Canon EOS M50 Mark II vs Sony a7 III Comparison
Canon EOS M50 Mark II
Sony a7 III
Price | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Brand | Canon | Sony | |
Model | EOS M50 Mark II | a7 III | |
Released Refers to the year this camera was officially made available for sale. | 2020 | 2018 | |
Announcement Date Refers to the date the manufacturer publicly announced the upcoming release and general specs of this camera. | October 14, 2020 | February 27, 2018 | |
Camera Type |  Mirrorless | Mirrorless | |
Camera Size | |||
Camera Weight |
The Sony a7 III takes the lead with a score of 81, while the Canon EOS M50 Mark II trails behind with a score of 59. Both cameras share some common specifications, as they are both mirrorless and were released within the past few years.
The Sony a7 III outperforms the Canon EOS M50 Mark II in various aspects, which contributes to its higher score. However, the Canon EOS M50 Mark II has some advantages as well, such as its lighter weight of 387g compared to Sony’s 650g, making it more portable and comfortable for extended use.
Although the Canon EOS M50 Mark II is more budget-friendly, the Sony a7 III offers a better overall camera experience for those willing to invest more.
In the end, the choice between these two cameras depends on the user’s priorities and budget. The Sony a7 III is the better camera with a higher score, but the Canon EOS M50 Mark II offers a more affordable and lightweight option for those with specific needs.
Canon EOS M50 Mark II vs Sony a7 III Overview and Optics
The Sony a7 III wins in the optics comparison with a score of 81/100, while the Canon EOS M50 Mark II scores 59/100. Both cameras have 24 megapixels, a shooting speed of 10, CMOS sensors, and distinct lens mounts – Canon EF-M for the M50 Mark II and Sony FE for the a7 III.
The Sony a7 III outperforms the Canon EOS M50 Mark II in several aspects. The a7 III has a higher DXOMARK sensor score of 96, compared to the M50 Mark II’s score of 58. This high score indicates the a7 III’s superior image quality. Additionally, the a7 III has a full-frame sensor, providing better low-light performance and a wider field of view. The a7 III also features image stabilization, which reduces the effects of camera shake and allows for sharper images.
On the other hand, the Canon EOS M50 Mark II has a smaller APS-C sensor, which can be advantageous for specific purposes such as macro photography or when using telephoto lenses. However, this sensor size does not provide any significant advantages over the full-frame sensor in the Sony a7 III.
In comparing the optics of the Canon EOS M50 Mark II and Sony a7 III, it is evident that the Sony a7 III offers superior image quality, a better sensor, and image stabilization. While the Canon EOS M50 Mark II has a smaller sensor that may benefit specific photography styles, the Sony a7 III is the clear winner in terms of overall optical performance.
|
Optics
|
Canon EOS M50 Mark II
|
Sony a7 III
|
|
|
|
|
||
Megapixels The higher the number of megapixels, the more detail the cameras sensor can capture. | 24 MP | 24.2 MP | |
|---|---|---|---|
Image Resolution Image resolution is measured in pixels and megapixels, width by height. The higher the number, the higher its resolution. | 6000 x 4000 px | 6000 x 4000 px | |
Sensor Type The camera sensor captures light and records the image. Sensors vary in physical size, the number of pixels, and quality. | CMOS | CMOS | |
Sensor Size The sensor size contributes to the overall quality as well as the dynamic and tonal range a camera can capture. As a rule of thumb, the more surface there is to read the light, the more information it will capture. | 14.9 x 22.3 mm | 23.8 x 35.6 mm | |
Sensor Format Refers to the most commonly used sensor sizes. |  APS-C |  Full Frame | |
Frame Rate The number of sequential frames per second the camera can write to the memory card when shooting in burst or continuous mode. | 10 fps | 10 fps | |
Lens Mount The lens mount will tell you what type of lens range you can fit onto the camera body. Often the same camera company will have different lens ranges for different cameras. | Canon EF-M | Sony FE | |
Image Processor The image processor in the camera converts the information collected on the sensor for digital storage on the memory card. | Digic 8 | Bionz X | |
Aspect Ratio The aspect ratio refers to the proportional difference between width and height. The most popular aspect ratios are 3:2 and 4:3. |  3:2 | 3:2 | |
Minimum ISO (Native) Refers to the lowest native (or 'base') ISO setting. Lower ISO are less sensitive to light but make a cleaner image. | 100 | 100 | |
Maximum ISO (Native) Refers to the highest native (or 'base') ISO setting. Higher ISO is necessary for low-light situations or night photography, but higher ISOs often introduce grain or noise. | 25,600 | 51,200 | |
Minimum ISO (Expanded) Expanded (or extended) ISO is a digitally enhanced feature available on some cameras. It allows you to push beyond the native ISO range if necessary. | 100 | 50 | |
Maximum ISO (Expanded) Expanded (or extended) ISO is a digitally enhanced feature available on some cameras. It allows you to push beyond the native ISO range if necessary. | 51200 | 204800 | |
Minimum Shutter Speed The minimum shutter speed will tell you the longest exposure your camera can take without using an external accessory. | 30 s | 30 s | |
Maximum Shutter Speed The maximum shutter speed tells you the length inside 1 second the camera will capture. These can sometimes be extended with accessories such as extra external batteries. | 1/ 4000 s | 1/ 8000 s | |
Autofocus Points Autofocus points show where the camera is focusing graphically as squares or brackets in Live View or on an electronic viewfinder. These points are also used for light meter readings. | 143 | 693 | |
In-body Stabilization In-body Stabilization means the camera has a certain technology embedded that counteracts camera shake. |   |  | |
Viewfinder Type The viewfinder type is either electronic or optical. Electronic viewfinders will have a small screen in the viewfinder. Optical viewfinders will use prisms and mirrors to look through the lens. | Electronic | Electronic | |
Viewfinder Resolution | 2,360,000 dots | 2,359,296 dots |
Canon EOS M50 Mark II vs Sony a7 III Video Performance
The Canon EOS M50 Mark II outperforms the Sony a7 III in video capabilities with a score of 91/100, compared to the Sony’s 70. Both cameras share common video specifications, such as 4K maximum video resolution and video dimensions of 3840 x 2160. However, the differences in their video performance lie in the maximum video frame rate.
The Canon EOS M50 Mark II excels with a maximum video frame rate of 120fps, enabling smoother and more detailed slow-motion footage. This feature makes the Canon camera more versatile for various video shooting scenarios, such as capturing fast-paced action or creating cinematic effects.
On the other hand, the Sony a7 III has a lower maximum video frame rate of 30fps. While this frame rate is suitable for standard video recording, it limits the camera’s ability to capture high-quality slow-motion footage.
|
Video
|
Canon EOS M50 Mark II
|
Sony a7 III
|
|
|
|
|
||
Video Indicates if this camera is capable of recording video. |  | | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max Video Resolution The best resolution this camera can capture video in. Modern cameras can capture up to 8K video. |  4K | 4K | |
Max Video Dimensions Video resolution measured by the greatest number of pixels possible in each frame, width by height. A higher resolution means more detail or clarity in your video. | 3840 x 2160 px | 3840 x 2160 px | |
Max Video Frame Rate How many frames per second your video will capture. Most cameras have options for multiple frame rates, depending on the resolution you shoot in. For a general video, 24p or 30p is the standard, but more serious filmmakers may need a higher frame rate for creative effect. | 120 p | 30 p | |
Time-Lapse Built In A built in time-lapse mode will allow continuous shooting throughout a prolonged period of time to be compressed into a sped up video. |  | | |
Video File Format Different cameras can record in various video file formats. The File format you record in can impact how you edit and use the files. | MPEG-4 | XAVC S, AVCHD |
Canon EOS M50 Mark II vs Sony a7 III Features and Benefits
The Sony a7 III outperforms the Canon EOS M50 Mark II in features, scoring 81/100 compared to the Canon’s 70/100. Both cameras share several specifications, such as a 3-inch touchscreen, flip screen, absence of GPS, and the presence of WIFI and Bluetooth connectivity.
The Sony a7 III’s superiority lies in its screen resolution, which stands at 921,600 dots, providing a sharper and clearer display than the Canon EOS M50 Mark II, which has a resolution of 1,040,000 dots. This difference in screen resolution allows users to review images and navigate the menu more efficiently on the Sony a7 III.
Although the Canon EOS M50 Mark II scores lower in features, it does have a higher screen resolution than the Sony a7 III. This advantage, however, does not outweigh the overall better performance of the Sony a7 III.
Comparing the two cameras, the Sony a7 III offers better features and performance, making it the preferable choice for users who prioritize those aspects. On the other hand, the Canon EOS M50 Mark II may be a better option for users who value a higher screen resolution. Ultimately, the right choice depends on individual preferences and priorities.
|
Features
|
Canon EOS M50 Mark II
|
Sony a7 III
|
|
|
|
|
||
Built-in Flash A built-in flash will often be positioned right above the lens. This will automatically pop up when you activate it. |  | | |
|---|---|---|---|
External Flash External flashes are often connected through a hot shoe at the top of a camera, or a cable at the side of the camera. |  | | |
GPS GPS features in a camera will include location metadata to each of your photographs. |  | | |
Weather Sealing Weather sealing capabilities will give you more confidence when shooting in unfavourable conditions. |  | | |
Screen Type | TFT LCD | LCD | |
Touch Screen Touchscreen allows you to change camera settings and access menus with a swipe of your finger, instead of using buttons. |  | | |
Screen Size |  3" | 3" | |
Screen Resolution Screen dots indicate the resolution of the LCD screen by including each sub pixel. | 1,040,000 dots | 921,600 dots | |
Flip Screen A flip screen (or articulating screen) is a second screen which can flip out from the side or top of the camera. This rotating screen allows you more freedom to take photos at different angles. |  | | |
Live View Live View feature allows you to see a continuous live video of what is being seen through your lens. |  | | |
Wi-Fi |  | | |
Bluetooth Bluetooth capabilities allow you wireless control of your camera with other external devices. |  | | |
Canon EOS M50 Mark II vs Sony a7 III Storage and Battery
The Sony a7 III outperforms the Canon EOS M50 Mark II in storage and battery with a score of 81, compared to the Canon’s 21/100. Both cameras accept SD, SDHC, and SDXC memory cards, with the Sony also supporting Memory Stick Duo, Pro Duo, and Pro-HG Duo cards. Additionally, the Sony a7 III features two memory card slots, while the Canon has only one.
The Sony a7 III has a significant advantage in battery life, providing 750 shots per charge, compared to the Canon’s 305 shots. The Sony’s NP-FZ100 battery surpasses the Canon’s LP-E12 in terms of capacity.
Although the Canon EOS M50 Mark II falls behind in this comparison, it still provides a decent battery life and memory card compatibility for casual photographers. However, the Sony a7 III’s superior battery life and dual memory card slots make it a better choice for professionals or enthusiasts who require extended shooting sessions and more storage flexibility.
|
Storage and Battery
|
Canon EOS M50 Mark II
|
Sony a7 III
|
|
|
|
|
||
Memory Card | SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-I compatible) | SD / SDHC / SDXC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro-HG Duo | |
|---|---|---|---|
Dual Memory Card Slots |  | | |
Battery Type | LP-E12 | NP-FZ100 | |
Battery Life Approximately how long this cameras battery will last measured by how many photographs you will be able to take. | 305 shots | 750 shots | |
USB Charging |  | |
|
DXOMARK Scores
Sensor scores tested by DXOMARK |
Canon EOS M50 Mark II
|
Sony a7 III
|
|
Overall Score DXOMARK overall sensor score. | N/A | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Portrait (Color Depth) As described by DXOMARK 'The Portrait score in our camera sensor reviews defines color depth performance and its unit is a number of bits. A color depth of 22 bits is excellent; differences below 1 bit are barely noticeable.' | N/A | 25.1 bits | |
Landscape (Dynamic Range) As described by DXOMARK 'The Landscape score in our camera sensor tests defines the maximum dynamic range of the camera sensor and its unit is an exposure value (EV). A value of 12 EV is excellent with differences below 0.5 EV usually not noticeable.' | N/A | 14.7 EVs | |
Sports (Low-Light ISO) Described by DXOMARK as 'The maximal value of ISO sensitivity needed to reach a given value of Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR). The greater the value, the better' | N/A | 3722 |
|
Scores
|
Canon EOS M50 Mark II
|
Sony a7 III
|
|
Main Features | N/A | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Extra Features | N/A | ||
Construction and Durability | N/A | ||
Handling and Ergonomics | N/A | ||
Value for Money | N/A | ||
Total Score | N/A |
Canon EOS M50 Mark II vs Sony a7 III – Our Verdict
Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Canon EOS M50 Mark II or the Sony a7 III:
|
User Scores
|
Canon EOS M50 Mark II
|
Sony a7 III
|
|
B&H photo video | N/A |
|---|