Fujifilm X-T3 vs X-T4 Comparison

The Fujifilm X-T4 outperforms the X-T3 with a score of 76/100 compared to 72/100. Both cameras are mirrorless models, with the X-T3 released in 2018 and the X-T4 in 2020. They share similar dimensions, with the X-T3 measuring 133 x 93 x 59mm and the X-T4 slightly larger at 135 x 93 x 84mm.

The X-T4 excels with its higher score, reflecting its improved features and performance. However, the X-T3 has a lower launch price of $539 compared to the X-T4’s $1699, making it a more cost-effective option. Weighing less at 539g, the X-T3 is also more lightweight than the X-T4’s 607g.

Each camera has its advantages, with the X-T4 offering better performance and the X-T3 being more budget-friendly and lighter. Choose the one that best suits your needs and preferences.

Fujifilm X-T3 vs X-T4 Overview and Optics

The Fujifilm X-T4 emerges as the winner in the optics comparison, with a score of 73/100, while the Fujifilm X-T3 scores 67/100. Both cameras share several specifications, such as 26-megapixel resolution, 20 fps shooting speed, CMOS sensor type, X-Processor 4, APS-C sensor size, and Fujifilm X lens mount. DXOMARK does not score Fujifilm cameras, so there is no available score for the sensors.

The X-T4 outperforms the X-T3 mainly due to its image stabilization feature. This added functionality allows photographers to capture sharper images in low light conditions or while using longer focal length lenses. Image stabilization is essential for reducing the effects of camera shake and can result in more consistent image quality.

On the other hand, the X-T3 does not offer any significant advantages over the X-T4 in terms of optics. Both cameras have the same sensor, processor, and lens mount, which means that their overall image quality should be very similar. The lack of image stabilization in the X-T3 is its primary drawback in this comparison.

In light of these factors, the Fujifilm X-T4 is the superior choice for photographers seeking the best possible image quality and performance. Its image stabilization feature sets it apart from the X-T3, providing a clear advantage in various shooting situations. While the X-T3 is still a capable camera, the X-T4’s enhanced optics make it the more appealing option for those who prioritize image quality and stability.

The Fujifilm X-T4 emerges as the superior camera in terms of video capabilities, scoring 91 out of 100, as opposed to the Fujifilm X-T3’s score of 83. Both cameras share some common specifications, including 4K max video resolution and max video dimensions of 4096 x 2160. Additionally, both cameras have built-in time-lapse functionality.

The X-T4 outperforms the X-T3 mainly due to its higher max video frame rate of 120fps, which is twice the X-T3’s 60fps. This higher frame rate allows for smoother and more detailed slow-motion footage, making the X-T4 a more versatile option for videographers.

However, the X-T3 is not without its merits. Despite having a lower frame rate, it still delivers high-quality video at 60fps, which is sufficient for most users. Moreover, the X-T3’s built-in time-lapse functionality ensures that it remains a reliable choice for capturing stunning visuals over time.

When comparing the two cameras, it is evident that the Fujifilm X-T4’s higher video score reflects its superior video capabilities, particularly in terms of its impressive max frame rate. This makes it the better choice for those who prioritize video quality and require the ability to capture slow-motion footage. On the other hand, the Fujifilm X-T3 remains a solid option for users who can work with its 60fps frame rate and still desire high-quality video and time-lapse features.

The Fujifilm X-T4 emerges as the winner with a feature score of 85/100, while the Fujifilm X-T3 trails slightly behind at 83/100. Both cameras share several specifications, including a 3-inch screen size, the presence of touchscreen functionality, a flip screen, GPS, WIFI, and Bluetooth capabilities.

The X-T4 outshines the X-T3 in screen resolution, boasting 1,620,000 dots compared to the X-T3’s 1,040,000 dots. This higher screen resolution results in a clearer and sharper display, providing users with a better overall viewing experience.

While the X-T3 lags behind the X-T4 in terms of screen resolution, it still offers a strong feature set with a touchscreen, flip screen, WIFI, and Bluetooth capabilities. However, the X-T3 does not surpass the X-T4 in any of these areas.

In terms of features, the Fujifilm X-T4 is the superior camera due to its higher screen resolution. The X-T3 is a strong contender, but it does not excel in any particular area compared to the X-T4. Users who prioritize a sharper display should opt for the X-T4, while those who find the shared specifications sufficient may still consider the X-T3 a viable option.

The Fujifilm X-T4 outperforms the X-T3 in storage and battery, scoring 73/100 compared to the X-T3’s 68/100. Both cameras share common ground, with two memory card slots and compatibility with SD, SDHC, and SDXC cards. They also both support USB charging.

The X-T4 excels with its UHS-II compatibility, allowing for faster memory card performance. Additionally, its battery life is superior, offering 500 shots per charge with the NP-W235 battery, compared to the X-T3’s 390 shots using the NP-W126S battery.

The X-T3, while not as strong in battery life, still provides a respectable number of shots per charge. However, it lacks the UHS-II compatibility found in the X-T4.

Considering the storage and battery aspects, the Fujifilm X-T4 proves to be a better choice, offering enhanced memory card performance and longer battery life. The X-T3 remains a viable option, but the X-T4’s advantages make it worth considering for those prioritizing these features.

Still not sure which camera is best for you? Check out some more popular camera comparisons for inspiration:

• Fujifilm X100V vs X100F
• Canon 70D vs 80D
• Nikon Z50 vs Canon M50
• Canon EOS R vs R6
• Sony a7 II vs a7S III Specs
• Canon M200 vs M50
• Nikon Z6 II vs Nikon Z7 II