Canon EOS M50 Mark II vs Sony a6100 Comparison
Canon EOS M50 Mark II
Sony a6100
Price |
from
Check Price
|
from
Check Price
| |
|---|---|---|---|
Brand | Canon | Sony | |
Model | EOS M50 Mark II | a6100 | |
Released Refers to the year this camera was officially made available for sale. | 2020 | 2019 | |
Announcement Date Refers to the date the manufacturer publicly announced the upcoming release and general specs of this camera. | October 14, 2020 | August 28, 2019 | |
Camera Type |  Mirrorless | Mirrorless | |
Camera Size | |||
Camera Weight |
The Sony a6100 emerges as the winner with a score of 66/100, while the Canon EOS M50 Mark II trails behind with a score of 59/100. Both mirrorless cameras have the same launch price of $750 and similar dimensions, with the Sony a6100 measuring 120 x 67 x 59mm and the Canon EOS M50 Mark II at 116 x 88 x 59mm. The weights are also comparable, with the Sony a6100 weighing 396g and the Canon EOS M50 Mark II at 387g.
The Sony a6100 outperforms the Canon EOS M50 Mark II due to its superior autofocus system, better low-light performance, and longer battery life. On the other hand, the Canon EOS M50 Mark II has a more user-friendly interface and a fully articulating touchscreen, making it a better choice for beginners and vloggers.
Taking these factors into account, the Sony a6100 is the better option for more experienced photographers seeking better performance, while the Canon EOS M50 Mark II caters to those prioritizing ease of use and vlogging capabilities.
Canon EOS M50 Mark II vs Sony a6100 Overview and Optics
The Sony a6100 outperforms the Canon EOS M50 Mark II in optics with a score of 68/100, a difference of 9 points from the Canon’s score of 59/100. Both cameras share several specifications, including 24-megapixel sensors, CMOS sensor types, APS-C sensor sizes, and the absence of image stabilization. However, the Sony a6100 has distinct advantages that contribute to its higher score.
The Sony a6100 possesses an edge in shooting speed, with 11 frames per second compared to the Canon’s 10 frames per second. This slight advantage allows for capturing fast-moving subjects with more precision. The a6100 also benefits from a superior DXOMARK sensor score of 82, compared to the Canon’s 58. This difference indicates better overall image quality and low-light performance.
Despite these advantages, the Canon EOS M50 Mark II has its own strengths. It features a Digic 8 processor, which, although not directly comparable to the Sony’s Bionz X processor, still delivers fast performance and quality image processing. The camera also uses the Canon EF-M lens mount, offering compatibility with a range of Canon lenses.
The lens mount for the Sony a6100 is the Sony E mount, which provides access to an extensive selection of Sony lenses. Although both cameras have their respective lens ecosystems, the Sony a6100 has the advantage in terms of overall optics performance due to its better shooting speed and DXOMARK sensor score.
Comparing the optics of the Canon EOS M50 Mark II and the Sony a6100, the a6100 is the clear winner. Its superior shooting speed and sensor performance make it a better choice for those prioritizing image quality and capturing fast-moving subjects. However, the Canon EOS M50 Mark II remains a reliable option for those already invested in the Canon lens ecosystem or who prefer its processor.
|
Optics
|
Canon EOS M50 Mark II
|
Sony a6100
|
|
|
|
|
||
Megapixels The higher the number of megapixels, the more detail the cameras sensor can capture. | 24 MP | 24 MP | |
|---|---|---|---|
Image Resolution Image resolution is measured in pixels and megapixels, width by height. The higher the number, the higher its resolution. | 6000 x 4000 px | 6000 x 4000 px | |
Sensor Type The camera sensor captures light and records the image. Sensors vary in physical size, the number of pixels, and quality. | CMOS | CMOS | |
Sensor Size The sensor size contributes to the overall quality as well as the dynamic and tonal range a camera can capture. As a rule of thumb, the more surface there is to read the light, the more information it will capture. | 14.9 x 22.3 mm | 15.6 x 23.5 mm | |
Sensor Format Refers to the most commonly used sensor sizes. |  APS-C | APS-C | |
Frame Rate The number of sequential frames per second the camera can write to the memory card when shooting in burst or continuous mode. | 10 fps | 11 fps | |
Lens Mount The lens mount will tell you what type of lens range you can fit onto the camera body. Often the same camera company will have different lens ranges for different cameras. | Canon EF-M | Sony E | |
Image Processor The image processor in the camera converts the information collected on the sensor for digital storage on the memory card. | Digic 8 | Bionz X | |
Aspect Ratio The aspect ratio refers to the proportional difference between width and height. The most popular aspect ratios are 3:2 and 4:3. |  3:2 | 3:2 | |
Minimum ISO (Native) Refers to the lowest native (or 'base') ISO setting. Lower ISO are less sensitive to light but make a cleaner image. | 100 | 100 | |
Maximum ISO (Native) Refers to the highest native (or 'base') ISO setting. Higher ISO is necessary for low-light situations or night photography, but higher ISOs often introduce grain or noise. | 25,600 | 32,000 | |
Minimum ISO (Expanded) Expanded (or extended) ISO is a digitally enhanced feature available on some cameras. It allows you to push beyond the native ISO range if necessary. | 100 | 100 | |
Maximum ISO (Expanded) Expanded (or extended) ISO is a digitally enhanced feature available on some cameras. It allows you to push beyond the native ISO range if necessary. | 51200 | 51000 | |
Minimum Shutter Speed The minimum shutter speed will tell you the longest exposure your camera can take without using an external accessory. | 30 s | 30 s | |
Maximum Shutter Speed The maximum shutter speed tells you the length inside 1 second the camera will capture. These can sometimes be extended with accessories such as extra external batteries. | 1/ 4000 s | 1/ 4000 s | |
Autofocus Points Autofocus points show where the camera is focusing graphically as squares or brackets in Live View or on an electronic viewfinder. These points are also used for light meter readings. | 143 | 425 | |
In-body Stabilization In-body Stabilization means the camera has a certain technology embedded that counteracts camera shake. |   | | |
Viewfinder Type The viewfinder type is either electronic or optical. Electronic viewfinders will have a small screen in the viewfinder. Optical viewfinders will use prisms and mirrors to look through the lens. | Electronic | Electronic | |
Viewfinder Resolution | 2,360,000 dots | 1,440,000 dots |
Canon EOS M50 Mark II vs Sony a6100 Video Performance
When comparing the Canon EOS M50 Mark II and the Sony a6100 for their video capabilities, both cameras tie with a video score of 91/100. This result shows that they offer similar performance in terms of video shooting.
The Canon EOS M50 Mark II and the Sony a6100 share several common video specifications. Both cameras have a maximum video resolution of 4K and video dimensions of 3840 x 2160. Additionally, they can record at a maximum video frame rate of 120fps and have built-in time-lapse functionality.
Despite the similar scores, there are areas where one camera excels over the other. The Canon EOS M50 Mark II offers an edge in terms of user-friendly features and menu navigation, making it easier for beginners and casual users to operate. It also has a reputation for producing excellent color reproduction, resulting in visually appealing videos.
On the other hand, the Sony a6100 stands out for its superior autofocus system, which ensures that subjects remain sharp and in focus during video recording. This feature is particularly useful for action and sports videography, where fast and accurate focus is crucial.
In comparing the video capabilities of the Canon EOS M50 Mark II and the Sony a6100, it is evident that both cameras provide strong performance in this area. While the Canon offers a more user-friendly experience and better color reproduction, the Sony excels in autofocus performance. Ultimately, the choice between these two cameras depends on the specific needs and preferences of the user.
|
Video
|
Canon EOS M50 Mark II
|
Sony a6100
|
|
|
|
|
||
Video Indicates if this camera is capable of recording video. |   | | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max Video Resolution The best resolution this camera can capture video in. Modern cameras can capture up to 8K video. |  4K | 4K | |
Max Video Dimensions Video resolution measured by the greatest number of pixels possible in each frame, width by height. A higher resolution means more detail or clarity in your video. | 3840 x 2160 px | 3840 x 2160 px | |
Max Video Frame Rate How many frames per second your video will capture. Most cameras have options for multiple frame rates, depending on the resolution you shoot in. For a general video, 24p or 30p is the standard, but more serious filmmakers may need a higher frame rate for creative effect. | 120 p | 120 p | |
Time-Lapse Built In A built in time-lapse mode will allow continuous shooting throughout a prolonged period of time to be compressed into a sped up video. |  | | |
Video File Format Different cameras can record in various video file formats. The File format you record in can impact how you edit and use the files. | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S, H.264 |
Canon EOS M50 Mark II vs Sony a6100 Features and Benefits
The Canon EOS M50 Mark II wins in the features comparison with a score of 70/100, while the Sony a6100 scores 68/100. Both cameras share several common specifications, including a 3-inch screen size, touchscreen capabilities, flip screen, and the absence of GPS. Additionally, they both come with WIFI and Bluetooth connectivity.
The Canon EOS M50 Mark II outperforms the Sony a6100 in terms of screen resolution, boasting 1,040,000 dots compared to the Sony’s 921,600 dots. This higher resolution provides a clearer and sharper display, making it easier for users to review images and navigate the camera’s menu.
On the other hand, the Sony a6100 still has its merits, even though it does not surpass the Canon EOS M50 Mark II in the features comparison. It matches the Canon model in essential aspects, such as screen size, touchscreen, flip screen, WIFI, and Bluetooth. This similarity in specs indicates that the Sony a6100 is still a reliable option for photographers who prioritize these features.
Taking these factors into account, the Canon EOS M50 Mark II emerges as the better camera in terms of features, primarily due to its higher screen resolution. However, the Sony a6100 remains a strong contender, as it shares many essential specifications with the Canon model. Users should weigh their preferences and priorities when choosing between these two cameras, as both offer valuable features for different photography needs.
|
Features
|
Canon EOS M50 Mark II
|
Sony a6100
|
|
|
|
|
||
Built-in Flash A built-in flash will often be positioned right above the lens. This will automatically pop up when you activate it. |  | | |
|---|---|---|---|
External Flash External flashes are often connected through a hot shoe at the top of a camera, or a cable at the side of the camera. |  | | |
GPS GPS features in a camera will include location metadata to each of your photographs. |  | | |
Weather Sealing Weather sealing capabilities will give you more confidence when shooting in unfavourable conditions. |  | | |
Screen Type | TFT LCD | LCD | |
Touch Screen Touchscreen allows you to change camera settings and access menus with a swipe of your finger, instead of using buttons. |  | | |
Screen Size |  3" | 3" | |
Screen Resolution Screen dots indicate the resolution of the LCD screen by including each sub pixel. | 1,040,000 dots | 921,600 dots | |
Flip Screen A flip screen (or articulating screen) is a second screen which can flip out from the side or top of the camera. This rotating screen allows you more freedom to take photos at different angles. |  | | |
Live View Live View feature allows you to see a continuous live video of what is being seen through your lens. |  | | |
Wi-Fi |  | | |
Bluetooth Bluetooth capabilities allow you wireless control of your camera with other external devices. |  | | |
Canon EOS M50 Mark II vs Sony a6100 Storage and Battery
The Sony a6100 wins in the storage and battery category with a score of 37/100, while the Canon EOS M50 Mark II scores 21/100. Both cameras have one memory card slot and accept SD, SDHC, and SDXC cards. However, the Sony a6100 also supports Memory Stick Pro Duo cards, offering more storage options.
The Sony a6100 has a longer battery life of 420 shots, compared to the Canon EOS M50 Mark II’s 305 shots. Additionally, the a6100 features USB charging, making it more convenient to charge on-the-go.
The Canon EOS M50 Mark II does not offer any advantages in storage and battery over the Sony a6100. Its lower battery life and lack of USB charging limit its usability in comparison.
Considering the storage and battery aspects, the Sony a6100 proves to be the better camera. Its longer battery life, USB charging, and additional memory card compatibility make it a more practical choice for photographers.
|
Storage and Battery
|
Canon EOS M50 Mark II
|
Sony a6100
|
|
|
|
|
||
Memory Card | SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-I compatible) | SD / SDHC / SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo | |
|---|---|---|---|
Dual Memory Card Slots |  | | |
Battery Type | LP-E12 | NP-FW50 | |
Battery Life Approximately how long this cameras battery will last measured by how many photographs you will be able to take. | 305 shots | 420 shots | |
USB Charging |  | |
|
DXOMARK Scores
Sensor scores tested by DXOMARK |
Canon EOS M50 Mark II
|
Sony a6100
|
|
Scores
|
Canon EOS M50 Mark II
|
Sony a6100
|
Alternatives to the Canon EOS M50 Mark II and Sony a6100
Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Canon EOS M50 Mark II or the Sony a6100:
|
User Scores
|
Canon EOS M50 Mark II
|
Sony a6100
|
|
B&H photo video |
|---|