Canon EOS M50 Mark II vs Sony a6400 Comparison
Canon EOS M50 Mark II
Sony a6400
Price |
from
Check Price
|
from
Check Price
| |
|---|---|---|---|
Brand | Canon | Sony | |
Model | EOS M50 Mark II | a6400 | |
Released Refers to the year this camera was officially made available for sale. | 2020 | 2019 | |
Announcement Date Refers to the date the manufacturer publicly announced the upcoming release and general specs of this camera. | October 14, 2020 | January 15, 2019 | |
Camera Type |  Mirrorless | Mirrorless | |
Camera Size | |||
Camera Weight |
The Sony a6400 emerges as the winner with a score of 70/100, outperforming the Canon EOS M50 Mark II, which scored 59/100. Both cameras are mirrorless and were released in 2019 and 2020, respectively. They share similar dimensions, with the Sony a6400 measuring 120 x 67 x 60mm and the Canon EOS M50 Mark II at 116 x 88 x 59mm. The Sony a6400 is slightly heavier at 403g, while the Canon EOS M50 Mark II weighs 387g.
The Sony a6400’s higher score indicates better performance in terms of specifications. It offers more advanced features, justifying its higher launch price of $900 compared to the Canon EOS M50 Mark II’s $750 price tag. However, the Canon EOS M50 Mark II still has its advantages, such as its lighter weight, making it more portable and convenient for photography enthusiasts.
Taking these factors into account, the Sony a6400 proves to be the superior option for those seeking more advanced features, while the Canon EOS M50 Mark II is better suited for those prioritizing portability and a lower price point.
Canon EOS M50 Mark II vs Sony a6400 Overview and Optics
The Sony a6400 wins the optics comparison with a score of 68/100, while the Canon EOS M50 Mark II scores 59/100. Both cameras share some common specifications, such as having 24-megapixel CMOS sensors, APS-C sensor size, and no image stabilization. They also have different lens mounts, with the Canon using the EF-M mount and the Sony using the E mount.
The Sony a6400 outperforms the Canon EOS M50 Mark II in several aspects. Firstly, the a6400 has a slightly higher shooting speed of 11 compared to the M50 Mark II’s 10. This means that the a6400 can capture more frames per second, which is beneficial for action photography. Furthermore, the a6400 has a better DXOMARK score for the sensor, at 83 compared to the M50 Mark II’s 58. This indicates that the a6400’s sensor performs better in terms of image quality and low-light performance.
On the other hand, the Canon EOS M50 Mark II has the advantage of using the Digic 8 processor, which is known for its fast and efficient performance. However, this advantage does not outweigh the benefits offered by the Sony a6400’s superior sensor and shooting speed.
Taking all these factors into account, the Sony a6400 emerges as the better camera in terms of optics. Its higher score reflects its superior sensor performance and faster shooting speed, making it a more suitable choice for photographers who prioritize image quality and action photography. While the Canon EOS M50 Mark II’s processor is a strong feature, it is not enough to compensate for the shortcomings in its sensor and shooting speed.
|
Optics
|
Canon EOS M50 Mark II
|
Sony a6400
|
|
|
|
|
||
Megapixels The higher the number of megapixels, the more detail the cameras sensor can capture. | 24 MP | 24.2 MP | |
|---|---|---|---|
Image Resolution Image resolution is measured in pixels and megapixels, width by height. The higher the number, the higher its resolution. | 6000 x 4000 px | 6000 x 4000 px | |
Sensor Type The camera sensor captures light and records the image. Sensors vary in physical size, the number of pixels, and quality. | CMOS | CMOS | |
Sensor Size The sensor size contributes to the overall quality as well as the dynamic and tonal range a camera can capture. As a rule of thumb, the more surface there is to read the light, the more information it will capture. | 14.9 x 22.3 mm | 15.6 x 23.5 mm | |
Sensor Format Refers to the most commonly used sensor sizes. |  APS-C | APS-C | |
Frame Rate The number of sequential frames per second the camera can write to the memory card when shooting in burst or continuous mode. | 10 fps | 11 fps | |
Lens Mount The lens mount will tell you what type of lens range you can fit onto the camera body. Often the same camera company will have different lens ranges for different cameras. | Canon EF-M | Sony E | |
Image Processor The image processor in the camera converts the information collected on the sensor for digital storage on the memory card. | Digic 8 | Bionz X | |
Aspect Ratio The aspect ratio refers to the proportional difference between width and height. The most popular aspect ratios are 3:2 and 4:3. |  3:2 | 3:2 | |
Minimum ISO (Native) Refers to the lowest native (or 'base') ISO setting. Lower ISO are less sensitive to light but make a cleaner image. | 100 | 100 | |
Maximum ISO (Native) Refers to the highest native (or 'base') ISO setting. Higher ISO is necessary for low-light situations or night photography, but higher ISOs often introduce grain or noise. | 25,600 | 32,000 | |
Minimum ISO (Expanded) Expanded (or extended) ISO is a digitally enhanced feature available on some cameras. It allows you to push beyond the native ISO range if necessary. | 100 | 100 | |
Maximum ISO (Expanded) Expanded (or extended) ISO is a digitally enhanced feature available on some cameras. It allows you to push beyond the native ISO range if necessary. | 51200 | 102400 | |
Minimum Shutter Speed The minimum shutter speed will tell you the longest exposure your camera can take without using an external accessory. | 30 s | 30 s | |
Maximum Shutter Speed The maximum shutter speed tells you the length inside 1 second the camera will capture. These can sometimes be extended with accessories such as extra external batteries. | 1/ 4000 s | 1/ 4000 s | |
Autofocus Points Autofocus points show where the camera is focusing graphically as squares or brackets in Live View or on an electronic viewfinder. These points are also used for light meter readings. | 143 | 425 | |
In-body Stabilization In-body Stabilization means the camera has a certain technology embedded that counteracts camera shake. |   | | |
Viewfinder Type The viewfinder type is either electronic or optical. Electronic viewfinders will have a small screen in the viewfinder. Optical viewfinders will use prisms and mirrors to look through the lens. | Electronic | Electronic | |
Viewfinder Resolution | 2,360,000 dots | 2,359,296 dots |
Canon EOS M50 Mark II vs Sony a6400 Video Performance
The Canon EOS M50 Mark II and the Sony a6400 both have impressive video capabilities, with each camera scoring 91/100. They share several key features, making them strong contenders for videography enthusiasts.
Both cameras boast 4K video resolution, ensuring high-quality footage with maximum dimensions of 3840 x 2160. Additionally, they offer a maximum video frame rate of 120fps, allowing for smooth slow-motion capture. Time-lapse functionality is built into each camera, providing users with creative options for dynamic video content.
Despite the identical scores, the Canon EOS M50 Mark II has some advantages over the Sony a6400. The M50 Mark II is known for its user-friendly interface and touch-screen controls, making it more accessible for beginners. Furthermore, Canon’s color science is often praised for producing vibrant and accurate colors, which can enhance video footage.
On the other hand, the Sony a6400 offers benefits that the Canon EOS M50 Mark II lacks. The a6400 has a longer battery life, which is essential for extended video shoots. Additionally, the camera’s autofocus system is renowned for its speed and accuracy, ensuring sharp focus on subjects throughout your video clips.
Taking these factors into account, the Canon EOS M50 Mark II is an excellent choice for users who value ease of use and vibrant colors in their video content. The Sony a6400, however, is better suited for those who prioritize battery life and autofocus performance. Ultimately, both cameras provide high-quality video capabilities, and the choice between them depends on individual preferences and specific shooting requirements.
|
Video
|
Canon EOS M50 Mark II
|
Sony a6400
|
|
|
|
|
||
Video Indicates if this camera is capable of recording video. |   | | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max Video Resolution The best resolution this camera can capture video in. Modern cameras can capture up to 8K video. |  4K | 4K | |
Max Video Dimensions Video resolution measured by the greatest number of pixels possible in each frame, width by height. A higher resolution means more detail or clarity in your video. | 3840 x 2160 px | 3840 x 2160 px | |
Max Video Frame Rate How many frames per second your video will capture. Most cameras have options for multiple frame rates, depending on the resolution you shoot in. For a general video, 24p or 30p is the standard, but more serious filmmakers may need a higher frame rate for creative effect. | 120 p | 120 p | |
Time-Lapse Built In A built in time-lapse mode will allow continuous shooting throughout a prolonged period of time to be compressed into a sped up video. |  | | |
Video File Format Different cameras can record in various video file formats. The File format you record in can impact how you edit and use the files. | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, AVCHD Ver. 2.0, XAVC S |
Canon EOS M50 Mark II vs Sony a6400 Features and Benefits
The Sony a6400 wins the features comparison with a score of 81/100, while the Canon EOS M50 Mark II scores 70/100. Both cameras share several common features, which include a 3-inch touchscreen, flip screen, Wi-Fi, and Bluetooth connectivity. Neither camera has GPS capabilities.
The Sony a6400 is superior in terms of screen resolution, offering 921,600 dots compared to the Canon EOS M50 Mark II’s 1,040,000 dots. This means that the a6400 provides a sharper and clearer display, allowing for better image review and menu navigation. The higher feature score of the Sony a6400 reflects its overall advantage in terms of camera features.
Despite its lower feature score, the Canon EOS M50 Mark II still has some advantages. Its touchscreen is more responsive, which makes it easier to navigate menus and adjust settings. Additionally, the M50 Mark II has a more user-friendly interface, making it a better option for beginners who may find the a6400’s menu system more complex and difficult to navigate.
Taking these factors into account, the Sony a6400 is the better camera in terms of features, with a higher score and a superior screen resolution. However, the Canon EOS M50 Mark II offers a more responsive touchscreen and user-friendly interface, making it a viable option for those seeking a simpler camera experience. Ultimately, the choice between these two cameras will depend on individual preferences and the specific needs of the photographer.
|
Features
|
Canon EOS M50 Mark II
|
Sony a6400
|
|
|
|
|
||
Built-in Flash A built-in flash will often be positioned right above the lens. This will automatically pop up when you activate it. |  | | |
|---|---|---|---|
External Flash External flashes are often connected through a hot shoe at the top of a camera, or a cable at the side of the camera. |  | | |
GPS GPS features in a camera will include location metadata to each of your photographs. |  | | |
Weather Sealing Weather sealing capabilities will give you more confidence when shooting in unfavourable conditions. |  | | |
Screen Type | TFT LCD | LCD | |
Touch Screen Touchscreen allows you to change camera settings and access menus with a swipe of your finger, instead of using buttons. |  | | |
Screen Size |  3" | 3" | |
Screen Resolution Screen dots indicate the resolution of the LCD screen by including each sub pixel. | 1,040,000 dots | 921,600 dots | |
Flip Screen A flip screen (or articulating screen) is a second screen which can flip out from the side or top of the camera. This rotating screen allows you more freedom to take photos at different angles. |  | | |
Live View Live View feature allows you to see a continuous live video of what is being seen through your lens. |  | | |
Wi-Fi |  | | |
Bluetooth Bluetooth capabilities allow you wireless control of your camera with other external devices. |  | | |
Canon EOS M50 Mark II vs Sony a6400 Storage and Battery
The Sony a6400 outperforms the Canon EOS M50 Mark II in storage and battery, scoring 37/100 compared to the Canon’s 21/100. Both cameras have a single memory card slot and are compatible with SD, SDHC, and SDXC cards, while the Sony a6400 also accepts Memory Stick Duo cards.
The a6400’s battery life is superior, offering 410 shots compared to the M50 Mark II’s 305 shots. The Sony a6400 uses an NP-FW50 battery, while the Canon relies on an LP-E12 battery. Additionally, the a6400 has the advantage of USB charging, which the M50 Mark II lacks.
Despite the lower score, the Canon EOS M50 Mark II still offers decent battery life and compatibility with widely available memory cards. However, the Sony a6400 clearly provides better battery performance and more storage options.
Considering these factors, the Sony a6400 stands out as the stronger choice in terms of storage and battery capabilities, while the Canon EOS M50 Mark II remains a reasonable option for those who prioritize other features.
|
Storage and Battery
|
Canon EOS M50 Mark II
|
Sony a6400
|
|
|
|
|
||
Memory Card | SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-I compatible) | SD / SDHC / SDXC, Memory Stick Duo (UHS-I compatible) | |
|---|---|---|---|
Dual Memory Card Slots |  | | |
Battery Type | LP-E12 | NP-FW50 | |
Battery Life Approximately how long this cameras battery will last measured by how many photographs you will be able to take. | 305 shots | 410 shots | |
USB Charging |  | |
|
DXOMARK Scores
Sensor scores tested by DXOMARK |
Canon EOS M50 Mark II
|
Sony a6400
|
|
Overall Score DXOMARK overall sensor score. | N/A | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Portrait (Color Depth) As described by DXOMARK 'The Portrait score in our camera sensor reviews defines color depth performance and its unit is a number of bits. A color depth of 22 bits is excellent; differences below 1 bit are barely noticeable.' | N/A | 24 bits | |
Landscape (Dynamic Range) As described by DXOMARK 'The Landscape score in our camera sensor tests defines the maximum dynamic range of the camera sensor and its unit is an exposure value (EV). A value of 12 EV is excellent with differences below 0.5 EV usually not noticeable.' | N/A | 13.6 EVs | |
Sports (Low-Light ISO) Described by DXOMARK as 'The maximal value of ISO sensitivity needed to reach a given value of Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR). The greater the value, the better' | N/A | 1431 |
|
Scores
|
Canon EOS M50 Mark II
|
Sony a6400
|
|
Main Features | N/A | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Extra Features | N/A | ||
Construction and Durability | N/A | ||
Handling and Ergonomics | N/A | ||
Value for Money | N/A | ||
Total Score | N/A |
Alternatives to the Canon EOS M50 Mark II and Sony a6400
Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Canon EOS M50 Mark II or the Sony a6400:
|
User Scores
|
Canon EOS M50 Mark II
|
Sony a6400
|
|
B&H photo video |
|---|