Score DXOMARK overall sensor score. | N/A | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Portrait (Color Depth) As described by DXOMARK 'The Portrait score in our camera sensor reviews defines color depth performance and its unit is a number of bits. A color depth of 22 bits is excellent; differences below 1 bit are barely noticeable.' | N/A | 24.9 bits | |
Landscape (Dynamic Range) As described by DXOMARK 'The Landscape score in our camera sensor tests defines the maximum dynamic range of the camera sensor and its unit is an exposure value (EV). A value of 12 EV is excellent with differences below 0.5 EV usually not noticeable.' | N/A | 13.6 EVs | |
Sports (Low-Light ISO) Described by DXOMARK as 'The maximal value of ISO sensitivity needed to reach a given value of Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR). The greater the value, the better' | N/A | 2449 |
|
Scores
|
Canon EOS M50 Mark II
|
Sony a7 II
|
|
Main Features | N/A | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Extra Features | N/A | ||
Construction and Durability | N/A | ||
Handling and Ergonomics | N/A | ||
Value for Money | N/A | ||
Total Score | N/A |
Canon EOS M50 Mark II vs Sony a7 II – Our Verdict
Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Canon EOS M50 Mark II or the Sony a7 II:
|
User Scores
|
Canon EOS M50 Mark II
|
Sony a7 II
|
|
B&H photo video |
|---|