Canon EOS R10 vs Sony a7 III
Comparison
Canon EOS R10
Sony a7 III
Price |
from
Check Price
|
from
Check Price
| |
|---|---|---|---|
Brand | Canon | Sony | |
Model | EOS R10 | a7 III | |
Released Refers to the year this camera was officially made available for sale. | 2022 | 2018 | |
Announcement Date Refers to the date the manufacturer publicly announced the upcoming release and general specs of this camera. | May 24, 2022 | February 27, 2018 | |
Camera Type |  Mirrorless | Mirrorless | |
Camera Size | |||
Camera Weight |
The Sony a7 III outperforms the Canon EOS R10 with a score of 80/100 compared to 69/100. Both cameras are mirrorless and share similar dimensions, with the Canon EOS R10 measuring 123 x 88 x 83mm and weighing 426g, while the Sony a7 III measures 127 x 96 x 74mm and weighs 650g.
The Canon EOS R10 has an advantage in terms of its lower launch price of $980 and lighter weight. However, the Sony a7 III scores higher due to its superior performance and features. Despite being an older model, released in 2018 with a launch price of $2000, the Sony a7 III maintains its lead in the market.
Taking these factors into consideration, the Sony a7 III proves to be the better camera, offering more value for its higher price point. Meanwhile, the Canon EOS R10 provides a more affordable and lightweight option for those prioritizing cost and portability.
Canon EOS R10 vs Sony a7 III Overview and Optics
The Sony a7 III outperforms the Canon EOS R10 in optics with a score of 81/100, compared to the Canon’s 71/100. Both cameras share some common specifications, such as 24-megapixel resolution, CMOS sensor type, and lens mounts compatible with their respective brands (Canon RF and Sony FE).
The Sony a7 III excels in several areas, making it the better choice for optics. It has a full-frame sensor, which allows for better image quality and low-light performance compared to the Canon’s APS-C sensor. Additionally, the Sony a7 III has image stabilization, which is absent in the Canon EOS R10. This feature helps reduce camera shake, resulting in sharper images.
However, the Canon EOS R10 has its advantages. It boasts a faster shooting speed of 15 frames per second, compared to the Sony a7 III’s 10 frames per second. This makes the Canon EOS R10 a better option for capturing fast-moving subjects. Additionally, the Canon EOS R10 has a slightly higher DXOMARK score for the sensor (97) than the Sony a7 III (96), indicating marginally better sensor performance.
The Sony a7 III’s full-frame sensor and image stabilization make it a superior choice for those prioritizing image quality and low-light performance. However, the Canon EOS R10’s faster shooting speed may appeal to photographers who frequently capture fast-paced action. Ultimately, the choice between these two cameras depends on individual preferences and specific photography needs.
|
Optics
|
Canon EOS R10
|
Sony a7 III
|
|
|
|
|
||
Megapixels The higher the number of megapixels, the more detail the cameras sensor can capture. | 24 MP | 24.2 MP | |
|---|---|---|---|
Image Resolution Image resolution is measured in pixels and megapixels, width by height. The higher the number, the higher its resolution. | 6000 x 4000 px | 6000 x 4000 px | |
Sensor Type The camera sensor captures light and records the image. Sensors vary in physical size, the number of pixels, and quality. | CMOS | CMOS | |
Sensor Size The sensor size contributes to the overall quality as well as the dynamic and tonal range a camera can capture. As a rule of thumb, the more surface there is to read the light, the more information it will capture. | 22.2 x 14.8 mm | 23.8 x 35.6 mm | |
Sensor Format Refers to the most commonly used sensor sizes. |  APS-C |  Full Frame | |
Frame Rate The number of sequential frames per second the camera can write to the memory card when shooting in burst or continuous mode. | 15 fps | 10 fps | |
Lens Mount The lens mount will tell you what type of lens range you can fit onto the camera body. Often the same camera company will have different lens ranges for different cameras. | Canon RF | Sony FE | |
Image Processor The image processor in the camera converts the information collected on the sensor for digital storage on the memory card. | Digic X | Bionz X | |
Aspect Ratio The aspect ratio refers to the proportional difference between width and height. The most popular aspect ratios are 3:2 and 4:3. |  3:2 | 3:2 | |
Minimum ISO (Native) Refers to the lowest native (or 'base') ISO setting. Lower ISO are less sensitive to light but make a cleaner image. | 100 | 100 | |
Maximum ISO (Native) Refers to the highest native (or 'base') ISO setting. Higher ISO is necessary for low-light situations or night photography, but higher ISOs often introduce grain or noise. | 32,000 | 51,200 | |
Minimum ISO (Expanded) Expanded (or extended) ISO is a digitally enhanced feature available on some cameras. It allows you to push beyond the native ISO range if necessary. | 100 | 50 | |
Maximum ISO (Expanded) Expanded (or extended) ISO is a digitally enhanced feature available on some cameras. It allows you to push beyond the native ISO range if necessary. | 51200 | 204800 | |
Minimum Shutter Speed The minimum shutter speed will tell you the longest exposure your camera can take without using an external accessory. | 30 s | 30 s | |
Maximum Shutter Speed The maximum shutter speed tells you the length inside 1 second the camera will capture. These can sometimes be extended with accessories such as extra external batteries. | 1/ 4000 s | 1/ 8000 s | |
Autofocus Points Autofocus points show where the camera is focusing graphically as squares or brackets in Live View or on an electronic viewfinder. These points are also used for light meter readings. | 651 | 693 | |
In-body Stabilization In-body Stabilization means the camera has a certain technology embedded that counteracts camera shake. |   |  | |
Viewfinder Type The viewfinder type is either electronic or optical. Electronic viewfinders will have a small screen in the viewfinder. Optical viewfinders will use prisms and mirrors to look through the lens. | Electronic | Electronic | |
Viewfinder Resolution | 2,360,000 dots | 2,359,296 dots |
Canon EOS R10 vs Sony a7 III Video Performance
The Canon EOS R10 clearly outperforms the Sony a7 III in video capabilities, with a video score of 91/100 compared to Sony’s 56/100. Both cameras have a maximum video resolution of 4K and video dimensions of 3840 x 2160, which shows their similarities in producing high-quality footage.
The Canon EOS R10 excels with its higher maximum video frame rate of 120fps, allowing for smoother and more detailed slow-motion footage, while the Sony a7 III can only achieve 30fps. Additionally, the Canon EOS R10 has a built-in time-lapse functionality, which is not present in the Sony a7 III. This feature allows the Canon EOS R10 users to create stunning time-lapse videos without the need for external software or accessories.
The Sony a7 III may have a lower video score, but it still offers 4K video resolution and dimensions, making it suitable for consumers who do not require high frame rates or time-lapse functionality. It is important to note that the Sony a7 III’s video capabilities are not necessarily bad; they are simply surpassed by the Canon EOS R10 in certain aspects.
Considering the video capabilities of both cameras, the Canon EOS R10 is the superior choice for those seeking advanced video features such as higher frame rates and built-in time-lapse functionality. On the other hand, the Sony a7 III remains a viable option for those who prioritize 4K resolution and do not require the additional video features offered by the Canon EOS R10.
|
Video
|
Canon EOS R10
|
Sony a7 III
|
|
|
|
|
||
Video Indicates if this camera is capable of recording video. |  | | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max Video Resolution The best resolution this camera can capture video in. Modern cameras can capture up to 8K video. |  4K | 4K | |
Max Video Dimensions Video resolution measured by the greatest number of pixels possible in each frame, width by height. A higher resolution means more detail or clarity in your video. | 3840 x 2160 px | 3840 x 2160 px | |
Max Video Frame Rate How many frames per second your video will capture. Most cameras have options for multiple frame rates, depending on the resolution you shoot in. For a general video, 24p or 30p is the standard, but more serious filmmakers may need a higher frame rate for creative effect. | 120 p | 30 p | |
Time-Lapse Built In A built in time-lapse mode will allow continuous shooting throughout a prolonged period of time to be compressed into a sped up video. |  | | |
Video File Format Different cameras can record in various video file formats. The File format you record in can impact how you edit and use the files. | MPEG-4, MOV | XAVC S, AVCHD |
Canon EOS R10 vs Sony a7 III Features and Benefits
The Sony a7 III outperforms the Canon EOS R10 in features with a score of 81/100, compared to the Canon’s 70/100. Both cameras share several specifications, including a 3-inch screen, touchscreen capability, flip screen, and the absence of GPS. Additionally, both cameras are equipped with WIFI and Bluetooth connectivity.
The Sony a7 III excels in screen resolution, offering 921,600 dots compared to the Canon EOS R10’s 1,040,000 dots. This higher resolution provides a clearer and more detailed display, making it easier for photographers to review images and navigate menus. The Sony a7 III’s overall higher score indicates that it offers a more comprehensive set of features.
On the other hand, the Canon EOS R10 still has its advantages. Although it has a lower overall feature score, the camera still offers a solid feature set that meets the needs of many photographers. The Canon EOS R10’s touchscreen, flip screen, WIFI, and Bluetooth capabilities make it a reliable and user-friendly option.
When comparing the two cameras, it is clear that the Sony a7 III has a slight edge over the Canon EOS R10 in terms of features. The higher screen resolution enhances the user experience, and the overall higher score reflects its superiority in this aspect. However, the Canon EOS R10 remains a viable option for photographers who value its specific features and may prefer the Canon brand. Ultimately, the choice between the two cameras will depend on individual preferences and priorities.
|
Features
|
Canon EOS R10
|
Sony a7 III
|
|
|
|
|
||
Built-in Flash A built-in flash will often be positioned right above the lens. This will automatically pop up when you activate it. |  | | |
|---|---|---|---|
External Flash External flashes are often connected through a hot shoe at the top of a camera, or a cable at the side of the camera. |  | | |
GPS GPS features in a camera will include location metadata to each of your photographs. |  | | |
Weather Sealing Weather sealing capabilities will give you more confidence when shooting in unfavourable conditions. |  | | |
Screen Type | TFT LCD | LCD | |
Touch Screen Touchscreen allows you to change camera settings and access menus with a swipe of your finger, instead of using buttons. |  | | |
Screen Size |  3" | 3" | |
Screen Resolution Screen dots indicate the resolution of the LCD screen by including each sub pixel. | 1,040,000 dots | 921,600 dots | |
Flip Screen A flip screen (or articulating screen) is a second screen which can flip out from the side or top of the camera. This rotating screen allows you more freedom to take photos at different angles. |  | | |
Live View Live View feature allows you to see a continuous live video of what is being seen through your lens. |  | | |
Wi-Fi |  | | |
Bluetooth Bluetooth capabilities allow you wireless control of your camera with other external devices. |  | | |
Canon EOS R10 vs Sony a7 III Storage and Battery
The Sony a7 III outperforms the Canon EOS R10 in storage and battery with a score of 68/100 compared to the R10’s 40/100. Both cameras accept SD, SDHC, and SDXC memory cards. However, the a7 III has two memory card slots and also supports Memory Stick Duo, Pro Duo, and Pro-HG Duo cards, giving it an edge in storage capacity and flexibility.
In terms of battery life, the Sony a7 III is superior with 750 shots per charge, while the Canon EOS R10 only offers 450 shots. The a7 III uses the NP-FZ100 battery type, which lasts longer than the R10’s LP-E17.
The only advantage the Canon EOS R10 has over the Sony a7 III in this category is its USB charging capability. This feature allows for convenient charging on-the-go, whereas the Sony a7 III lacks this option.
Taking these factors into account, the Sony a7 III is the better choice for those prioritizing storage capacity and battery life. On the other hand, the Canon EOS R10 may be more suitable for users who value USB charging convenience.
|
Storage and Battery
|
Canon EOS R10
|
Sony a7 III
|
|
|
|
|
||
Memory Card | SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-I compatible) | SD / SDHC / SDXC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro-HG Duo | |
|---|---|---|---|
Dual Memory Card Slots |  | | |
Battery Type | LP-E17 | NP-FZ100 | |
Battery Life Approximately how long this cameras battery will last measured by how many photographs you will be able to take. | 450 shots | 750 shots | |
USB Charging |  | |
|
DXOMARK Scores
Sensor scores tested by DXOMARK |
Canon EOS R10
|
Sony a7 III
|
|
Overall Score DXOMARK overall sensor score. | N/A | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Portrait (Color Depth) As described by DXOMARK 'The Portrait score in our camera sensor reviews defines color depth performance and its unit is a number of bits. A color depth of 22 bits is excellent; differences below 1 bit are barely noticeable.' | N/A | 25.1 bits | |
Landscape (Dynamic Range) As described by DXOMARK 'The Landscape score in our camera sensor tests defines the maximum dynamic range of the camera sensor and its unit is an exposure value (EV). A value of 12 EV is excellent with differences below 0.5 EV usually not noticeable.' | N/A | 14.7 EVs | |
Sports (Low-Light ISO) Described by DXOMARK as 'The maximal value of ISO sensitivity needed to reach a given value of Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR). The greater the value, the better' | N/A | 3722 |
|
Scores
|
Canon EOS R10
|
Sony a7 III
|
|
Main Features | N/A | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Extra Features | N/A | ||
Construction and Durability | N/A | ||
Handling and Ergonomics | N/A | ||
Value for Money | N/A | ||
Total Score | N/A |
Alternatives to the Canon EOS R10 and Sony a7 III
Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Canon EOS R10 or the Sony a7 III:
|
User Scores
|
Canon EOS R10
|
Sony a7 III
|