CameraReviews.com
menu
Hi Camera Lovers 👋 If you buy a camera through our referral links, you support our site at no cost to you 😉 Full info here.

Sony FX3 vs Sony FX30 Comparison

Optics
Video
Features
Storage & Battery

Sony FX3

Sony FX3 image
75%

Sony FX30

Sony FX30
Winner!
80%
Sony FX3
vs
Sony FX30
Price
Brand
Ricoh
Sony
Model
FX3
FX30
Released
2021
2022
Announcement Date
February 23, 2021
September 28, 2022
Camera Type
Mirrorless
Mirrorless
Camera Size
Camera Weight

The Sony FX30 outperforms the Sony FX3 with a score of 80/100 compared to 75/100. Both cameras share similarities as mirrorless cameras announced in 2021 and 2022, with similar dimensions (Sony FX3: 129.7 x 77.8 x 84.5mm, Sony FX30: 78 x 130 x 85mm) and weight (Sony FX3: 640g, Sony FX30: 646g).

The Sony FX30 excels due to its lower launch price of $1799 compared to the Sony FX3’s $3900, making it more accessible to consumers. In contrast, the Sony FX3 has a slight advantage in weight, being 6g lighter than the FX30.

Considering these factors, the Sony FX30 emerges as the winner due to its better score and affordability. The Sony FX3 remains a viable option for those who prioritize a lighter camera.

Sony FX3 vs Sony FX30 Overview and Optics

The Sony FX30 wins the optics comparison with a score of 78/100, while the Sony FX3 scores 71/100. Both cameras share some key specifications, including a 10 fps shooting speed, CMOS sensor, Bionz XR processor, Sony E lens mount, and image stabilization. They also have the same DXOMARK sensor score of 94.

The FX30’s higher score is due to its 26-megapixel resolution, which is more than double the FX3’s 12.1 megapixels. This higher resolution allows the FX30 to capture more details in images, making it suitable for photographers who need high-resolution images for large prints or extensive cropping. Additionally, the FX30 features an APS-C sensor, which provides a smaller form factor and a wider selection of lenses compared to the full-frame sensor found in the FX3.

On the other hand, the FX3’s full-frame sensor offers better low-light performance and a shallower depth of field, which can be advantageous for certain types of photography, such as portraits and events. However, its lower resolution of 12.1 megapixels may not be sufficient for photographers who require high-resolution images.

Considering these differences, the Sony FX30 is the superior camera in terms of optics, thanks to its higher resolution and smaller sensor size. However, the FX3’s full-frame sensor may be more suitable for photographers who prioritize low-light performance and a shallower depth of field. Ultimately, the choice between the two cameras will depend on the specific needs and preferences of the user.

Optics
Optics
71%
78%
Megapixels
12.1 MP
26 MP
Image Resolution
4240 × 2832 px
6192 x 4128 px
Sensor Type
CMOS
CMOS
Sensor Size
35.6 x 23.8 mm
23.4 x 15.6 mm
Sensor Format
Full Frame
APS-C
Frame Rate
10 fps
10 fps
Lens Mount
Sony E
Sony E
Image Processor
Bionz XR
Bionz XR
Aspect Ratio
3:2
3:2
Minimum ISO (Native)
80
100
Maximum ISO (Native)
102,400
32,000
Minimum ISO (Expanded)
40
100
Maximum ISO (Expanded)
409600
102400
Minimum Shutter Speed
30 s
30 s
Maximum Shutter Speed
1/ 8000 s
1/ 8000 s
Autofocus Points
627
759
In-body Stabilization
Viewfinder Type
None
None

Sony FX3 vs Sony FX30 Video Performance

The Sony FX3 outperforms the Sony FX30 in video capabilities, scoring 91 out of 100 compared to the FX30’s score of 77. Both cameras share some common specifications, such as 4K max video resolution, 3840 x 2160 max video dimensions, and a max video frame rate of 120fps. However, the FX3 has distinct advantages that contribute to its higher video score.

One significant advantage of the FX3 is the built-in time-lapse functionality. This feature allows users to create stunning time-lapse videos without the need for additional equipment or software. In contrast, the FX30 lacks this built-in functionality, which might be a deal-breaker for some users.

Despite the lower video score, the FX30 still offers impressive video capabilities, matching the FX3 in resolution, dimensions, and frame rate. However, the absence of built-in time-lapse functionality is a drawback that could impact the user experience for those who value this feature.

Comparing the two cameras, the Sony FX3 clearly stands out as the better option for videographers due to its time-lapse functionality. This feature enhances the camera’s versatility and creative potential, making it a more appealing choice for users seeking high-quality video performance. On the other hand, the Sony FX30 remains a solid option for those who prioritize video resolution, dimensions, and frame rate, but are willing to forgo the convenience of built-in time-lapse capabilities.

Video
Video
91%
77%
Video
Max Video Resolution
4K
4K
Max Video Dimensions
3840 x 2160 px
3840 x 2160 px
Max Video Frame Rate
120 p
120 p
Time-Lapse Built In
Video File Format
MPEG-4, MOV, XAVC S, XAVC HS, XAVC S-1
H.264, H.265, XAVC S, XAVC HS, XAVC S-I

Sony FX3 vs Sony FX30 Features and Benefits

The Sony FX30 outperforms the Sony FX3 with a feature score of 85/100 compared to the FX3’s 83/100. Both cameras share common specifications such as a 3-inch screen size, touchscreen capability, flip screen, GPS absence, WIFI, and Bluetooth connectivity.

The FX30 surpasses the FX3 in screen resolution, boasting 2,360,000 dots compared to the FX3’s 1,440,000 dots. This higher resolution provides the FX30 with a sharper and clearer display, enhancing user experience when reviewing images and navigating menus.

On the other hand, the FX3 has its own advantages. While the FX3’s feature score is slightly lower than the FX30’s, it does not necessarily make it an inferior camera. It is crucial to consider individual preferences and specific needs when choosing between the two models. The FX3 might offer other features or performance aspects that cater to a user’s unique requirements, making it a better choice for them.

In comparing the Sony FX3 and Sony FX30, the FX30 emerges as the winner in terms of feature score and screen resolution. However, it is essential to acknowledge that the right choice ultimately depends on the individual’s needs and preferences. Both cameras offer impressive features, and users should carefully evaluate their specific requirements before making a decision.

Features
Features
83%
85%
Built-in Flash
External Flash
GPS
Weather Sealing
Screen Type
TFT LCD
TFT LCD
Touch Screen
Screen Size
3"
3"
Screen Resolution
1,440,000 dots
2,360,000 dots
Flip Screen
Live View
Wi-Fi
Bluetooth

Sony FX3 vs Sony FX30 Storage and Battery

The Sony FX3 and Sony FX30 both score 76/100 in storage and battery, displaying similar capabilities. Each camera has two memory card slots and supports SD, SDHC, SDXC (UHS-II compatible), and CFexpress Type A memory cards. Both cameras also use the NP-FZ100 battery type and offer USB charging.

Regarding battery life, the Sony FX3 holds a slight advantage with 600 shots per charge, compared to the FX30’s 570 shots. This difference, although minor, gives the FX3 an edge for extended shooting sessions.

On the other hand, the Sony FX30 offers no notable advantages in storage and battery over the FX3, as their specifications are nearly identical.

Given their equal scores and similar specifications, both the Sony FX3 and Sony FX30 provide adequate storage and battery performance. The FX3’s marginally longer battery life may slightly favor users with extended shooting needs, but overall, both cameras excel in this category.

Storage and Battery
Storage and Battery
76%
76%
Memory Card
SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-II compatible), CFexpress Type A
SD, CFexpress Type A
Dual Memory Card Slots
Battery Type
NP-FZ100
NP-FZ100
Battery Life
600 shots
570 shots
USB Charging
DXOMARK Scores
Sensor scores tested by DXOMARK
Scores

Alternatives to the Sony FX3 and Sony FX30

Sony FX3 vs Sony FX30 Comparison image.

Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Sony FX3 or the Sony FX30:

User Scores
Spotted a mistake with these specs? Please let us know so we can update it!