Canon EOS R6 Mark II vs Fujifilm X-H2 Comparison
Canon EOS R6 Mark II
Fujifilm X-H2
Price | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Brand | Canon | Fujifilm | |
Model | EOS R6 Mark II | X-H2 | |
Released Refers to the year this camera was officially made available for sale. | 2022 | 2022 | |
Announcement Date Refers to the date the manufacturer publicly announced the upcoming release and general specs of this camera. | February 11, 2022 | May 31, 2022 | |
Camera Type |  Mirrorless | Mirrorless | |
Camera Size | |||
Camera Weight |
The Fujifilm X-H2 takes the lead with a score of 82/100, while the Canon EOS R6 Mark II follows closely at 78/100. Both cameras are mirrorless and were released in 2022, sharing similar dimensions and announcement dates. The Fujifilm X-H2 excels with its lower launch price of $1999 compared to the Canon’s $2499. However, the Canon EOS R6 Mark II has the advantage of being lighter at 588g, as opposed to the Fujifilm’s 660g.
Taking these specifications into account, the Fujifilm X-H2 offers a more budget-friendly option without compromising quality. On the other hand, the Canon EOS R6 Mark II provides a lighter camera for those prioritizing portability. Ultimately, the final choice depends on the user’s preferences and priorities.
Canon EOS R6 Mark II vs Fujifilm X-H2 Overview and Optics
The Canon EOS R6 Mark II outperforms the Fujifilm X-H2 in optics, scoring 83/100 compared to the Fujifilm’s 81/100. Both cameras share several common specifications, such as CMOS sensor type, image stabilisation, and compatibility with their respective lens mounts. However, there are key differences that set them apart.
The Canon EOS R6 Mark II excels with its full-frame sensor size, Digic X processor, and 40 shooting speed, which surpasses the Fujifilm X-H2’s APS-C sensor size, X-Processor 5, and 15 shooting speed. The larger sensor and faster processor allow the Canon EOS R6 Mark II to capture more detail and perform better in low-light conditions. Additionally, the Canon’s superior shooting speed ensures capturing fast-moving subjects with ease.
On the other hand, the Fujifilm X-H2 boasts a higher megapixel count of 40 compared to Canon’s 24. This higher resolution allows for more detailed images and greater cropping flexibility. However, the Fujifilm’s DXOMARK score for the sensor is not available, making it difficult to compare the overall sensor performance directly.
Despite the Fujifilm X-H2’s advantage in resolution, the Canon EOS R6 Mark II’s full-frame sensor, faster shooting speed, and advanced processor contribute to its higher optics score. The Fujifilm X-H2 still has its merits, particularly for those seeking higher resolution images. Ultimately, the choice between these two cameras will depend on the photographer’s priorities and preferences.
|
Optics
|
Canon EOS R6 Mark II
|
Fujifilm X-H2
|
|
|
|
|
||
Megapixels The higher the number of megapixels, the more detail the cameras sensor can capture. | 24 MP | 40 MP | |
|---|---|---|---|
Image Resolution Image resolution is measured in pixels and megapixels, width by height. The higher the number, the higher its resolution. | 6000 x 4000 px | 7728 x 5152 px | |
Sensor Type The camera sensor captures light and records the image. Sensors vary in physical size, the number of pixels, and quality. | CMOS | CMOS | |
Sensor Size The sensor size contributes to the overall quality as well as the dynamic and tonal range a camera can capture. As a rule of thumb, the more surface there is to read the light, the more information it will capture. | 24 x 36 mm | 23.5 x 15.6 mm | |
Sensor Format Refers to the most commonly used sensor sizes. |  Full Frame |  APS-C | |
Frame Rate The number of sequential frames per second the camera can write to the memory card when shooting in burst or continuous mode. | 40 fps | 15 fps | |
Lens Mount The lens mount will tell you what type of lens range you can fit onto the camera body. Often the same camera company will have different lens ranges for different cameras. | Canon RF | Fujifilm X | |
Image Processor The image processor in the camera converts the information collected on the sensor for digital storage on the memory card. | Digic X | X-Processor 5 | |
Aspect Ratio The aspect ratio refers to the proportional difference between width and height. The most popular aspect ratios are 3:2 and 4:3. |  3:2 | 3:2 | |
Minimum ISO (Native) Refers to the lowest native (or 'base') ISO setting. Lower ISO are less sensitive to light but make a cleaner image. | 100 | 125 | |
Maximum ISO (Native) Refers to the highest native (or 'base') ISO setting. Higher ISO is necessary for low-light situations or night photography, but higher ISOs often introduce grain or noise. | 102,400 | 12,800 | |
Minimum ISO (Expanded) Expanded (or extended) ISO is a digitally enhanced feature available on some cameras. It allows you to push beyond the native ISO range if necessary. | 50 | 80 | |
Maximum ISO (Expanded) Expanded (or extended) ISO is a digitally enhanced feature available on some cameras. It allows you to push beyond the native ISO range if necessary. | 204800 | 51200 | |
Minimum Shutter Speed The minimum shutter speed will tell you the longest exposure your camera can take without using an external accessory. | 30 s | 30 s | |
Maximum Shutter Speed The maximum shutter speed tells you the length inside 1 second the camera will capture. These can sometimes be extended with accessories such as extra external batteries. | 1/ 8000 s | 1/ 8000 s | |
Autofocus Points Autofocus points show where the camera is focusing graphically as squares or brackets in Live View or on an electronic viewfinder. These points are also used for light meter readings. | 4,897 | 425 | |
In-body Stabilization In-body Stabilization means the camera has a certain technology embedded that counteracts camera shake. |   | | |
Viewfinder Type The viewfinder type is either electronic or optical. Electronic viewfinders will have a small screen in the viewfinder. Optical viewfinders will use prisms and mirrors to look through the lens. | Electronic | Electronic | |
Viewfinder Resolution | 3,690,000 dots | 5,760,000 dots |
Canon EOS R6 Mark II vs Fujifilm X-H2 Video Performance
The Canon EOS R6 Mark II and the Fujifilm X-H2 both have a high video score, with the Fujifilm taking the lead with it’s maximum video resolution of 8K and video dimensions of 3840 x 2160.
Both cameras have their respective strengths and weaknesses in video performance. he Fujifilm X-H2 offers better color science, resulting in more accurate and vibrant colors in the video output. This allows users to spend less time editing and color grading their footage. The Fujifilm X-H2 also has a more compact and lightweight design, making it a more portable option for videographers who need to travel or shoot on location frequently.
The Canon EOS R6 Mark II excels in its user-friendly interface, making it easier for users to navigate and adjust settings during video recording. Additionally, the Canon EOS R6 Mark II boasts a more extensive range of native lenses, providing videographers with greater flexibility and creative options when capturing footage.
Both cameras have their respective strengths and weaknesses in video performance. he Fujifilm X-H2 offers better color science, resulting in more accurate and vibrant colors in the video output. This allows users to spend less time editing and color grading their footage. The Fujifilm X-H2 also has a more compact and lightweight design, making it a more portable option for videographers who need to travel or shoot on location frequently.
|
Video
|
Canon EOS R6 Mark II
|
Fujifilm X-H2
|
|
|
|
|
||
Video Indicates if this camera is capable of recording video. |  | | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max Video Resolution The best resolution this camera can capture video in. Modern cameras can capture up to 8K video. |  4K |  8K | |
Max Video Dimensions Video resolution measured by the greatest number of pixels possible in each frame, width by height. A higher resolution means more detail or clarity in your video. | 3840 x 2160 px | 7680 x 4320 px | |
Max Video Frame Rate How many frames per second your video will capture. Most cameras have options for multiple frame rates, depending on the resolution you shoot in. For a general video, 24p or 30p is the standard, but more serious filmmakers may need a higher frame rate for creative effect. | 60 p | 360 p | |
Time-Lapse Built In A built in time-lapse mode will allow continuous shooting throughout a prolonged period of time to be compressed into a sped up video. |  | | |
Video File Format Different cameras can record in various video file formats. The File format you record in can impact how you edit and use the files. | MPEG-4, MOV | MPEG-4, MOV |
Canon EOS R6 Mark II vs Fujifilm X-H2 Features and Benefits
The Fujifilm X-H2 wins in the features comparison with a score of 85/100, while the Canon EOS R6 Mark II scores 72/100. Both cameras share several specifications, including a 3-inch touchscreen with a resolution of 1620000 dots, flip screen, WIFI, and Bluetooth connectivity.
The Fujifilm X-H2 outperforms the Canon EOS R6 Mark II in terms of features, mainly due to the presence of GPS. The GPS functionality allows photographers to geotag their images, which is beneficial for professionals and enthusiasts who need accurate location data for their work. This added functionality gives the X-H2 an edge over the R6 Mark II.
On the other hand, the Canon EOS R6 Mark II does not have any specific features that make it better than the Fujifilm X-H2. Both cameras have similar screen capabilities, connectivity options, and user-friendly interfaces. The lack of GPS in the R6 Mark II puts it at a disadvantage compared to the X-H2.
Considering the individual strengths and weaknesses of the cameras, the Fujifilm X-H2’s GPS functionality gives it an advantage over the Canon EOS R6 Mark II. Photographers seeking accurate location data for their images will find the X-H2 more suitable for their needs. However, both cameras offer excellent features, and users who do not require GPS functionality may still find the Canon EOS R6 Mark II a worthy contender in the market.
|
Features
|
Canon EOS R6 Mark II
|
Fujifilm X-H2
|
|
|
|
|
||
Built-in Flash A built-in flash will often be positioned right above the lens. This will automatically pop up when you activate it. |   | | |
|---|---|---|---|
External Flash External flashes are often connected through a hot shoe at the top of a camera, or a cable at the side of the camera. |  | | |
GPS GPS features in a camera will include location metadata to each of your photographs. |  | | |
Weather Sealing Weather sealing capabilities will give you more confidence when shooting in unfavourable conditions. |  | | |
Screen Type | TFT LCD | TFT LCD | |
Touch Screen Touchscreen allows you to change camera settings and access menus with a swipe of your finger, instead of using buttons. |  | | |
Screen Size |  3" | 3" | |
Screen Resolution Screen dots indicate the resolution of the LCD screen by including each sub pixel. | 1,620,000 dots | 1,620,000 dots | |
Flip Screen A flip screen (or articulating screen) is a second screen which can flip out from the side or top of the camera. This rotating screen allows you more freedom to take photos at different angles. |  | | |
Live View Live View feature allows you to see a continuous live video of what is being seen through your lens. |  | | |
Wi-Fi |  | | |
Bluetooth Bluetooth capabilities allow you wireless control of your camera with other external devices. |  | | |
Canon EOS R6 Mark II vs Fujifilm X-H2 Storage and Battery
The Fujifilm X-H2 takes the lead in storage and battery with a score of 79/100, while the Canon EOS R6 Mark II scores 11 points lower at 68/100. Both cameras share common specifications, such as having two memory card slots and USB charging capabilities. The Fujifilm X-H2 accepts CFexpress Type B and SD (UHS-II Compatible) memory cards, whereas the Canon EOS R6 Mark II is compatible with SD, SDHC, and SDXC (UHS-II compatible) memory cards.
The Fujifilm X-H2 outperforms the Canon EOS R6 Mark II in battery life, offering 680 shots per charge, compared to the Canon’s 360 shots. This extended battery life makes the Fujifilm X-H2 more suitable for extended shooting sessions. On the other hand, the Canon EOS R6 Mark II provides a wider range of memory card compatibility, which may be advantageous for photographers with existing memory card collections.
Considering these factors, the Fujifilm X-H2’s superior battery life makes it a better choice for photographers who require extended shooting capabilities. However, the Canon EOS R6 Mark II’s broader memory card compatibility offers flexibility for users with varied memory card preferences.
|
Storage and Battery
|
Canon EOS R6 Mark II
|
Fujifilm X-H2
|
|
|
|
|
||
Memory Card | SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-II compatible) | CFexpress Type B, SD (UHS-II Compatible) | |
|---|---|---|---|
Dual Memory Card Slots |  | | |
Battery Type | LP-E6NH | NP-W235 | |
Battery Life Approximately how long this cameras battery will last measured by how many photographs you will be able to take. | 360 shots | 680 shots | |
USB Charging |  | |
|
DXOMARK Scores
Sensor scores tested by DXOMARK |
Canon EOS R6 Mark II
|
Fujifilm X-H2
|
|
Scores
|
Canon EOS R6 Mark II
|
Fujifilm X-H2
|
Canon EOS R6 Mark II vs Fujifilm X-H2 – Our Verdict
Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Canon EOS R6 Mark II or the Fujifilm X-H2:
|
User Scores
|
Canon EOS R6 Mark II
|
Fujifilm X-H2
|