Fujifilm X-A2 vs X-M1 Comparison
Fujifilm X-A2
Fujifilm X-M1
The Fujifilm X-M1 takes the lead with a score of 51/100, compared to the Fujifilm X-A2‘s 44/100. Both cameras are mirrorless and share similar dimensions, with the X-A2 measuring 117 x 67 x 40mm and the X-M1 at 117 x 67 x 39mm. The X-M1 is also slightly lighter at 330g, while the X-A2 weighs 350g.
The X-M1’s higher score and higher launch price of $700, as opposed to the X-A2’s $549, indicate its superior features. However, the X-A2 still offers decent performance for its lower price, making it a good option for budget-conscious buyers.
When considering the specifications, the Fujifilm X-M1 is the better camera, but the X-A2 remains a viable alternative for those seeking an affordable option.
Fujifilm X-A2 vs X-M1 Overview and Optics
The Fujifilm X-A2 and Fujifilm X-M1 both score 53/100 in optics, indicating no clear winner. These cameras share several specifications, such as 16-megapixel resolution, 5.6 shooting speed, CMOS sensor type, EXR Processor II, APS-C sensor size, Fujifilm X lens mount, and no image stabilization.
Given the identical scores and specifications, it is difficult to determine which camera has better optics. However, certain factors may contribute to a user’s preference for one model over the other. The Fujifilm X-A2 is better in terms of user experience, as it offers a tilting screen that allows shooting from different angles. This feature can be particularly useful for photographers who need to capture images from unique perspectives or in challenging environments.
On the other hand, the Fujifilm X-M1 has a more advanced autofocus system, which may be better for photographers who require fast and accurate focus in their work. This advantage can be particularly useful in situations where capturing a fleeting moment is essential, such as sports or wildlife photography.
Despite these differences, both cameras have the same optics score, which suggests that the overall image quality produced by each model is comparable. Therefore, the choice between the Fujifilm X-A2 and Fujifilm X-M1 may ultimately come down to specific features and personal preferences rather than a significant difference in optical performance.
Fujifilm X-A2 vs X-M1 Video Performance
The Fujifilm X-A2 and the Fujifilm X-M1 both have a video score of 43/100, indicating that they have similar video capabilities. Both cameras offer Full HD video resolution with maximum dimensions of 1920 x 1080 and a maximum video frame rate of 30fps. Neither camera has built-in time-lapse functionality.
The winning camera in this comparison is neither, as both cameras have the same video score and share common specifications. The X-A2 and X-M1 perform equally well when it comes to video capabilities.
However, it is essential to consider the individual strengths of each camera. The Fujifilm X-A2 and the Fujifilm X-M1 both provide Full HD video resolution, ensuring high-quality video recording. The maximum video frame rate of 30fps allows for smooth video playback, making both cameras suitable for everyday video recording tasks.
On the other hand, the lack of built-in time-lapse functionality in both cameras may be a drawback for some users. Time-lapse photography is a popular technique used to capture slow-moving events, and its absence might limit the creative potential of these cameras.
To conclude, the Fujifilm X-A2 and the Fujifilm X-M1 have identical video capabilities, resulting in a tie in this comparison. Both cameras offer Full HD video resolution and a maximum video frame rate of 30fps, providing good video quality for everyday use. However, the absence of built-in time-lapse functionality may be a limitation for users seeking to explore more creative videography techniques.
Fujifilm X-A2 vs X-M1 Features and Benefits
The Fujifilm X-M1 emerges as the winner in the features comparison, with a score of 54/100, while the Fujifilm X-A2 lags behind with a score of 28/100. Both cameras share similar specifications in certain aspects, including a 3-inch screen size, a screen resolution of 920,000 dots, the absence of a touchscreen, a flip screen, no GPS, and WIFI connectivity.
The X-M1 outperforms the X-A2 in the area of Bluetooth connectivity, as it is equipped with this feature, offering users more convenience and flexibility when transferring files and connecting to other devices. This additional connectivity option makes the X-M1 a more versatile and user-friendly camera compared to the X-A2.
On the other hand, the X-A2 does not have any significant advantages over the X-M1 in terms of features. Both cameras are quite similar in most aspects, which makes the X-M1’s higher score and Bluetooth connectivity the primary factors that set it apart from the X-A2.
Taking all factors into consideration, it is clear that the Fujifilm X-M1 is the superior camera when it comes to features. The added Bluetooth connectivity allows for easier file transfers and device connections, making it a more practical option for users. While the X-A2 does not have any distinct advantages over the X-M1, its similarities in other specifications make it a decent alternative for those who may not prioritize Bluetooth connectivity.
Fujifilm X-A2 vs X-M1 Storage and Battery
The Fujifilm X-A2 wins the storage and battery comparison with a score of 24/100, while the Fujifilm X-M1 scores 21/100. Both cameras have one memory card slot and accept the same types of memory cards: SD, SDHC, and SDXC. Additionally, both cameras use the NP-W126 battery type and do not offer USB charging.
The X-A2 surpasses the X-M1 in battery life, providing 410 shots compared to the X-M1’s 350 shots. This advantage allows users to take more photos before needing to recharge or replace the battery.
On the other hand, the X-M1 holds a slight edge in storage compatibility, as it supports UHS-I compatible memory cards. This feature enables faster data transfer rates for the X-M1.
In this comparison, the Fujifilm X-A2 proves to be the better option for storage and battery life. Its longer battery life ensures that users can capture more moments without interruptions. Meanwhile, the X-M1’s UHS-I compatibility offers a minor advantage in storage performance, but it is not enough to outweigh the X-A2’s superior battery life.
Fujifilm X-A2 vs X-M1 – Our Verdict
Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Fujifilm X-A2 or the Fujifilm X-M1: