Nikon D3100 vs D3400 Comparison
Nikon D3100
Nikon D3400
DSLRDSLRThe Nikon D3400 takes the lead with a score of 61/100, compared to the Nikon D3100‘s 41/100. Both cameras are DSLR models, announced in 2016 and 2010, respectively. They share similar dimensions, with the D3400 measuring 124 x 98 x 76mm and the D3100 at 124 x 96 x 75mm.
The D3400 has the advantage of being a more recent model and is priced lower at $650, while the D3100 launched at $699. The D3400 also boasts a lighter weight of 445g, as opposed to the D3100’s 505g.
The D3100 doesn’t have any clear advantages over the D3400, making the latter a better choice for photographers. Its lower price, lighter weight, and higher score make it the winner in this comparison.
Nikon D3100 vs D3400 Overview and Optics
The Nikon D3400 emerges as the superior camera in optics, scoring 65/100 compared to the Nikon D3100’s 41/100. Both cameras share some common specifications, such as the CMOS sensor type, APS-C sensor size, Nikon F DX lens mount, and the absence of image stabilization.
The D3400 outperforms the D3100 in several aspects. It has a higher megapixel count of 24.2 compared to the D3100’s 14.8, allowing for more detailed and larger prints. The D3400 also features a faster shooting speed of 5 frames per second (fps) compared to the D3100’s 3 fps, making it more suitable for capturing fast-moving subjects. Additionally, the D3400’s Expeed 4 processor contributes to better image quality and processing speed than the D3100’s Expeed 2 processor. Lastly, the D3400 has a significantly higher DXOMARK score of 86 compared to the D3100’s 67, indicating a better overall sensor performance.
The D3100, however, does not have any optical advantages over the D3400. The lower score reflects its inferior performance in terms of megapixels, shooting speed, processor, and sensor quality.
Taking these factors into account, the Nikon D3400 proves to be a better choice for photographers seeking higher quality optics. With its higher megapixel count, faster shooting speed, and improved processor, the D3400 offers a clear advantage over the D3100, making it a more suitable option for those prioritizing image quality and performance.
APS-CAPS-C
3:23:2
Nikon D3100 vs D3400 Video Performance
When comparing the video capabilities of the Nikon D3100 and the Nikon D3400, it is important to note that the Nikon D3100 does not have video functionality. Therefore, the comparison in this aspect is solely focused on the Nikon D3400’s video capabilities.
The Nikon D3400 has a video score of 56 out of 100. Its maximum video resolution is Full HD, with dimensions of 1920 x 1080. This camera also has a maximum video frame rate of 60fps, providing smooth video playback. However, it does not have built-in time-lapse functionality.
Taking into consideration the video capabilities of both cameras, it is clear that the Nikon D3400 offers video functionality, while the Nikon D3100 does not. The Nikon D3400’s video features, such as Full HD resolution and a 60fps frame rate, provide users with the ability to capture high-quality video content.
Full HD
Nikon D3100 vs D3400 Features and Benefits
The Nikon D3400 emerges as the winner in the comparison of features with a score of 54 out of 100, while the Nikon D3100 trails behind with a score of 36 out of 100. Both cameras share certain specifications, such as a 3-inch screen size, absence of a touchscreen, flip screen, GPS, and WIFI. Despite these similarities, the Nikon D3400 outperforms the D3100 in certain aspects, while the D3100 has limited advantages over the D3400.
The Nikon D3400 boasts a higher screen resolution of 921,000 dots, compared to the D3100’s 230,000 dots. This difference in resolution allows the D3400 to deliver a clearer and more detailed display for users, enabling better image review and menu navigation. Additionally, the Nikon D3400 is equipped with Bluetooth connectivity, a feature absent in the D3100. This allows for seamless transfer of images to compatible devices, enhancing the user experience and convenience.
On the other hand, the Nikon D3100 does not offer any significant advantages over the D3400 in terms of features. Both cameras lack a touchscreen, flip screen, GPS, and WIFI, limiting the D3100’s ability to outshine its counterpart.
Taking into account the higher screen resolution and Bluetooth connectivity, the Nikon D3400 is a better option for those seeking enhanced display quality and convenient image sharing capabilities. The D3100, with its lower feature score and lack of distinct advantages, falls short in comparison. Therefore, the Nikon D3400 is the more suitable choice for photographers looking for a camera with superior features.
3"3"
Nikon D3100 vs D3400 Storage and Battery
The Nikon D3100 wins in the storage and battery category with a score of 53/100, compared to the Nikon D3400’s score of 45/100. Both cameras have a single memory card slot and accept SD, SDHC, and SDXC cards. Neither camera offers USB charging.
The D3100’s battery life stands out, providing 4500 shots per charge with its EN-EL14 battery. This is a significant advantage over the D3400, which only delivers 1200 shots using its EN-EL14a battery.
However, the D3400’s battery type, the EN-EL14a, is an updated version of the D3100’s EN-EL14. This means the D3400 may benefit from improved battery technology, even though its battery life is shorter.
Considering these factors, the Nikon D3100 is superior in terms of storage and battery life, while the Nikon D3400 has an updated battery type. Both cameras have the same memory card compatibility and lack USB charging.
Nikon D3100 vs D3400 – Our Verdict
Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Nikon D3100 or the Nikon D3400: