Side-by-side specs, scores and live prices. Start over
|
✓ WINNER
 94
SCORE
|
 75
SCORE
|
|
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Brand | Canon | Ricoh |
| Model | EOS R5 | FX3 |
Released ⓘRefers to the year this camera was officially made available for sale. |
2020 | 2021 |
Announcement date ⓘRefers to the date the manufacturer publicly announced the upcoming release and general specs of this camera. |
30/07/2020 | 23/02/2021 |
| Camera type | Mirrorless | Mirrorless |
| Camera size | 138 x 98 x 88 mm | 129.7 x 77.8 x 84.5 mm |
| Camera weight | 680 g | 640 g |
| Optics | ||
Megapixels ⓘThe higher the number of megapixels, the more detail the cameras sensor can capture. |
45 MP050 | 12.1 MP050 |
Image resolution ⓘImage resolution is measured in pixels and megapixels, width by height. The higher the number, the higher its resolution. |
8192 x 5464 | 4240 × 2832 |
Sensor type ⓘThe camera sensor captures light and records the image. Sensors vary in physical size, the number of pixels, and quality. |
CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size ⓘThe sensor size contributes to the overall quality as well as the dynamic and tonal range a camera can capture. As a rule of thumb, the more surface there is to read the light, the more information it will capture. |
23.9 x 35.9 | 35.6 x 23.8 |
Sensor format ⓘRefers to the most commonly used sensor sizes. |
Full Frame | Full Frame |
Continuous shooting ⓘThe number of sequential frames per second the camera can write to the memory card when shooting in burst or continuous mode. |
20 fps045 | 10 fps045 |
Lens mount ⓘThe lens mount will tell you what type of lens range you can fit onto the camera body. Often the same camera company will have different lens ranges for different cameras. |
Canon RF | Sony E |
Image processor ⓘThe image processor in the camera converts the information collected on the sensor for digital storage on the memory card. |
Digic X | Bionz XR |
Aspect ratio ⓘThe aspect ratio refers to the proportional difference between width and height. The most popular aspect ratios are 3:2 and 4:3. |
3:2 | 3:2 |
Min ISO ⓘRefers to the lowest native (or 'base') ISO setting. Lower ISO are less sensitive to light but make a cleaner image. |
10030200 | 8030200 |
Max ISO ⓘRefers to the highest native (or 'base') ISO setting. Higher ISO is necessary for low-light situations or night photography, but higher ISOs often introduce grain or noise. |
512003003280000 | 1024003003280000 |
Min ISO (expanded) ⓘExpanded (or extended) ISO is a digitally enhanced feature available on some cameras. It allows you to push beyond the native ISO range if necessary. |
10030200 | 4030200 |
Max ISO (expanded) ⓘExpanded (or extended) ISO is a digitally enhanced feature available on some cameras. It allows you to push beyond the native ISO range if necessary. |
1024003003280000 | 4096003003280000 |
Minimum shutter speed ⓘThe minimum shutter speed will tell you the longest exposure your camera can take without using an external accessory. |
3044080 | 3044080 |
Max shutter speed ⓘThe maximum shutter speed tells you the length inside 1 second the camera will capture. These can sometimes be extended with accessories such as extra external batteries. |
800080032000 | 800080032000 |
Autofocus points ⓘAutofocus points show where the camera is focusing graphically as squares or brackets in Live View or on an electronic viewfinder. These points are also used for light meter readings. |
10530300 | 6270300 |
In-body stabilisation ⓘIn-body Stabilization means the camera has a certain technology embedded that counteracts camera shake. |
✓ | ✓ |
Viewfinder type ⓘThe viewfinder type is either electronic or optical. Electronic viewfinders will have a small screen in the viewfinder. Optical viewfinders will use prisms and mirrors to look through the lens. |
Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder dots | 576000009900000 | N/A |
| Video | ||
Video ⓘIndicates if this camera is capable of recording video. |
✓ | ✓ |
Max video resolution ⓘThe best resolution this camera can capture video in. Modern cameras can capture up to 8K video. |
8K | 4K |
Max video format ⓘVideo resolution measured by the greatest number of pixels possible in each frame, width by height. A higher resolution means more detail or clarity in your video. |
8192 x 4320 | 3840 x 2160 |
Max video frame rate ⓘHow many frames per second your video will capture. Most cameras have options for multiple frame rates, depending on the resolution you shoot in. For a general video, 24p or 30p is the standard, but more serious filmmakers may need a higher frame rate for creative effect. |
120 fps | 120 fps |
Timelapse built in ⓘA built in time-lapse mode will allow continuous shooting throughout a prolonged period of time to be compressed into a sped up video. |
✓ | ✓ |
Video file format ⓘDifferent cameras can record in various video file formats. The File format you record in can impact how you edit and use the files. |
MP4 | MPEG-4, MOV, XAVC S, XAVC HS, XAVC S-1 |
| Features | ||
Builtin flash ⓘA built-in flash will often be positioned right above the lens. This will automatically pop up when you activate it. |
✗ | ✗ |
External flash ⓘExternal flashes are often connected through a hot shoe at the top of a camera, or a cable at the side of the camera. |
✓ | ✓ |
GPS ⓘGPS features in a camera will include location metadata to each of your photographs. |
✗ | ✗ |
Weather sealing ⓘWeather sealing capabilities will give you more confidence when shooting in unfavourable conditions. |
✓ | ✓ |
| Screen type | LCD | TFT LCD |
Touch screen ⓘTouchscreen allows you to change camera settings and access menus with a swipe of your finger, instead of using buttons. |
✓ | ✓ |
| Screen size | 3.2" | 3" |
Screen dots ⓘScreen dots indicate the resolution of the LCD screen by including each sub pixel. |
21000001150001500000 | 14400001150001500000 |
Flip screen ⓘA flip screen (or articulating screen) is a second screen which can flip out from the side or top of the camera. This rotating screen allows you more freedom to take photos at different angles. |
✓ | ✓ |
Live view ⓘLive View feature allows you to see a continuous live video of what is being seen through your lens. |
✓ | ✓ |
Wi-Fi ⓘBuilt-in Wi-Fi allows you to connect your camera and share images wirelessly. |
✓ | ✓ |
Bluetooth ⓘBluetooth capabilities allow you wireless control of your camera with other external devices. |
✓ | ✓ |
| Storage & battery | ||
| Memory card | SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-II compatible), CFexpress | SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-II compatible), CFexpress Type A |
| Dual memory card slots | ✓ | ✓ |
| Battery type | LP-E6NH | NP-FZ100 |
Battery life ⓘApproximately how long this cameras battery will last measured by how many photographs you will be able to take. |
320 shots1505000 | 600 shots1505000 |
| USB charging | ✓ | ✓ |
The Canon EOS R5 takes the lead with a score of 86/100, while the Sony FX3 trails behind at 75/100. Both cameras are mirrorless and were released in 2020 and 2021, respectively. They share similarities in size and weight, with the Canon measuring 138 x 98 x 88mm and weighing 680g, and the Sony at 129.7 x 77.8 x 84.5mm and 640g.
The Canon EOS R5 outperforms the Sony FX3 with its higher score, reflecting its superior quality. The higher launch price of $4499 for the Canon also suggests a more premium product compared to the Sony’s $3900 price tag.
However, the Sony FX3 is not without its merits. Its lighter weight and more compact size may appeal to users who prioritize portability and ease of handling. Despite its lower score, it still offers reliable performance at a more affordable price point.
Taking these factors into consideration, the Canon EOS R5 is the better camera in terms of overall quality and performance, while the Sony FX3 caters to those who value convenience and affordability.
The Canon EOS R5 outperforms the Sony FX3 in optics, scoring 88/100 compared to the Sony’s 71/100. Both cameras share several key features, including a full-frame CMOS sensor, image stabilization, and compatibility with their respective lens mounts (Canon RF for the R5 and Sony E for the FX3).
The EOS R5’s superior performance can be attributed to its higher megapixel count of 45, which allows for greater detail and resolution in images. Additionally, its shooting speed of 20 frames per second (fps) is double that of the FX3’s 10 fps, enabling faster action capture and improved performance in sports or wildlife photography. The R5’s sensor also has a slightly higher DXOMARK score of 95, compared to the FX3’s 94, indicating marginally better image quality.
On the other hand, the Sony FX3’s lower megapixel count of 12.1 can be advantageous in low-light situations, as larger pixels capture more light and reduce noise. However, this benefit is somewhat offset by the R5’s superior sensor performance. The FX3’s Bionz XR processor is highly capable, but it does not outshine the R5’s Digic X processor in terms of overall performance.
In conclusion, the Canon EOS R5 offers superior optics performance with its higher megapixel count, faster shooting speed, and slightly better sensor quality. The Sony FX3 may have an edge in low-light situations, but it does not surpass the R5 in other aspects. Ultimately, photographers seeking the best optics performance should opt for the Canon EOS R5.
The Canon EOS R5 triumphs over the Sony FX3 in terms of video capabilities with a score of 100/100, while the FX3 scores 91/100. Both cameras share some similarities in specs, such as a maximum video frame rate of 120fps and built-in time-lapse functionality. However, there are areas where the R5 outperforms the FX3, and some aspects in which the FX3 has an advantage.
The Canon EOS R5 excels in video resolution and dimensions, offering a stunning 8K resolution with maximum dimensions of 8192 x 4320. This feature allows for capturing incredibly detailed and sharp footage, which is highly beneficial for professional videographers and filmmakers who require top-notch quality.
On the other hand, the Sony FX3 provides a maximum video resolution of 4K and dimensions of 3840 x 2160. While this is still considered high-quality and suitable for most video projects, it falls short compared to the R5’s 8K capabilities. However, the lower resolution can be advantageous for users who need smaller file sizes and faster processing times.
Despite the differences in resolution, both cameras perform well in terms of frame rate and time-lapse functionality. The 120fps frame rate ensures smooth motion capture, and the built-in time-lapse feature allows for creative and dynamic video content.
In comparing the video capabilities of the Canon EOS R5 and Sony FX3, the R5 stands out with its superior 8K resolution and dimensions, making it the better choice for professional videographers seeking the highest quality footage. The FX3, although not as powerful in resolution, remains a viable option for those prioritizing smaller file sizes and quicker processing. The shared features of 120fps frame rate and time-lapse functionality ensure both cameras deliver excellent performance in these areas.
The Canon EOS R5 outperforms the Sony FX3 in features with a score of 87/100, compared to the Sony FX3’s 83/100. Both cameras share several common specifications, including a touchscreen, flip screen, Wi-Fi, and Bluetooth connectivity. Neither camera has GPS functionality.
The Canon EOS R5 stands out with its larger screen size of 3.2 inches and a higher screen resolution of 2,100,000 dots. This means the R5 offers a more detailed and expansive viewing experience for users when composing shots or reviewing images and videos. The improved screen resolution also contributes to the camera’s overall higher feature score.
The Sony FX3, despite its lower feature score, still offers a respectable 3-inch screen and a 1,440,000-dot resolution. This camera remains a strong contender, especially for users who prefer a more compact size without sacrificing essential features. While the FX3 may not have the same level of screen performance as the EOS R5, its other features are on par with its competitor.
In comparing the Canon EOS R5 and the Sony FX3, the R5 takes the lead in terms of features, primarily due to its superior screen size and resolution. However, the Sony FX3 remains a viable option for those who prioritize compactness and do not require the highest screen specifications. Both cameras offer a range of valuable features, making them suitable choices for various photography and videography needs.
The Sony FX3 outperforms the Canon EOS R5 in storage and battery, scoring 76/100 compared to the R5’s 68/100. Both cameras share similarities, such as having two memory card slots and accepting SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II compatible) cards. Additionally, both cameras offer USB charging capabilities.
The FX3’s edge lies in its battery life, which delivers 600 shots compared to the R5’s 320 shots. The Sony FX3 uses the NP-FZ100 battery type, contributing to its longer battery life. Furthermore, the FX3 accepts CFexpress Type A cards, providing faster write speeds and larger storage capacities.
On the other hand, the Canon EOS R5 also accepts CFexpress cards, which are compatible with both cameras. However, the R5’s battery life falls short, with only 320 shots using the LP-E6NH battery type.
Taking these factors into account, the Sony FX3 emerges as the superior choice in terms of storage and battery performance. The Canon EOS R5, while offering similar storage options, lags behind in battery life, making it less suitable for extended shooting sessions.
Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Canon EOS R5 or the Sony FX3:
