Side-by-side specs, scores and live prices. Start over
 78
SCORE
|
✓ WINNER
 85
SCORE
|
|
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Brand | Canon | Sony |
| Model | EOS R6 Mark II | a7R IVA |
Released ⓘRefers to the year this camera was officially made available for sale. |
2022 | 2021 |
Announcement date ⓘRefers to the date the manufacturer publicly announced the upcoming release and general specs of this camera. |
11/02/2022 | 07/04/2021 |
| Camera type | Mirrorless | Mirrorless |
| Camera size | 138.4 × 98.4 × 88.4 mm | 129 x 96 x 78 mm |
| Camera weight | 588 g | 665 g |
| Optics | ||
Megapixels ⓘThe higher the number of megapixels, the more detail the cameras sensor can capture. |
24 MP050 | 61 MP050 |
Image resolution ⓘImage resolution is measured in pixels and megapixels, width by height. The higher the number, the higher its resolution. |
6000 x 4000 | 9504 x 6336 |
Sensor type ⓘThe camera sensor captures light and records the image. Sensors vary in physical size, the number of pixels, and quality. |
CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size ⓘThe sensor size contributes to the overall quality as well as the dynamic and tonal range a camera can capture. As a rule of thumb, the more surface there is to read the light, the more information it will capture. |
24 x 36 | 35.7 x 23.8 |
Sensor format ⓘRefers to the most commonly used sensor sizes. |
Full Frame | Full Frame |
Continuous shooting ⓘThe number of sequential frames per second the camera can write to the memory card when shooting in burst or continuous mode. |
40 fps045 | 10 fps045 |
Lens mount ⓘThe lens mount will tell you what type of lens range you can fit onto the camera body. Often the same camera company will have different lens ranges for different cameras. |
Canon RF | Sony FE |
Image processor ⓘThe image processor in the camera converts the information collected on the sensor for digital storage on the memory card. |
Digic X | Bionz X |
Aspect ratio ⓘThe aspect ratio refers to the proportional difference between width and height. The most popular aspect ratios are 3:2 and 4:3. |
3:2 | 3:2 |
Min ISO ⓘRefers to the lowest native (or 'base') ISO setting. Lower ISO are less sensitive to light but make a cleaner image. |
10030200 | 10030200 |
Max ISO ⓘRefers to the highest native (or 'base') ISO setting. Higher ISO is necessary for low-light situations or night photography, but higher ISOs often introduce grain or noise. |
1024003003280000 | 320003003280000 |
Min ISO (expanded) ⓘExpanded (or extended) ISO is a digitally enhanced feature available on some cameras. It allows you to push beyond the native ISO range if necessary. |
5030200 | 5030200 |
Max ISO (expanded) ⓘExpanded (or extended) ISO is a digitally enhanced feature available on some cameras. It allows you to push beyond the native ISO range if necessary. |
2048003003280000 | 1024003003280000 |
Minimum shutter speed ⓘThe minimum shutter speed will tell you the longest exposure your camera can take without using an external accessory. |
3044080 | 3044080 |
Max shutter speed ⓘThe maximum shutter speed tells you the length inside 1 second the camera will capture. These can sometimes be extended with accessories such as extra external batteries. |
800080032000 | 800080032000 |
Autofocus points ⓘAutofocus points show where the camera is focusing graphically as squares or brackets in Live View or on an electronic viewfinder. These points are also used for light meter readings. |
48970300 | 5670300 |
In-body stabilisation ⓘIn-body Stabilization means the camera has a certain technology embedded that counteracts camera shake. |
✓ | ✓ |
Viewfinder type ⓘThe viewfinder type is either electronic or optical. Electronic viewfinders will have a small screen in the viewfinder. Optical viewfinders will use prisms and mirrors to look through the lens. |
Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder dots | 369000009900000 | 576000009900000 |
| Video | ||
Video ⓘIndicates if this camera is capable of recording video. |
✓ | ✓ |
Max video resolution ⓘThe best resolution this camera can capture video in. Modern cameras can capture up to 8K video. |
4K | 4K |
Max video format ⓘVideo resolution measured by the greatest number of pixels possible in each frame, width by height. A higher resolution means more detail or clarity in your video. |
3840 x 2160 | 3840 x 2160 |
Max video frame rate ⓘHow many frames per second your video will capture. Most cameras have options for multiple frame rates, depending on the resolution you shoot in. For a general video, 24p or 30p is the standard, but more serious filmmakers may need a higher frame rate for creative effect. |
60 fps | 120 fps |
Timelapse built in ⓘA built in time-lapse mode will allow continuous shooting throughout a prolonged period of time to be compressed into a sped up video. |
✓ | ✓ |
Video file format ⓘDifferent cameras can record in various video file formats. The File format you record in can impact how you edit and use the files. |
MPEG-4, MOV | MPEG-4, MOV, H.264 |
| Features | ||
Builtin flash ⓘA built-in flash will often be positioned right above the lens. This will automatically pop up when you activate it. |
✗ | ✗ |
External flash ⓘExternal flashes are often connected through a hot shoe at the top of a camera, or a cable at the side of the camera. |
✓ | ✓ |
GPS ⓘGPS features in a camera will include location metadata to each of your photographs. |
✗ | ✗ |
Weather sealing ⓘWeather sealing capabilities will give you more confidence when shooting in unfavourable conditions. |
✓ | ✓ |
| Screen type | TFT LCD | TFT LCD |
Touch screen ⓘTouchscreen allows you to change camera settings and access menus with a swipe of your finger, instead of using buttons. |
✓ | ✓ |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Screen dots ⓘScreen dots indicate the resolution of the LCD screen by including each sub pixel. |
16200001150001500000 | 23600001150001500000 |
Flip screen ⓘA flip screen (or articulating screen) is a second screen which can flip out from the side or top of the camera. This rotating screen allows you more freedom to take photos at different angles. |
✓ | ✓ |
Live view ⓘLive View feature allows you to see a continuous live video of what is being seen through your lens. |
✓ | ✓ |
Wi-Fi ⓘBuilt-in Wi-Fi allows you to connect your camera and share images wirelessly. |
✓ | ✓ |
Bluetooth ⓘBluetooth capabilities allow you wireless control of your camera with other external devices. |
✓ | ✓ |
| Storage & battery | ||
| Memory card | SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-II compatible) | SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-II compatible) |
| Dual memory card slots | ✓ | ✓ |
| Battery type | LP-E6NH | NP-FZ100 |
Battery life ⓘApproximately how long this cameras battery will last measured by how many photographs you will be able to take. |
360 shots1505000 | 670 shots1505000 |
| USB charging | ✓ | ✓ |
The Sony a7R IVA outperforms the Canon EOS R6 Mark II with a score of 85/100 compared to 78/100. Both cameras share similarities as mirrorless devices, with announcement dates in 2021 and 2022 respectively. The Canon has a lower launch price at $2499, while the Sony is priced at $3500.
The Canon EOS R6 Mark II is lighter, weighing 588g, and larger in size at 138.4 x 98.4 x 88.4mm. This makes it more convenient for users who prioritize portability. However, the Sony a7R IVA’s higher score signifies its superior performance in various aspects, justifying its higher price tag.
Despite being heavier at 665g and slightly smaller at 129 x 96 x 78mm, the Sony a7R IVA offers better features and overall performance. Users who value quality and features over size and weight may find the Sony a7R IVA a better fit. The difference in scores highlights the superiority of the Sony a7R IVA, while the Canon EOS R6 Mark II remains a viable option for those seeking a more budget-friendly and portable option.
The Sony a7R IVA outperforms the Canon EOS R6 Mark II in optics with a score of 85/100 compared to 83/100. Both cameras share several specifications, including a CMOS sensor, full-frame sensor size, and image stabilization. Additionally, they each have their respective lens mounts: the Canon RF for the EOS R6 Mark II and the Sony FE for the a7R IVA.
The Sony a7R IVA surpasses the Canon EOS R6 Mark II in terms of megapixels and sensor performance. With 61 megapixels, the a7R IVA offers more than double the resolution of the EOS R6 Mark II’s 24 megapixels. This difference allows for greater detail and better-quality images. Furthermore, the a7R IVA has a higher DXOMARK score for its sensor (99) than the EOS R6 Mark II (91), indicating superior sensor performance.
On the other hand, the Canon EOS R6 Mark II excels in shooting speed. With a shooting speed of 40, it is significantly faster than the Sony a7R IVA, which has a shooting speed of 10. This advantage makes the EOS R6 Mark II more suitable for capturing fast-moving subjects or action photography.
In terms of optics, the Sony a7R IVA is the superior choice due to its higher resolution and better sensor performance. However, the Canon EOS R6 Mark II’s faster shooting speed could make it the preferred option for photographers who prioritize capturing fast-paced action. Ultimately, the choice between these two cameras will depend on the specific needs and preferences of the photographer.
The Sony a7R IVA emerges as the winner in the video capabilities comparison, scoring 91/100, while the Canon EOS R6 Mark II trails behind with a score of 83/100. Both cameras share common video specifications, such as a maximum video resolution of 4K and dimensions of 3840 x 2160. Additionally, both cameras feature built-in time-lapse functionality, making them suitable for creative video projects.
The Sony a7R IVA outperforms the Canon EOS R6 Mark II in terms of maximum video frame rate, offering a remarkable 120fps, while the Canon model only provides 60fps. This higher frame rate allows the Sony camera to capture smoother and more detailed slow-motion footage, making it a superior choice for videographers who prioritize fluid motion and cinematic visuals.
However, the Canon EOS R6 Mark II still has its merits. While it has a lower frame rate, it maintains the same 4K resolution and dimensions as the Sony a7R IVA, ensuring that the video quality remains sharp and detailed. This makes it a viable option for those who do not require the higher frame rate provided by the Sony camera.
After considering the video capabilities of both cameras, it is clear that the Sony a7R IVA is the better option for those seeking enhanced slow-motion capabilities and smooth video footage. Meanwhile, the Canon EOS R6 Mark II remains a suitable choice for users who prioritize 4K resolution and dimensions, despite its lower frame rate.
The Sony a7R IVA outperforms the Canon EOS R6 Mark II with a feature score of 85/100 compared to 72/100. Both cameras share similarities in specifications, such as a 3-inch screen size, touchscreen capabilities, flip screen, WIFI, and Bluetooth connectivity. However, the Sony a7R IVA surpasses the Canon EOS R6 Mark II in certain aspects, while the latter has some advantages as well.
The Sony a7R IVA’s screen resolution is superior at 2,360,000 dots, compared to the Canon EOS R6 Mark II’s 1,620,000 dots. This higher resolution provides a clearer and more detailed display for better image viewing and menu navigation. The Canon EOS R6 Mark II, on the other hand, offers GPS functionality, which the Sony a7R IVA lacks. This feature allows for easier geotagging and location tracking, which can be beneficial for photographers who travel or shoot outdoors frequently.
Despite the Canon EOS R6 Mark II’s advantage in GPS functionality, the Sony a7R IVA’s higher feature score proves it to be the better camera in terms of overall performance and capabilities. The improved screen resolution enhances user experience and image quality, while the absence of GPS in the Sony a7R IVA may not be a significant drawback for some users.
To conclude, the Sony a7R IVA stands out as a superior camera due to its higher feature score and better screen resolution. The Canon EOS R6 Mark II still has its merits, particularly with its GPS functionality, but the Sony a7R IVA ultimately offers a more comprehensive and enhanced photography experience.
The Sony a7R IVA outperforms the Canon EOS R6 Mark II in storage and battery, scoring 79/100 compared to Canon’s 68/100. Both cameras have two memory card slots and accept SD, SDHC, and SDXC cards with UHS-II compatibility. They also support USB charging.
The Sony a7R IVA’s superior score results from its longer battery life of 670 shots, compared to the Canon EOS R6 Mark II’s 360 shots. The Sony camera utilizes an NP-FZ100 battery, while the Canon uses an LP-E6NH battery. This significant difference in battery life allows the Sony a7R IVA users to capture more images without needing to recharge or replace the battery.
Although the Canon EOS R6 Mark II has a lower score in this category, it does not have any advantages over the Sony a7R IVA in terms of storage and battery. Both cameras share the same memory card compatibility and USB charging feature.
Considering the significant difference in battery life, the Sony a7R IVA is the clear winner in the storage and battery category, providing users with extended shooting time and convenience. The Canon EOS R6 Mark II, while sharing similar storage features, falls short in battery performance.
Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Canon EOS R6 Mark II or the Sony a7R IVA:
