Canon EOS M50 Mark II vs Sony ZV-E10 Comparison
Canon EOS M50 Mark II
Sony ZV-E10
Price | |||
---|---|---|---|
Brand | Canon | Sony | |
Model | EOS M50 Mark II | ZV-E10 | |
Released Refers to the year this camera was officially made available for sale. | 2020 | 2021 | |
Announcement Date Refers to the date the manufacturer publicly announced the upcoming release and general specs of this camera. | October 14, 2020 | July 27, 2021 | |
Camera Type | |||
Camera Size | |||
Camera Weight |
The Sony ZV-E10 wins the comparison with a score of 65/100, while the Canon EOS M50 Mark II scores 59/100. Both cameras are mirrorless and were released in 2020 and 2021, respectively. They share common specifications such as launch price, with the Sony ZV-E10 priced at $700 and the Canon EOS M50 Mark II at $750.
The Sony ZV-E10 has a better score due to its lighter weight (343g) and smaller size (115 x 64 x 45mm), making it more portable and convenient for users. On the other hand, the Canon EOS M50 Mark II has a slightly higher launch price, which could be an advantage for those looking for a more premium product.
When comparing the two cameras, the Sony ZV-E10 is the better choice due to its higher score and more compact design. The Canon EOS M50 Mark II may still appeal to some users due to its slightly higher price, but overall, the Sony ZV-E10 is the winner in this comparison.
Canon EOS M50 Mark II vs Sony ZV-E10 Overview and Optics
The Sony ZV-E10 takes the lead in optics with a score of 69/100, while the Canon EOS M50 Mark II trails behind at 59/100. Both cameras share some common specifications, such as 24 megapixels, a CMOS sensor, an APS-C sensor size, and no image stabilization. However, the differences in their scores stem from the distinct features each camera offers.
The Sony ZV-E10 outperforms the Canon EOS M50 Mark II in several aspects. It has a faster shooting speed of 11 compared to 10, which allows for capturing moments more efficiently. Additionally, the Sony ZV-E10 has a higher DXOMARK score for the sensor at 86, compared to the Canon EOS M50 Mark II’s score of 58. This difference results in better image quality and improved low-light performance. Furthermore, the Sony ZV-E10 has a 4:3 aspect ratio, providing more flexibility in framing and composition.
On the other hand, the Canon EOS M50 Mark II has its advantages as well. It features a Digic 8 processor, which contributes to faster processing and better image quality. Moreover, the Canon EF-M lens mount offers compatibility with Canon’s range of lenses, providing more options for various shooting scenarios.
In terms of optics, the Sony ZV-E10 proves to be the stronger contender with its faster shooting speed, higher DXOMARK score, and more versatile aspect ratio. However, the Canon EOS M50 Mark II should not be disregarded, as its Digic 8 processor and lens compatibility may cater to specific user preferences. Ultimately, the choice between these two cameras depends on individual needs and priorities.
Optics
|
Canon EOS M50 Mark II
|
Sony ZV-E10
|
|
|
|
||
Megapixels The higher the number of megapixels, the more detail the cameras sensor can capture. | 24 MP | 24 MP | |
---|---|---|---|
Image Resolution Image resolution is measured in pixels and megapixels, width by height. The higher the number, the higher its resolution. | 6000 x 4000 px | 6000 x 4000 px | |
Sensor Type The camera sensor captures light and records the image. Sensors vary in physical size, the number of pixels, and quality. | CMOS | CMOS | |
Sensor Size The sensor size contributes to the overall quality as well as the dynamic and tonal range a camera can capture. As a rule of thumb, the more surface there is to read the light, the more information it will capture. | 14.9 x 22.3 mm | 23.5 x 15.6 mm | |
Sensor Format Refers to the most commonly used sensor sizes. | |||
Frame Rate The number of sequential frames per second the camera can write to the memory card when shooting in burst or continuous mode. | 10 fps | 11 fps | |
Lens Mount The lens mount will tell you what type of lens range you can fit onto the camera body. Often the same camera company will have different lens ranges for different cameras. | Canon EF-M | Sony E | |
Image Processor The image processor in the camera converts the information collected on the sensor for digital storage on the memory card. | Digic 8 | Bionz X | |
Aspect Ratio The aspect ratio refers to the proportional difference between width and height. The most popular aspect ratios are 3:2 and 4:3. | |||
Minimum ISO (Native) Refers to the lowest native (or 'base') ISO setting. Lower ISO are less sensitive to light but make a cleaner image. | 100 | 100 | |
Maximum ISO (Native) Refers to the highest native (or 'base') ISO setting. Higher ISO is necessary for low-light situations or night photography, but higher ISOs often introduce grain or noise. | 25,600 | 32,000 | |
Minimum ISO (Expanded) Expanded (or extended) ISO is a digitally enhanced feature available on some cameras. It allows you to push beyond the native ISO range if necessary. | 100 | 100 | |
Maximum ISO (Expanded) Expanded (or extended) ISO is a digitally enhanced feature available on some cameras. It allows you to push beyond the native ISO range if necessary. | 51200 | 51200 | |
Minimum Shutter Speed The minimum shutter speed will tell you the longest exposure your camera can take without using an external accessory. | 30 s | 30 s | |
Maximum Shutter Speed The maximum shutter speed tells you the length inside 1 second the camera will capture. These can sometimes be extended with accessories such as extra external batteries. | 1/ 4000 s | 1/ 4000 s | |
Autofocus Points Autofocus points show where the camera is focusing graphically as squares or brackets in Live View or on an electronic viewfinder. These points are also used for light meter readings. | 143 | 425 | |
In-body Stabilization In-body Stabilization means the camera has a certain technology embedded that counteracts camera shake. | |||
Viewfinder Type The viewfinder type is either electronic or optical. Electronic viewfinders will have a small screen in the viewfinder. Optical viewfinders will use prisms and mirrors to look through the lens. | Electronic | None | |
Viewfinder Resolution | 2,360,000 dots | N/A |
Canon EOS M50 Mark II vs Sony ZV-E10 Video Performance
The Canon EOS M50 Mark II and the Sony ZV-E10 both have a video score of 91/100, indicating that these cameras have similar video capabilities. They share common features, such as 4K max video resolution, 120fps max video frame rate, and built-in time-lapse functionality. However, there are differences between the two cameras that make each one better in certain aspects.
The Canon EOS M50 Mark II has a slight advantage in max video dimensions, offering 3840 x 2160 resolution compared to the Sony ZV-E10’s 3840 x 1920 resolution. This means that the EOS M50 Mark II provides slightly higher video quality, which can be beneficial for those who prioritize image clarity and detail.
On the other hand, the Sony ZV-E10 has its own unique strengths. Although it has a slightly lower max video dimension, this difference may not be significant enough for most users to notice. The ZV-E10 may offer other features or performance aspects that appeal to specific users, such as better autofocus or color reproduction. However, these factors are not reflected in the video score, so it is essential to consider individual needs and preferences when choosing between these cameras.
In comparing the Canon EOS M50 Mark II and the Sony ZV-E10, both cameras have impressive video capabilities with a tied score of 91/100. The EOS M50 Mark II has a slight edge in video resolution, while the ZV-E10 may offer other advantages not reflected in the score. Ultimately, the choice between these cameras depends on individual preferences and specific needs for video performance.
Video
|
Canon EOS M50 Mark II
|
Sony ZV-E10
|
|
|
|
||
Video Indicates if this camera is capable of recording video. | |||
---|---|---|---|
Max Video Resolution The best resolution this camera can capture video in. Modern cameras can capture up to 8K video. | |||
Max Video Dimensions Video resolution measured by the greatest number of pixels possible in each frame, width by height. A higher resolution means more detail or clarity in your video. | 3840 x 2160 px | 3840 x 1920 px | |
Max Video Frame Rate How many frames per second your video will capture. Most cameras have options for multiple frame rates, depending on the resolution you shoot in. For a general video, 24p or 30p is the standard, but more serious filmmakers may need a higher frame rate for creative effect. | 120 p | 120 p | |
Time-Lapse Built In A built in time-lapse mode will allow continuous shooting throughout a prolonged period of time to be compressed into a sped up video. | |||
Video File Format Different cameras can record in various video file formats. The File format you record in can impact how you edit and use the files. | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, XAVC S, MOV |
Canon EOS M50 Mark II vs Sony ZV-E10 Features and Benefits
The Canon EOS M50 Mark II wins in features with a score of 70/100, while the Sony ZV-E10 scores slightly lower at 68/100. Both cameras share common specifications, including a 3-inch screen, touchscreen capability, flip screen, absence of GPS, and the presence of WIFI and Bluetooth connectivity.
The Canon EOS M50 Mark II is better in terms of screen resolution, offering 1,040,000 dots compared to the Sony ZV-E10’s 920,000 dots. This higher resolution provides clearer and sharper image previews, making it easier for users to assess image quality and composition. This difference in screen resolution contributes to the Canon camera’s higher feature score.
The Sony ZV-E10, despite its lower overall score, has some advantages. For instance, the ZV-E10 and M50 Mark II share the same screen size and flip screen capability, making them equally suitable for vlogging and content creation. Both cameras also offer similar connectivity options, with WIFI and Bluetooth, allowing for easy sharing and transferring of images and videos.
Considering these points, the Canon EOS M50 Mark II edges out the Sony ZV-E10 in features, primarily due to its higher screen resolution. However, the similarities in other features mean that both cameras are still suitable for various photography and videography needs. Users should weigh the importance of screen resolution and other personal preferences when choosing between these two cameras.
Features
|
Canon EOS M50 Mark II
|
Sony ZV-E10
|
|
|
|
||
Built-in Flash A built-in flash will often be positioned right above the lens. This will automatically pop up when you activate it. | |||
---|---|---|---|
External Flash External flashes are often connected through a hot shoe at the top of a camera, or a cable at the side of the camera. | |||
GPS GPS features in a camera will include location metadata to each of your photographs. | |||
Weather Sealing Weather sealing capabilities will give you more confidence when shooting in unfavourable conditions. | |||
Screen Type | TFT LCD | LCD | |
Touch Screen Touchscreen allows you to change camera settings and access menus with a swipe of your finger, instead of using buttons. | |||
Screen Size | |||
Screen Resolution Screen dots indicate the resolution of the LCD screen by including each sub pixel. | 1,040,000 dots | 920,000 dots | |
Flip Screen A flip screen (or articulating screen) is a second screen which can flip out from the side or top of the camera. This rotating screen allows you more freedom to take photos at different angles. | |||
Live View Live View feature allows you to see a continuous live video of what is being seen through your lens. | |||
Wi-Fi | |||
Bluetooth Bluetooth capabilities allow you wireless control of your camera with other external devices. | |||
Canon EOS M50 Mark II vs Sony ZV-E10 Storage and Battery
The Sony ZV-E10 wins in storage and battery with a score of 24/100, while the Canon EOS M50 Mark II scores 21/100. Both cameras have one memory card slot and do not support USB charging. They accept SD, SDHC, and SDXC memory cards, with the ZV-E10 also compatible with Memory Stick Pro Duo.
The ZV-E10 outperforms the M50 Mark II in battery life, providing 440 shots compared to the M50’s 305 shots. This longer battery life makes the ZV-E10 a more reliable option for extended shooting sessions. The M50 Mark II, however, has no significant advantages in storage and battery over the ZV-E10.
Considering these points, the Sony ZV-E10 proves to be the better choice for storage and battery life, making it more suitable for users who require longer shooting times and additional memory card compatibility.
Storage and Battery
|
Canon EOS M50 Mark II
|
Sony ZV-E10
|
|
|
|
||
Memory Card | SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-I compatible) | SD / SDHC / SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo | |
---|---|---|---|
Dual Memory Card Slots | |||
Battery Type | LP-E12 | NP-FW50 | |
Battery Life Approximately how long this cameras battery will last measured by how many photographs you will be able to take. | 305 shots | 440 shots | |
USB Charging |
DXOMARK Scores
Sensor scores tested by DXOMARK |
Canon EOS M50 Mark II
|
Sony ZV-E10
|
Scores
|
Canon EOS M50 Mark II
|
Sony ZV-E10
|
Alternatives to the Canon EOS M50 Mark II and Sony ZV-E10
Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Canon EOS M50 Mark II or the Sony ZV-E10:
User Scores
|
Canon EOS M50 Mark II
|
Sony ZV-E10
|
|
B&H photo video |
---|