CameraReviews.com
menu
Hi Camera Lovers 👋 If you buy a camera through our referral links, you support our site at no cost to you 😉 Full info here.

Nikon D3200 vs D3400 Comparison

Optics
Video
Features
Storage & Battery

Nikon D3200

Nikon D3200 camera image
54%

Nikon D3400

Nikon D3400 Camera image
Winner!
61%
Nikon D3200
vs
Nikon D3400
Price
Brand
Nikon
Nikon
Model
D3200
D3400
Released
2012
2016
Announcement Date
April 19, 2012
August 17, 2016
Camera Type
DSLR
DSLR
Camera Size
Camera Weight

The Nikon D3400 emerges as the winner with a score of 61/100, while the Nikon D3200 trails behind at 54/100. Both cameras are DSLRs and share similar dimensions, with the D3200 measuring 125 x 96 x 77mm and the D3400 at 124 x 98 x 76mm. The D3400 has an advantage in weight, being lighter at 445g compared to the D3200’s 505g.

The D3400 was released in 2016 and, despite being newer, had a lower launch price of $650 compared to the D3200’s $699 in 2012. This makes the D3400 a better value for money, offering improved performance at a lower cost. However, the D3200 still has its merits and may suit those who prefer a slightly heavier camera for stability. Ultimately, the Nikon D3400 stands out as the superior choice due to its higher score, lighter weight, and better value.

Nikon D3200 vs D3400 Overview and Optics

The Nikon D3400 emerges as the winner in the optics category with a score of 65/100, slightly ahead of the Nikon D3200, which scores 63/100. Both cameras share common specifications, such as 24.2 megapixels, CMOS sensor type, APS-C sensor size, Nikon F DX lens mount, and lack of image stabilization.

The D3400’s higher score is primarily due to its faster shooting speed and more advanced processor. With a shooting speed of 5 frames per second (fps), compared to the D3200’s 4 fps, the D3400 allows for better continuous shooting and capturing fast-moving subjects. Additionally, the Expeed 4 processor in the D3400 delivers faster processing and better overall performance than the Expeed 3 processor found in the D3200.

Another advantage of the D3400 is its superior DXOMARK sensor score of 86, compared to the D3200’s score of 81. This indicates that the D3400 has better low-light performance, color depth, and dynamic range.

However, the D3200 does have some benefits. The camera is more affordable than the D3400, making it an attractive option for photographers on a budget. Additionally, the differences in performance between the two cameras are not significant enough to be a deal-breaker for many users.

Taking these factors into account, the Nikon D3400 proves to be the better camera in terms of optics, offering faster shooting speed, an advanced processor, and a higher DXOMARK sensor score. However, the Nikon D3200 remains a viable option for those seeking a more affordable camera with similar specifications.

Optics
Optics
63%
65%
Megapixels
24.2 MP
24.2 MP
Image Resolution
6016 x 4000 px
6000 x 4000 px
Sensor Type
CMOS
CMOS
Sensor Size
15.4 x 23.2 mm
15.6 x 23.5 mm
Sensor Format
APS-C
APS-C
Frame Rate
4 fps
5 fps
Lens Mount
Nikon F DX
Nikon F DX
Image Processor
Expeed 3
Expeed 4
Aspect Ratio
3:2
3:2
Minimum ISO (Native)
100
100
Maximum ISO (Native)
6,400
25,600
Minimum ISO (Expanded)
100
100
Maximum ISO (Expanded)
12800
25600
Minimum Shutter Speed
30 s
30 s
Maximum Shutter Speed
1/ 4000 s
1/ 4000 s
Autofocus Points
11
11
In-body Stabilization
Viewfinder Type
Optical (pentamirror)
Optical (pentamirror)

Nikon D3200 vs D3400 Video Performance

The Nikon D3400 emerges as the winner in terms of video capabilities, scoring 56/100 compared to the Nikon D3200’s score of 43/100. Both cameras share some common specifications, such as Full HD video resolution and maximum video dimensions of 1920 x 1080. Neither camera has built-in time-lapse functionality.

The D3400 outperforms the D3200 in video frame rate, offering 60fps as opposed to the D3200’s 30fps. This higher frame rate allows for smoother video playback and enhanced slow-motion capabilities, which is an advantage for those who plan on shooting action scenes or sports events.

While the D3200 falls short in comparison to the D3400’s video capabilities, it is important to note that it still produces Full HD video at a respectable 30fps. This may be sufficient for casual users who do not require advanced video features or those who primarily focus on still photography.

After examining the video capabilities of both cameras, it is evident that the Nikon D3400 offers superior performance with its higher frame rate. This makes it a more suitable choice for users who prioritize video quality and smooth playback. On the other hand, the Nikon D3200 remains a viable option for those who do not have advanced video requirements and are content with its Full HD capabilities at 30fps.

Video
Video
43%
56%
Video
Max Video Resolution
Full HD
Full HD
Max Video Dimensions
1920 x 1080 px
1920 x 1080 px
Max Video Frame Rate
30 p
60 p
Time-Lapse Built In
Video File Format
MOV
MOV

Nikon D3200 vs D3400 Features and Benefits

The Nikon D3400 comes out on top in the features comparison with a score of 54/100, outperforming the Nikon D3200, which has a score of 41/100. Both cameras share several specifications, including a 3-inch screen size, 921,000-dot screen resolution, and the absence of a touchscreen, flip screen, GPS, and WIFI capabilities.

The Nikon D3400’s higher score is due to its Bluetooth connectivity, a feature absent in the Nikon D3200. This advantage allows users to easily transfer images and remotely control the camera using compatible devices, providing added convenience and flexibility in various photographic situations.

On the other hand, the Nikon D3200 does not have any notable features that make it superior to the D3400. Both cameras have the same screen size and resolution, and neither offers a touchscreen or flip screen. The lack of GPS and WIFI capabilities in both models further emphasizes their similarities.

Given the specifications, it is clear that the Nikon D3400 is the better choice for those seeking additional connectivity options. Its Bluetooth capability sets it apart from the Nikon D3200, offering users an edge in terms of convenience and control. While the Nikon D3200 does not have any standout features that make it a more appealing option, it remains a solid choice for those who prioritize simplicity and do not require advanced connectivity options.

Features
Features
41%
54%
Built-in Flash
External Flash
GPS
Weather Sealing
Screen Type
LCD
LCD
Touch Screen
Screen Size
3"
3"
Screen Resolution
921,000 dots
921,000 dots
Flip Screen
Live View
Wi-Fi
Bluetooth

Nikon D3200 vs D3400 Storage and Battery

The Nikon D3400 outperforms the Nikon D3200 in storage and battery with a score of 45/100 compared to the D3200’s 27/100. Both cameras have one memory card slot and accept SD, SDHC, and SDXC cards. The D3200 is UHS-I compatible, while the D3400 is not specified.

The D3400’s battery life is significantly longer, providing 1200 shots per charge compared to the D3200’s 540 shots. The D3400 uses the EN-EL14a battery type, while the D3200 uses EN-EL14. Neither camera offers USB charging capabilities.

Though the D3200 is UHS-I compatible, which enables faster read and write speeds, its overall storage and battery performance falls short. The D3400’s impressive battery life makes it the clear winner in this category, providing more than double the shots per charge.

Storage and Battery
Storage and Battery
27%
45%
Memory Card
SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-I compatible)
SD / SDHC / SDXC
Dual Memory Card Slots
Battery Type
EN-EL14
EN-EL14a
Battery Life
540 shots
1,200 shots
USB Charging
DXOMARK Scores
Sensor scores tested by DXOMARK
Overall Score
81%
86%
Portrait (Color Depth)
24.1 bits
24.8 bits
Landscape (Dynamic Range)
13.2 EVs
13.9 EVs
Sports (Low-Light ISO)
1131
1192
Scores

Nikon D3200 vs D3400 – Our Verdict

Nikon D3200 vs D3400 Comparison image.

Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Nikon D3200 or the Nikon D3400:

User Scores
Spotted a mistake with these specs? Please let us know so we can update it!