Fujifilm X-H2 vs Sony a7R IV Comparison
Fujifilm X-H2
Sony a7R IV
Price | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Brand | Fujifilm | Sony | |
Model | X-H2 | a7R IV | |
Released Refers to the year this camera was officially made available for sale. | 2022 | 2019 | |
Announcement Date Refers to the date the manufacturer publicly announced the upcoming release and general specs of this camera. | May 31, 2022 | July 16, 2019 | |
Camera Type |  Mirrorless | Mirrorless | |
Camera Size | |||
Camera Weight |
The Sony a7R IV edges out the Fujifilm X-H2 with a score of 84/100 compared to 82/100. Both cameras are mirrorless and share similar dimensions and weight. The X-H2 measures 136 x 93 x 95mm and weighs 660g, while the a7R IV is 129 x 96 x 78mm and 665g.
The Fujifilm X-H2 has a more attractive launch price of $1999, making it more affordable than the Sony a7R IV at $3500. However, the a7R IV’s higher score suggests it offers better performance and features despite its higher cost.
Though the X-H2 was released in 2022, three years after the a7R IV’s 2019 release, it couldn’t surpass the latter’s performance. The Sony a7R IV remains a strong contender in the mirrorless camera market, while the Fujifilm X-H2 provides a more budget-friendly option without compromising on quality.
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Sony a7R IV Overview and Optics
The Sony a7R IV outperforms the Fujifilm X-H2 in optics, scoring 85/100 compared to the X-H2’s 81/100. Both cameras share several specifications, such as CMOS sensors, image stabilization, and lens mounts specific to their respective brands. However, there are notable differences that contribute to the Sony a7R IV’s higher score.
The Sony a7R IV has a significant advantage in megapixels, boasting 61.2 compared to the X-H2’s 40. This results in sharper, more detailed images. Additionally, the a7R IV has a full-frame sensor, which is larger than the X-H2’s APS-C sensor. A larger sensor generally leads to better image quality, particularly in low light situations. The Sony a7R IV also has a DXOMARK score of 99 for its sensor, which is a reliable indicator of its superior performance.
On the other hand, the Fujifilm X-H2 has a faster shooting speed of 15 frames per second, compared to the a7R IV’s 10. This makes the X-H2 more suitable for capturing fast-moving subjects and action shots. Furthermore, the X-H2 is equipped with the X-Processor 5, a powerful and efficient processor that ensures optimal performance.
Despite these advantages, the Fujifilm X-H2 falls short in terms of optics when compared to the Sony a7R IV. The a7R IV’s higher megapixel count, full-frame sensor, and impressive DXOMARK score set it apart as the superior choice for photographers seeking the best image quality.
While both cameras have their merits, the Sony a7R IV ultimately takes the lead in optics. Its higher score reflects its outstanding performance in image quality, making it the preferred choice for photographers who prioritize sharp, detailed images.
|
Optics
|
Fujifilm X-H2
|
Sony a7R IV
|
|
|
|
|
||
Megapixels The higher the number of megapixels, the more detail the cameras sensor can capture. | 40 MP | 61.2 MP | |
|---|---|---|---|
Image Resolution Image resolution is measured in pixels and megapixels, width by height. The higher the number, the higher its resolution. | 7728 x 5152 px | 9504 x 6336 px | |
Sensor Type The camera sensor captures light and records the image. Sensors vary in physical size, the number of pixels, and quality. | CMOS | CMOS | |
Sensor Size The sensor size contributes to the overall quality as well as the dynamic and tonal range a camera can capture. As a rule of thumb, the more surface there is to read the light, the more information it will capture. | 23.5 x 15.6 mm | 23.8 x 35.7 mm | |
Sensor Format Refers to the most commonly used sensor sizes. |  APS-C |  Full Frame | |
Frame Rate The number of sequential frames per second the camera can write to the memory card when shooting in burst or continuous mode. | 15 fps | 10 fps | |
Lens Mount The lens mount will tell you what type of lens range you can fit onto the camera body. Often the same camera company will have different lens ranges for different cameras. | Fujifilm X | Sony FE | |
Image Processor The image processor in the camera converts the information collected on the sensor for digital storage on the memory card. | X-Processor 5 | Bionz X | |
Aspect Ratio The aspect ratio refers to the proportional difference between width and height. The most popular aspect ratios are 3:2 and 4:3. |  3:2 | 3:2 | |
Minimum ISO (Native) Refers to the lowest native (or 'base') ISO setting. Lower ISO are less sensitive to light but make a cleaner image. | 125 | 100 | |
Maximum ISO (Native) Refers to the highest native (or 'base') ISO setting. Higher ISO is necessary for low-light situations or night photography, but higher ISOs often introduce grain or noise. | 12,800 | 32,000 | |
Minimum ISO (Expanded) Expanded (or extended) ISO is a digitally enhanced feature available on some cameras. It allows you to push beyond the native ISO range if necessary. | 80 | 50 | |
Maximum ISO (Expanded) Expanded (or extended) ISO is a digitally enhanced feature available on some cameras. It allows you to push beyond the native ISO range if necessary. | 51200 | 102400 | |
Minimum Shutter Speed The minimum shutter speed will tell you the longest exposure your camera can take without using an external accessory. | 30 s | 30 s | |
Maximum Shutter Speed The maximum shutter speed tells you the length inside 1 second the camera will capture. These can sometimes be extended with accessories such as extra external batteries. | 1/ 8000 s | 1/ 8000 s | |
Autofocus Points Autofocus points show where the camera is focusing graphically as squares or brackets in Live View or on an electronic viewfinder. These points are also used for light meter readings. | 425 | 425 | |
In-body Stabilization In-body Stabilization means the camera has a certain technology embedded that counteracts camera shake. |   | | |
Viewfinder Type The viewfinder type is either electronic or optical. Electronic viewfinders will have a small screen in the viewfinder. Optical viewfinders will use prisms and mirrors to look through the lens. | Electronic | Electronic | |
Viewfinder Resolution | 5,760,000 dots | 5,760,000 dots |
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Sony a7R IV Video Performance
The Fujifilm X-H2 emerges as the winner in terms of video capabilities, with a score of 83 out of 100, compared to the Sony a7R IV’s score of 70. Both cameras share some common specifications, such as a maximum video resolution of 4K and dimensions of 3840 x 2160. Additionally, both cameras have built-in time-lapse functionality.
The Fujifilm X-H2 outperforms the Sony a7R IV in one crucial aspect: the maximum video frame rate. The X-H2 can capture video at a rate of 60 frames per second (fps), while the a7R IV’s maximum frame rate is 30fps. This means that the X-H2 can record smoother and more detailed footage, particularly when capturing fast-moving subjects or utilizing slow-motion effects.
On the other hand, the Sony a7R IV has no specific advantages over the Fujifilm X-H2 in terms of video capabilities. Both cameras offer the same resolution and time-lapse features, with the X-H2 taking the lead in frame rate capabilities.
Considering the 13-point difference in video scores and the higher frame rate offered by the Fujifilm X-H2, it is the superior choice for videographers. The X-H2 provides smoother footage and greater creative possibilities for capturing motion and action. Meanwhile, the Sony a7R IV falls short in this category, despite sharing some common features with the X-H2. Ultimately, those seeking a camera with strong video capabilities should opt for the Fujifilm X-H2 over the Sony a7R IV.
|
Video
|
Fujifilm X-H2
|
Sony a7R IV
|
|
|
|
|
||
Video Indicates if this camera is capable of recording video. |  | | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max Video Resolution The best resolution this camera can capture video in. Modern cameras can capture up to 8K video. |  8K |  4K | |
Max Video Dimensions Video resolution measured by the greatest number of pixels possible in each frame, width by height. A higher resolution means more detail or clarity in your video. | 7680 x 4320 px | 3840 x 2160 px | |
Max Video Frame Rate How many frames per second your video will capture. Most cameras have options for multiple frame rates, depending on the resolution you shoot in. For a general video, 24p or 30p is the standard, but more serious filmmakers may need a higher frame rate for creative effect. | 360 p | 30 p | |
Time-Lapse Built In A built in time-lapse mode will allow continuous shooting throughout a prolonged period of time to be compressed into a sped up video. |  | | |
Video File Format Different cameras can record in various video file formats. The File format you record in can impact how you edit and use the files. | MPEG-4, MOV | XAVC S, AVCHD Ver. 2.0, MP4 |
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Sony a7R IV Features and Benefits
The Fujifilm X-H2 triumphs over the Sony a7R IV with a feature score of 85/100, compared to the Sony’s 83/100. Both cameras share several specifications, including a 3-inch screen size, touchscreen capability, flip screen, and the absence of GPS. Additionally, both cameras are equipped with WIFI and Bluetooth connectivity.
The Fujifilm X-H2 takes the lead with its superior screen resolution of 1,620,000 dots, which surpasses the Sony a7R IV’s 1,440,000 dots. This higher resolution provides clearer and sharper display, allowing for more precise image review and menu navigation.
Although the Sony a7R IV falls short in screen resolution, it remains a strong competitor with its own unique advantages. It is important to consider other factors, such as sensor quality, lens compatibility, and overall performance when making a final decision.
Both the Fujifilm X-H2 and the Sony a7R IV have their strengths and weaknesses. The Fujifilm X-H2 boasts a higher feature score and screen resolution, while the Sony a7R IV remains a worthy opponent with its own merits. Ultimately, the choice between these two cameras depends on individual preferences and specific needs.
|
Features
|
Fujifilm X-H2
|
Sony a7R IV
|
|
|
|
|
||
Built-in Flash A built-in flash will often be positioned right above the lens. This will automatically pop up when you activate it. |   | | |
|---|---|---|---|
External Flash External flashes are often connected through a hot shoe at the top of a camera, or a cable at the side of the camera. |  | | |
GPS GPS features in a camera will include location metadata to each of your photographs. |  | | |
Weather Sealing Weather sealing capabilities will give you more confidence when shooting in unfavourable conditions. |  | | |
Screen Type | TFT LCD | LCD | |
Touch Screen Touchscreen allows you to change camera settings and access menus with a swipe of your finger, instead of using buttons. |  | | |
Screen Size |  3" | 3" | |
Screen Resolution Screen dots indicate the resolution of the LCD screen by including each sub pixel. | 1,620,000 dots | 1,440,000 dots | |
Flip Screen A flip screen (or articulating screen) is a second screen which can flip out from the side or top of the camera. This rotating screen allows you more freedom to take photos at different angles. |  | | |
Live View Live View feature allows you to see a continuous live video of what is being seen through your lens. |  | | |
Wi-Fi |  | | |
Bluetooth Bluetooth capabilities allow you wireless control of your camera with other external devices. |  | | |
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Sony a7R IV Storage and Battery
The Fujifilm X-H2 and Sony a7R IV both receive a storage and battery score of 79/100. These cameras share common specifications, such as having two memory card slots and USB charging capabilities. The X-H2 accepts CFexpress Type B and SD (UHS-II compatible) cards, while the a7R IV takes SD, SDHC, and SDXC (UHS-II compatible) cards.
The Fujifilm X-H2 has a slight advantage in battery life, offering 680 shots per charge with its NP-W235 battery, compared to the Sony a7R IV’s 670 shots using the NP-FZ100 battery. This difference may not be significant for most users, but it is worth considering for those who require extended shooting sessions.
On the other hand, the Sony a7R IV provides more versatility in memory card compatibility, accepting SD, SDHC, and SDXC cards. This may be an advantage for photographers who already own a variety of SD cards and do not wish to invest in new CFexpress Type B cards.
Considering the storage and battery aspects, both cameras perform similarly, with the Fujifilm X-H2 offering slightly longer battery life and the Sony a7R IV providing greater memory card compatibility. Users should weigh these factors according to their individual needs and preferences when choosing between these two cameras.
|
Storage and Battery
|
Fujifilm X-H2
|
Sony a7R IV
|
|
|
|
|
||
Memory Card | CFexpress Type B, SD (UHS-II Compatible) | SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-II compatible) | |
|---|---|---|---|
Dual Memory Card Slots |  | | |
Battery Type | NP-W235 | NP-FZ100 | |
Battery Life Approximately how long this cameras battery will last measured by how many photographs you will be able to take. | 680 shots | 670 shots | |
USB Charging |  | |
|
DXOMARK Scores
Sensor scores tested by DXOMARK |
Fujifilm X-H2
|
Sony a7R IV
|
|
Overall Score DXOMARK overall sensor score. | N/A | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Portrait (Color Depth) As described by DXOMARK 'The Portrait score in our camera sensor reviews defines color depth performance and its unit is a number of bits. A color depth of 22 bits is excellent; differences below 1 bit are barely noticeable.' | N/A | 26 bits | |
Landscape (Dynamic Range) As described by DXOMARK 'The Landscape score in our camera sensor tests defines the maximum dynamic range of the camera sensor and its unit is an exposure value (EV). A value of 12 EV is excellent with differences below 0.5 EV usually not noticeable.' | N/A | 14.8 EVs | |
Sports (Low-Light ISO) Described by DXOMARK as 'The maximal value of ISO sensitivity needed to reach a given value of Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR). The greater the value, the better' | N/A | 3344 |
|
Scores
|
Fujifilm X-H2
|
Sony a7R IV
|
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Sony a7R IV – Our Verdict
Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Fujifilm X-H2 or the Sony a7R IV:
|
User Scores
|
Fujifilm X-H2
|
Sony a7R IV
|
|
B&H photo video | N/A |
|---|