Side-by-side specs, scores and live prices. Start over
 59
SCORE
|
✓ WINNER
 84
SCORE
|
|
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Brand | Canon | Sony |
| Model | EOS M50 Mark II | a7R IV |
Released ⓘRefers to the year this camera was officially made available for sale. |
2020 | 2019 |
Announcement date ⓘRefers to the date the manufacturer publicly announced the upcoming release and general specs of this camera. |
14/10/2020 | 16/07/2019 |
| Camera type | Mirrorless | Mirrorless |
| Camera size | 116 x 88 x 59 mm | 129 x 96 x 78 mm |
| Camera weight | 387 g | 665 g |
| Optics | ||
Megapixels ⓘThe higher the number of megapixels, the more detail the cameras sensor can capture. |
24 MP050 | 61.2 MP050 |
Image resolution ⓘImage resolution is measured in pixels and megapixels, width by height. The higher the number, the higher its resolution. |
6000 x 4000 | 9504 x 6336 |
Sensor type ⓘThe camera sensor captures light and records the image. Sensors vary in physical size, the number of pixels, and quality. |
CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size ⓘThe sensor size contributes to the overall quality as well as the dynamic and tonal range a camera can capture. As a rule of thumb, the more surface there is to read the light, the more information it will capture. |
14.9 x 22.3 | 23.8 x 35.7 |
Sensor format ⓘRefers to the most commonly used sensor sizes. |
APS-C | Full Frame |
Continuous shooting ⓘThe number of sequential frames per second the camera can write to the memory card when shooting in burst or continuous mode. |
10 fps045 | 10 fps045 |
Lens mount ⓘThe lens mount will tell you what type of lens range you can fit onto the camera body. Often the same camera company will have different lens ranges for different cameras. |
Canon EF-M | Sony FE |
Image processor ⓘThe image processor in the camera converts the information collected on the sensor for digital storage on the memory card. |
Digic 8 | Bionz X |
Aspect ratio ⓘThe aspect ratio refers to the proportional difference between width and height. The most popular aspect ratios are 3:2 and 4:3. |
3:2 | 3:2 |
Min ISO ⓘRefers to the lowest native (or 'base') ISO setting. Lower ISO are less sensitive to light but make a cleaner image. |
10030200 | 10030200 |
Max ISO ⓘRefers to the highest native (or 'base') ISO setting. Higher ISO is necessary for low-light situations or night photography, but higher ISOs often introduce grain or noise. |
256003003280000 | 320003003280000 |
Min ISO (expanded) ⓘExpanded (or extended) ISO is a digitally enhanced feature available on some cameras. It allows you to push beyond the native ISO range if necessary. |
10030200 | 5030200 |
Max ISO (expanded) ⓘExpanded (or extended) ISO is a digitally enhanced feature available on some cameras. It allows you to push beyond the native ISO range if necessary. |
512003003280000 | 1024003003280000 |
Minimum shutter speed ⓘThe minimum shutter speed will tell you the longest exposure your camera can take without using an external accessory. |
3044080 | 3044080 |
Max shutter speed ⓘThe maximum shutter speed tells you the length inside 1 second the camera will capture. These can sometimes be extended with accessories such as extra external batteries. |
400080032000 | 800080032000 |
Autofocus points ⓘAutofocus points show where the camera is focusing graphically as squares or brackets in Live View or on an electronic viewfinder. These points are also used for light meter readings. |
1430300 | 4250300 |
In-body stabilisation ⓘIn-body Stabilization means the camera has a certain technology embedded that counteracts camera shake. |
✗ | ✓ |
Viewfinder type ⓘThe viewfinder type is either electronic or optical. Electronic viewfinders will have a small screen in the viewfinder. Optical viewfinders will use prisms and mirrors to look through the lens. |
Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder dots | 236000009900000 | 576000009900000 |
| Video | ||
Video ⓘIndicates if this camera is capable of recording video. |
✓ | ✓ |
Max video resolution ⓘThe best resolution this camera can capture video in. Modern cameras can capture up to 8K video. |
4K | 4K |
Max video format ⓘVideo resolution measured by the greatest number of pixels possible in each frame, width by height. A higher resolution means more detail or clarity in your video. |
3840 x 2160 | 3840 x 2160 |
Max video frame rate ⓘHow many frames per second your video will capture. Most cameras have options for multiple frame rates, depending on the resolution you shoot in. For a general video, 24p or 30p is the standard, but more serious filmmakers may need a higher frame rate for creative effect. |
120 fps | 30 fps |
Timelapse built in ⓘA built in time-lapse mode will allow continuous shooting throughout a prolonged period of time to be compressed into a sped up video. |
✓ | ✓ |
Video file format ⓘDifferent cameras can record in various video file formats. The File format you record in can impact how you edit and use the files. |
MPEG-4 | XAVC S, AVCHD Ver. 2.0, MP4 |
| Features | ||
Builtin flash ⓘA built-in flash will often be positioned right above the lens. This will automatically pop up when you activate it. |
✓ | ✗ |
External flash ⓘExternal flashes are often connected through a hot shoe at the top of a camera, or a cable at the side of the camera. |
✓ | ✓ |
GPS ⓘGPS features in a camera will include location metadata to each of your photographs. |
✗ | ✗ |
Weather sealing ⓘWeather sealing capabilities will give you more confidence when shooting in unfavourable conditions. |
✗ | ✓ |
| Screen type | TFT LCD | LCD |
Touch screen ⓘTouchscreen allows you to change camera settings and access menus with a swipe of your finger, instead of using buttons. |
✓ | ✓ |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Screen dots ⓘScreen dots indicate the resolution of the LCD screen by including each sub pixel. |
10400001150001500000 | 14400001150001500000 |
Flip screen ⓘA flip screen (or articulating screen) is a second screen which can flip out from the side or top of the camera. This rotating screen allows you more freedom to take photos at different angles. |
✓ | ✓ |
Live view ⓘLive View feature allows you to see a continuous live video of what is being seen through your lens. |
✓ | ✓ |
Wi-Fi ⓘBuilt-in Wi-Fi allows you to connect your camera and share images wirelessly. |
✓ | ✓ |
Bluetooth ⓘBluetooth capabilities allow you wireless control of your camera with other external devices. |
✓ | ✓ |
| Storage & battery | ||
| Memory card | SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-I compatible) | SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-II compatible) |
| Dual memory card slots | ✗ | ✓ |
| Battery type | LP-E12 | NP-FZ100 |
Battery life ⓘApproximately how long this cameras battery will last measured by how many photographs you will be able to take. |
305 shots1505000 | 670 shots1505000 |
| USB charging | ✗ | ✓ |
The Sony a7R IV emerges as the winner in this comparison, scoring 84/100, while the Canon EOS M50 Mark II scores 59/100. Both cameras are mirrorless and were released in 2019 and 2020, respectively. Their sizes are similar, with the Sony a7R IV being slightly larger and heavier than the Canon EOS M50 Mark II.
The Sony a7R IV’s higher score shows that it is a better camera, offering more advanced features and capabilities. This justifies its higher launch price of $3500 compared to the Canon EOS M50 Mark II’s $750. However, the Canon EOS M50 Mark II’s lower price and lighter weight make it a more budget-friendly and portable option.
Taking these factors into account, it’s evident that the Sony a7R IV is the superior choice for professional photographers, while the Canon EOS M50 Mark II may be more suitable for those who prioritize affordability and portability.
The Sony a7R IV outperforms the Canon EOS M50 Mark II in optics, with a score of 85/100 compared to the Canon’s 59/100. Both cameras share similarities in their specifications, such as a CMOS sensor, 10 fps shooting speed, and lens mounts compatible with their respective brand’s lenses. However, the differences between the two models are significant, leading to the Sony a7R IV’s higher score.
The Sony a7R IV excels with its 61.2-megapixel resolution, full-frame sensor, and image stabilization. The higher resolution allows for more detailed images, while the full-frame sensor captures more light and delivers better image quality. The inclusion of image stabilization helps reduce the effects of camera shake, resulting in sharper images. Additionally, the a7R IV has a DXOMARK sensor score of 99, indicating superior image quality and low-light performance.
On the other hand, the Canon EOS M50 Mark II has a lower resolution of 24 megapixels and an APS-C sensor. This smaller sensor size may limit image quality and low-light performance compared to the Sony a7R IV. Furthermore, the Canon M50 Mark II lacks image stabilization and has a lower DXOMARK sensor score of 58. The camera’s Digic 8 processor, however, is a reliable and fast image processor, ensuring efficient performance and image processing.
The Sony a7R IV’s superior optics make it a better choice for photographers seeking high-resolution images, better low-light performance, and image stabilization. The Canon EOS M50 Mark II, while not as advanced in optics, still offers decent performance and image quality for casual photographers or those on a budget. Ultimately, the choice between these two cameras depends on the individual’s needs and preferences.
The Canon EOS M50 Mark II outperforms the Sony a7R IV in video capabilities with a score of 91/100 compared to the Sony’s 70/100. Both cameras share some common features, such as 4K maximum video resolution and 3840 x 2160 maximum video dimensions. Additionally, both cameras offer built-in time-lapse functionality.
The Canon EOS M50 Mark II excels in video performance largely due to its maximum video frame rate of 120fps, allowing for smooth and high-quality slow-motion footage. This is a significant advantage over the Sony a7R IV, which offers a maximum video frame rate of just 30fps. The higher frame rate of the Canon camera provides more versatility and creative options for videographers.
Although the Sony a7R IV has a lower video score, it is worth noting that its video capabilities are still impressive, and it may be more suitable for certain users. The camera’s 4K video resolution and built-in time-lapse functionality are valuable assets for those who prioritize these features.
When comparing the video capabilities of the Canon EOS M50 Mark II and the Sony a7R IV, the Canon camera clearly has an advantage in terms of frame rate, providing more creative options and better slow-motion footage. However, the Sony a7R IV remains a strong contender with its 4K video resolution and time-lapse feature. Ultimately, the Canon EOS M50 Mark II is the superior choice for videographers seeking top-notch video performance, while the Sony a7R IV may still meet the needs of those who prioritize resolution and time-lapse functionality.
The Sony a7R IV outperforms the Canon EOS M50 Mark II in features with a score of 83/100 compared to the Canon’s 70/100. Both cameras share several specifications, such as a 3-inch touchscreen, flip screen, and the absence of GPS. Additionally, both cameras have built-in WIFI and Bluetooth capabilities.
The Sony a7R IV’s higher feature score is due to its superior screen resolution of 1,440,000 dots, compared to the Canon’s 1,040,000 dots. This higher resolution provides clearer and sharper image playback and menu navigation. The Sony a7R IV also has a more robust weather sealing, making it a more durable and reliable choice for outdoor and professional use.
The Canon EOS M50 Mark II, while trailing in features, has some advantages. It is lighter and more compact, making it a more convenient option for casual photographers and travelers. The Canon also has a slightly more affordable price tag, which may appeal to budget-conscious consumers.
Taking these factors into account, the Sony a7R IV proves to be the better camera in terms of features and performance, making it an excellent choice for professionals and enthusiasts. The Canon EOS M50 Mark II, on the other hand, is a suitable option for casual photographers and those seeking a more compact and budget-friendly camera. Both cameras offer unique strengths, allowing potential buyers to choose the best fit for their needs and preferences.
The Sony a7R IV outperforms the Canon EOS M50 Mark II in storage and battery, scoring 79/100 compared to Canon’s 21/100. Both cameras accept SD, SDHC, and SDXC memory cards, but the Sony a7R IV has two memory card slots and is compatible with UHS-II cards, while the Canon EOS M50 Mark II has only one slot and is compatible with UHS-I cards.
The Sony a7R IV also has a superior battery life, providing 670 shots per charge compared to the Canon EOS M50 Mark II’s 305 shots. Additionally, the a7R IV uses the NP-FZ100 battery type and supports USB charging, while the Canon uses the LP-E12 battery type and lacks USB charging capabilities.
The Canon EOS M50 Mark II does not offer any advantages over the Sony a7R IV in terms of storage and battery. Consequently, the Sony a7R IV is the clear winner in this category, offering better storage options and longer battery life, making it a more reliable choice for photographers.
Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Canon EOS M50 Mark II or the Sony a7R IV:
