Fujifilm X-E3 vs Fujifilm X-E4 — Which Is Better?

Fujifilm X-E3 vs X-E4 Overview and Optics

The Fujifilm X-E4 outperforms the Fujifilm X-E3 in optics with a score of 67/100 compared to the X-E3’s score of 64/100. Both cameras share common features such as a CMOS sensor, Fujifilm X lens mount, APS-C sensor size, and lack of image stabilization. Despite these similarities, the X-E4 has notable advantages over the X-E3.

The X-E4 boasts 26 megapixels, which is higher than the X-E3’s 24 megapixels. This difference allows the X-E4 to capture more detail and produce higher resolution images. Additionally, the X-E4 has a superior shooting speed of 20 frames per second, compared to the X-E3’s 8 frames per second. This faster shooting speed enables the X-E4 to capture fast-moving subjects with more accuracy and less motion blur. The X-E4 also features the more advanced X-Processor 4, which contributes to faster image processing and improved performance in low light conditions.

While the X-E3 falls short in some areas, it still offers solid performance. The X-Processor Pro in the X-E3 provides reliable image processing and is capable of producing high-quality images. However, the X-E4’s advantages in megapixels, shooting speed, and processor make it the superior choice in terms of optics.

In comparing the Fujifilm X-E3 and X-E4, the X-E4 emerges as the winner due to its higher optics score and improved specifications. With its higher megapixel count, faster shooting speed, and advanced processor, the X-E4 is the better choice for photographers who prioritize image quality and performance.

The Fujifilm X-E4 outperforms the Fujifilm X-E3 in video capabilities with a score of 91/100 compared to the X-E3’s 69/100. Both cameras share certain specifications, including 4K video resolution. However, the X-E4 offers superior video dimensions and frame rates, making it the better choice for videographers.

The X-E4 has a maximum video dimension of 4096 x 2160, while the X-E3’s maximum is 3840 x 2160. This difference provides higher quality video output and better detail in the X-E4. Furthermore, the X-E4 has a maximum video frame rate of 240fps, which is significantly higher than the X-E3’s 60fps. This higher frame rate allows for smoother video playback and the ability to create slow-motion footage.

One area where the X-E3 falls short is the lack of built-in time-lapse functionality. The X-E4 has this feature, which enables users to capture time-lapse videos without the need for additional equipment or software. This added functionality makes the X-E4 more versatile for various video projects.

Despite the lower score, the X-E3 still delivers 4K video resolution, which is suitable for many video applications. However, its limitations in video dimensions, frame rates, and the absence of built-in time-lapse functionality make it a less desirable choice when compared to the X-E4.

Considering the substantial difference in their video scores and the superior specifications of the X-E4, it is evident that the Fujifilm X-E4 is the better choice for those focused on video capabilities. The X-E3 may still be suitable for some users, but its limitations make it a less competitive option.

The Fujifilm X-E4 takes the lead with a feature score of 72, slightly ahead of the Fujifilm X-E3’s score of 70. Both cameras share several specifications, including a 3-inch screen size, touchscreen capabilities, WiFi, and Bluetooth connectivity. However, there are differences that set them apart and contribute to the X-E4’s higher feature score.

The X-E4 outperforms the X-E3 in screen resolution, boasting an impressive 1,620,000 dots compared to the X-E3’s 1,040,000 dots. This difference provides the X-E4 with a sharper and more detailed display for reviewing images and navigating menus. Additionally, the X-E4 has a flip screen, a feature absent in the X-E3. This flip screen allows for easier shooting from various angles and is particularly useful for vlogging and self-portraits.

On the other hand, the X-E3 does not have any particular advantages over the X-E4 in terms of features. Both cameras lack GPS capabilities, which could be a downside for those who want to geotag their photos. However, this absence does not give either camera an edge over the other.

Taking these differences into account, the Fujifilm X-E4 is the superior choice when considering features. Its higher screen resolution and flip screen functionality contribute to its lead over the X-E3. While the X-E3 does not have any specific advantages over the X-E4, it remains a solid option for those who prioritize other aspects, such as price or size. However, for users seeking the most feature-rich camera between the two, the Fujifilm X-E4 is the clear winner.

The Fujifilm X-E4 outperforms the X-E3 in storage and battery, scoring 35/100 compared to the X-E3’s 21/100. Both cameras have one memory card slot and accept SD, SDHC, and SDXC (UHS-I compatible) cards. They also use the same battery type, NP-W126S.

The X-E4’s advantage lies in its longer battery life and USB charging capability. With 380 shots per charge, it surpasses the X-E3’s 350 shots, providing more shooting time before needing a recharge. The X-E4 also supports USB charging, allowing for convenient charging options on-the-go.

The X-E3 does not offer any advantages in storage and battery compared to the X-E4. The Fujifilm X-E4’s extended battery life and USB charging make it the better choice for photographers who value convenience and longer shooting sessions.