If you buy a product through one of our referral links we will earn a commission (without costing you anything).
Prices last updated on .
As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
If you buy a product through one of our referral links we will earn a commission (without costing you anything).
Prices last updated on .
As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
The Nikon D3400 emerges as the winner with a score of 61/100, compared to the Nikon D5300‘s 57/100. Both cameras share the DSLR type and have similar dimensions, with the D3400 measuring 124 x 98 x 76mm and the D5300 measuring 125 x 98 x 76mm. The D3400 is also lighter, weighing 445g, while the D5300 weighs 480g.
The D3400 has the advantage of being more recent, released in 2016, and a lower launch price of $650 compared to the D5300’s 2013 release and $800 launch price. However, the D5300 may still offer some features that the D3400 lacks, despite its lower score. Ultimately, the D3400’s higher score and lower price make it a more attractive option for those seeking a DSLR camera with solid performance.
Nikon D3400 vs D5300 Overview and Optics
The Nikon D3400 and Nikon D5300 both receive a score of 65/100 for their optics, showing no difference in overall performance. These cameras share several specifications, including 24.2 megapixels, 5 fps shooting speed, a CMOS sensor, Expeed 4 processor, APS-C sensor size, Nikon F DX lens mount, and no image stabilization.
Despite having the same overall score, the D3400 has a slightly higher DXOMARK score of 86 for its sensor, compared to the D5300’s score of 83. This indicates that the D3400 may produce marginally better image quality.
On the other hand, the D5300 offers additional features that may benefit some users, although these do not directly impact the optics. It is important to consider these features when choosing between the two cameras.
Based on the optics alone, there is no clear winner between the Nikon D3400 and Nikon D5300, as they both perform equally well in this aspect. However, the D3400 has a slight edge in sensor performance, while the D5300 offers extra features. Ultimately, the choice between these cameras depends on the individual’s priorities and preferences.
Optics
Nikon D3400
Nikon D5300
Megapixels
24.2 MP
24.2 MP
Image Resolution
6000 x 4000 px
6000 x 4000 px
Sensor Type
CMOS
CMOS
Sensor Size
15.6 x 23.5 mm
15.6 x 23.5 mm
Sensor Format
APS-C
APS-C
Frame Rate
5 fps
5 fps
Lens Mount
Nikon F DX
Nikon F DX
Image Processor
Expeed 4
Expeed 4
Aspect Ratio
3:2
3:2
Minimum ISO (Native)
100
100
Maximum ISO (Native)
25,600
12,800
Minimum ISO (Expanded)
100
100
Maximum ISO (Expanded)
25600
25600
Minimum Shutter Speed
30 s
30 s
Maximum Shutter Speed
1/ 4000 s
1/ 4000 s
Autofocus Points
11
39
In-body Stabilization
Viewfinder Type
Optical (pentamirror)
Optical (pentamirror)
Nikon D3400 vs D5300 Video Performance
The Nikon D5300 emerges as the winner in the video category with a score of 70/100, while the Nikon D3400 trails behind at 56/100. Both cameras share some common specifications, such as Full HD video resolution and maximum video dimensions of 1920 x 1080. They also have the same maximum video frame rate of 60fps.
The winning camera, Nikon D5300, surpasses the D3400 with the inclusion of time-lapse functionality built-in. This feature allows photographers to create stunning time-lapse videos without needing additional equipment or software. This advantage makes the D5300 more versatile and appealing to videographers who require time-lapse capabilities.
The Nikon D3400, despite having a lower score, still offers solid video performance with its Full HD resolution and 60fps frame rate. It may not have the time-lapse functionality, but it remains a reliable choice for users who do not require this feature. The D3400’s lower score does not mean it is a poor choice for video recording; it simply lacks the added functionality found in the D5300.
After comparing the video capabilities of both cameras, the Nikon D5300 stands out as the better choice for videographers, especially those who value time-lapse functionality. The Nikon D3400, on the other hand, remains a viable option for users who prioritize high-resolution video and fast frame rates without needing the extra time-lapse feature. Ultimately, the decision between these two cameras depends on the specific video requirements and preferences of the user.
Video
Nikon D3400
Nikon D5300
Video
Max Video Resolution
Full HD
Full HD
Max Video Dimensions
1920 x 1080 px
1920 x 1080 px
Max Video Frame Rate
60 p
60 p
Time-Lapse Built In
Video File Format
MOV
MOV
Nikon D3400 vs D5300 Features and Benefits
The Nikon D3400 comes out on top with a feature score of 54/100, while the Nikon D5300 trails behind with a score of 46/100. Both cameras share a few specifications, such as a 3-inch screen size, absence of a touchscreen, and having Bluetooth connectivity (D3400) or Wi-Fi (D5300) for wireless image transfers. However, the D3400 stands out in certain aspects, while the D5300 excels in others.
The D3400 has a higher feature score, which is due to its Bluetooth connectivity. This allows for seamless image transfers and remote control of the camera via a smartphone. Additionally, the D3400’s screen resolution is slightly lower at 921,000 dots, compared to the D5300’s 1,037,000 dots, but this difference is negligible in real-world usage.
On the other hand, the D5300 boasts a larger 3.2-inch screen with a flip-out design, making it more versatile for different shooting angles and situations. This camera also has built-in GPS for geotagging images and Wi-Fi connectivity for easy sharing and remote control. However, it lacks Bluetooth connectivity, which might be a downside for some users.
After comparing the features of both cameras, the Nikon D3400 stands out as the winner due to its higher score and Bluetooth connectivity, making it a more user-friendly option for those who value seamless image transfers and remote control. The Nikon D5300, however, offers more versatility with its flip-out screen, GPS, and Wi-Fi, making it a strong contender for users who prioritize these features. Ultimately, the choice between the two cameras depends on individual preferences and priorities.
Features
Nikon D3400
Nikon D5300
Built-in Flash
External Flash
GPS
Weather Sealing
Screen Type
LCD
LCD
Touch Screen
Screen Size
3"
3.2"
Screen Resolution
921,000 dots
1,037,000 dots
Flip Screen
Live View
Wi-Fi
Bluetooth
Nikon D3400 vs D5300 Storage and Battery
The Nikon D3400 triumphs over the Nikon D5300 in storage and battery with a score of 45/100, while the D5300 lags behind at 29/100. Both cameras share common specifications, such as having a single memory card slot and accepting SD, SDHC, and SDXC memory cards. Additionally, neither camera offers USB charging, and both utilize the EN-EL14a battery type.
The D3400’s superiority in storage and battery is evident in its battery life, providing 1200 shots per charge compared to the D5300’s 600 shots. This significant difference makes the D3400 a more reliable option for extended shooting sessions.
On the other hand, the D5300 does not hold any advantage over the D3400 in terms of storage and battery. The lower score simply reflects its shorter battery life.
Considering these factors, the Nikon D3400 proves to be the better choice for those prioritizing storage and battery performance. The D5300, with its shorter battery life, may not be the ideal option for photographers who require longer shooting times without frequent battery replacement.
If you buy a product through one of our referral links we will earn a commission (without costing you anything).
Prices last updated on .
As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
If you buy a product through one of our referral links we will earn a commission (without costing you anything).
Prices last updated on .
As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.