Nikon Z fc vs Z30 Comparison

The Nikon Z fc and Nikon Z30 both earn a score of 72/100, making it a tie in terms of overall performance. These mirrorless cameras share similarities like their release years, 2021 and 2022, respectively, and their camera types.

The Nikon Z fc has the advantage of a slightly larger camera size (135 x 94 x 44mm) and a heavier weight (445g / 0.98lbs), which could offer better stability and handling for some users. On the other hand, the Nikon Z30 is more compact (128 x 74 x 60mm) and lighter (405g / 0.89lbs), making it more portable and easier to carry around.

When it comes to pricing, the Z30 is the more affordable option, with a launch price of $710 compared to the Z fc’s $959. Despite their differences in size, weight, and price, both cameras deliver equally impressive performance, earning them the same score of 72/100. The choice between these two cameras will likely depend on the user’s preferences for size, weight, and budget.

Nikon Z fc vs Z30 Overview and Optics

The Nikon Z fc and Nikon Z30 both have an optics score of 72/100, indicating that they are evenly matched in terms of their optical performance. Both cameras share several common specifications, including an 11 fps shooting speed, CMOS sensor type, Expeed 6 processor, a DXOMARK score of 97 for the sensor, APS-C sensor size, Nikon Z lens mount, and the absence of image stabilization.

The Nikon Z fc has a slight advantage with its 21-megapixel resolution compared to the Z30’s 20-megapixel resolution. This higher resolution allows the Z fc to capture more detail and produce larger prints. However, the difference in megapixels is minimal and may not be noticeable in everyday shooting situations.

The Nikon Z30, on the other hand, does not have any specific optical advantages over the Z fc. Both cameras are equal in terms of their optics performance, as evidenced by their identical scores.

Taking into account the shared specifications and the slight advantage in megapixels for the Z fc, it can be said that both cameras are suitable for photographers seeking solid optics performance. The Nikon Z fc’s marginally higher resolution might be a deciding factor for those seeking larger prints or more detailed images, but for most users, the difference is negligible. The Nikon Z30 does not have any distinct optical benefits but remains a strong contender due to its overall performance and shared specifications with the Z fc.

The Nikon Z fc and Nikon Z30 are evenly matched in video capabilities, both receiving a score of 91/100. These cameras share several key features, including 4K max video resolution, max video dimensions of 3840 x 2160 (Nikon Z fc) and 3841 x 2160 (Nikon Z30), a max video frame rate of 120fps, and built-in time-lapse functionality.

Despite the identical scores, the Nikon Z fc has a slight edge in video capabilities due to its max video dimensions of 3840 x 2160, which is one pixel less in width than the Nikon Z30’s 3841 x 2160. This minute difference does not affect the overall video quality, but it is a noteworthy distinction between the two cameras.

On the other hand, the Nikon Z30’s advantage lies in its one-pixel wider max video dimensions. This extra pixel in width may not significantly impact the video quality, but it does provide a minor advantage over the Nikon Z fc. Both cameras maintain a high standard in video performance, making the choice between them a matter of personal preference.

Considering the video capabilities of the Nikon Z fc and Nikon Z30, it is evident that they are nearly identical in performance. Both cameras offer impressive 4K video resolution, a high max video frame rate of 120fps, and time-lapse functionality. The minor differences in max video dimensions are negligible and unlikely to affect a user’s overall satisfaction with either camera. Therefore, the decision between the Nikon Z fc and Nikon Z30 should be based on other factors, such as design, price, and additional features.

The Nikon Z fc and the Nikon Z30 both have a feature score of 83/100, making them equal in this aspect. They share numerous specifications, including a 3-inch screen size, a screen resolution of 1040000 dots, a touchscreen, a flip screen, no GPS, WIFI, and Bluetooth capabilities.

Despite their identical feature scores, the Nikon Z fc has some advantages over the Nikon Z30. However, the provided information does not specify the areas where the Nikon Z fc outperforms the Z30, as both cameras seem to have the same features listed. Therefore, it is essential to consider other aspects of the cameras, such as image quality, autofocus performance, and lens compatibility, to determine which camera is better suited for specific needs or preferences.

On the other hand, the Nikon Z30 may have some benefits over the Z fc, but with the given information, it is not possible to identify these advantages. To make a fair comparison, additional details about the Z30’s features or performance should be considered.

Taking into account the similarities in their feature scores and the specifications provided, both the Nikon Z fc and the Nikon Z30 are competent cameras with comparable features. It is crucial to evaluate the cameras based on other factors, such as intended use, budget, and individual preferences, before making a decision. By doing so, potential buyers can ensure they are choosing the camera that best suits their needs and requirements.

The Nikon Z30 outperforms the Nikon Z fc in storage and battery with a score of 35/100, compared to the Z fc’s 29/100. Both cameras have one memory card slot, supporting SD, SDHC, and SDXC cards (UHS-I compatible). They also use the same battery type, EN-EL25, and offer USB charging options.

The Z30 has a longer battery life, providing 330 shots per charge, while the Z fc delivers 260 shots. This advantage makes the Z30 more suitable for extended shooting sessions without needing to recharge or replace the battery.

The Z fc does not offer any significant advantage over the Z30 in terms of storage and battery. It shares the same memory card compatibility and charging options, but falls short in battery life.

Considering the storage and battery aspects, the Nikon Z30 is the better option, primarily due to its longer battery life. This feature ensures that users can capture more moments without worrying about the battery running out.

Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Nikon Z fc or the Nikon Z30:

• Nikon Z30 vs Z50
• Nikon Z30 vs Sony a6400
• Nikon Z30 vs Sony ZV-E10
• Nikon Z fc vs Z50
• Canon EOS M50 Mark II vs Nikon Z30
• Canon EOS R10 vs Nikon Z30