CameraReviews.com
menu
Hi Camera Lovers 👋 If you buy a camera through our referral links, you support our site at no cost to you 😉 Full info here.

Fujifilm X-T3 vs Sony a6400 Comparison

Optics
Video
Features
Storage & Battery

Fujifilm X-T3

fujifilm
Winner!
72%

Sony a6400

sony a6400
70%
Fujifilm X-T3
vs
Sony a6400
Price
539
900
Brand
Fujifilm
Sony
Model
X-T3
a6400
Released
2018
2019
Announcement Date
06/09/2018
15/01/2019
Camera Type
Mirrorless
Mirrorless
Camera Size
133 x 93 x 59 mm
120 x 67 x 60 mm
Camera Weight
539
403
Compare

The Fujifilm X-T3 edges out the Sony a6400 by a narrow margin, scoring 72/100 compared to the Sony’s 70/100. Both cameras are mirrorless and were introduced just a few months apart, with the Fujifilm X-T3 in 2018 and Sony a6400 in 2019. They share similar dimensions, though the Sony a6400 is slightly smaller and lighter, weighing 403g compared to the Fujifilm X-T3’s 539g.

The Fujifilm X-T3 has a lower launch price of $539, making it more affordable than the Sony a6400, which debuted at $900. This price difference gives the Fujifilm X-T3 an advantage for budget-conscious buyers. On the other hand, the Sony a6400’s compact size and lighter weight make it more portable and easier to carry around.

Taking these factors into account, the Fujifilm X-T3 is a better value for the money, while the Sony a6400 offers greater portability. Both cameras have their strengths, and the choice between them ultimately depends on individual preferences and priorities.

Fujifilm X-T3 vs Sony a6400 Overview and Optics

The Sony a6400 triumphs over the Fujifilm X-T3 in optics with a score of 68/100, just one point ahead of the X-T3’s 67/100. Both cameras have several specifications in common, such as the CMOS sensor type, APS-C sensor size, and the absence of image stabilization. They also share similar lens mounts, with the Fujifilm X-T3 using the Fujifilm X mount and the Sony a6400 using the Sony E mount.

The Fujifilm X-T3 excels in certain aspects, such as having a higher megapixel count of 26 compared to the Sony a6400’s 24.2. This allows for capturing more detail in images. Furthermore, the X-T3 has a superior shooting speed of 20, which is almost twice as fast as the a6400’s 11, making it more suitable for capturing fast-moving subjects.

On the other hand, the Sony a6400 has a DXOMARK sensor score of 83, which gives it an edge in terms of image quality. The Fujifilm X-T3 does not have a DXOMARK score, as the organization does not score Fujifilm cameras. Additionally, the a6400 is equipped with the Bionz X processor, while the X-T3 uses the X-Processor 4. Both processors are advanced and efficient, but the Bionz X is known for its excellent noise reduction capabilities.

Taking these factors into account, the Sony a6400 has a slight advantage in terms of optics, mainly attributed to its DXOMARK score and noise reduction capabilities. However, the Fujifilm X-T3 does not lag far behind, offering a higher megapixel count and faster shooting speed. Ultimately, the choice between the two cameras depends on the specific needs and preferences of the photographer.

Optics
Optics
67%
68%
Megapixels
26 MP
24.2 MP
Image Resolution
6240 x 4160 px
6000 x 4000 px
Sensor Type
CMOS
CMOS
Sensor Size
23.5 x 15.6 mm
15.6 x 23.5 mm
Sensor Format
APS-C
APS-C
Frame Rate
20 fps
11 fps
Lens Mount
Fujifilm X
Sony E
Image Processor
X-Processor 4
Bionz X
Aspect Ratio
3:2
3:2
Minimum ISO (Native)
160
100
Maximum ISO (Native)
12800
32000
Minimum ISO (Expanded)
80
100
Maximum ISO (Expanded)
51200
102400
Minimum Shutter Speed
30 s
30 s
Maximum Shutter Speed
1/ 8000 s
1/ 4000 s
Autofocus Points
425
425
In-body Stabilization
Viewfinder Type
Electronic
Electronic
Viewfinder Resolution
3690000 dots
2359296 dots

Fujifilm X-T3 vs Sony a6400 Video Performance

The Sony a6400 emerges as the winner in the video department with a score of 91/100, while the Fujifilm X-T3 trails behind with a score of 83/100. Both cameras share common features, such as 4K video resolution and built-in time-lapse functionality. However, the differences in their capabilities are what sets them apart.

The Sony a6400 boasts a higher maximum video frame rate of 120fps compared to the Fujifilm X-T3’s 60fps. This advantage allows the a6400 to capture smoother slow-motion footage and provides more flexibility in post-production. Additionally, the a6400 has a smaller video dimension of 3840 x 2160, which makes it easier to edit and store footage without compromising quality.

On the other hand, the Fujifilm X-T3 has a larger video dimension at 4096 x 2160, offering a slightly wider aspect ratio for more cinematic footage. However, this advantage comes with the trade-off of larger file sizes and potentially more challenging editing workflows.

In terms of video capabilities, the Sony a6400 takes the lead due to its higher frame rate, offering greater versatility for videographers. The Fujifilm X-T3, while still a strong contender, falls short in this aspect. That being said, the X-T3’s larger video dimension may appeal to those seeking a more cinematic look.

Ultimately, the choice between these two cameras depends on the specific needs of the user. The Sony a6400 is the superior option for those prioritizing smooth slow-motion footage and easier editing, while the Fujifilm X-T3 might be better suited for users who prefer a wider aspect ratio for their videos.

Video
Video
83%
91%
Video
1
1
Max Video Resolution
4K
4K
Max Video Dimensions
4096 x 2160 px
3840 x 2160 px
Max Video Frame Rate
60 p
120 p
Time-Lapse Built In
1
1
Video File Format
MPEG-4, MOV
MPEG-4, AVCHD Ver. 2.0, XAVC S

Fujifilm X-T3 vs Sony a6400 Features and Benefits

The Fujifilm X-T3 emerges as the winner in the features comparison with a score of 83/100, slightly ahead of the Sony a6400, which scores 81/100. Both cameras share several specifications, making them closely matched in terms of features.

Both the Fujifilm X-T3 and Sony a6400 have 3-inch screens, touchscreens, flip screens, and lack GPS. They also both include WIFI and Bluetooth capabilities. This shows that both cameras are designed with modern connectivity and user experience in mind.

The Fujifilm X-T3 outperforms the Sony a6400 in screen resolution, offering 1,040,000 dots compared to the Sony’s 921,600 dots. This higher resolution provides a clearer and more detailed image preview and playback experience for the user, making it easier to assess image quality and focus on the X-T3.

Despite its slightly lower feature score, the Sony a6400 still holds its own in this comparison. Its features are almost on par with the Fujifilm X-T3, and the difference in screen resolution may not be a deciding factor for many users. The a6400 is still a strong contender with its set of features and capabilities.

In comparing these two cameras, the Fujifilm X-T3 has a slight advantage in terms of features, mainly due to its higher screen resolution. However, the Sony a6400 remains a competitive choice with its similar set of features. Ultimately, the decision between these two cameras will depend on the user’s preferences and priorities regarding features and overall camera performance.

Features
Features
83%
81%
Built-in Flash
1
External Flash
1
1
GPS
Weather Sealing
1
1
Screen Type
TFT LCD
LCD
Touch Screen
1
1
Screen Size
3
3
Screen Resolution
1040000 dots
921600 dots
Flip Screen
1
1
Live View
1
1
Wi-Fi
1
1
Bluetooth
1
1

Fujifilm X-T3 vs Sony a6400 Storage and Battery

The Fujifilm X-T3 wins the storage and battery comparison with a score of 68/100, while the Sony a6400 scores 37/100. Both cameras have USB charging and accept SD, SDHC, and SDXC memory cards. However, the X-T3 stands out with its dual memory card slots, offering more storage flexibility compared to the a6400’s single slot.

The Sony a6400 has a slightly longer battery life of 410 shots, as opposed to the X-T3’s 390 shots. Despite this advantage, the X-T3 still scores higher due to its superior overall storage capabilities and battery features. The X-T3 uses the NP-W126S battery, while the a6400 uses the NP-FW50 battery.

Considering the storage and battery aspects, the Fujifilm X-T3 is the better choice for photographers who prioritize storage flexibility and battery features. The Sony a6400 may be suitable for those who value a slightly longer battery life, but it falls short in other aspects compared to the X-T3.

Storage and Battery
Storage and Battery
68%
37%
Memory Card
SD / SDHC / SDXC
SD / SDHC / SDXC, Memory Stick Duo (UHS-I compatible)
Dual Memory Card Slots
1
Battery Type
NP-W126S
NP-FW50
Battery Life
390 shots
410 shots
USB Charging
1
1
DXOMARK Scores
Sensor scores tested by DXOMARK
Overall Score
N/A
83
Portrait (Color Depth)
N/A
24 bits
Landscape (Dynamic Range)
N/A
13.6 EVs
Sports (Low-Light ISO)
N/A
1431
Scores
Main Features
92
Extra Features
80
Construction and Durability
93
Handling and Ergonomics
87
Value for Money
85
Total Score
87

Fujifilm X-T3 vs Sony a6400 – Our Verdict

Fujifilm X-T3 vs Sony a6400 Comparison image.

Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Fujifilm X-T3 or the Sony a6400:

User Scores
B&H photo video
1
1
amazon
Spotted a mistake with these specs? Please let us know so we can update it!