Fujifilm X-H2 vs Sony a7 IV Comparison
Fujifilm X-H2
Sony a7 IV
Price | |||
---|---|---|---|
Brand | Fujifilm | Sony | |
Model | X-H2 | a7 IV | |
Released Refers to the year this camera was officially made available for sale. | 2022 | 2021 | |
Announcement Date Refers to the date the manufacturer publicly announced the upcoming release and general specs of this camera. | May 31, 2022 | October 21, 2021 | |
Camera Type | |||
Camera Size | |||
Camera Weight |
The Sony a7 IV edges out the Fujifilm X-H2 with a score of 84/100 compared to 82/100. Both cameras are mirrorless and share similar dimensions and weight, with the Sony a7 IV being slightly more compact and lighter. The Fujifilm X-H2 was announced in 2022, while the Sony a7 IV was released in 2021.
The Sony a7 IV’s higher score indicates better overall performance, but it comes at a higher launch price of $2499 compared to the Fujifilm X-H2’s $1999. The Fujifilm X-H2, although scoring slightly lower, offers a more budget-friendly option without compromising too much on quality.
While both cameras have their advantages, the Sony a7 IV proves to be a better choice for those willing to invest in a higher-priced option. On the other hand, the Fujifilm X-H2 is a great alternative for budget-conscious photographers who still want excellent performance.
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Sony a7 IV Overview and Optics
The Sony a7 IV outperforms the Fujifilm X-H2 in optics, scoring 85/100 compared to the X-H2’s 81/100. Both cameras share some common specifications, including a CMOS sensor, image stabilization, and compatibility with their respective lens mounts (Sony FE for the a7 IV and Fujifilm X for the X-H2).
The Sony a7 IV excels with its full-frame sensor, which provides better low-light performance and increased dynamic range than the Fujifilm X-H2’s APS-C sensor. Additionally, the a7 IV’s DXOMARK sensor score of 97 indicates superior image quality. Despite having fewer megapixels (33) compared to the X-H2 (40), the a7 IV’s full-frame sensor compensates for this difference, resulting in higher overall image quality.
On the other hand, the Fujifilm X-H2 has a higher shooting speed of 15 frames per second, compared to the a7 IV’s 10 frames per second. This advantage makes the X-H2 more suitable for action and sports photography. Furthermore, the X-H2’s 40-megapixel sensor allows for more detailed images, which may be beneficial for certain applications, such as landscape or product photography.
In terms of optics, the Sony a7 IV is the superior choice due to its full-frame sensor and higher DXOMARK score, which contribute to better overall image quality. The Fujifilm X-H2, while not as strong in this area, still offers advantages in shooting speed and megapixels, making it a suitable option for specific photography needs. Ultimately, the choice between these two cameras depends on the photographer’s priorities and preferred shooting scenarios.
Optics
|
Fujifilm X-H2
|
Sony a7 IV
|
|
|
|
||
Megapixels The higher the number of megapixels, the more detail the cameras sensor can capture. | 40 MP | 33 MP | |
---|---|---|---|
Image Resolution Image resolution is measured in pixels and megapixels, width by height. The higher the number, the higher its resolution. | 7728 x 5152 px | 7008 x 4672 px | |
Sensor Type The camera sensor captures light and records the image. Sensors vary in physical size, the number of pixels, and quality. | CMOS | CMOS | |
Sensor Size The sensor size contributes to the overall quality as well as the dynamic and tonal range a camera can capture. As a rule of thumb, the more surface there is to read the light, the more information it will capture. | 23.5 x 15.6 mm | 23.8 x 35.6 mm | |
Sensor Format Refers to the most commonly used sensor sizes. | |||
Frame Rate The number of sequential frames per second the camera can write to the memory card when shooting in burst or continuous mode. | 15 fps | 10 fps | |
Lens Mount The lens mount will tell you what type of lens range you can fit onto the camera body. Often the same camera company will have different lens ranges for different cameras. | Fujifilm X | Sony E | |
Image Processor The image processor in the camera converts the information collected on the sensor for digital storage on the memory card. | X-Processor 5 | Bionz XR | |
Aspect Ratio The aspect ratio refers to the proportional difference between width and height. The most popular aspect ratios are 3:2 and 4:3. | |||
Minimum ISO (Native) Refers to the lowest native (or 'base') ISO setting. Lower ISO are less sensitive to light but make a cleaner image. | 125 | 100 | |
Maximum ISO (Native) Refers to the highest native (or 'base') ISO setting. Higher ISO is necessary for low-light situations or night photography, but higher ISOs often introduce grain or noise. | 12,800 | 51,200 | |
Minimum ISO (Expanded) Expanded (or extended) ISO is a digitally enhanced feature available on some cameras. It allows you to push beyond the native ISO range if necessary. | 80 | 50 | |
Maximum ISO (Expanded) Expanded (or extended) ISO is a digitally enhanced feature available on some cameras. It allows you to push beyond the native ISO range if necessary. | 51200 | 204400 | |
Minimum Shutter Speed The minimum shutter speed will tell you the longest exposure your camera can take without using an external accessory. | 30 s | 30 s | |
Maximum Shutter Speed The maximum shutter speed tells you the length inside 1 second the camera will capture. These can sometimes be extended with accessories such as extra external batteries. | 1/ 8000 s | 1/ 8000 s | |
Autofocus Points Autofocus points show where the camera is focusing graphically as squares or brackets in Live View or on an electronic viewfinder. These points are also used for light meter readings. | 425 | 759 | |
In-body Stabilization In-body Stabilization means the camera has a certain technology embedded that counteracts camera shake. | |||
Viewfinder Type The viewfinder type is either electronic or optical. Electronic viewfinders will have a small screen in the viewfinder. Optical viewfinders will use prisms and mirrors to look through the lens. | Electronic | Electronic | |
Viewfinder Resolution | 5,760,000 dots | 3,686,400 dots |
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Sony a7 IV Video Performance
The Fujifilm X-H2 outperforms the Sony a7 IV in video capabilities. Both cameras share some common specifications, such as video dimensions of 3840 x 2160 and built-in time-lapse functionality, making them suitable for creative videography projects.
The Fujifilm X-H2’s superior video performance stems from its higher maximum resolution of 8K and video frame rate of 360fps, more than double that of the Sony a7 IV. This allows the X-H2 to capture smoother slow-motion footage, providing greater flexibility in post-production and enhancing the final video quality. The higher frame rate is a significant advantage for videographers who prioritize capturing fast-paced action or detailed movement.
Video
|
Fujifilm X-H2
|
Sony a7 IV
|
|
|
|
||
Video Indicates if this camera is capable of recording video. | |||
---|---|---|---|
Max Video Resolution The best resolution this camera can capture video in. Modern cameras can capture up to 8K video. | |||
Max Video Dimensions Video resolution measured by the greatest number of pixels possible in each frame, width by height. A higher resolution means more detail or clarity in your video. | 7680 x 4320 px | 3840 x 2160 px | |
Max Video Frame Rate How many frames per second your video will capture. Most cameras have options for multiple frame rates, depending on the resolution you shoot in. For a general video, 24p or 30p is the standard, but more serious filmmakers may need a higher frame rate for creative effect. | 360 p | 120 p | |
Time-Lapse Built In A built in time-lapse mode will allow continuous shooting throughout a prolonged period of time to be compressed into a sped up video. | |||
Video File Format Different cameras can record in various video file formats. The File format you record in can impact how you edit and use the files. | MPEG-4, MOV | MPEG-4, XAVC S, XAVC HS, XAVC S-I, H.264, H.265 |
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Sony a7 IV Features and Benefits
The Fujifilm X-H2 edges out the Sony a7 IV with a feature score of 85/100 compared to 83/100. Both cameras share several similarities, including a 3-inch screen, touchscreen capability, flip screen, GPS absence, and the presence of WIFI and Bluetooth connectivity.
The Fujifilm X-H2 stands out with a higher screen resolution of 1,620,000 dots, providing a sharper and more detailed display for composing and reviewing images. This advantage allows photographers to better assess their shots and make necessary adjustments, improving the overall shooting experience.
On the other hand, the Sony a7 IV has its strengths, but in this comparison of features, it does not surpass the Fujifilm X-H2. Both cameras are evenly matched in most aspects, making the higher screen resolution of the X-H2 the primary differentiator.
Given these points, the Fujifilm X-H2 emerges as the winner in this comparison, offering a superior screen resolution that enhances the user experience. The Sony a7 IV remains a strong contender, matching the X-H2 in many areas, but falling short in screen resolution. Ultimately, photographers seeking a camera with a more detailed display should opt for the Fujifilm X-H2, while those who prioritize other aspects may still find the Sony a7 IV to be a suitable choice.
Features
|
Fujifilm X-H2
|
Sony a7 IV
|
|
|
|
||
Built-in Flash A built-in flash will often be positioned right above the lens. This will automatically pop up when you activate it. | |||
---|---|---|---|
External Flash External flashes are often connected through a hot shoe at the top of a camera, or a cable at the side of the camera. | |||
GPS GPS features in a camera will include location metadata to each of your photographs. | |||
Weather Sealing Weather sealing capabilities will give you more confidence when shooting in unfavourable conditions. | |||
Screen Type | TFT LCD | LCD | |
Touch Screen Touchscreen allows you to change camera settings and access menus with a swipe of your finger, instead of using buttons. | |||
Screen Size | |||
Screen Resolution Screen dots indicate the resolution of the LCD screen by including each sub pixel. | 1,620,000 dots | 1,040,000 dots | |
Flip Screen A flip screen (or articulating screen) is a second screen which can flip out from the side or top of the camera. This rotating screen allows you more freedom to take photos at different angles. | |||
Live View Live View feature allows you to see a continuous live video of what is being seen through your lens. | |||
Wi-Fi | |||
Bluetooth Bluetooth capabilities allow you wireless control of your camera with other external devices. | |||
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Sony a7 IV Storage and Battery
The Fujifilm X-H2 wins in the storage and battery category with a score of 79/100, while the Sony a7 IV scores 76/100. Both cameras have two memory card slots and support USB charging. The X-H2 accepts CFexpress Type B and SD (UHS-II compatible) cards, while the a7 IV takes CFexpress Type A and SD (UHS-II compatible) cards.
The X-H2 outperforms the a7 IV in battery life, providing 680 shots per charge with its NP-W235 battery, compared to the a7 IV’s 580 shots using the NP-FZ100 battery. This longer battery life makes the X-H2 more suitable for extended shooting sessions.
The a7 IV, however, uses CFexpress Type A cards, which are smaller and lighter than Type B cards. This can be an advantage for photographers prioritizing compactness and weight reduction in their gear.
Considering these factors, the Fujifilm X-H2 is the better choice for those who need a longer battery life and are comfortable with the larger CFexpress Type B cards. The Sony a7 IV may be preferable for those seeking a more compact storage solution with its use of CFexpress Type A cards.
Storage and Battery
|
Fujifilm X-H2
|
Sony a7 IV
|
|
|
|
||
Memory Card | CFexpress Type B, SD (UHS-II Compatible) | CFexpress Type A, SD (UHS-II compatible) | |
---|---|---|---|
Dual Memory Card Slots | |||
Battery Type | NP-W235 | NP-FZ100 | |
Battery Life Approximately how long this cameras battery will last measured by how many photographs you will be able to take. | 680 shots | 580 shots | |
USB Charging |
DXOMARK Scores
Sensor scores tested by DXOMARK |
Fujifilm X-H2
|
Sony a7 IV
|
|
Overall Score DXOMARK overall sensor score. | N/A | ||
---|---|---|---|
Portrait (Color Depth) As described by DXOMARK 'The Portrait score in our camera sensor reviews defines color depth performance and its unit is a number of bits. A color depth of 22 bits is excellent; differences below 1 bit are barely noticeable.' | N/A | 25.4 bits | |
Landscape (Dynamic Range) As described by DXOMARK 'The Landscape score in our camera sensor tests defines the maximum dynamic range of the camera sensor and its unit is an exposure value (EV). A value of 12 EV is excellent with differences below 0.5 EV usually not noticeable.' | N/A | 14.7 EVs | |
Sports (Low-Light ISO) Described by DXOMARK as 'The maximal value of ISO sensitivity needed to reach a given value of Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR). The greater the value, the better' | N/A | 3379 |
Scores
|
Fujifilm X-H2
|
Sony a7 IV
|
Alternatives to the Fujifilm X-H2 and Sony a7 IV
Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Fujifilm X-H2 or the Sony a7 IV:
User Scores
|
Fujifilm X-H2
|
Sony a7 IV
|
|
B&H photo video | N/A |
---|