Canon EOS R10 vs Nikon Z6 II Comparison

The Nikon Z6 II outperforms the Canon EOS R10 with a score of 83/100 compared to 69/100. Both cameras share similarities as mirrorless models, released in 2020 and 2022, respectively. They have comparable sizes, with the Canon EOS R10 measuring 123 x 88 x 83mm and the Nikon Z6 II at 134 x 101 x 70mm.

The Canon EOS R10 has an advantage in terms of weight and price, weighing 426g (0.94lbs) and costing $980. In contrast, the Nikon Z6 II weighs 705g (1.55lbs) and has a launch price of $1995. This makes the Canon EOS R10 a more budget-friendly and lightweight option.

Despite its higher price and weight, the Nikon Z6 II’s superior score indicates that it offers better performance and features overall. This could make it a more appealing choice for photographers seeking top-quality results. Ultimately, the choice between these two cameras depends on the user’s priorities, whether it’s budget and portability or performance and capabilities.

Canon EOS R10 vs Nikon Z6 II Overview and Optics

The Nikon Z6 II triumphs over the Canon EOS R10 in optics, scoring 83/100 compared to the R10’s 71/100. Both cameras boast 24 and 24.5 megapixels respectively, CMOS sensors, and similar shooting speeds (15 for Canon and 14 for Nikon). They also share compatibility with their respective lens mounts, the Canon RF and Nikon Z mounts.

The Nikon Z6 II outperforms the Canon EOS R10 in several areas, contributing to its higher optics score. The Z6 II features a full-frame sensor, while the R10 has an APS-C sensor. Full-frame sensors typically provide better image quality, low-light performance, and dynamic range. Additionally, the Z6 II has built-in image stabilisation, which helps reduce camera shake and blur in images. This feature is absent in the R10.

Although the Canon EOS R10 falls short in some aspects, it does have a few advantages. The R10’s Digic X processor is a powerful and efficient single processor, while the Nikon Z6 II uses dual Expeed 6 processors. Furthermore, the R10’s sensor has a slightly higher DXOMARK score of 97, compared to the Z6 II’s score of 94, suggesting the R10’s sensor may perform better in certain situations.

Despite these advantages for the Canon EOS R10, the Nikon Z6 II remains the superior choice in optics due to its full-frame sensor and image stabilisation. These features contribute to better overall image quality and versatility in various shooting conditions. While the R10 has a marginally better DXOMARK score and a powerful processor, the Z6 II’s advantages in sensor size and stabilisation make it the clear winner in this comparison.

The Canon EOS R10 and Nikon Z6 II both have a video score of 91/100, indicating that their video capabilities are highly comparable. Both cameras feature a maximum video resolution of 4K, with dimensions of 3840 x 2160, and a maximum video frame rate of 120fps. Additionally, both cameras have built-in time-lapse functionality.

The Canon EOS R10 and Nikon Z6 II share these strong video specifications, making them highly capable cameras for videography enthusiasts and professionals alike. However, there may be specific features or aspects of each camera that make one more suitable for certain users or shooting conditions.

For the Canon EOS R10, its strengths lie in the fact that it matches the Nikon Z6 II in terms of video capabilities, while potentially offering other advantages in its overall features or ergonomics. Users who prefer the Canon brand or have experience with Canon cameras may find the EOS R10 to be a more appealing choice.

On the other hand, the Nikon Z6 II also excels in video performance, matching the EOS R10 in all key video specifications. Nikon loyalists or those who prefer the handling and functionality of Nikon cameras may lean towards the Z6 II as their preferred choice for video work.

Ultimately, the choice between the Canon EOS R10 and Nikon Z6 II will depend on user preferences and specific needs, as both cameras boast impressive video capabilities. It is essential for potential buyers to consider other factors, such as lens availability, price, and compatibility with existing gear, before making a decision.

The Nikon Z6 II triumphs over the Canon EOS R10 in terms of features, scoring 87/100 compared to the Canon’s 70/100. Both cameras share several specifications, including touchscreen capabilities, Wi-Fi, and Bluetooth connectivity. Neither camera offers GPS functionality.

The Nikon Z6 II outperforms the Canon EOS R10 in screen size and resolution. The Nikon boasts a larger 3.2-inch screen, compared to the Canon’s 3-inch screen. Furthermore, the Nikon Z6 II’s screen resolution is significantly higher at 2,100,000 dots, while the Canon EOS R10 only has 1,040,000 dots. This makes the Nikon’s display sharper and more detailed, enhancing the user experience while composing and reviewing images.

On the other hand, the Canon EOS R10 has a flip screen, which the Nikon Z6 II lacks. This feature allows for more versatile shooting angles and is especially useful for vlogging or taking selfies. However, this advantage does not outweigh the Nikon’s superior screen size and resolution.

In terms of features, the Nikon Z6 II clearly outshines the Canon EOS R10. The larger screen size and higher resolution contribute to a better user experience, while the shared touchscreen, Wi-Fi, and Bluetooth capabilities ensure that both cameras remain competitive in terms of connectivity. The Canon EOS R10’s flip screen is a useful addition, but it does not compensate for the Nikon’s overall superior feature set. As a result, the Nikon Z6 II is the better choice for photographers in search of a camera with more advanced features.

The Nikon Z6 II surpasses the Canon EOS R10 in storage and battery with a score of 71/100 compared to the R10’s 40/100. Both cameras share the USB charging capability, making them convenient for on-the-go charging.

The Nikon Z6 II outperforms the Canon EOS R10 with its dual memory card slots, accepting both SD (UHS-II compatible) and CFexpress Type B / XQD cards. This feature provides users with more storage flexibility and backup options. Additionally, the Z6 II’s battery life is slightly lower at 410 shots compared to the R10’s 450 shots; however, this difference is minimal and does not significantly impact performance.

The Canon EOS R10 offers a longer battery life with 450 shots per charge, using the LP-E17 battery. Its storage capacity, however, is limited to a single SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I compatible) memory card slot, which may be insufficient for some users.

Considering both cameras, the Nikon Z6 II excels in storage options, while the Canon EOS R10 provides a marginally longer battery life. The Z6 II’s dual memory card slots and compatibility with various card types make it a more versatile choice for photographers who prioritize storage flexibility.

Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Canon EOS R10 or the Nikon Z6 II:

• Canon EOS R10 vs EOS R50
• Canon EOS R10 vs EOS R7
• Canon EOS 90D vs EOS R10
• Canon EOS R10 vs Nikon Z50
• Nikon Z6 vs Z6 II
• Nikon Z5 vs Z6 II