Nikon Z fc vs Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark III Comparison

The Nikon Z fc outperforms the Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark III with a score of 72 to 65. Both cameras are mirrorless and share similar dimensions, with the Nikon Z fc measuring 135 x 94 x 44mm and the Olympus at 125 x 85 x 50mm. The Nikon Z fc is slightly heavier at 445g compared to the Olympus’ 414g.

Nikon Z fc’s advantages include a more recent release date (2021) and a lower launch price of $959. This makes it a more attractive option for budget-conscious buyers seeking up-to-date technology. On the other hand, the Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark III, released in 2019, has a higher launch price of $1199 but offers a lighter and more compact design.

Considering these factors, the Nikon Z fc is the better choice for those seeking a modern and affordable camera, while the Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark III may appeal to those prioritizing size and weight.

Nikon Z fc vs Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark III Overview and Optics

The Nikon Z fc outperforms the Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark III in optics, scoring 72/100 compared to the Olympus’ 60/100. Both cameras share common features, such as a CMOS sensor and a similar megapixel count (21 for the Nikon and 20 for the Olympus). However, there are key differences that set the Nikon Z fc ahead.

The Nikon Z fc has a superior sensor, with a DXOMARK score of 97 compared to the Olympus’ 55. Additionally, its sensor size is APS-C, larger than the Olympus’ Micro Four Thirds sensor. The larger sensor size contributes to the Nikon’s better image quality and low-light performance. The Nikon Z fc also has a more advanced processor, the Expeed 6, while the Olympus uses the TruePic VIII.

Despite its lower score, the Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark III has some advantages. Its shooting speed is much faster at 30 frames per second compared to the Nikon’s 11. This makes the Olympus better suited for action photography. Furthermore, the Olympus has built-in image stabilization, while the Nikon Z fc does not. This feature can help reduce camera shake and produce sharper images.

Both cameras have unique lens mounts, with the Nikon Z fc utilizing the Nikon Z mount and the Olympus using the Micro 4/3 mount. This means that each camera has access to a different range of lenses, which may be a deciding factor for some users.

The Nikon Z fc’s superior sensor and processor make it the better option for those seeking optimal image quality and low-light performance. However, the Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark III’s faster shooting speed and image stabilization may appeal to action photographers or those who require steadier shots. Ultimately, the choice between these two cameras will depend on the user’s specific needs and preferences.

The Nikon Z fc and the Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark III both score 91/100 in video capabilities, indicating that they are on par in this aspect. They share common video specifications, such as max video resolution of 4K, max video frame rate of 120fps, and built-in time-lapse functionality.

The Nikon Z fc has a max video dimension of 3840 x 2160, providing high-quality video footage. Additionally, its 120fps frame rate allows for smooth slow-motion capture, and the built-in time-lapse functionality enables users to create stunning time-lapse videos.

The Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark III, on the other hand, offers a slightly higher max video dimension of 4096 x 2160, giving it a slight edge in video quality. Like the Nikon Z fc, it also has a 120fps frame rate and built-in time-lapse functionality, making it equally capable of producing smooth slow-motion footage and time-lapse videos.

Despite the Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark III having a larger max video dimension, both cameras have the same video score, indicating that their overall video capabilities are evenly matched. Users can expect high-quality video footage, smooth slow-motion capture, and excellent time-lapse functionality from both cameras.

Therefore, both the Nikon Z fc and the Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark III are strong contenders for videographers, offering equivalent video capabilities. The choice between these two cameras ultimately depends on personal preferences and additional factors such as price, ergonomics, and lens selection.

The Nikon Z fc and the Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark III both have a feature score of 83/100, making them equal in this aspect. They share several specifications, including a 3-inch screen size, 1,040,000-dot screen resolution, touchscreen functionality, flip screen, and the absence of GPS. Additionally, both cameras support WIFI and bluetooth connectivity.

The Nikon Z fc stands out due to its retro design and larger sensor, which may appeal to photographers who prefer a classic look and better low-light performance. The larger sensor also provides a shallower depth of field, allowing for more creative control in image composition.

On the other hand, the Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark III has a more compact and lightweight body, making it easier to carry around and hold for extended periods. Furthermore, it features in-body image stabilization, which can help reduce the effects of camera shake and improve image sharpness.

In comparing the features of both cameras, the Nikon Z fc excels in design and low-light performance due to its larger sensor, while the Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark III offers advantages in portability and image stabilization. Ultimately, the choice between these two cameras depends on the photographer’s preferences and needs.

The Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark III wins the storage and battery comparison with a score of 35/100, while the Nikon Z fc scores 29/100. Both cameras have one memory card slot and support USB charging. They accept SD, SDHC, and SDXC memory cards, but the Olympus has an advantage by being UHS-II compatible, allowing faster read and write speeds.

The Olympus also outperforms the Nikon in battery life, providing 310 shots per charge compared to the Nikon’s 260 shots. This longer battery life is beneficial for extended shooting sessions. The Olympus uses the BLS-50 battery, while the Nikon relies on the EN-EL25 battery.

Though the Nikon Z fc lags in this comparison, it still offers decent battery life and storage capabilities for its class. However, the Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark III is the better choice for photographers who prioritize faster memory card compatibility and longer battery life.

Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Nikon Z fc or the Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark III:

• Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV vs OM-D E-M5 Mark III
• Nikon Z fc vs Z50
• Fujifilm X-T5 vs Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark III
• Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark III vs Panasonic Lumix DC-G9
• Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III vs OM-D E-M5 Mark III
• Nikon Z fc vs Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV